Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1016-1029, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and serious side effect of cancer treatment. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced OM in pediatric patients can reach up to 91.5% and has a major impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of current interventions and agents for the management of OM in children undergoing chemo/radiotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases from January 2000 until March 2023. Thirty-four randomized studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and five RCTs investigating the efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) intervention or the agent honey were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of two RCTs indicated that topical application of honey on oral mucosa was effective in shortening the mean duration of hospital stay in children with severe OM (MD=-4.33, p=0.002). However, LLLT was not found to be effective for the prevention or treatment of OM grade ≥II (RR=0.99, p=0.99). Moreover, the therapeutic application of LLLT did not show significant benefit for lower risk of OM grade ≥II (RR=0.48, p=0.58). CONCLUSION: Various interventions and agents were examined in the present study for the management of OM. Honey could be a promising candidate for the treatment of OM in pediatric patients. Further high-quality RCTs are required to enhance our findings.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estomatitis , Niño , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Miel , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/terapia , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Acta Chir Belg ; 117(3): 137-148, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28399780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The scope of this article is to perform a meta-analysis of the studies that compare the use of triclosan-coated sutures (TCS) to uncoated sutures in prevention of surgical-site infections (SSIs). METHODS: A systematic search of randomized and non-randomized studies was carried out on Pubmed and Scopus databases until July 2016. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of 30 studies (19 randomized, 11 non-randomized; 15,385 procedures) gave evidence that TCS were associated with a lower risk of SSIs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.81). Triclosan-coated sutures were associated with lower risk for SSIs in high-quality randomized studies (Jadad score 4 or 5). A lower risk for the development of SSIs based on wound classification was observed in clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated but not for dirty procedures. No benefit was observed in specific types of surgery: colorectal, cardiac, lower limb vascular or breast surgery. Only a trend was found for lower risk for wound dehiscence, whereas no difference was observed for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Further randomized studies are needed to confirm the role of TCS in specific surgical procedures and whether or not they are related with lower risk for mortality.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Suturas , Triclosán/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/mortalidad , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA