Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival.

BACKGROUND: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains poor. A physiologically distinct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategy consisting of (1) active compression-decompression CPR and/or automated CPR, (2) an impedance threshold device, and (3) automated controlled elevation of the head and thorax (ACE) has been shown to improve neurological survival significantly versus conventional (C) CPR in animal models. This resuscitation device combination, termed ACE-CPR, is now used clinically. OBJECTIVES: To assess the probability of OHCA survival to hospital discharge after ACE-CPR versus C-CPR. METHODS: As part of a prospective registry study, 227 ACE-CPR OHCA patients were enrolled 04/2019-07/2020 from 6 pre-hospital systems in the United States. Individual C-CPR patient data (n = 5196) were obtained from three large published OHCA randomized controlled trials from high-performing pre-hospital systems. The primary study outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and favorable neurological survival. Propensity-score matching with a 1:4 ratio was performed to account for imbalances in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Irrespective of initial rhythm, ACE-CPR (n = 222) was associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (OR) of survival to hospital discharge relative to C-CPR (n = 860), when initiated in <11 min (3.28, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.55-6.92) and < 18 min (1.88, 95 % CI, 1.03-3.44) after the emergency call, respectively. Rapid use of ACE-CPR was also associated with higher probabilities of ROSC and favorable neurological survival. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with C-CPR controls, rapid initiation of ACE-CPR was associated with a higher likelihood of survival to hospital discharge after OHCA.

Rationale and Strategies for Development of an Optimal Bundle of Management for Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVES: To construct a highly detailed yet practical, attainable roadmap for enhancing the likelihood of neurologically intact survival following sudden cardiac arrest. DESIGN SETTING AND PATIENTS: Population-based outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were collated for 10 U.S. counties in Alaska, California, Florida, Ohio, Minnesota, Utah, and Washington. The 10 identified emergency medical services systems were those that had recently reported significant improvements in neurologically intact survival after introducing a more comprehensive approach involving citizens, hospitals, and evolving strategies for incorporating technology-based, highly choreographed care and training. Detailed inventories of in-common elements were collated from the ten 9-1-1 agencies and assimilated. For reference, combined averaged outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring January 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018, were compared with concurrent U.S. outcomes reported by the well-established Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. INTERVENTIONS: Most commonly, interventions and components from the ten 9-1-1 systems consistently included extensive public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, 9-1-1 system-connected smart phone applications, expedited dispatcher procedures, cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality monitoring, mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, devices for enhancing negative intrathoracic pressure regulation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation protocols, body temperature management procedures, rapid cardiac angiography, and intensive involvement of medical directors, operational and quality assurance officers, and training staff. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (n = 78,704), the cohorts from the 10 emergency medical services agencies examined (n = 2,911) demonstrated significantly increased likelihoods of return of spontaneous circulation (mean 37.4% vs 31.5%; p < 0.001) and neurologically favorable hospital discharge, particularly after witnessed collapses involving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and shockable cardiac rhythms (mean 10.7% vs 8.4%; p < 0.001; and 41.6% vs 29.2%; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of neurologically favorable survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest can improve substantially in communities that conscientiously and meticulously introduce a well-sequenced, highly choreographed, system-wide portfolio of both traditional and nonconventional approaches to training, technologies, and physiologic management. The commonalities found in the analyzed systems create a compelling case that other communities can also improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes significantly by conscientiously exploring and adopting similar bundles of system organization and care.

Confirming the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of a Bundled Methodology to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving a Head-Up/Torso-Up Chest Compression Technique.

OBJECTIVES: Combined with devices that enhance venous return out of the brain and into the thorax, preclinical outcomes are improved significantly using a synergistic bundled approach involving mild elevation of the head and chest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The objective here was to confirm clinical safety/feasibility of this bundled approach including use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided at a head-up angle. DESIGN: Quarterly tracking of the frequency of successful resuscitation before, during, and after the clinical introduction of a bundled head-up/torso-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation strategy. SETTING: 9-1-1 response system for a culturally diverse, geographically expansive, populous jurisdiction. PATIENTS: All 2,322 consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases (all presenting cardiac rhythms) were followed over 3.5 years (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017). INTERVENTIONS: In 2014, 9-1-1 crews used LUCAS (Physio-Control Corporation, Redmond, WA) mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation and impedance threshold devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. After April 2015, they also 1) applied oxygen but deferred positive pressure ventilation several minutes, 2) solidified a pit-crew approach for rapid LUCAS placement, and 3) subsequently placed the patient in a reverse Trendelenburg position (~20°). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No problems were observed with head-up/torso-up positioning (n = 1,489), but resuscitation rates rose significantly during the transition period (April to June 2015) with an ensuing sustained doubling of those rates over the next 2 years (mean, 34.22%; range, 29.76-39.42%; n = 1,356 vs 17.87%; range, 14.81-20.13%, for 806 patients treated prior to the transition; p < 0.0001). Outcomes improved across all subgroups. Response intervals, clinical presentations and indications for attempting resuscitation remained unchanged. Resuscitation rates in 2015-2017 remained proportional to neurologically intact survival (~35-40%) wherever tracked. CONCLUSIONS: The head-up/torso-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation bundle was feasible and associated with an immediate, steady rise in resuscitation rates during implementation followed by a sustained doubling of the number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients being resuscitated. These findings make a compelling case that this bundled technique will improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes significantly in other clinical evaluations.

Evaluation of a transthecal digital nerve block in the injured pediatric patient.

BACKGROUND: Digital anesthesia in the pediatric population has traditionally been accomplished using a ring block that requires multiple injections. A modified transthecal digital nerve block is a single-injection technique of the midproximal phalanx that has been shown to be technically simple and highly effective in adults. OBJECTIVE: To describe the success rate of the modified transthecal digital nerve block in children. METHODS: : A convenience sample of children requiring digital anesthesia for minor surgical procedures on the fingers or thumb at an urban tertiary-care pediatric emergency department were prospectively enrolled into the study. A transthecal digital nerve block was performed by injecting a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivicaine into the flexor tendon sheath at the midpoint between the proximal digital and the proximal interphalangeal joint creases. The volume of anesthetic was based on age. All nerve blocks were performed by 3 investigators trained in the procedure. Successful digital anesthesia was defined as complete loss of pinprick sensation on both the dorsal and palmar aspects of the digit and the ability to complete the anticipated minor surgical procedure without pain. Primary outcome measures were anesthesia success rate and pain score. Age-appropriate pain scale scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale, 0-3 years; Faces Scale, 4-7 years; and visual analog scale, > or =8 years) were recorded 5 minutes after injection. All patients were followed up for 6 months to assess for adverse events. RESULTS: Between November 2003 and March 2004, 48 patients (50 digits) requiring digital anesthesia were enrolled into the study. The mean age of patients was 8.3 years (median, 7.6 years; range, 0.7-17.5 years). Twenty-four (50%) were boys and 30 whites (62.5%). Overall, the transthecal digital nerve block technique was successful in 47 (94%) of the 50 digits (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-98%), including 37 (97%) of 38 fingers (95% CI, 85%-99%) and 10 (83%) of 12 thumbs (95% CI, 54%-96%). Forty-seven (94%) of the 50 digits had a recorded pain score of 0 five minutes after injection. Mean (SD) procedure time was 113 (24.8) seconds, and mean (SD) anesthetic volume was 2.13 (0.61) mL. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The single-injection modified transthecal digital nerve block is a safe and effective method for digital anesthesia in children. These data confirm the applicability of transthecal digital nerve block for children with finger and thumb injuries that require minor surgical procedures.