Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Res Notes ; 8: 261, 2015 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26108920

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory tract infections are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. Many studies have described the frequency of viruses in hospitalized patients, but studies describing the prevalence of viruses in the community setting are limited, particularly in developing countries, where most of the deaths from serious respiratory diseases occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diversity of respiratory viruses in the community setting using molecular diagnostic tools, as well as the clinical characteristics of respiratory viral infections in the general pediatric practice in Mexico. METHODS: Children with respiratory tract infections attending private pediatric practices during a 10-month period in five cities of the state of Veracruz were included. Nasal swabs were taken and processed by a multiplex detection kit for 15 respiratory viruses. RESULTS: 525 children were included from July 2011 to May 2012; 44% were female, mean age was 45 months. The 3 most frequent clinical diagnosis were: rhinopharyngitis 68%, pharyngitis 18%, and 3.3% influenza-like illness. 71.5% of the samples were positive for virus. The five most frequent pathogens were respiratory syncycitial virus in 18.3% of the children, rhinovirus in 17.5%, influenza A 9.1%, adenovirus 7.2%, and enterovirus 3.4%, although all 15 viruses were detected; there were viral coinfections in 14.1%, and 28.5% of the samples were negative. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of respiratory infections in the community setting in Mexico was associated to viruses. Although testing for common respiratory pathogens in children with acute respiratory tract infections may lead to a better understanding of the role of viral pathogens in, and eventually to improvement in the management of, individual patients, additional prospective studies are required to study the need of routinely using such tests in general pediatric practices in resource-limited countries.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Virus/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Virus/clasificación
2.
Virol J ; 12: 31, 2015 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25889995

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies characterizing the incidence of rhinovirus (RV) have been carried out in hospitalized children and in developed countries. In those studies, RV-C has been associated with more severe respiratory tract infections than RV species A and B. In this study we determined the frequency and diversity of RV strains associated with upper and lower respiratory tract infections (URTI, LRTI) in Mexico, and describe the clinical characteristics of the illness associated with different RV species. METHODS: A prospective surveillance of 526 and 250 children with URTI and LRTI was carried out. Respiratory samples were analyzed by RT-PCR for viruses. The 5' untranslated region of the RV genome was amplified and sequenced. RESULTS: In the case of URTI, 17.5% were positive for RV, while this virus was found in 24.8% of LRTI. The RV species was determined in 73 children with URTI: 61.6% were RV-A, 37% RV-C and, 1.4% RV-B; and in 43 children with LRTI: 51.2% were RV-A, 41.8% RV-C, and 7% RV-B. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were found in patients with RV-A or RV-C infections. A high genetic diversity of RV strains was found in both URTI and LRTI. CONCLUSIONS: Both RV-A and RV-C species were frequently found in hospitalized as well as in outpatient children. This study underlines the high prevalence and genetic diversity of RV strains in Mexico and the potential severity of disease associated with RV-A and RV-C infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Picornaviridae/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Rhinovirus/fisiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Rhinovirus/genética , Rhinovirus/aislamiento & purificación
3.
PLoS One ; 9(11): e113570, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25412469

RESUMEN

Viruses are the most frequent cause of respiratory disease in children. However, despite the advanced diagnostic methods currently in use, in 20 to 50% of respiratory samples a specific pathogen cannot be detected. In this work, we used a metagenomic approach and deep sequencing to examine respiratory samples from children with lower and upper respiratory tract infections that had been previously found negative for 6 bacteria and 15 respiratory viruses by PCR. Nasal washings from 25 children (out of 250) hospitalized with a diagnosis of pneumonia and nasopharyngeal swabs from 46 outpatient children (out of 526) were studied. DNA reads for at least one virus commonly associated to respiratory infections was found in 20 of 25 hospitalized patients, while reads for pathogenic respiratory bacteria were detected in the remaining 5 children. For outpatients, all the samples were pooled into 25 DNA libraries for sequencing. In this case, in 22 of the 25 sequenced libraries at least one respiratory virus was identified, while in all other, but one, pathogenic bacteria were detected. In both patient groups reads for respiratory syncytial virus, coronavirus-OC43, and rhinovirus were identified. In addition, viruses less frequently associated to respiratory infections were also found. Saffold virus was detected in outpatient but not in hospitalized children. Anellovirus, rotavirus, and astrovirus, as well as several animal and plant viruses were detected in both groups. No novel viruses were identified. Adding up the deep sequencing results to the PCR data, 79.2% of 250 hospitalized and 76.6% of 526 ambulatory patients were positive for viruses, and all other children, but one, had pathogenic respiratory bacteria identified. These results suggest that at least in the type of populations studied and with the sampling methods used the odds of finding novel, clinically relevant viruses, in pediatric respiratory infections are low.


Asunto(s)
Virus ADN/fisiología , Virus ARN/fisiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado , Preescolar , Coronavirus/genética , Coronavirus/fisiología , Virus ADN/clasificación , Virus ADN/genética , ADN Viral/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Nasofaringe/virología , Filogenia , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/virología , Virus ARN/clasificación , Virus ARN/genética , ARN Viral/análisis , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/genética , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/fisiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/patología , Rhinovirus/genética , Rhinovirus/fisiología , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...