Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(1): e0007998, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe Strongyloides stercoralis infection in kidney transplant recipients is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, although little is known about the risk factors for such infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, case-control study in which we assessed the risk factors for and clinical outcomes of severe S. stercoralis infections in kidney transplant recipients in Brazil. We included 138 kidney transplant recipients: 46 cases and 92 controls. Among the cases, the median number of days from transplantation to diagnosis was 117 (interquartile range [IQR], 73.5-965) and the most common clinical findings were gastrointestinal symptoms (in 78.3%) and respiratory symptoms (in 39.1%), whereas fever and eosinophilia were seen in only 32.6% and 43.5%, respectively. The 30-day all-cause mortality among the cases was 28.3% overall and was significantly higher among the cases of infection occurring within the first three months after transplantation (47% vs. 17.2%, P = 0.04). The independent risk factors were receiving a transplant from a deceased donor (odds ratio [OR] = 6.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.05-18.5), a history of bacterial infection (OR = 3.04, 95% CI = 1.2-7.5), and a cumulative corticosteroid dose (OR = 1.005, 95% CI = 1.001-1.009). The independent predictors of mortality were respiratory failure (OR = 98.33, 95% CI = 4.46-2169.77) and concomitant bacteremia (OR = 413.00, 95% CI = 4.83-35316.61). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Severe S. stercoralis infections are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. In endemic areas, such infection may occur late after transplantation, although it seems to be more severe when it occurs earlier after transplantation. Specific risk factors and clinical manifestations can identify patients at risk, who should receive prophylaxis or early treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Strongyloides stercoralis , Estrongiloidiasis/patología , Estrongiloidiasis/parasitología , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/farmacología , Adulto , Animales , Infecciones Bacterianas , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estrongiloidiasis/epidemiología , Estrongiloidiasis/mortalidad , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto Joven
2.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 21(2): e13035, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30548901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Late cytomegalovirus infections (LCMV) after the cessation of prophylaxis are well described. We aimed to assess clinical and epidemiological data on late-occurring cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in the absence of CMV prophylaxis in a cohort of kidney transplant patients. METHODS: In a cohort of kidney transplant recipients not employing CMV-specific prophylaxis, patients with CMV infections occurring after 6 months of transplantation were compared to patients with CMV infections diagnosed within the first 6 months (early infections). The main objectives were to compare clinical outcomes and evaluate risk factors for late CMV infection. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients were evaluated. Forty-three patients with LCMV infections were compared to 513 patients with early CMV infections. LCMV infections occurred after a median of 473 days of transplantation and had a more severe course, with a statistically significant higher rate of invasive disease and graft loss (60.5% vs 21.6% and 11.6% vs 3.1% respectively). Thirty-day mortality was twice as high for patients with LCMV, but did not reach statistical significance (9.3% vs 4.3%). By multivariate analysis, employment of antilymphocyte therapy early after transplantation and tacrolimus as initial immunosuppressive therapy were significantly protective for the occurrence of LCMV infections. CONCLUSION: Late CMV infections in the absence of specific prophylaxis after kidney transplantation have a more severe outcome when compared to early infections and occur in patients less immunosuppressed early after transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Citomegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Receptores de Trasplantes
3.
Med Mycol ; 51(1): 38-44, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22762208

RESUMEN

Candida glabrata is an infrequent cause of candidemia in Brazilian public hospitals. We investigated putative differences in the epidemiology of candidemia in institutions with different sources of funding. Prospective laboratory-based surveillance of candidemia was conducted in seven private and two public Brazilian tertiary care hospitals. Among 4,363 episodes of bloodstream infection, 300 were caused by Candida spp. (6.9%). Incidence rates were significantly higher in public hospitals, i.e., 2.42 vs. 0.91 episodes per 1,000 admissions (P< 0.01). Patients in private hospitals were older, more likely to be in an intensive care unit and to have been exposed to fluconazole before candidemia. Candida parapsilosis was more frequently recovered as the etiologic agent in public (33% vs. 16%, P< 0.001) hospitals, whereas C. glabrata was more frequently isolated in private hospitals (13% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). Fluconazole resistance among C. glabrata isolates was more frequent in private hospitals (76.5% vs. 20%, P = 0.02). The 30-day mortality was slightly higher among patients in public hospitals (53% vs. 43%, P = 0.10). Candida glabrata is an emerging pathogen in private institutions and in this setting, fluconazole should not be considered as a safe option for primary therapy of candidemia.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida glabrata/aislamiento & purificación , Candidemia/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Brasil/epidemiología , Candida glabrata/efectos de los fármacos , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidemia/epidemiología , Candidemia/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Demografía , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Fluconazol/farmacología , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Laboratorios de Hospital , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA