A Delphi consensus on the management of Spanish patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: OSARIDELPHI study.

The OSARIDELPHI study evaluated the level of agreement between specialists in osteoporosis regarding the management of patients with high-risk fractures in Spain. The results provide expert-based recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment related to fracture risk. Therefore, the study facilitates clinical decision-making for managing this patient's profile. PURPOSE: To evaluate the level of agreement between specialists in osteoporosis regarding the management of patients with high-risk fractures in Spain. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was performed using an online survey. In round 1, panel members rated their level of agreement with assessments on a 9-point Likert scale. Item selection was based on acceptance by ≥ 66.6% of panel experts and the agreement of the scientific committee. In round 2, the same panelists evaluated non-consensus items in round 1. RESULTS: A total of 80 panelists participated in round 1; of these, 78 completed the round 2 survey. In round 1, 122 items from 4 dimensions (definition of fracture risk: 11 items, prevention and diagnosis: 38 items, choice of treatment: 24 items, and treatment-associated quality of life: 49 items) were evaluated. The consensus was reached for 90 items (73.8%). Panelists agreed that categorizing high risk, very high risk, or imminent risk determines secondary prevention actions (97.5%). Experts agreed that treatment with bone-forming drugs should be considered in case of a very high risk of fracture, and a sequential change to antiresorptive drugs should be made after 1-2 years (97.5%). Panelists also recommended corrective action plans for non-adherent patients to improve adherence (97.5%). A total of 131 items were finally accepted after round 2. CONCLUSION: This Delphi study provides expert-based recommendations on clinical decision-making for managing patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.

Osteomalacia in Adults: A Practical Insight for Clinicians.

The term osteomalacia (OM) refers to a series of processes characterized by altered mineralization of the skeleton, which can be caused by various disorders of mineral metabolism. OM can be genetically determined or occur due to acquired disorders, among which the nutritional origin is particularly relevant, due to its wide epidemiological extension and its nature as a preventable disease. Among the hereditary diseases associated with OM, the most relevant is X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), which manifests in childhood, although its consequences persist into adulthood where it can acquire specific clinical characteristics, and, although rare, there are XLH cases that reach the third or fourth decade of life without a diagnosis. Some forms of OM present very subtle initial manifestations which cause both considerable diagnosis and treatment delay. On occasions, the presence of osteopenia and fragility fractures leads to an erroneous diagnosis of osteoporosis, which may imply the prescription of antiresorptive drugs (i.e., bisphosphonates or denosumab) with catastrophic consequences for OM bone. On the other hand, some radiological features of OM can be confused with those of axial spondyloarthritis and lead to erroneous diagnoses. The current prevalence of OM is not known and is very likely that its incidence is much higher than previously thought. Moreover, OM explains part of the therapeutic failures that occur in patients diagnosed with other bone diseases. Therefore, it is essential that clinicians who treat adult skeletal diseases take into account the considerations provided in this practical review when focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of their patients with bone diseases.

High incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and analyze risk factors for fracture. METHODS: Incidence of clinical fragility fractures in 330 postmenopausal women with RA was compared to that of a control population of 660 age-matched postmenopausal Spanish women. Clinical fractures during the previous five years were recorded. We analyzed associations with risk factors for fracture in both populations and with disease-related variables in RA patients. RESULTS: Median age of RA patients was 64 years; median RA duration was eight years. Sixty-nine percent were in remission or on low activity. Eighty-five percent had received glucocorticoids (GCs); 85 %, methotrexate; and 40 %, ≥1 biologic DMARD. Fifty-four patients and 47 controls had ≥1 major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Incidence of MOFs was 3.55 per 100 patient-year in patients and 0.72 in controls (HR: 2.6). Risk factors for MOFs in RA patients were age, previous fracture, parental hip fracture, years since menopause, BMD, erosions, disease activity and disability, and cumulative dose of GCs. Previous fracture in RA patients was a strong risk for MOFs (HR: 10.37). CONCLUSION: Of every 100 postmenopausal Spanish women with RA, 3-4 have a MOF per year. This is more than double that of the general population. A previous fracture poses a high risk for a new fracture. Other classic risk factors for fracture, RA disease activity and disability, and the cumulative dose of GCs are associated with fracture development.

Abatacept in monotherapy vs combined in interstitial lung disease of rheumatoid arthritis-multicentre study of 263 Caucasian patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept (ABA) in monotherapy (ABAMONO) vs combined ABA [ABA plus MTX (ABAMTX) or ABA plus non-MTX conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) (ABANON-MTX)] in RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD). METHODS: This was a restrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD Caucasian patients treated with ABA. We analysed in the three groups (ABAMONO, ABAMTX, ABANON-MTX) the following outcome variables: (i) dyspnoea; (ii) forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity of the lung for the carbon monoxide (DLCO); (iii) chest high-resolution CT (HRCT); (iv) DAS28-ESR; (v) CS-sparing effect; and (vi) ABA retention and side-effects. Differences between basal and final follow-up were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the differences between the three groups. RESULTS: We studied 263 RA-ILD patients (mean ± s.d. age 64.6 ± 10 years) [ABAMONO (n = 111), ABAMTX (n = 46) and ABANON-MTX (n = 106)]. At baseline, ABAMONO patients were older (67 ± 10 years) and took higher prednisone dose [10 (interquartile range 5-15) mg/day]. At that time, there were no statistically significant differences in sex, seropositivity, ILD patterns, FVC and DLCO, or disease duration. Following treatment, in all groups, most patients experienced stabilization or improvement in FVC, DLCO, dyspnoea and chest HRCT as well as improvement in DAS28-ESR. A statistically significant difference between basal and final follow-up was only found in CS-sparing effect in the group on combined ABA (ABAMTX or ABANON-MTX). However, in the multivariable analysis, there were no differences in any outcome variables between the three groups. CONCLUSION: In Caucasian individuals with RA-ILD, ABA in monotherapy or combined with MTX or with other conventional-DMARDs seems to be equally effective and safe. However, a CS-sparing effect is only observed with combined ABA.

Biological dose tapering in daily clinical practice: a 10 year follow-up study / Optimización de la dosis de biológicos en práctica clínica: experiencia de 10 años

OBJECTIVE: To describe practice patterns, long-term outcome, and related factors, in relation to biological therapies tapering in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a well-controlled real-world setting. METHODS: An observational longitudinal retrospective 10-year study was conducted in all RA patients receiving biological agents in an RA clinic from May 2003 to October 2013. Biological treatment of patients with sustained DAS28<3.2 or SDAI<11 was tapered (dose down-titrated or interval widen) or discontinued as per practice protocol. Primary outcome of tapering was relapse, defined as an increase in DAS28≥1.2. Descriptive, survival analysis, and logistic regression analysis with first relapse as dependent variable were carried out. RESULTS: Of 193 RA patients on biological treatment (mean age 54±14 years, 81% women), tapering was applied in 106 (55%) and discontinuation in 34 (17.6%). During follow-up 38 patients relapsed (62%). Rate of relapse was 10% at 6 months, 19% at 12 months, 33.2% at 2 years and 50% after 5 years. Mean time in dose reduction was 4.5 years [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.7-5.3]. Six patients (15.7%) did not respond after reinstatement of full dose of biologic. In the multivariate analysis, pain [OR=1.26 (95% CI: 1.11-1.43); P<.001] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [OR=1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.03); P=.011] at baseline were associated with relapse after tapering. CONCLUSIONS: Tapering may be considered a long-term option in RA patients on biologics and low disease activity, especially if low ESR and pain scores are present at baseline; treatment reinstatement could be considered a safe option in case of relapse

OBJETIVO: Describir los patrones de práctica clínica, los resultados a largo plazo y los factores relacionados en relación a la optimización de las terapias biológicas en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) en un entorno de vida real bien controlado. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo observacional longitudinal de 10 años que incluyó a todos los pacientes con AR que recibieron agentes biológicos en una consulta monográfica de AR entre mayo de 2003 y octubre de 2013. Se optimizó el tratamiento biológico (ajuste de dosis o ampliación de intervalo) en los pacientes con DAS28<3,2 o SDAI<11 de forma mantenida según un protocolo de práctica clínica. La variable principal fue la recaída, definida como un aumento en el DAS28≥1,2. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo, de supervivencia y modelos de regresión logística con la primera recaída como variable dependiente. RESULTADOS: De 193 pacientes con AR en tratamiento biológico (edad media 54±14 años, 81% mujeres), se optimizó la dosis en 106 (55%) y se interrumpió el tratamiento en 34 (17,6%). Durante el seguimiento 38 pacientes recayeron (62%). La tasa de recaída fue del 10% a los 6 meses, del 19% a los 12 meses, del 33,2% a los 2 años y del 50% a los 5 años. El tiempo medio con dosis reducida fue de 4 años y medio (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 3,7 a 5,3). Seis pacientes (15,7%) no respondieron después de restablecer la dosis completa de biológico. En el análisis multivariado, el dolor (OR=1,26 [IC 95%: 1,11 a 1,43]; p < 0,001) y la velocidad de sedimentación globular (VSG) (OR por mm/h=1,01 [IC 95%: 1,00 a 1,03]; p = 0,011) al inicio del estudio se asociaron a recaída tras la optimización. CONCLUSIONES: La optimización de la dosis se puede considerar una opción a largo plazo en pacientes con AR en tratamiento con agentes biológicos y baja actividad de la enfermedad, especialmente si la VSG y el dolor están en niveles bajos; la reinstauración del tratamiento podría considerarse una opción segura en caso de recaída en la mayoría de los pacientes

Performance of the ASAS Health Index for the Evaluation of Spondyloarthritis in Daily Practice.

OBJECTIVE: The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) is a tool designed to assess disease impact in spondyloarthritis (SpA), but its clinical performance is barely known. We aimed to test the clinimetric properties of ASAS HI in a real clinical setting. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 111 consecutive patients with SpA. The measurement properties of ASAS HI were tested against conventional assessment measures. Convergent validity was assessed by Spearman rho correlations, while discriminative validity was analyzed through receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A multivariate regression analysis was designed to identify ASAS HI items associated with active disease. RESULTS: The average ASAS HI was 5.4 ± 3.8 (interquartile range 3-8). ASAS HI showed high convergent validity against other SpA measures (rho ≥ 0.70, p < 0.0005). The optimal criteria for detecting high/very high disease activity Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) categories was an ASAS HI score > 6, area under the ROC curve 0.86 (95% CI 0.78-0.92), positive likelihood ratio 7.3 (95% CI 3.1-17.1), p < 0.0001. The ASAS HI items significantly associated with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index active disease were "I often get frustrated" (OR 9.2, 95% CI 1.2-69.4, p = 0.032), and "I sleep badly at night" (OR 7.7, 95% CI 1.4-41.6, p = 0.018). As for ASDAS, it was "pain sometimes disrupts my normal activities" (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.7-45.2, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The ASAS HI is a useful and simple instrument for its application in daily practice. Given its good clinimetric properties, it could be used as an additional instrument to evaluate SpA.

Enfermedad de Pyle: un modelo humano de homeostasis corticotrabecular diferenciada / Pyle's Disease: a human model of differentiated cortical and trabecular homeostasis

La enfermedad de Pyle (OMIN número 265900) es una displasia metafisaria de curso benigno que se hereda con un patrón autosómico recesivo. Se han descrito unos 30 casos genuinos hasta el momento. La causa de este proceso se conoce desde 2016, cuando se descubre su relación con mutaciones en el gen que codifica la proteína sFRP, un conocido inhibidor de la vía Wnt. Se presenta el caso de un varón de 58 años, diagnosticado de enfermedad de Pyle con base en sus características clínicas y radiográficas, cuyo fenotipo muestra un control diferencial de la homeostasis del hueso cortical y trabecular

Pyle's disease (OMIN number 265900) is a metaphyseal dysplasia of benign course, inherited with an autosomal recessive pattern. Some 30 genuine cases have been described so far. The cause of this process has been known since 2016, when its relationship to mutations in the gene encoding the sFRP protein, a known inhibitor of the Wnt pathway, was discovered. We report the case of a 58-year-old man, diagnosed with Pyle's disease based on his clinical and radiographic characteristics, whose phenotype suggested a differential control of cortical and trabecular bone homeostasis

Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis Index and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease Questionnaire: correlation and sensitivity to change in a real clinical setting.

OBJECTIVES: The performance of many outcome measures for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is almost unknown in real clinical practice. Our objective was to study the correlation and sensitivity to change of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) index and the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire in a real practice setting. METHODS: This was a prospective, open, non-controlled study that included 60 consecutive patients with PsA treated with ustekinumab. Most had been previously treated with one or more biologic therapeutic agents. The correlation (Spearman's rho coefficient) and the sensitivity to change [Standardized Mean Response (SMR)] of DAPSA and PsAID were studied. Effect size values of 0.20, 0.50 and 0.80 corresponded to low, moderate and high sensitivity to change, respectively. RESULTS: More than 70% of patients achieved therapeutic goals (21.7% were in remission and 50% in low disease activity according to DAPSA categories). Two out of three patients reached an acceptable symptomatic state (PsAID <4). The correlation between final values of both instruments was substantial (Spearman's rho: 0.62, p<0.0001). The SMR for the PsAID was 1.08 (0.95-1.21) and for DAPSA was 1.5 (1.37-1.63), both values corresponding to instruments with a high sensitivity to change (>0.80). The best PsAID cut-off value for identifying DAPSA remission was 3.32 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: DAPSA and PsAID seem to be useful instruments for a more comprehensive assessment of PsA in daily practice. Our results can help to disseminate the use of these instruments in the clinical practice of many rheumatologists.

Analysis by Age Group of Disease Outcomes in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study.

OBJECTIVES: Elderly psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients may show greater inflammatory activity and worse prognoses than patients of other ages. However, these patients may be at risk of receiving fewer systemic treatments. In this report, we have analysed disease outcomes in PsA by age groups. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicentre study included 227 PsA patients under biological and non-biological systemic therapies. The study population was divided into four categories by age: < 40, 40‒49, 50‒65 and > 65 years. Physical functioning, disease activity, remission rates and disease impact were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (13.7%) were under 40 years, 26.9% (n = 61) were 40-49 years, 26.4% (n = 60) were 50-65 years and 33.0% (n = 75) were patients > 65 years. Compared with the other age groups, disease duration was significantly higher in subjects older than 65 years (p < 0.001). Only 8% of patients older than 65 years received corticosteroids compared with 29% of patients aged < 40 years, 13.1% of patients aged 40-49 years and 26.7% of patients aged 50-65 years (p = 0.007). Similarly, only 36% of patients over 65 years of age received a biological therapy compared with between 51.6 and 59% for the other age groups (p = 0.036). However, remission rates were not statistically different between groups. Disease-associated physical disability was similar among groups. Compared with patients aged < 40 years, more patients > 65 years achieved low disease impact (10.7% vs 37.7%, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer older patients received corticosteroids and biological therapy. However, disease outcomes were similar or even better compared with those observed in younger patients. Therefore, treatment strategies for older patients with PsA should be similar to those offered to younger individuals.

Biological Dose Tapering in Daily Clinical Practice: A 10 Year Follow-up Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe practice patterns, long-term outcome, and related factors, in relation to biological therapies tapering in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a well-controlled real-world setting. METHODS: An observational longitudinal retrospective 10-year study was conducted in all RA patients receiving biological agents in an RA clinic from May 2003 to October 2013. Biological treatment of patients with sustained DAS28<3.2 or SDAI<11 was tapered (dose down-titrated or interval widen) or discontinued as per practice protocol. Primary outcome of tapering was relapse, defined as an increase in DAS28≥1.2. Descriptive, survival analysis, and logistic regression analysis with first relapse as dependent variable were carried out. RESULTS: Of 193 RA patients on biological treatment (mean age 54±14 years, 81% women), tapering was applied in 106 (55%) and discontinuation in 34 (17.6%). During follow-up 38 patients relapsed (62%). Rate of relapse was 10% at 6 months, 19% at 12 months, 33.2% at 2 years and 50% after 5 years. Mean time in dose reduction was 4.5 years [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.7-5.3]. Six patients (15.7%) did not respond after reinstatement of full dose of biologic. In the multivariate analysis, pain [OR=1.26 (95% CI: 1.11-1.43); P<.001] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [OR=1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.03); P=.011] at baseline were associated with relapse after tapering. CONCLUSIONS: Tapering may be considered a long-term option in RA patients on biologics and low disease activity, especially if low ESR and pain scores are present at baseline; treatment reinstatement could be considered a safe option in case of relapse.

Pyle's Disease: A human model of differentiated cortical and trabecular homeostasis. / Enfermedad de Pyle: un modelo humano de homeostasis corticotrabecular diferenciada.

Pyle's disease (OMIN number 265900) is a metaphyseal dysplasia of benign course, inherited with an autosomal recessive pattern. Some 30 genuine cases have been described so far. The cause of this process has been known since 2016, when its relationship to mutations in the gene encoding the sFRP protein, a known inhibitor of the Wnt pathway, was discovered. We report the case of a 58-year-old man, diagnosed with Pyle's disease based on his clinical and radiographic characteristics, whose phenotype suggested a differential control of cortical and trabecular bone homeostasis.

Abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease: A national multicenter study of 63 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the present study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in patients with ILD associated to RA. METHODS: National multicenter, non-controlled, open-label registry study of RA patients with ILD treated with ABA. RESULTS: 63 patients (36 women) with RA-associated ILD undergoing ABA therapy were studied. The mean ± standard deviation age at the time of the study was 63.2 ± 9.8 years. The median duration of RA and ILD from diagnosis were 6.8 and 1 year, respectively. RA was seropositive in 55 patients (87.3%). In 15 (23.8%) of 63 patients the development of ILD was closely related to the administration of synthetic or biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. After a follow-up of 9.4 ± 3.2 months, two-thirds of patients remained stable whereas one-quarter experienced improvement in the Modified Medical Research Council scale. At that time forced vital capacity remained stable in almost two-thirds of patents and improved in one out of five patients assessed. Also, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide remained stable in almost two-thirds and showed improvement in a quarter of the patients assessed. At 12 months, 50% of the 22 patients in whom chest HRCT scan was performed due persistence of respiratory symptoms showed stabilization, 8 (36.4%) improvement and 3 worsening of the HRCT scan pattern. Eleven of 63 patients had to discontinue ABA, mainly due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: ABA appears to be an effective in RA-associated ILD.

Osteoinmunología: el estudio de la relación entre el sistema inmune y el tejido óseo / Osteoimmunology: the study of the relationship between the immune system and bone tissue

El tejido óseo es una estructura fuertemente regulada, que desempeña un papel esencial en diferentes funciones fisiológicas. A través de acciones autocrinas y paracrinas participa en la hematopoyesis, influyendo en el destino de las células madre hematopoyéticas. Existe además una serie de moléculas compartidas y también múltiples conexiones entre el sistema inmune y el tejido óseo. Con el objetivo de agrupar los conocimientos que relacionan ambos sistemas, se ha desarrollado una nueva disciplina conocida con el término «osteoinmunología». Su progresión en los últimos años ha sido exponencial y nos ha permitido relacionar e incrementar el conocimiento en temas aparentemente alejados como la erosión reumatoide, la osteoporosis posmenopáusica, las metástasis óseas o la enfermedad periodontal. En la presente revisión hemos tratado de resumir los avances más relevantes que se han producido en la última década, sobre todo en aquellos aspectos que interesan de manera preferente a la reumatología(AU)

Bone tissue is a highly regulated structure, which plays an essential role in various physiological functions. Through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, bone tissue is involved in hematopoiesis, influencing the fate of hematopoietic stem cells. There are a number of molecules shared by bone cells and immune system cells indicating that there are multiple connections between the immune system and bone tissue. In order to pool all the knowledge concerning both systems, a new discipline known under the term «osteoimmunology» has been developed. Their progress in recent years has been exponential and allowed us to connect and increase our knowledge in areas not seemingly related such as rheumatoid erosion, postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone metastases or periodontal disease. In this review, we have tried to summarize the most important advances that have occurred in the last decade, especially in those areas of interest related to rheumatology(AU)

Osteoimmunology: the study of the relationship between the immune system and bone tissue.

Bone tissue is a highly regulated structure, which plays an essential role in various physiological functions. Through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, bone tissue is involved in hematopoiesis, influencing the fate of hematopoietic stem cells. There are a number of molecules shared by bone cells and immune system cells indicating that there are multiple connections between the immune system and bone tissue. In order to pool all the knowledge concerning both systems, a new discipline known under the term «osteoimmunology¼ has been developed. Their progress in recent years has been exponential and allowed us to connect and increase our knowledge in areas not seemingly related such as rheumatoid erosion, postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone metastases or periodontal disease. In this review, we have tried to summarize the most important advances that have occurred in the last decade, especially in those areas of interest related to rheumatology.

Dropped head syndrome in a patient with scleromyositis.

Dropped head syndrome (DHS) occurs in patients with severe weakness of the neck extensor muscles, of diverse origin, but most frequently because of neuromuscular diseases. Exceptionally, DHS may be the first manifestation of a systemic autoimmune disease. This report describes the case of a patient with DHS as a presenting sign of scleromyositis. We analyze the clinical features of the case and discuss the most important aspects of its pathogenesis and differential diagnosis.

Entheseal ultrasound abnormalities in patients with SAPHO syndrome.

This study was conducted to investigate the presence and characteristics of the ultrasound lesions that may be found in the entheses of patients with SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis) syndrome. This cross-sectional study included 15 patients with SAPHO syndrome and 30 healthy controls matched for age, sex and body mass index. Subjects with regular sport activities as well as those with other rheumatic conditions were excluded from the study. Ultrasonography was used in both groups to study 14 entheses of the upper and lower extremities. Different elementary lesions representative of enthesis damage were defined. A total of 210 entheses in the study group and 420 in the control group were evaluated. Only one patient presented clinical enthesitis. In the study group, seven of the 15 patients (47%) showed morpho-structural entheseal alterations, versus only four of the 30 controls (13.3%; p < 0.001). The subjects with SAPHO showed ultrasound alterations in 32/210 entheses (15%), while the controls showed alterations in 20/420 entheses (4.8%), p < 0.001. The entheses with the largest number of morpho-structural alterations were those of the patellar and Achilles tendon. None of the controls showed power Doppler signal at enthesis or perienthesis level. Ultrasound evidence of enthesopathy seems to be a common feature in this series of patients with SAPHO syndrome.

[Mineral and bone disorders associated with chronic kidney disease]. / Trastorno mineral y óseo asociado a la enfermedad renal crónica.

Chronic renal failure (CRF) is frequent in patients with osteoporosis and the rheumatologist should be familiarized with basic diagnostic and treatment guidelines for bone mineral disease associated to this process. In patients with osteoporosis and stage I and II CRF, diagnosis and treatment does not vary from that in patients with normal RF. In stage III CRF, the focus will depend on the result of testing. In advanced stage CRF the approach should be coordinated with a nephrologist. In these cases it is possible to use antiresorptive agents although in well-selected and studied patients. The present review analyzes recent advances in this field with a focus on daily clinical practice.

Trastorno mineral y óseo asociado a la enfermedad renal crónica / Mineral and bone disorders associated with chronic kidney disease

La enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) es frecuente en pacientes con osteoporosis, por lo que el reumatólogo debe estar familiarizado con las pautas básicas de diagnóstico y tratamiento del trastorno mineral y óseo asociado a este proceso. En pacientes con osteoporosis y ERC grados I y II, el diagnóstico y tratamiento no varían en relación con el que se realiza en pacientes con FR normal. En la ERC en estadio III, el enfoque dependerá de los resultados de las pruebas solicitadas. En la ERC avanzada el abordaje deberá ser coordinado con el nefrólogo. En estos casos es posible la utilización de antirresortivos, aunque en casos muy seleccionados y muy bien estudiados. En la presente revisión se analizan los avances más recientes que se han producido en este campo, con un enfoque dirigido a la práctica clínica habitual (AU)

Chronic renal failure (CRF) is frequent in patients with osteoporosis and the rheumatologist should be familiarized with basic diagnostic and treatment guidelines for bone mineral disease associated to this process. In patients with osteoporosis and stage I and II CRF, diagnosis and treatment does not vary from that in patients with normal RF. In stage III CRF, the focus will depend on the result of testing. In advanced stage CRF the approach should be coordinated with a nephrologist. In these cases it is possible to use antiresorptive agents although in well-selected and studied patients. The present review analyzes recent advances in this field with a focus on daily clinical practice (AU)

[Adverse effects of bisphosphonates]. / Efectos adversos de los bisfosfonatos.

Aminobisphosphonates are drugs that have been used successfully in the treatment of osteoporosis for more than 20 years. Although main registry studies found a scarcity of relevant adverse events, in recent years and as a result of pharmacovigilance, different complications have been reported, some potentially serious. This has raised questions on the safety of these drugs, especially in high doses, like those used in oncology and long-term treatment, as needed in patients with osteoporosis. In this review, based on the analysis of relevant scientific evidence from clinical trials, case series, cohort studies and databases published to date, we summarize the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the adverse effects of these drugs.

Efectos adversos de los bisfosfonatos / Adverse effects of bisphosphonates

Los aminobisfosfonatos son fármacos que han sido utilizados con éxito en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis desde hace más de 20 años. Aunque en los estudios principales realizados para obtener la aprobación de su comercialización no se registraron efectos adversos relevantes, en los últimos años, y como resultado de la farmacovigilancia, se ha comunicado de manera irregular una serie de complicaciones, algunas potencialmente graves, que han puesto en duda la seguridad de estos fármacos, sobre todo en dosis elevadas como las que se utilizan en oncología y en tratamientos de larga duración, como los que se emplean en la osteoporosis. En la presente revisión, basada en el análisis de las pruebas científicas más relevantes procedentes de los ensayos clínicos, series de casos, estudios de cohortes y bases de datos publicados hasta el momento, se resumen las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los efectos adversos de los bisfosfonatos (AU)

Aminobisphosphonates are drugs that have been used successfully in the treatment of osteoporosis for more than 20 years. Although main registry studies found a scarcity of relevant adverse events, in recent years and as a result of pharmacovigilance, different complications have been reported, some potentially serious. This has raised questions on the safety of these drugs, especially in high doses, like those used in oncology and long-term treatment, as needed in patients with osteoporosis. In this review, based on the analysis of relevant scientific evidence from clinical trials, case series, cohort studies and databases published to date, we summarize the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the adverse effects of these drugs (AU)