Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 8(1): e629, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36698437

RESUMEN

Same-day discharge of children after appendectomy for simple appendicitis is safe and associated with enhanced parent satisfaction. Our general pediatric surgeons aimed to improve the rate of same-day discharge after appendectomy for simple appendicitis. Methods: We implemented a clinical practice guideline in September 2019. A surgeon-of-the-week service model and the urgent operating room started in November 2019 and January 2020, respectively. Data for children with simple appendicitis from our academic medical center were gathered prospectively using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric. Patient outcomes before intervention implementation (n = 278) were compared with patients following implementation (n = 264). Results: The average monthly percentage of patients discharged on the day of surgery increased in the postimplementation group (32% versus 75%). Median postoperative length of stay decreased [16.5 hours (interquartile range, 15.9) versus 4.4 hours (interquartile range, 11.7), P < 0.001], and the proportion of patients discharged directly from the postoperative anesthesia care unit increased (22.8% versus 43.6%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in balancing measures, including the return to the emergency department and readmission. Fewer children were discharged home on oral antibiotics after implementation (6.8% versus 1.5%, P = 0.002), and opioid prescribing at discharge remained low (2.5% versus 1.1%, P = 0.385). Conclusions: Using quality improvement methodology and care standardization, we significantly improved the rate of same-day discharge after appendectomy for simple appendicitis without impacting emergency department visits or readmissions. As a result, our health care system saved 140 hospital days over the first 21 months.

2.
J Surg Res ; 279: 692-701, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35940047

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic disadvantage has been associated with increased complicated appendicitis rates. Our purpose was to analyze the complex interactions between social determinants of health (SDOH) and postoperative outcomes in pediatric appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children who underwent appendectomy at our institution (1/2015-12/2020) were retrospectively reviewed. We used home addresses to determine composite measures of neighborhood/area-level socioeconomic advantage (Area Deprivation Index [ADI] and Social Deprivation Index [SDI]), and other area-level indicators. We created a novel, composite outcome score computed as a weighted average of eight outcome measures. Feature selection and exploratory factor analysis were used to create a multivariate model predictive of outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1117 children with appendicitis, 20.59% had complicated (perforated) appendicitis. Factor analysis identified two multivariate latent factors; Factor 1 contained SDI, ADI, and % unemployed in the population, and Factor 2 contained % Hispanic and % foreign-born in the population. Low Factor 2 scores (communities with more Hispanic/foreign-born residents) were associated with increased length of stay, more frequent postoperative percutaneous drainage, and increased postoperative imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Interactions between SDOH and pediatric surgical care go beyond the individual patient and suggest that vulnerable populations are exposed to contextual conditions that may impact outcomes. Specifically, neighborhood-level factors, including the prevalence of Hispanic ethnicity and foreign-born individuals, are associated with outcomes in pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis. Reducing disparities in complicated appendicitis outcomes may involve addressing neighborhood-level SDOH through strategic reallocation of healthcare resources and developing targeted interventions to improve access to pediatric surgical care in underserved communities.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(12): 845-851, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35649748

RESUMEN

More than twenty years ago, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties began the conversion of graduate medical education from a structure- and process-based model to a competency-based framework. The educational outcomes assessment tool, known as the Milestones, was introduced in 2013 for seven specialties and by 2015 for the remaining specialties, including pediatric surgery. Designed to be an iterative process with improvements over time based on feedback and evidence-based literature, the Milestones started the evolution from 1.0 to 2.0 in 2016. The formation of Pediatric Surgery Milestones 2.0 began in 2019 and was finalized in 2021 for implementation in the 2022-2023 academic year. Milestones 2.0 are fewer in number and are stated in more straightforward language. It incorporated the harmonized milestones, subcompetencies for non-patient care and non-medical knowledge that are consistent across all medical and surgical specialties. There is a new Supplemental Guide that lists examples, references and links to other assessment tools and resources for each subcompetency. Milestones 2.0 represents a continuous process of feedback, literature review and revision with goals of improving patient care and maintaining public trust in graduate medical education's ability to self-regulate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Niño , Estados Unidos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Acreditación , Evaluación Educacional
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 93(3): 291-298, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma team activation leveling decisions are complex and based on many variables. Accurate triage decisions improve patient safety and resource utilization. Our purpose was to establish proof-of-concept for using principal component analysis (PCA) to identify multivariate predictors of injury severity and to assess their ability to predict outcomes in pediatric trauma patients. We hypothesized that we could identify significant principal components (PCs) among variables used for decisions regarding trauma team activation and that PC scores would be predictive of outcomes in pediatric trauma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the trauma registry (January 2014 to December 2020) at our pediatric trauma center, including all pediatric patients (age <18 years) who triggered a trauma team activation. Data included patient demographics, prehospital report, Injury Severity Score, and outcomes. Four significant principal components were identified using PCA. Differences in outcome variables between the highest and lowest quartile for PC score were examined. RESULTS: There were 1,090 pediatric patients included. The four significant PCs accounted for greater than 96% of the overall data variance. The first PC was a composite of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale and Revised Trauma Score and was predictive of outcomes, including injury severity, length of stay, and mortality. The second PC was characterized primarily by prehospital systolic blood pressure and high PC scores were associated with increased length of stay. The third and fourth PCs were characterized by patient age and by prehospital Revised Trauma Score and systolic blood pressure, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that, using information available at the time of trauma team activation, PCA can be used to identify key predictors of patient outcome. While the ultimate goal is to create a machine learning-based predictive tool to support and improve clinical decision making, this study serves as a crucial step toward developing a deep understanding of the features of the model and their behavior with actual clinical data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level III.


Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones , Adolescente , Niño , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Análisis de Componente Principal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Triaje , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
5.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(1): 63-73, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34657739

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (CA) was high at our children's hospital. We hypothesized that practice standardization, including obtaining intra-operative cultures of abdominal fluid in patients with CA, would improve outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization after appendectomy. METHODS: A quality improvement team designed and implemented a clinical practice guideline for CA that included obtaining intra-operative culture of purulent fluid, administering piperacillin/tazobactam for at least 72 h post-operatively, and transitioning to oral antibiotics based on intraoperative culture data. We compared outcomes before and after guideline implementation. RESULTS: From July 2018-October 2019, 63 children underwent appendectomy for CA compared to 41 children from January-December 2020. Compliance with our process measures are as follows: Intra-operative culture was obtained in 98% of patients post-implementation; 95% received at least 72 h of piperacillin-tazobactam; and culture results were checked on all patients. Culture results altered the choice of discharge antibiotics in 12 (29%) of patients. All-cause morbidity (SSI, emergency department visit, readmission to hospital, percutaneous drain, unplanned return to operating room) decreased significantly from 35% to 15% (p=0.02). Surgical site infections became less frequent, occurring on average every 27 days pre-implementation and every 60 days after care pathway implementation (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a clinical practice guideline was associated with reduced morbidity after appendectomy for CA. Intra-operative fluid culture during appendectomy for CA appears to facilitate the selection of appropriate post-operative antibiotics and, thus, minimize SSIs and overall morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Apendicitis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(7)2021 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34301696

RESUMEN

A term male infant was born to a healthy 24-year-old mother with antenatally diagnosed liver-up, left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and gastroschisis. The infant was stabilised in the neonatal intensive care unit and then underwent primary repair of the CDH via left subcostal incision and silo placement for the gastroschisis. Serial silo reductions were started postoperatively and umbilical flap closure for the gastroschisis was performed on day of life 6. The patient was weaned from respiratory support, started on enteral feeds, and discharged home at 1 month of age. He was weaned from supplemental nasogastric feeds by 6 weeks of age and is currently well and thriving at 11 months of age.


Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Adulto , Nutrición Enteral , Gastrosquisis/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastrosquisis/cirugía , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ombligo , Adulto Joven
7.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(6): 1258-1259, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33388141

Asunto(s)
Empiema , Niño , Humanos
9.
Surg Open Sci ; 2(1): 27-33, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32754705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perioperative care after appendectomy may be the first exposure to opioids for many children. A quality improvement project was implemented to assess current practice of prescribing pain medications after a laparoscopic appendectomy to decrease unnecessary opioid use via simple, targeted steps. METHODS: Three measures were implemented in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: (1) ice packs to incision in postanesthesia care unit, (2) standard pain scores within 30 minutes of admission to ward postoperatively, and (3) standardized postoperative order set minimizing opioid utilization and limited number of opioids prescribed at discharge. Pre- and postimplementation data were compared with the primary outcome variable: opioid utilization during the postoperative period. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age or gender between the 814 preimplementation and 263 postimplementation patients. Postimplementation compliance is 66.9% for icepacks, 88% for pain scores, and 94.7% for postoperative order set. There were statistically significant decreases in intravenous and enteral opioids administered, number of opioid doses prescribed at discharge, and patients discharged with an opioid prescription. CONCLUSION: By using a multidisciplinary assessment of current state, culture, and management of parental, patient, and nursing expectations, our institution was able to reduce overall opioid consumption.

10.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 21(1): 72-80, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494028

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Prospectively compare parent/nurse controlled analgesia (PNCA) to continuous opioid infusion (COI) in the post-operative neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population. DESIGN/METHODS: A randomized controlled trial compared neonates treated with morphine PNCA to those treated with morphine COI. The primary outcome was average opioid consumption up to 3 post-operative days. Secondary outcomes included 1) pain intensity, 2) adverse events that may be directly related to opioid consumption, and 3) parent and nurse satisfaction. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 25 post-operative neonates and young infants randomized to either morphine PNCA (n = 16) or COI (n = 9). Groups differed significantly on daily opioid consumption, with the PNCA group receiving significantly less opioid (P = .02). Groups did not differ on average pain score or frequency of adverse events (P values > .05). Parents in both groups were satisfied with their infant's pain management and parents in the PNCA group were slightly more satisfied with their level of involvement (P = .03). Groups did not differ in nursing satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: PNCA may be an effective alternative to COI for pain management in the NICU population. This method may also substantially reduce opioid consumption, provide more individualized care, and improve parent satisfaction with their level of participation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients in the NICU represent one of our most vulnerable patient populations. As nurses strive to provide safe and effective pain management, results of this study suggest PNCA may allow nurses to maintain their patients' comfort while providing less opioid and potentially improving parental perception of involvement. STUDY TYPE: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Intravenosas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/organización & administración , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Proyectos Piloto
11.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(3): 406-413, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31362826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ambiguity regarding timing and duration of perioperative IV antibiotics in AA and CA exists. We wanted to determine if an association existed between surgical site infections (SSI) in children with acute (AA) or complicated appendicitis (CA) and timing and duration of perioperative antibiotics. METHODS: We performed a single institution, case control observational study of patients with (n = 988) and CA (n = 561) from 2013 to 2017. The exposure was the timing and/or duration of pre- and postoperative antibiotics. The outcome measure was SSI development within 60 days of surgery. RESULTS: SSI occurred in 2.5% AA and 19.1% CA patients. We identified 18-70 min before incision (MBI) as the best interval for preoperative antibiotic administration with regards to SSI occurrence with SSI OR = 3.0 (95% CI 1.35, 6.68) p = 0.0356 for antibiotics given 0-17 MBI and OR = 3.21 (95% CI 1.45, 7.09) p = 0.0108) for antibiotics given >70 MBI. Postoperative antibiotics did not confer protection from SSI in AA patients (p = 0.718). CA patients who achieved normal physiologic indices within ≤6 days (Early Responders, ER) had 8.8% SSI while the Late Responders (LR, normal by >6 days) had 49.3% SSI rate (p < 0.001). ER patients who received IV antibiotics for 1-2 postoperative days had higher SSI rates compared to 3, 4, 5, or 6 days, but higher odds of SSI were found only with 1 day. Additional oral antibiotics decreased SSI for ER (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.159, 0.87; p = 0.0145), but not LR patients (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.55, 2.85, p = 0.5951). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics given within 18-70 MBI for appendectomy may be associated with decreased SSI. Postoperative antibiotics should not be given for AA. In ER CA patients, additional oral antibiotics may decrease SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(1): 80-85, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708210

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypothermia has been shown to increase surgical site infection (SSI) rates in adults. We sought to characterize whether intraoperative hypothermia or hyperthermia is associated with postoperative infections in infants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≤6 months old who underwent surgical procedures from November 2013 to October 2015 at a Level I ACS Children's Surgical Center. The outcome was infections within 30 days after operation, with particular attention to SSI. Data obtained included weight and age at surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physiologic status, wound class, case length, blood transfusion within 72 h of surgery, and administration of prophylactic antibiotics. Temperatures were classified as hypothermia (T < 36 °C), normothermia (T = 36.0 to 37.9 °C), and hyperthermia (T ≥ 38 °C). RESULTS: The 885 patients had 25 SSIs (2.8%) and 11 nonsurgical site infections (1.2%). On univariate analysis, weight at surgery, higher ASA, perioperative transfusions, and longer case length were associated with higher rate of SSI. Higher median Thigh, higher median T low, and any hyperthermia were associated with higher rate of SSI. On multivariable logistic regression adjusted analyses, hyperthermia at any time during the case was associated with SSI (OR 3.47, [95% CI 1.34, 9.04], p = 0.011). Transfusions were also associated with higher SSI rates (OR 3.60 [95% CI, 1.28, 10.3], p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative hyperthermia is associated with increased SSI rates in infants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal , Hipotermia/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Análisis de Varianza , Transfusión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Quirófanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/fisiopatología
13.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 20(9): 847-887, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483379

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To update the American Academy of Pediatrics and Society of Critical Care Medicine's 2004 Guidelines and levels of care for PICU. DESIGN: A task force was appointed by the American College of Critical Care Medicine to follow a standardized and systematic review of the literature using an evidence-based approach. The 2004 Admission, Discharge and Triage Guidelines served as the starting point, and searches in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and PubMed resulted in 329 articles published from 2004 to 2016. Only 21 pediatric studies evaluating outcomes related to pediatric level of care, specialized PICU, patient volume, or personnel. Of these, 13 studies were large retrospective registry data analyses, six small single-center studies, and two multicenter survey analyses. Limited high-quality evidence was found, and therefore, a modified Delphi process was used. Liaisons from the American Academy of Pediatrics were included in the panel representing critical care, surgical, and hospital medicine expertise for the development of this practice guidance. The title was amended to "practice statement" and "guidance" because Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was not possible in this administrative work and to align with requirements put forth by the American Academy of Pediatrics. METHODS: The panel consisted of two groups: a voting group and a writing group. The panel used an iterative collaborative approach to formulate statements on the basis of the literature review and common practice of the pediatric critical care bedside experts and administrators on the task force. Statements were then formulated and presented via an online anonymous voting tool to a voting group using a three-cycle interactive forecasting Delphi method. With each cycle of voting, statements were refined on the basis of votes received and on comments. Voting was conducted between the months of January 2017 and March 2017. The consensus was deemed achieved once 80% or higher scores from the voting group were recorded on any given statement or where there was consensus upon review of comments provided by voters. The Voting Panel was required to vote in all three forecasting events for the final evaluation of the data and inclusion in this work. The writing panel developed admission recommendations by level of care on the basis of voting results. RESULTS: The panel voted on 30 statements, five of which were multicomponent statements addressing characteristics specific to PICU level of care including team structure, technology, education and training, academic pursuits, and indications for transfer to tertiary or quaternary PICU. Of the remaining 25 statements, 17 reached consensus cutoff score. Following a review of the Delphi results and consensus, the recommendations were written. CONCLUSIONS: This practice statement and level of care guidance manuscript addresses important specifications for each PICU level of care, including the team structure and resources, technology and equipment, education and training, quality metrics, admission and discharge criteria, and indications for transfer to a higher level of care. The sparse high-quality evidence led the panel to use a modified Delphi process to seek expert opinion to develop consensus-based recommendations where gaps in the evidence exist. Despite this limitation, the members of the Task Force believe that these recommendations will provide guidance to practitioners in making informed decisions regarding pediatric admission or transfer to the appropriate level of care to achieve best outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/organización & administración , Admisión del Paciente/normas , Alta del Paciente/normas , Triaje/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Pediatrics ; 144(4)2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31488695

RESUMEN

This is an executive summary of the 2019 update of the 2004 guidelines and levels of care for PICU. Since previous guidelines, there has been a tremendous transformation of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine with advancements in pediatric cardiovascular medicine, transplant, neurology, trauma, and oncology as well as improvements of care in general PICUs. This has led to the evolution of resources and training in the provision of care through the PICU. Outcome and quality research related to admission, transfer, and discharge criteria as well as literature regarding PICU levels of care to include volume, staffing, and structure were reviewed and included in this statement as appropriate. Consequently, the purposes of this significant update are to address the transformation of the field and codify a revised set of guidelines that will enable hospitals, institutions, and individuals in developing the appropriate PICU for their community needs. The target audiences of the practice statement and guidance are broad and include critical care professionals; pediatricians; pediatric subspecialists; pediatric surgeons; pediatric surgical subspecialists; pediatric imaging physicians; and other members of the patient care team such as nurses, therapists, dieticians, pharmacists, social workers, care coordinators, and hospital administrators who make daily administrative and clinical decisions in all PICU levels of care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Admisión del Paciente/normas , Alta del Paciente/normas , Pediatría/normas , Triaje/normas , Comités Consultivos , Niño , Cuidados Críticos/tendencias , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Lactante , Pediatría/tendencias
15.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(12): 2539-2545, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519359

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgical management of appendicitis accounts for ~30% of total expenditure in the practice of pediatric surgery and is associated with high cost variation. We hypothesize that incorporating single-incision laparoscopy (SILS) and the resultant by-product dual-incision laparoscopy (DILS) into a historically three-incision laparoscopic (TILS) appendectomy practice affords equal outcomes at lower cost. METHODS: Appendectomies performed at a large-volume tertiary care children's hospital from 1/2015-12/2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy technique and appendicitis severity were stratified against operative and admission direct variable (DV) costs. Secondary outcomes included perioperative time course and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 970 appendectomies were analyzed during the study period (61% acute, 39% complex appendicitis). SILS and DILS had significantly lower mean DV costs and OR times compared to TILS for both acute and complex appendicitis while maintaining equivalent outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SILS and DILS appendectomy techniques can be incorporated into pediatric surgical practice at lower cost than TILS appendectomy while maintaining equivalent outcomes. Further, the introduction of a tiered approach to laparoscopic appendectomy, in which all cases are started as SILS with additional incisions added based on operative difficulty, is estimated to save $74,580 annually in operative DV costs at a pediatric surgical center averaging 314 laparoscopic appendectomies per year. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Costos Directos de Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/economía , Apendicitis/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Laparoscopía/economía , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
16.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(3): 434-438, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29884552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients has been historically deemed unwise, since the trigger for breaths is the electromyographic activity of the diaphragmatic muscle. We report on our NAVA experience in CDH patients. METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective review of newborns from 1/1/2012-1/1/2017 at a Level I Children's Surgery Center undergoing CDH repair. Data obtained included demographics, defect type and repair, respiratory support, and outcomes. RESULTS: Seven infants with CDH were placed on noninvasive-NAVA (NIV-NAVA) after extubation. All seven patients underwent open transabdominal repair, with five requiring patch repair. All survived to discharge, and one year after birth. When we compared this group to a contemporary cohort of patients who also underwent CDH repair, we found no significant differences in birth weight, postmenstrual age, or gender. However, there was a significantly higher need for inhaled nitric oxide (p = 0.002), high frequency oscillatory ventilation (p = 0.016), and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation support (p = 0.045) in the NIV-NAVA cohort. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of NIV-NAVA being successfully utilized as an adjunct to wean infants from conventional ventilation after CDH repair, even in those who require patch repair or with more significant disease severity. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III- Retrospective Comparative Study.


Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/métodos , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Diafragma/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Soporte Ventilatorio Interactivo/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Ventilación no Invasiva/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Desconexión del Ventilador/métodos
17.
Surg Endosc ; 33(3): 745-749, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30006842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric antral webs are mucosal structures, varying from fenestrated diaphragms to mucosal crescents, resulting in varying degrees of foregut obstruction. Patients commonly present with vomiting, failure to thrive, and abdominal pain. Prevalence is unknown, and diagnosis can be difficult. METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective review of patients from 4/1/2015-4/1/2018 at a Level I Children's Surgery Center undergoing gastric antral web resection. Data obtained included demographics, preoperative workup, surgical repair, and outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were identified; 67% were male with an average age of 30 months at diagnosis. Initial diagnosis was established by a combination of fluoroscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in all patients. Patients presented with emesis (76%), failure to thrive (57%), need for post-pyloric tube feeds (33%), and abdominal pain (14%). Web localization without intraoperative EGD (n = 3) was initially challenging. As a result, intraoperative EGD was combined with operative antral web resection to facilitate web localization (n = 18). Web marking techniques have evolved from marking with suture (n = 1) and tattoo (n = 2), to endoscopic clip application (n = 12). All 21 patients underwent web resection, 2 were performed laparoscopically. Twenty underwent Heineke-Mikulicz pyloroplasty during the initial surgery. Average length of stay was 5.5 days. There were no intraoperative complications or deaths. Permanent symptom resolution occurred in 90% of patients immediately, with a statistically significant decrease in emesis (p < 0.001), failure to thrive (p < 0.001), and need for post-pyloric tube feeding (p = 0.009) within 6 months of surgery. CONCLUSION: Gastric antral webs should be considered in the differential diagnosis for a child with persistent vomiting. Web resection with the use of intraoperative endoscopic localization can result in permanent symptom resolution in the majority of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Antro Pilórico/anomalías , Estenosis Pilórica/diagnóstico , Estenosis Pilórica/cirugía , Vómitos/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Insuficiencia de Crecimiento/etiología , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Mucosa Gástrica/anomalías , Humanos , Lactante , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Antro Pilórico/diagnóstico por imagen , Antro Pilórico/cirugía , Estenosis Pilórica/complicaciones , Estenosis Pilórica/etiología , Píloro/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Ann Surg ; 268(3): 497-505, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29994930

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This prospective observational study was designed to assess Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) after surgical treatment for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF), Hirschsprung disease (HD), gastroschisis (GAS), omphalocele (OMP), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Improvements in neonatal and surgical care have led to increased survival for many newborn conditions. Quality of life in these patients is seldom explored in a longitudinal manner. We hypothesized that age-adjusted physical and psychosocial scores would improve over time, but with diagnosis-dependent variation. METHODS: Data were collected from 241 patients (CDH = 52; EA/TEF = 62; HD = 46; GAS = 32; OMP = 26; NEC = 23) in an institutional Clinical Outcomes Registry (COR) from 2012 to 2017. Aggregate physical, psychosocial, and overall PedsQL scores were determined for each diagnosis. Spline regression models were created to model scores as a function of age. RESULTS: Physical scores trended up for all diagnoses except CDH and NEC beyond age 10. Psychosocial scores trended up for all diagnoses except NEC and EA/TEF beyond age 10. Beyond age 12, CDH, GAS, and HD patients had overall scores within the normal range, while NEC, OMP, and EA/TEF patients had scores similar to children with chronic medical illness. CONCLUSION: Variation exists in long-term PedsQL scores after neonatal surgery for selected, complex disease. Beyond age 12, quality of life is significantly impaired in NEC, moderately impaired in OMP and EA/TEF, and within normal range for CDH, HD, and GAS patients at the population level. These data are relevant to prenatal and perioperative discussions with patients and families.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/cirugía , Hernia Umbilical/cirugía , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/cirugía , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/cirugía , Wisconsin
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...