Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Total hip Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent literature regarding regional anesthesia (RA) techniques and outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the face of changing surgical techniques and perioperative considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on large meta-analyses, peripheral nerve blocks are indicated for THA. Each block has its own risks and benefits and data for outcomes for particular techniques are limited. New surgical techniques, improved use of multimodal analgesia, and improved ultrasound guided regional anesthetics lead to better pain control for patients undergoing THA with less associated risks. Block selection continues to be influenced by provider comfort, surgical approach, patient anatomy, and postoperative goals. Head-to-head studies of particular nerve blocks are warranted.

Safety Considerations for Outpatient Arthroplasty.

Since 2018, the number of total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed on an outpatient basis has dramatically increased. Both surgeon and anesthesiologist should be aware of the implications for the safety of outpatient TJAs and potential patient risk factors that could alter this safety profile. Although smaller studies suggest that the risk of negative outcomes is equivalent when comparing outpatient and inpatient arthroplasty, larger database analyses suggest that, even when matched for comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty may be at increased risk of surgical or medical complications. Appropriate patient selection is critical for the success of any outpatient arthroplasty program. Potential exclusion criteria for outpatient TJA may include age greater than 75 years, bleeding disorder, history of deep vein thrombosis, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and hypoalbuminemia, among others. Patient optimization before surgery is also warranted. The potential risks of same-day versus next-day discharge have yet to be elicited in a large-scale manner.

Safety and Complications of Landmark-based Paravertebral Blocks: A Retrospective Analysis of 979 Patients and 4983 Injections.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the incidence of complications after landmark-based paravertebral blocks for breast surgery. METHODS: The medical records of patients who received a paravertebral block for breast surgery between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. Patient age, sex, type of procedure, number of injections, volume of injected anesthetic, and possible complications were noted. A record was identified as a possible serious block-related complication if there was concern or treatment for local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax, altered mental status, or intrathecal/epidural spread. Other complications recorded were immediate postblock hypotension and nausea/vomiting requiring treatment and unanticipated postsurgical admission. Patients receiving ultrasound-guided paravertebral blocks were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, 979 patients received paravertebral blocks using the landmark technique for breast surgery, totaling 4983 injections. Overall, 6 patients required assessment for postblock issues (0.61%), including hypotension (2 patients), nausea (3 patients), and hypotension + altered mental status (1 patient). This latter patient was identified as having a serious complication related to the paravertebral block (0.1%). This patient had unintentional intrathecal spread and altered mental status that required mechanical ventilation. The incidence of block-related hypotension and nausea requiring treatment was thus 0.31% and 0.31% respectively. Four patients required unanticipated admission, but none were for block-related reasons. No patients in this study were found to have local anesthetic systemic toxicity or pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that landmark-based paravertebral blocks for breast surgery result in a very low complication rate and are a safe technique for postsurgical analgesia.

Safety and Feasibility of a Fast-Track Pathway for Neurosurgical Craniotomy Patients: Bypassing the Intensive Care Unit.

Objective: To describe the safety and feasibility of a fast-track pathway for neurosurgical craniotomy patients receiving care in a neurosciences progressive care unit (NPCU). Patients and Methods: Traditionally, most craniotomy patients are admitted to the neurosciences intensive care unit (NSICU) for postoperative follow-up. Decreased availability of NSICU beds during the coronavirus disease-2019 delta surge led our team to establish a de-novo NPCU to preserve capacity for patients requiring high level of care and would bypass routine NSICU admissions. Patients were selected a priori by treating neurosurgeons on the basis of the potential need for high-level ICU services. After operation, selected patients were transferred to the postoperative care unit, where suitability for NPCU transfer was reassessed with checklist-criteria. This process was continued after the delta surge. Results: From July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022, 57 patients followed the NPCU protocol. Thirty-four (59.6%) were women, and the mean age was 56 years. Fifty-seven craniotomies for 34 intra-axial and 23 extra-axial lesions were performed. After assessment and application of the checklist-criteria, 55 (96.5%) were transferred to NPCU, and only 2 (3.5%) were transferred to ICU. All 55 patients followed in NPCU had good safety outcomes without requiring NSICU transfer. This saved $143,000 and led to 55 additional ICU beds for emergent admissions. Conclusion: This fast-track craniotomy protocol provides early experience that a surgeon-selected group of patients may be suitably monitored outside the traditional NSICU. This system has the potential to reduce overall health care expenses, increase capacity for NSICU bed availability, and change the paradigm of NSICU admission.

Preoperative anxiolytic and antidepressant medications as risk factors for increased opioid use after total knee arthroplasty: a matched retrospective cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature has suggested that the presence of anxiety or depression may be linked to increased postoperative pain. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether patients who use anxiolytics or antidepressants preoperatively were associated with worse acute pain outcomes after elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A chart review of patients who underwent TKA at our institution was conducted. The primary outcome was mean opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OME) on the day of surgery (POD 0) through postoperative day 1 (POD1). Secondary outcomes included median pain scores during hospitalization, the need for an acute pain service (APS) consultation, and mean length of stay. Patients were matched (1 : 1) according to multiple factors including age, surgical anaesthesia type, preoperative pain scores, and placement of a single-injection adductor canal block. RESULTS: 83 patients were successfully matched in each group. During POD0-1, patients with anxiolytic or antidepressant prescriptions required a mean of 101.36 mg OME (SD = 66.89), compared to 86.78 mg (SD = 62.66) among patients without use of these medications ( P = 0.011) (estimate of average treatment effect of +22.86). Similarly, these patients were more likely to report a slightly higher median pain score than patients not taking anxiolytics or antidepressants (4.00 [SD 1.95] vs. 3.77 [SD 2.01], P = 0.031) (estimate of average treatment effect of +0.55). However, there were no differences in hospital length of stay, acute pain service consultation, visit to an Emergency Department within one week of discharge, and readmission within one week of discharge. There were also no differences in outcomes when comparing patients with a history of anxiety or depression to those without this history. CONCLUSIONS: The use of chronic anxiolytics or antidepressants was associated with increased opioid use and slightly higher pain scores in patients undergoing TKA. These associations were independent of a medical diagnosis of anxiety or depression. The mode-rate increase in perioperative opioid consumption and pain scores was not associated with an increase in APS consultations or length of stay.

Twenty-three-hour stays in the ambulatory surgical center: benefits, pathways and protocols.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent evidence that discusses the clinical, financial, and logistical implications of a 23 h stay postsurgical stay unit in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC). RECENT FINDINGS: Twenty-three-hour stays in ambulatory surgery centers are safe, but proper patient selection and optimization are key to maintaining a high level of safety. The financial implications of overnight stays in ASCs rely heavily on payment structures and comparative costs at hospital-based outpatient surgery centers. The establishment of pathways and protocols for clinical care are key to the success of a 23 h stay at an ASC. SUMMARY: A concurrent concern with the recent increase in outpatient surgery and medical complexity of cases performed in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) is the possibility that patients may need overnight stay. Further, whether certain patients would benefit from anticipated 23 h observation rather than same-day discharge is an emerging topic. Overnight stays in ASCs may have financial advantages and decrease the risk of unanticipated admission with proper patient selection. The use of protocols and established pathways is key to the success of this model.

The Use of Pectoralis Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Practice Advisory and Narrative Review from the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA).

Although pectoralis (PECS) blocks are commonly used for breast surgery, recommendations regarding the efficacy of these blocks have thus far not been developed by any professional anesthesia society. Given the potential impact of PECS blocks on analgesia after outpatient breast surgery, The Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) convened a task force to develop a practice advisory on the use of this analgesic technique. In this practice advisory, we compare the efficacy of PECS blocks with systemic analgesia, local infiltration anesthesia, and paravertebral blockade. Our objectives were to advise on two clinical questions. (1) Does PECS-1 and/or -2 blockade provide more effective analgesia for breast-conserving surgery than either systemic analgesics or surgeon-provided local infiltration anesthesia? (2) Does PECS-1 and/or -2 blockade provide equivalent analgesia for mastectomy compared with a paravertebral block (PVB)? Among patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, PECS blocks moderately reduce postoperative opioid use, prolong time to analgesic rescue, and decrease postoperative pain scores when compared with systemic analgesics. SAMBA recommends the use of a PECS-1 or -2 blockade in the absence of systemic analgesia (Strength of Recommendation A). No evidence currently exists that strongly favors the use of PECS blocks over surgeon-performed local infiltration in this surgical population. SAMBA cannot recommend PECS blocks over surgical infiltration (Strength of Recommendation C). For patients undergoing a mastectomy, a PECS block may provide an opioid-sparing effect similar to that achieved with PVB; SAMBA recommends the use of a PECS block if a patient is unable to receive a PVB (Strength of Recommendation A).

Safety Considerations for Outpatient Arthroplasty.

Since 2018, the number of total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed on an outpatient basis has dramatically increased. Both surgeon and anesthesiologist should be aware of the implications for the safety of outpatient TJAs and potential patient risk factors that could alter this safety profile. Although smaller studies suggest that the risk of negative outcomes is equivalent when comparing outpatient and inpatient arthroplasty, larger database analyses suggest that, even when matched for comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty may be at increased risk of surgical or medical complications. Appropriate patient selection is critical for the success of any outpatient arthroplasty program. Potential exclusion criteria for outpatient TJA may include age greater than 75 years, bleeding disorder, history of deep vein thrombosis, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and hypoalbuminemia, among others. Patient optimization before surgery is also warranted. The potential risks of same-day versus next-day discharge have yet to be elicited in a large-scale manner.

Paravertebral block: anatomy and relevant safety issues.

Paravertebral block, especially thoracic paravertebral block, is an effective regional anesthetic technique that can provide significant analgesia for numerous surgical procedures, including breast surgery, pulmonary surgery, and herniorrhaphy. The technique, although straightforward, is not devoid of potential adverse effects. Proper anatomic knowledge and adequate technique may help decrease the risk of these effects. In this brief discourse, we discuss the anatomy and technical aspects of paravertebral blocks and emphasize the importance of appropriate needle manipulation in order to minimize the risk of complications. We propose that, when using a landmark-based approach, limiting medial and lateral needle orientation and implementing caudal (rather than cephalad) needle redirection may provide an extra margin of safety when performing this technique. Likewise, recognizing a target that is not in close proximity to the neurovascular bundle when using ultrasound guidance may be beneficial.

Regional Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesiologists.

Proper pain control is critical for ambulatory surgery. Regional anesthesia can decrease postoperative pain, improve patient satisfaction, and expedite patient discharge. This article discusses the techniques, clinical pearls, and potential pitfalls associated with those blocks, which are most useful in an ambulatory perioperative setting. Interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, axillary, paravertebral, erector spinae, pectoralis, serratus anterior, transversus abdominis plane, femoral, adductor canal, popliteal, interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee, and ankle blocks are described.

Opioid consumption in total knee arthroplasty patients: a retrospective comparison of adductor canal and femoral nerve continuous infusions in the presence of a sciatic nerve catheter.

OBJECTIVE: To compare opioid consumption among patients who receive a continuous adductor canal block (ACB) versus continuous femoral nerve block (FB) for total knee arthroplasty analgesia in the presence of an intermittent sciatic nerve catheter (iSB). DESIGN: Matched cohort retrospective study. SETTING: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. PATIENTS: Ninety patient charts were included in this study: 45 patients with continuous ACB/iSB and 45 with continuous FB/iSB. Patients were matched according to mean preoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, BMI, age, and gender. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome of the study was postoperative on-demand opioid consumption on postoperative days 0 (POD 0), 1 (POD 1), and 2 (POD 2). Secondary outcomes included postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for anterior and posterior knee pain, incidence of nausea and pruritus, need for intravenous rescue opioid, and need for catheter bolus by a physician. MAIN RESULTS: On POD 0, mean opioid consumption in milligrams of oral morphine equivalent [mean±SD (95% CI)] was 43.98mg±33.36 (33.96, 54) in the ACB/iSB group vs 38.45mg±30.99 (29.14, 47.76) in the FB/iSB group, respectively (P=.42); on POD 1, 74.96mg±37.23 (63.78, 86.14) vs 72.40mg±62.34 (53.67, 91.13) (P=.81); on POD 2, 28.19mg±17.69 (22.87, 33.51) vs 31.84mg±23.09 (24.90, 38.78) (P=.40). On POD 1, median anterior knee VAS scores at rest were equivalent in both the ACB/iSB and FB/iSB groups (1 vs 1, respectively, P=.46); however, patients in the ACB/iSB group were more likely to have higher anterior knee pain scores with movement (4 vs 1, P=.002). CONCLUSION: In the first 2 days after a total knee arthroplasty, opioid consumption in patients with continuous ACB/iSB was not significantly different from patients receiving continuous FB/iSB. Continuous adductor canal block appears to provide adequate analgesia when compared to continuous femoral blockade.

THE USE OF PARAVERTEBRAL BLOCKADE FOR ANALGESIA AFTER ANTERIOR-APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.

BACKGROUND: Anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty (ATHA) are becoming increasingly popular. We postulated that the use of PVB of the T12, L1, and L2 roots would provide adequate analgesia for ATHA while allowing motor sparing. METHODS: The medical records of 20 patients undergoing primary ATHA were reviewed. T12, L1 and L2 paravertebral blockade was accomplished with 3-4 ml of 1% ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 and 0.5 mg/ml of preservative-free dexamethasone per level. Primary outcomes were mean opioid consumption in intravenous morphine equivalents and worst recorded visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during postoperative days 0 to 2 (POD 0 to 2). RESULTS: Mean opioid consumption was 8.4 mg on POD0, 16.6 mg on POD1, and 9.8 mg on POD2. Median worst VAS scores were 2 for all time intervals except POD 0, which had a median value of 0. All patients had full hip motor strength the evening of POD0.19 patients were able to ambulate the afternoon of POD1. CONCLUSION: T12-L2 PVB, when utilized as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, results in moderate opioid consumption, low VAS scores, preservation of hip motor function, and may be an effective regional anesthesia technique for ATHA.