The Prognostic and Predictive Role of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) as Biomarkers in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Pancreatic cancer has poor survival despite modern-day advances in its management. At present, there are no available biomarkers that can predict chemotherapy response or help inform prognosis. In more recent years, there has been increased interest in potential inflammatory biomarkers, with studies revealing a worse prognosis of patients with a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in a range of tumour types. Our aim was to assess the role of three inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood in predicting chemotherapy response in patients with earlier disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and as a prognostic marker in all patients that underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer. Using retrospective records, we discovered that patients with a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>5) at the time of diagnosis had worse median overall survival than those with ratios ≤5 at 13 and 32.4 months (p = 0.001, HR 2.43), respectively. We were able to appreciate a correlation between a higher platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and increased residual tumour in the histopathological specimen in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the association was weak (p = 0.03, coefficient 0.21). Due to the dynamic relationship between the immune system and pancreatic cancer, it is unsurprising that immune markers may be useful as potential biomarkers; however, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

The Right Treatment Strategy for the Right Patient: A Biomarker-Driven Approach to Neoadjuvant vs. Surgery-First Management of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

The genomic heterogeneity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is becoming increasingly appreciated. We aimed to evaluate the ability of a triple biomarker panel (S100A4, Ca-125, and mesothelin) to predict: (i) genetic PDAC subtypes; (ii) clinical phenotypes; and (iii) the optimal treatment strategy (neoadjuvant vs. surgery-first) in resectable and borderline resectable PDAC. Patients who underwent resection for resectable and borderline resectable PDAC were included from one single-institutional cohort and one multi-institutional cohort from the Australian Pancreatic Genome Initiative (APGI). Tumors were immunohistochemically evaluated for S100A4, Ca-125, and mesothelin, and a subset from the APGI cohort underwent RNA sequencing. This study included 252 and 226 patients from the single institution and the APGI cohorts, respectively. Triple-negative biomarker status correlated with non-squamous PDAC genotypes (p = 0.020), lower rates of distant recurrence (p = 0.002), and longer median overall survival (mOS) with the surgery-first approach compared with neoadjuvant treatment (33.3 vs. 22.2 mths, p = 0.038) in resectable PDAC. In contrast, the triple-positive disease was associated with longer mOS with neoadjuvant treatment compared with the surgery-first approach (29.5 vs. 13.7 mths, p = 0.021) in resectable and borderline resectable PDAC. In conclusion, the triple biomarker panel predicts genetic PDAC subtypes, clinical phenotypes, and optimal treatment strategies in resectable and borderline resectable PDAC.

Life-threatening diarrhea in neuroendocrine tumors: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors are rare, heterogeneous neoplasms that produce a wide variety of clinical symptoms. Diarrhea in neuroendocrine tumors is incredibly common and is usually benign in nature. We report two extreme cases of diarrhea in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors that threatened fatality and provide evidence for steroids as a novel agent in the management of vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old Caucasian male with a grade 2 (Ki-67 17%) metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumor, and a 43-year-old female with a grade 2 (Ki-67 5%) metastatic pancreatic vasoactive intestinal peptide tumor. Both patients suffered life-threatening diarrhea despite extensive treatment modalities, including new systemic agents. This case explains how a lack of compliance and patient under-reporting of symptoms contributed to their challenging clinical course. Only steroids had a significant sustained effect on the diarrhea of the patient with vasoactive intestinal peptide tumor. CONCLUSIONS: This report discusses two rare cases of life-threatening diarrhea in neuroendocrine tumors and stresses the importance of accurate clinical history taking, patient education, and compliance for symptom control. The report suggests steroids as a potential novel pharmaceutical option in the management of vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors; this is of great significance as it may provide a new approach to their management and potentially act as a life-saving agent in other oncology patients.

Optimal Upfront Treatment in Surgically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Candidates: A High-Volume Center Retrospective Analysis.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a devastating disease with only 15-20% of patients resectable at diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for this cohort is becoming increasingly popular; however, there are no published randomized trials that support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over upfront surgery in resectable disease. This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted to compare both treatment pathways and to identify any potential prognostic markers. Medical records from one large volume pancreatic cancer center from 2013-2019 were reviewed and 126 patients with upfront resectable disease were analyzed. Due to a change in practice in our center patients treated prior to December 2016 received upfront surgery and those treated after this date received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 86 (68%) patients were treated with upfront surgery and 40 (32%) of patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our results demonstrated that patients treated with upfront surgery with early-stage (1a) disease had a longer median OS compared to those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (24 vs. 21 months, p = 0.028). This survival difference was not evident for all patients (regardless of stage). R0 resections were similar between groups (p = 0.605). We identified that both tumor viability (in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients) and tumor grade were useful prognostic markers. Upfront surgery for certain patients with low volume disease may be suitable despite the global trend towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy for all upfront resectable patients. A prospective clinical trial in this cohort incorporating biomarkers is needed to determine optimal therapy pathway.

Safety and Efficacy of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Octogenarians.

Backgrounds: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains the only hope of a cure in selected patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). With an aging population, there will be an increasing number of very elderly patients being diagnosed with PAC of whom a selected proportion would be suitable for PD. However, the literature on outcomes of elderly patients after PD remains ambiguous. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of PD in octogenarians with PAC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 304 patients with PAC undergoing PD. Patients were divided into two age groups using age of 80 years old as the cut-off. Results: Overall mortality and major morbidity rates were 0.5 and 18.5%, respectively. The octogenarian group had a higher rate of mortality (6.3%, n = 1, p < 0.001), a higher rate of major morbidity (37.5%, n = 6, p = 0.042) and a longer hospital stay (p = 0.035). However, median survival of octogenarians was 15.6 months. Multivariate analysis showed age was not identified as a prognostic factor for major morbidity and overall survival. Conclusion: Age alone should not be an exclusion criterion for consideration of PD. With careful selection, PD can be safely performed in octogenarians. Elderly patients should be referred to a specialized unit for an objective assessment to determine the suitability for this aggressive but potential curative approach.

A Critical Assessment of Postneoadjuvant Therapy Pancreatic Cancer Regression Grading Schemes With a Proposal for a Novel Approach.

Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal tumor response score (TRS) system to assess regression in pancreatic cancers resected after neoadjuvant therapy. We developed a novel TRS (Royal North Shore [RNS] system) based on estimating the percentage of tumor bed occupied by viable cancer and categorized into 3 tiers: grade 1 (≤10%), grade 2 (11% to 75%), and grade 3 (>75%). We assessed 147 resected carcinomas with this and other TRS systems (College of American Pathologists [CAP], MD Anderson Cancer Center [MDACC], and Evans). The 3-tiered RNS system predicted median survival after surgery for grades 1, 2, and 3 of 54, 23, and 9 months, respectively (P<0.05). The CAP, MDACC, and Evans systems also predicted survival (P<0.05) but less consistently. The median survival for MDACC and CAP grade 0 (complete regression) was less than MDACC grade 1 and CAP grades 1 and 2. There was no difference in survival between CAP grades 2 and 3 (P=0.960), Evans grades 1 and 2a (P=0.395), and Evans grades 2a and 2b (P=0.587). Interobserver concordance was weak for CAP (κ=0.431), moderate for MDACC (κ=0.691), minimal for Evans (κ=0.307), and moderate to strong for RNS (κ=0.632 to 0.84). Of age, sex, size, stage, grade, perineural and vascular invasion, extrapancreatic extension, margin status, and RNS score, only RNS score, vascular invasion, and extrapancreatic extension predicted survival in univariate analysis. Only extrapancreatic extension (P=0.034) and RNS score (P<0.0001) remained significant in multivariate analysis. We conclude that the RNS system is a reproducible and powerful predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancers treated with neoadjuvant therapy and should be investigated in larger cohorts.

Routine Early 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography Has Low Yield After Resection of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

OBJECTIVES: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (appNEN) generally carry a low recurrence risk. Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (DOTA PET) is increasingly used as it is more sensitive than cross-sectional imaging. We hypothesize that early DOTA PET is unlikely to detect recurrent disease in patients with low-risk resected appNEN because of the delayed pattern of recurrence. METHODS: Retrospective study (dual review) of patients undergoing DOTA PET 0 to 18 months after resected appNEN. The primary outcome was the proportion of scans demonstrating residual disease. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included (median age, 29 years; 63% female), most with small, low-grade appNEN. No scans (0%) showed residual/distant disease. Eight (20%) of 41 scans showed indeterminate findings requiring follow-up. Five (12%) scans were recommended for follow-up with modalities other than DOTA PET (vertebra, 3; thyroid; bone, 1 each). Three (7%) were recommended for follow-up with DOTA PET (all with indeterminate abdominal uptake). These 3 patients had no recurrent disease on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The Ga-DOTATATE PET is of no value when performed in the first 18 months after resected appNEN. Although 20% of scans showed indeterminate findings, more than half did not require repeat DOTA PET. Despite advantages over cross-sectional imaging, DOTA PET is not recommended in staging after completely resected appNEN.

Evaluation of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scanning in the Neoadjuvant Therapy Paradigm in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Little data exist on the utility of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in operable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with neoadjuvant (NA) therapy. METHODS: Consecutively treated patients with potentially operable PDAC were recruited from a quaternary referral center between 2015 and 2018. Data were collated on demographic, clinical, radiological, treatment, and disease-free and overall survival (OS) outcome measures, correlated with FDG-PET findings. RESULTS: Of 115 patients recruited, 61% were deemed upfront operable (n = 70), 33% borderline (n = 38), and 6% (n = 7) locally advanced. Ninety-five (83%) received NA chemotherapy with 23 (24%) sequential radiotherapy. Sixty-nine (73%) treated with NA were resected, 37 (54%) attained an R0 resection, 43 (62%) had N1 disease with median tumor viability of 50%. The median OS in the entire cohort was 30.48 months and in those who received NA chemotherapy followed by resection 37.98 months. Twelve percent (n = 13) were upstaged during NA therapy by PET. Preoperative standardized uptake value maximum of less than 5 versus 5 or greater after NA predicted for improved OS, 42.95 months versus 26.05 months, P = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort study of PDAC, the utility of FDG-PET in informing the patient treatment pathway was meaningfully demonstrated.

Biomarker panel predicts survival after resection in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of patients who undergo curative-intent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection experience disease recurrence within six months. We recently published a systematic review of prognostic immunohistochemical biomarkers in PDAC and shortlisted a panel of those reported with the highest level of evidence, including p53, p16, Ca-125, S100A4, FOXC1, EGFR, mesothelin, CD24 and UPAR. This study aims to discover and validate the prognostic significance of a combinatorial panel of tumor biomarkers in patients with resected PDAC. METHODS: Patients who underwent PDAC resection were included from a single institution discovery cohort and a multi-institutional validation cohort. Tumors in the discovery cohort were stained immunohistochemically for all nine shortlisted biomarkers. Biomarkers significantly associated with overall survival (OS) were reevaluated as a combinatorial panel in both discovery and validation cohorts for its prognostic significance. RESULTS: 224 and 191 patients were included in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. In both cohorts, S100A4, Ca-125 and mesothelin expression were associated with shorter OS. In both cohorts, the number of these biomarkers expressed was significantly associated with OS (discovery cohort 36.8 vs. 26.4 vs 16.3 vs 12.8 months, P < 0.001; validation cohort 25.2 vs 18.3 vs 13.6 vs 11.9 months, P = 0.008 for expression of zero, one, two and three biomarkers, respectively). On multivariable analysis, expression of at least one of three biomarkers was independently associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION: Combinations of S100A4, Ca-125 and mesothelin expression stratify survival after resection of localized PDAC. Co-expression of all three biomarkers is associated with the poorest prognostic outcome.

ATRX loss is an independent predictor of poor survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are rare neoplasms accounting for 1% to 2% of all pancreatic tumors. The biological behavior of PanNETs is heterogeneous and unpredictable, adding to the difficulties of clinical management. The DAXX (death domain associated protein) and ATRX (α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked) genes encode proteins involved in SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling. Somatic inactivating mutations in DAXX and ATRX are frequent in PanNETs, mutually exclusive, and associated with telomere dysfunction, resulting in genomic instability and alternate lengthening of telomeres. We sought to assess the clinical significance of the loss of the ATRX and DAXX proteins as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in patients with PanNET. From an unselected cohort of 105 patients, we found ATRX loss in 10 tumors (9.5%) and DAXX loss in 16 (15.2%). DAXX and ATRX losses were confirmed mutually exclusive and associated with other adverse clinicopathological variables and poor survival in univariate analysis. In addition, ATRX loss was also associated with higher AJCC stage and infiltrative tumor borders. However, only ATRX loss, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural spread were independent predictors of poor overall survival in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, loss of expression of ATRX as determined by IHC is a useful independent predictor of poor overall survival in PanNETs. Given its relative availability, ATRX loss as determined by IHC may have a role in routine clinical practice to refine prognostication in patients with PanNET.