RESUMEN
Introducción: El diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa latente (ITL) mediante IGRA sigue generando debate. La experiencia empleando dos pruebas IGRA de manera simultánea es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados de dos versiones de QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) con los de T-SPOT.TB y analizar la eficacia de esta estrategia dual (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) para el diagnóstico de la ITL en población con alguna condición inmunosupresora.Métodos: Estudio prospectivo (mayo 2015-junio 2017) que incluye 2.999 pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas, a los que se les realizó de manera simultánea dos IGRA: grupo-1 (1.535 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); grupo-2 (1.464 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Resultados: La concordancia entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB fue del 83,19% (κ = 0,532). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 14,33 vs. 17,06%; 82,41 vs. 74,46%; y 3,25 vs. 8,46%. La concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB fue del 87,56% (κ=0,609). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 15,02 vs. 15,36%; 82,92 vs. 79,37%; y 2,04 vs. 5,25%. Las discordancias entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus fueron del 12,43%, que implicaban que había 103 pacientes positivos y otros 79 pacientes negativos a expensas exclusivamente de uno de los dos IGRA.Conclusiones: Se evidenció una mayor concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB que entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB. Sin embargo, creemos que la proporción de resultados discordantes entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus es lo suficientemente relevante clínicamente como para justificar el empleo simultáneo de dos IGRA en este grupo específico de pacientes. (AU)
Introduction: The diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTI) by IGRA continues to generate debate. Experience in the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA tests is scant. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 versions of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) with those of T-SPOT.TB, and to analyse the effectiveness of a dual strategy (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) for the diagnosis of LTI in an immunosuppressed population.Methods: We conducted a prospective study (May 2015-June 2017) that included 2,999 immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics, in whom 2 simultaneous IGRA tests were performed: Group 1 (1535 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); Group 2 (1464 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Results: The concordance between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 83.19% (κ=0.532). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 14.33% vs. 17.06%; 82.41% vs. 74.46%; and 3.25% vs. 8.46%. The concordance between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.56% (κ=0.609). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 15.02% vs. 15.36%; 82.92% vs. 79.37%; and 2.04% vs. 5.25%. Discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus were 12.43%, suggesting that 103 patients were positive and another 79 were negative due exclusively to 1 of the 2 IGRAs.Conclusions: Greater concordance was found between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB than between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. However, we believe that the proportion of discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus is sufficiently important from a clinical point of view to justify the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA in this specific patient group. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Tuberculosis Latente/diagnóstico , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores InmunológicosRESUMEN
Introduction: The diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTI) by IGRA continues to generate debate. Experience in the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA tests is scant. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 versions of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) with those of T-SPOT.TB, and to analyse the effectiveness of a dual strategy (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) for the diagnosis of LTI in an immunosuppressed population.Methods: We conducted a prospective study (May 2015-June 2017) that included 2,999 immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics, in whom 2 simultaneous IGRA tests were performed: Group 1 (1535 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); Group 2 (1464 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Results: The concordance between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 83.19% (κ=0.532). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 14.33% vs. 17.06%; 82.41% vs. 74.46%; and 3.25% vs. 8.46%. The concordance between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.56% (κ=0.609). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 15.02% vs. 15.36%; 82.92% vs. 79.37%; and 2.04% vs. 5.25%. Discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus were 12.43%, suggesting that 103 patients were positive and another 79 were negative due exclusively to 1 of the 2 IGRAs.Conclusions: Greater concordance was found between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB than between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. However, we believe that the proportion of discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus is sufficiently important from a clinical point of view to justify the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA in this specific patient group. (AU)
Introducción: El diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa latente (ITL) mediante IGRA sigue generando debate. La experiencia empleando dos pruebas IGRA de manera simultánea es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados de dos versiones de QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) con los de T-SPOT.TB y analizar la eficacia de esta estrategia dual (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) para el diagnóstico de la ITL en población con alguna condición inmunosupresora.Métodos: Estudio prospectivo (mayo 2015-junio 2017) que incluye 2.999 pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas, a los que se les realizó de manera simultánea dos IGRA: grupo-1 (1.535 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); grupo-2 (1.464 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Resultados: La concordancia entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB fue del 83,19% (κ = 0,532). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 14,33 vs. 17,06%; 82,41 vs. 74,46%; y 3,25 vs. 8,46%. La concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB fue del 87,56% (κ=0,609). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 15,02 vs. 15,36%; 82,92 vs. 79,37%; y 2,04 vs. 5,25%. Las discordancias entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus fueron del 12,43%, que implicaban que había 103 pacientes positivos y otros 79 pacientes negativos a expensas exclusivamente de uno de los dos IGRA.Conclusiones: Se evidenció una mayor concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB que entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB. Sin embargo, creemos que la proporción de resultados discordantes entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus es lo suficientemente relevante clínicamente como para justificar el empleo simultáneo de dos IGRA en este grupo específico de pacientes. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Tuberculosis Latente/diagnóstico , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores InmunológicosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTI) by IGRA continues to generate debate. Experience in the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA tests is scant. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 versions of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) with those of T-SPOT.TB, and to analyse the effectiveness of a dual strategy (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) for the diagnosis of LTI in an immunosuppressed population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study (May 2015-June 2017) that included 2,999 immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics, in whom 2 simultaneous IGRA tests were performed: Group 1 (1535 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); Group 2 (1464 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus). RESULTS: The concordance between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 83.19% (κ=0.532). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 14.33% vs. 17.06%; 82.41% vs. 74.46%; and 3.25% vs. 8.46%. The concordance between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.56% (κ=0.609). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 15.02% vs. 15.36%; 82.92% vs. 79.37%; and 2.04% vs. 5.25%. Discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus were 12.43%, suggesting that 103 patients were positive and another 79 were negative due exclusively to 1 of the 2 IGRAs. CONCLUSIONS: Greater concordance was found between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB than between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. However, we believe that the proportion of discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus is sufficiently important from a clinical point of view to justify the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA in this specific patient group.