Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; 90(7): 1934-1936, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523121

RESUMEN

Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) is a rapid triage tool aiding the detection of life-threatening injuries. In academic settings, residents perform most eFAST; however, the ACGME has no recommendations for eFAST training standards. We surveyed general surgery programs (GSPs) regarding eFAST training and established a baseline for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for resident-performed eFAST. US GSP eFAST surveys were conducted by email and phone. We prospectively collected patient variables and evaluated resident performance from May to September 2022 and 2023 at an academic level I trauma center. A total of 60/339 general surgery residency programs (GSRPs) responded: Ten use Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) only, n = 7 group training, n = 8 on-the-job only, and n = 33 several methods. Resident-performed eFAST had accuracy = 85.6%, sensitivity = 35.6%, specificity = 97.2%, PPV = 75%, and NPV = 87%. General surgery residency program training in eFAST is non-standardized. Sensitivity was considerably lower than the literature suggests. Positive resident-performed eFAST is generally accurate. We recommend a standardized approach to resident training in eFAST.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Enfocada con Ecografía para Trauma , Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Cirugía General/educación , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Triaje
2.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 14: 1279-1284, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38028365

RESUMEN

Introduction: Soft-embalmed cadavers have been used in medical education with a variety of success in different curriculum objectives. In the United States, the ACL is the most commonly injured ligament. Yet, there has been little focus on the stability of the knee in the sagittal plane provided by the anterior cruciate ligament within the soft-embalmed cadaver model. If the soft-embalmed cadaver ligaments contain similar elastic properties as an in-vivo knees, this will offer yet another means for further advancements in medical education to detect and assess musculoskeletal injuries. Purpose: Evaluate how similarly the anterior tibial translation of soft-embalmed cadaver anterior cruciate ligaments compares to in-vivo tissue. Methods: The KT-1000 arthrometer was used to assess the laxity of the anterior cruciate ligament of thirteen soft-embalmed cadavers consisting of five females and eight males with a mean age of 79.3 years and duration of time since embalming ranging from 250 to 1156 days. Anterior displacement of the tibia in relation to the femur was registered at 67N and 89N. The soft-embalmed cadaver measurements were compared against twenty-one healthy uninjured individuals whose anterior tibial translation was measured using the same process. Data sets were analyzed using a welch two-sample t-test to determine the similarity between the means of the data sets. Results: The t-tests proved a significant difference between live and soft-embalmed cadaver knees. The anterior tibial translation in the set of healthy live knees directly compared to the soft-embalmed cadaver group for 67N depicts an average difference of 1.76mm. The same comparison at 89N depicts an average difference of 2.12mm. Conclusion: While soft-embalmed cadavers may not directly replicate ATT to an exact number to that of in vivo tissue, they still allow the perception of the tibial translation against a stationary femur. The difference is less than 2.5 mm in both data sets when compared to an in-vivo knee, equivalent to one-tenth of an inch. Suggesting the viability of soft-embalmed cadavers ATT and should not exclude their use in medical education.

3.
Am Surg ; 89(7): 3238-3240, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800399

RESUMEN

Blunt trauma patients are often evaluated with extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST). eFAST is a noninvasive, rapid, ultrasound-guided assessment for hemoperitoneum, pericardial effusion, and hemopneumothorax. Specificity and sensitivity are as high as 95% and 74%, respectively. Research suggests obesity confers increased morbidity and mortality and is an independent risk factor for trauma death. A previous study demonstrated that a BMI change from 36 to 40 changed the odds ratio for inaccurate eFAST from 1.85 to 3.12. Our current prospective data collection is 202 consecutive blunt trauma patients from 5/13/22 to 8/18/22 receiving an eFAST and a CT/OR for comparison. Odds ratio of inaccurate eFAST increased by 5.65% for each increase of 1 kg/m3 of BMI (95% Cl 0.1%-10.8%). This research also investigated surgical resident eFAST accuracy to improve patient outcomes through the implementation of individualized training in normal and obese models.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Enfocada con Ecografía para Trauma , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Obesidad/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA