RESUMEN
Objectives: To determine the risk of mortality and need for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: A longitudinal multicentre study including consecutive patients with severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] < 1.0 cm2) and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients were classified as: high-gradient (HG, mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg), normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG, mean gradient < 40 mmHg, indexed systolic volume (SVi) > 35 ml/m2) and LFLG (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, SVi ≤ 35 ml/m2). Results: Of 1,391 patients, 147 (10.5%) had LFLG, 752 (54.1%) HG, and 492 (35.4%) NFLG. Echocardiographic parameters of the LFLG group showed similar AVA to the HG group but with less severity in the dimensionless index, calcification, and hypertrophy. The HG group required AVR earlier than NFLG (p < 0.001) and LFLG (p < 0.001), with no differences between LFLG and NFLG groups (p = 0.358). Overall mortality was 27.7% (CI 95% 25.3-30.1) with no differences among groups (p = 0.319). The impact of AVR in terms of overall mortality reduction was observed the most in patients with HG (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.12-0.23; p < 0.001), followed by patients with LFLG (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.13-0.49; p < 0.001), and finally patients with NFLG (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.20-0.44; p < 0.001), with a risk reduction of 84, 75, and 71%, respectively. Conclusions: Paradoxical LFLG AS affects 10.5% of severe AS, and has a lower need for AVR than the HG group and similar to the NFLG group, with no differences in mortality. AVR had a lower impact on LFLG AS compared with HG AS. Therefore, the findings of the present study showed LFLG AS to have an intermediate clinical risk profile between the HG and NFHG groups.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The development of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis due to long-standing liver congestion is known to occur in adult patients with Fontan circulation. Hepatic elastography has shown to be a useful tool for the noninvasive assessment and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases, although the utility of this technique in Fontan patients remains to be adequately studied. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with Fontan circulation underwent an abdominal ultrasound and an acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography. In order to compare the results from this group, a cohort of 14 healthy controls and another group containing 17 patients with cirrhosis were included. The association between the velocity values measured with elastography and clinical and analytical parameters were also studied. RESULTS: Mean shear waves propagation velocity in liver tissue in the Fontan group was 1.86 ± 0.5 m/s, with 76% of patients over the cirrhosis threshold (1.55 m/s). The control group had a mean velocity of 1.09 ± 0.06 m/s, while the cirrhotic group obtained 2.71 ± 0.51 m/s. Seven patients with Fontan circulation had increased liver enzymes. Liver ultrasound showed evidence of chronic liver disease in six patients. Velocity values obtained in the presence or absence of analytical or liver ultrasound abnormalities showed significant differences in the univariate analysis (P = .04 and P = .03 respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, ARFI elastography showed increased wave propagation velocity values in the Fontan population suggesting increased liver stiffness which could be related to advanced fibrosis. A statistically significant association between ARFI values and the presence of analytical and ultrasound abnormalities has been demonstrated.
