Dabrafenib; preclinical characterization, increased efficacy when combined with trametinib, while BRAF/MEK tool combination reduced skin lesions.

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway activation has been implicated in many types of human cancer. BRAF mutations that constitutively activate MAPK signalling and bypass the need for upstream stimuli occur with high prevalence in melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. In this report we characterize the novel, potent, and selective BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib (GSK2118436). Cellular inhibition of BRAF(V600E) kinase activity by dabrafenib resulted in decreased MEK and ERK phosphorylation and inhibition of cell proliferation through an initial G1 cell cycle arrest, followed by cell death. In a BRAF(V600E)-containing xenograft model of human melanoma, orally administered dabrafenib inhibited ERK activation, downregulated Ki67, and upregulated p27, leading to tumor growth inhibition. However, as reported for other BRAF inhibitors, dabrafenib also induced MAPK pathway activation in wild-type BRAF cells through CRAF (RAF1) signalling, potentially explaining the squamous cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas arising in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. In addressing this issue, we showed that concomitant administration of BRAF and MEK inhibitors abrogated paradoxical BRAF inhibitor-induced MAPK signalling in cells, reduced the occurrence of skin lesions in rats, and enhanced the inhibition of human tumor xenograft growth in mouse models. Taken together, our findings offer preclinical proof of concept for dabrafenib as a specific and highly efficacious BRAF inhibitor and provide evidence for its potential clinical benefits when used in combination with a MEK inhibitor.

Discovery of Dabrafenib: A Selective Inhibitor of Raf Kinases with Antitumor Activity against B-Raf-Driven Tumors.

Hyperactive signaling of the MAP kinase pathway resulting from the constitutively active B-Raf(V600E) mutated enzyme has been observed in a number of human tumors, including melanomas. Herein we report the discovery and biological evaluation of GSK2118436, a selective inhibitor of Raf kinases with potent in vitro activity in oncogenic B-Raf-driven melanoma and colorectal carcinoma cells and robust in vivo antitumor and pharmacodynamic activity in mouse models of B-Raf(V600E) human melanoma. GSK2118436 was identified as a development candidate, and early clinical results have shown significant activity in patients with B-Raf mutant melanoma.

Development of potent B-RafV600E inhibitors containing an arylsulfonamide headgroup.

A potent series of inhibitors against the B-Raf(V600E) kinase have been developed that show excellent activity in cellular assays and good oral bioavailability in rats. The key structural features of the series are an arylsulfonamide headgroup, a thiazole core, and a fluorine ortho to the sulfonamide nitrogen.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1-aryl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases.

Using a high-throughput screening strategy, a series of 1-aryl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-ones was identified that inhibit the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/cyclin D1 complex-mediated phosphorylation of a protein substrate with IC(50)s in the low micromolar range. On the basis of preliminary structure-activity relationships (SAR), a model was proposed in which these inhibitors occupy the ATP-binding site of the enzyme, forming critical hydrogen bonds to the same residue (Val96) to which the amino group in ATP is presumed to bind. X-ray diffraction studies on a later derivative bound to CDK2 support this binding mode. Iterative cycles of synthesis and screening lead to a novel series of potent, CDK2-selective 6-(arylmethyl)pyrazolopyrimidinones. Placement of a hydrogen-bond donor in the meta-position on the 6-arylmethyl group resulted in approximately 100-fold increases in CDK4 affinity, giving ligands that were equipotent inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK2. These compounds exhibit antiproliferative effects in the NCI HCT116 and other cell lines. The potency of these antiproliferative effects is enhanced in anilide derivatives and translates into tumor growth inhibition in a mouse xenograft model.

Putative identification of functional interactions between DNA intercalating agents and topoisomerase II using the V79 in vitro micronucleus assay.

Clastogenicity is frequently observed following treatment of mammalian cells with new chemical entities. This clastogenicity, unless proven otherwise, is assumed to result from the imperfect repair of DNA lesions produced from covalent chemical/DNA interaction. However, clastogenicity can also arise via other mechanisms such as non-covalent chemical intercalation into DNA resulting in poisoning of cellular DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) and stabilization of DNA double strand breaks. We have recently reported modifications to the V79 in vitro micronucleus assay which allow an indirect evaluation of both the intercalative and topoisomerase-interactive activities of chemical agents. In the present studies we have used these modified assays to further assess the validity of this approach in an evaluation of a number of intercalating and non-intercalating polycyclic compounds. It is shown that intercalating agents may be catalytic topo II inhibitors (e.g. chloroquine (CHL), tacrine (TAC), 9-aminoacridine (9AA), ethidium bromide (EB)) or topo II poisons (e.g. proflavine (PROF), auramine O (AUR) and curcumin (CURC)). Still other intercalators are shown to lack detectable topo II-interactions, (e.g. imipramine (IMP), quinacrine (QUIN), 2-aminoanthracene (AA), iminostilbene (IMN) and promethazine (PHE)). It is concluded that (1) the clastogenicity of three agents, PROF (a typical DNA intercalating agent), and AUR and CURC (both structurally atypical intercalating agents, with unknown clastogenic mechanisms), may be due to topo II poisoning; (2) other intercalating agents may either act as catalytic topo II inhibitors or exhibit no functional topo II interaction; (3) The use of these cell-based approaches may provide a logical first step in determining if unexpected clastogenicity associated with test article exposure is due to a topo II interaction.