Comparison of different behaviour management techniques while administering injectable la with minimum pain perception and anxiety in children.

Background: Dental anxiety is a frequent reason for reluctance in young children, leading to challenges in delivering effective dental treatment due to their uncooperative behavior. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different behaviour management techniques while administrating injectable LA with minimum pain perception and anxiety in children. Material and Methods: One hundred and twenty children, aged 4 to 10 years, were equally and randomly assigned to four groups. In Group I, local anesthesia was administered while using wireless headphones. For Group II, local anesthesia was administered using a mobile phone with earpieces. Group III received local anesthesia while incorporating the 3D virtual reality eyewear method and Group IV received local anesthesia while utilizing the stress ball technique. Pain and anxiety assessments were conducted using various scales and Physiological parameters such as pulse rate and oxygen saturation levels were recorded and the resultant data were systematically tabulated for subsequent statistical analysis. Results: Virtual reality group showed highly significant result in terms of lowering anxiety and pain scores compared to audio, audio visual, stress ball groups (p<0.001). Virtual group (5.10) also displays significantly highest behavior scores than the audio (1.70), audio visual group (3.96) and Stress Ball groups (2.66). Conclusions: The virtual reality group emerged as the most effective method in alleviating anxiety and pain experienced by pediatric dental patients. Key words:Pain management, Anxiety, Distraction, Virtual reality device, Stress ball, Audiovisual, Audio.

An experimental setup and segmentation method for CFU counting on agar plate for the assessment of drinking water.

Quantification of bacterial colonies on an agar plate is a daily routine for a microbiologist to determine the number of viable microorganisms in the sample. In general, microbiologists perform a visual assessment of bacterial colonies which is time-consuming (takes 2 min per plate), tedious, and subjective. Some automatic counting algorithms are developed that save labour and time, but their results are affected by the non-illumination on an agar plate. To improve this, the present manuscript aims to develop an inexpensive and efficient device to acquire S.aureus images via an automatic counting method using image processing techniques under real laboratory conditions. The proposed method (P_ColonyCount) includes the region of interest extraction and color space transformation followed by filtering, thresholding, morphological operation, distance transform, and watershed technique for the quantification of isolated and overlapping colonies. The present work also shows a comparative study on grayscale, K, and green channels by applying different filter and thresholding techniques on 42 images. The results of all channels were compared with the score provided by the expert (manual count). Out of all the proposed method (P_ColonyCount), the K channel gives the best outcome in comparison with the other two channels (grayscale and green) in terms of precision, recall, and F-measure which are 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99 (2 h), 0.98, 0.99, and 0.98 (4 h), and 0.98, 0.98, 0.98 (6 h) respectively. The execution time of the manual and the proposed method (P_ColonyCount) for 42 images ranges from 19 to 113 s and 15 to 31 s respectively. Apart from this, a user-friendly graphical user interface is also developed for the convenient enumeration of colonies without any expert knowledge/training. The developed imaging device will be useful for researchers and teaching lab settings.

Utilization outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants in Medicare patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the adherence, persistence, discontinuation and switching rates of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for Medicare patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: This was retrospective observational cohort study design. Medicare Part D claims files were used for the study duration (2015-2018). Inclusion-exclusion criteria were applied to identify the NVAF and VTE sample using dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and warfarin during the identification period (2016-2017). Outcomes of adherence, persistence, time to non-persistence and time to discontinuation were assessed in those who did not switch the index drug in the follow-up period (365 days from the index date). Switching rates were assessed in those who switched the index drug at least once in the aforementioned follow-up period. Descriptive statistics were conducted for all the outcomes, and comparisons were made using t-tests, chi-square, and ANOVA. Logistic regression was conducted to compare the odds of being adherent and the odds of switching in NVAF and VTE patient cohorts. RESULTS: Of all the DOACs, patients with NVAF or VTE were most adherent to apixaban (PDC = 76.88). Among all the DOACs, non-persistence and discontinuation rates were highest for warfarin. Majority of the switches were reported from dabigatran to other DOAC and to apixaban from other DOAC. Despite the better utilization outcomes reported for apixaban users, Medicare plans covered rivaroxaban favorably. It was associated with the lowest mean amount paid by the patient (NVAF: $76; VTE: $59), and the highest mean amount paid by the plans (NVAF: $359; VTE: $326). CONCLUSION: Medicare plans need to consider adherence, persistence, discontinuation and switching rates of DOACs to make the coverage decisions.

Impact of comparative effectiveness research on Medicare coverage of direct oral anticoagulants.

Aim: To evaluate the association of comparative effectiveness research with Medicare coverage of direct oral anticoagulants. Materials & methods: A literature review for direct oral anticoagulants was conducted from 2011 to 2017. Monthly prescription drug plan and formulary files (n = 28) were used to conduct change-point analysis and assess each outcome variable. Results: Up to 2013, studies showed that dabigatran was more effective than rivaroxaban. In 2015, apixaban was shown to be the safest and most effective drug in comparison with all direct oral anticoagulants. In 2016-2017, dabigatran and apixaban were shown to have similar efficacy. Approximately 75% of plans covered dabigatran under tier 3 until 2015. From 2011 to 2017, less than 30% of plans required prior authorizations, 50% imposed quantity limits and mean copayment was lowest for rivaroxaban. Conclusion: Consistent with comparative effectiveness research, Medicare plans covered apixaban more favorably and edoxaban less favorably. However, discrepancies in comparative effectiveness research translation were found for rivaroxaban and dabigatran.

Preidentification of high-risk pregnancies to improve triaging at the time of admission and management of complications in labour room: a quality improvement initiative.

Complications can occur anytime during pregnancy and childbirth. Pregnancies associated with high-risk factors have a higher-than-normal risk for fetomaternal complications. Bhagwan Mahavir hospital is a public sector hospital catering to low-risk and high-risk pregnant women (PW) in the labour room (LR)). The obstetrics and gynaecology team observed that at times the LR team failed to identify high-risk pregnancy (HRP) during admission in LR and to manage complications timely and efficiently. Therefore, the team started a quality improvement (QI) project in January 2019 with the aim to admit preidentified HRP in LR from existing 0% to 80% in 3 months.The QI team followed the point-of-care quality improvement methodology to conduct this improvement process. They identified HRP in the outpatient department (OPD) during their antenatal care (ANC) visits, mentioned an HRP number on their ANC cards, and did risk stratification with yellow and red stickers into moderate and severe HRP respectively. Preidentified HRP were attended, admitted and managed on priority in the LR. The team achieved its aim in the ninth week of the QI initiative and sustaining to date. The team also measured and analysed the type of HRP identified in OPD, complications occurring around the process of childbirth in LR, maternal near-miss, maternal death and PW referred out from LR. They observed a 6.5%-point reduction (68.93%) in the median complication rate of major life-threatening complications following this improvement process.This new intervention facilitated the team in early initiation of management of HRP in OPD, their triaging in LR, preparedness towards managing complications, involvement of support staff, PW and their relatives in the patient care, and redistribution of human resources according to priority area. The lessons learnt are generalisable and can be used in other facilities with similar settings.

A Cost-Effectiveness Study Comparing Ready-to-Administer and Traditional Vial-and-Syringe Method for Opioids.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model for manufacturer-prepared prefilled ready-to-administer (RTA) syringe products versus the traditional vial-and-syringe administration of intravenous (IV) opioids. METHODS: Cost parameters included cost of manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product, traditional vial and syringe, drug preparation, drug administration, drug waste, and severity of error. Effectiveness endpoint included number of preparation and administration errors in each comparator arm. Simple decision tree was used, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the reduction in the incremental errors per observation with RTA compared with traditional vial-and-syringe method. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to test the robustness of the model. TreeAge Pro software was used to create and analyze the decision model. All the cost parameters were converted to USD 2021. RESULTS: Base-case analysis showed that the cost of the RTA arm was lower by $182.61 and the number of errors in the RTA arm was lower by 94%, compared with the traditional vial-and-syringe arm. The manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product was found to be cost-effective with an incremental savings of $22,554 per additional error avoided. Sensitivity analysis showed that ICER value was most sensitive to the probability of errors; however, the results were robust in showing that RTA is the preferred cost-effective option, when both the costs and effectiveness parameters were varied substantially. CONCLUSION: This economic evaluation  analyzed costs of using manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product IV opioids and incremental benefits in terms of reduced errors, adverse events, and their associated costs. Manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product was found to be cost-effective, demonstrating cost savings by reduction in the error rates. Integrating and adopting RTA syringe products within a health system could play an important role in improving care, building efficiency, increasing patient safety, and saving money.

Antibiotic prescribing trends in the US during the first 11 months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The study aims to compare antibiotic prescribing trends for U.S. COVID-19 patients, categorized by disease severity, and non-COVID-19 population with similar symptoms during 2019-2020 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort design using Symphony Health (January-November 2020). Sample population included about 13.3 million patients with at least one prescription claim ±6 months from date of diagnosis of COVID-19 or COVID-19 like symptom. Cohorts were categorized based on diagnosis codes; COVID-19 positive cohorts 1 to 3 with severe, mild, and no symptoms, respectively and non-COVID-19 cohorts 4 and 5 with severe and mild symptoms, respectively. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic characteristics and acute antibiotic utilization (≤7 days) including total number of antibiotics, weekly rate of prescribing, and proportion of fills in three "appropriateness" categories (always appropriate, potentially appropriate, never appropriate). RESULTS: Three cohorts with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis code constituted a total of about 1.8 million patients (13.53%). About 22.79% of COVID-19 positive groups had severe symptoms, 24.43% had moderate symptoms and the majority, 52.78%, had no symptoms. In the analytical sample of 13 million, about 4.2 million antibiotic prescriptions were prescribed to 2.5 million patients (19%) within 7 days of the first diagnosis of either COVID-19 or COVID-19-like symptoms. Within the COVID-19 positive cohorts, about 11% received an antibiotic prescription, while the non-COVID-19 cohorts, about 19.70% received an antibiotic. Among patients with antibiotic prescriptions, about 37.01% were prescribed an antibiotic "appropriately", 39.46% were prescribed a "potentially appropriate" antibiotic and about 22.64% received an "inappropriate" antibiotic. Among patients prescribed antibiotics, azithromycin was the most common, ranging from 21.80 to 44.80% for each cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall proportion of COVID-19 patients receiving antibiotics was much lower than non-COVID-19 patients, the findings suggest use of antibiotics persisted despite guidelines against widespread use, particularly for patients with moderate and mild COVID-19 symptoms.

Impact of telehealth on health care resource utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim: To assess healthcare utilization (HCRU) among patients with incident telehealth visit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials & methods: Retrospective pre-post analyses was conducted using HealthJump data. Adults continuously enrolled with an incident telehealth visit between Feb and April 2020 were identified. Demographics, clinical characteristics, proportion of patients with ≥1 HCRU visits and post-index trends in HCRU were analyzed. Results: Sample constituted 2799 patients, 60.34% female and 46.23% white with mean age 59.70. Significant increase in patients with outpatient visits (5.36%, p < 0.005; only established), non-face-to-face visits (99.50%, p < 0.005) and prescription use (12.86%, p < 0.005) was reported. Conclusion: Among patients utilizing telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic, HCRU changed significantly. Better deployment policies and adoption techniques of telehealth could potentially act as a strong tool to revolutionize the healthcare delivery, with or without the pandemic.

A Continuous Observation Workflow Time Study to Assess Intravenous Push Waste.

Background: There are significant costs associated with proper controlled substance disposal, management, and regulatory compliance. Given the high abuse potential of fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine it is imperative that (1) product waste is minimized; and (2) waste procedures are followed to ensure safe disposal. Research is needed to better understand the financial and workforce impacts of drug waste on inpatient hospital units. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the waste associated with administering fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine via the intravenous push route. Two categories of waste were evaluated: (1) the quantity (mg/µg) of drug disposed; and (2) workforce time associated with the waste disposal process. Methods: A workflow time study design, a sub-set of continuous direct observation time motion studies, was employed to achieve the research objectives. A data collection tool was developed to capture medication type, waste amount, activity time stamps, total time, and number of interruptions at two separate study sites. Descriptive statistics were conducted on all the data measures. The number of assessments, total values, and mean values were reported for each drug (fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine) separately as well as grouped data. Results: A total of 669 distinct waste observations meeting inclusion criteria were collected during a study period of 15 days. In total, 207 mg of hydromorphone and 17 962.50 µg of fentanyl were wasted during this study. Nursing staff time associated with the wasting process totaled 50 990 seconds (849.83 minutes or 14.16 hours). A combined waste (loss) of approximately $1605.39 was associated with controlled substance wasting. The cost per dose wasted in this study was found to be $2.40 for all medications. When a yearly extrapolation model was applied to the four study units, the total combined product and workforce waste cost was $35 425. Conclusion: There are financially significant costs associated with wasting both the product and the valuable time of a skilled workforce. Optimizing product size, taking special note to match product availability with common practice use, would reduce the associated financial burden on our health-systems nationwide.

Association between marijuana use and nonmedical prescription opioid use in the United States: are we shifting from one epidemic to another?

The United States (US) is grappling with a severe opioid epidemic. Marijuana is emerging as a therapy for pain management and an alternative to opioids, but little evidence supports its long-term benefits. This study aims to examine the association of marijuana use among patients on prescription pain relievers in a retrospective cross-sectional study using zero-inflated negative binomial regression. The recipients of prescription pain medicines were identified using National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015-2017). Irrespective of the state marijuana laws, marijuana use days were 34% higher and odds of having zero days of marijuana use were 73% lower in those using nonmedical prescription opioids vs. not (IRR = 1.34, p < 0.0001; OR = 0.27, p < 0.0001, respectively). In the absence of consequential evidence supporting marijuana for pain management and more states venturing into legalizing it, there needs to be more caution as the country struggles to recover from one epidemic.