RESUMEN
Importance: Single-arm trials have allowed for transformative therapies to be made available to patients expeditiously. However, using single-arm trials to support drug approval presents several challenges that must be carefully considered. Observations: Between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration granted 176 new malignant hematology and oncology indications based on single-arm trials, including 116 accelerated approvals (AAs) and 60 traditional approvals. Overall, 87 approvals (49%) were for new molecular entities or original biologics and 89 (51%) were supplemental indications. Response rate (RR) was the most common end point used to support approval in these single-arm trials (173 of 176 [98%]). Of the 116 AAs based on single-arm trials, 45 (38%) fulfilled their postmarketing requirement to verify clinical benefit, 61 (52%) are pending verification of benefit, and 10 (9%) were withdrawn from the market as of December 31, 2021. Most (56 of 61 [92%]) AAs based on single-arm trials pending verification of benefit occurred during the previous 5 years and have ongoing confirmatory trials as of December 2021. Conclusions and Relevance: Single-arm trials have been a common development strategy to support regulatory approval as early-stage expansion cohorts with promising durable RRs have become more prevalent. In the appropriate context, single-arm trials using durable RRs can allow patients expedited access to novel therapies and will continue to serve a role in advancing drug development in oncology. However, single-arm trials have a smaller noncomparative safety data set, inability to use time-to-event end points, and other limitations that require careful consideration within the context of the disease and available therapies. The randomized clinical trial remains the preferred approach in clinical investigation.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Productos Biológicos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Aprobación de Drogas , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Oncología Médica , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiation therapy (RT) are widely used to treat various cancers, but little data are available to guide clinicians on ICI use sequentially with RT. Objective: To assess whether there is an increased risk of serious adverse events (AEs) associated with RT given within 90 days prior to an ICI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual patient data were pooled from 68 prospective trials of ICIs submitted in initial or supplemental licensing applications in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases through December 2019. Two cohorts were generated: (1) patients who received RT within the 90 days prior to beginning ICI therapy and (2) those who did not receive RT within the 90 days prior to beginning ICI therapy, and AE frequencies were determined. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed. Interventions: All patients received an ICI (atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab); 1733 received RT within the 90 days prior to starting ICI therapy, and 13â¯956 did not. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was frequency and severity of AEs. Incidence of AEs was compared descriptively between participants who did vs did not receive RT in the propensity score-matched set. Because all analyses are exploratory (ie, not preplanned and no alpha allocated), assessment for statistical significance of the differences between groups was not considered appropriate. Results: A total of 25â¯469 patients were identified; 8634 were excluded because they lacked comparators who had received RT (n = 976), did not receive an ICI (n = 4949), received RT outside of the target window (n = 2338), or had missing data in 1 or more variables used in the propensity analysis (n = 371), leaving 16â¯835 patients included in the analysis. The majority were younger than 65 years (9447 [56.1%]), male (10â¯459 [62.1%]), and White (13â¯422 [79.7%]). Patients receiving RT had generally similar rates of AEs overall to those patients who did not receive RT. The average absolute difference in rates across the AEs was 1.2%, and the difference ranged from 0% for neurologic AEs to 8% for fatigue. No difference in grade 3 to 4 AEs was observed between the 2 groups (absolute difference ranged from 0.01% to 2%). These findings persisted after propensity score matching. Conclusions and Relevance: In this pooled analysis, administration of an ICI within 90 days following RT did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of serious AEs. Thus, it would appear to be safe to administer an ICI within 90 days of receiving RT. These findings should be confirmed in future prospective trials.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Over the last decade, there has been tremendous progress in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancers with a changing therapy landscape. This summary provides an overview of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for gynecologic cancers from 2010 to 2020, totaling 17 new indications. For each of the approved indications, endpoints, trial design, results, and regulatory considerations are outlined. Among these 17 indications, six received accelerated approval (AA) and 11 received regular approval (RA). As of September 2021, of the six AA, three have subsequently demonstrated clinical benefit resulting in conversion to RA and the remaining three have ongoing clinical trials that have not yet reported results. Approval decisions for these 17 indications were supported by primary efficacy endpoints of progression-free survival (n = 10), objective response rate (n = 6), and overall survival (n = 1) and showed a favorable benefit-risk profile. Among the 17 indications, 15 received priority review and three applications participated in one or more novel Oncology Center of Excellence initiatives, including Real Time Oncology Review, Assessment Aid, and Project Orbis. Current FDA thinking on drug development opportunities and regulatory initiatives currently under way will be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Over the last decade, the treatment of patients with breast cancer has been greatly impacted by the approval of multiple drugs and indications. This summary describes 30 FDA approvals of treatments for breast cancer from 2010 to 2020. The trial design endpoints, results, and regulatory considerations are described for each approved indication. Of the 30 indications, 23 (76.6%) received regular and 7 (23.3%) received accelerated approval. Twenty-six approvals were granted in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and four in early breast cancer. Approval decisions for the 26 MBC indications were initially supported by progression-free survival (PFS) in 21 (80.8%), overall survival (OS) or a combination of OS and PFS in two (7.7%), and objective response rate (ORR) in three (11.5%). The four approvals in early breast cancer utilized pathologic complete response (pCR) in one (25%) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in three (75%) trials. Among the 30 indications, 22 received priority review, seven were granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation, and 10 applications participated in one or more pilot Oncology Center of Excellence regulatory review initiatives, including Real Time Oncology Review, Assessment Aid, and Project Orbis. FDA initiatives to advance breast cancer drug development are also described.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Aprobación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Oncología Médica , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, improving outcomes in patients with advanced malignancies. The use of ICIs in clinical practice, and the number of ICI clinical trials, are rapidly increasing. The use of ICIs in combination with other forms of cancer therapy, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy, is also expanding. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can be serious in up to a third of patients. Critical questions remain surrounding the characteristics and outcomes of irAEs, and how they may affect the overall risk-benefit relationship for combination therapies. This article proposes a framework for irAE classification and reporting, and identifies limitations in the capture and sharing of data on irAEs from current clinical trial and real-world data. We outline key gaps and suggestions for clinicians, clinical investigators, drug sponsors, patients, and other stakeholders to make these critical data more available to researchers for pooled analysis, to advance contemporary understanding of irAEs, and ultimately improve the efficacy of ICIs.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
On December 19, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval to olaparib monotherapy for first-line maintenance treatment of BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer and, on May 8, 2020, expanded the indication of olaparib to include its use in combination with bevacizumab for first-line maintenance treatment of homologous recombination deficient (HRD)-positive advanced ovarian cancer. Both these approvals were based on randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Approval for olaparib monotherapy was based on the SOLO-1 trial, comparing the efficacy of olaparib versus placebo in patients with BRCAm advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer after surgical cytoreduction and first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Two companion diagnostic (CDx) tests were approved with this indication: BRACAnalysis CDx, for germline BRCA1/2 alterations, and FoundationOne CDx, for BRCA1/2 alterations in tissue specimens. Approval for olaparib in combination with bevacizumab was based on the results of the PAOLA-1 trial that compared olaparib with bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Myriad myChoice CDx was designated as a companion diagnostic device for use of olaparib plus bevacizumab combination for ovarian cancer associated with HRD-positive status. Both trials demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival and favorable benefit-risk profiles for the indicated populations. This article summarizes the FDA thought process and data supporting the approval of olaparib as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for maintenance therapy in this setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These approvals represent the first poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, alone or in combination with bevacizumab, approved in first-line maintenance treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy. In patients with BRCA-mutated tumors, olaparib monotherapy demonstrated a 70% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with placebo, and olaparib in combination with bevacizumab demonstrated a 67% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with bevacizumab alone in homologous recombination deficient-positive tumors. These approvals represent a major advance for the treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer who are in complete or partial response after their initial platinum-based chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Ftalazinas , Bevacizumab , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Piperazinas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to rucaparib in May 2020 for the treatment of adult patients with deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic)-associated metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have been treated with androgen receptor-directed therapy and a taxane. This approval was based on data from the ongoing multicenter, open-label single-arm trial TRITON2. The primary endpoint, confirmed objective response rate, in the 62 patients who met the above criteria, was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31%-57%). The median duration of response was not estimable (95% CI: 6.4 to not estimable). Fifty-six percent of patients had a response duration of >6 months and 15% >12 months. The safety profile of rucaparib was generally consistent with that of the class of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitors and other trials of rucaparib in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Deaths due to adverse events (AEs) occurred in 1.7% of patients, and 8% discontinued rucaparib because of an AE. Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 59% of patients. No patients with prostate cancer developed myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. The trial TRITON3 in patients with mCRPC is ongoing and is planned to verify the clinical benefit of rucaparib in mCRPC. This article summarizes the FDA thought process and data supporting this accelerated approval. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The accelerated approval of rucaparib for the treatment of adult patients with deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic)-associated metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer who have been treated with androgen receptor-directed therapy and a taxane represents the first approved therapy for this selected patient population. This approval was based on a single-arm trial demonstrating a confirmed objective response rate greater than that of available therapy with a favorable duration of response and an acceptable toxicity profile. The ongoing trial TRITON3 is verifying the clinical benefit of this drug.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
On September 17, 2019, FDA granted accelerated approval to pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for the treatment of patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma that is not microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and who have disease progression following prior systemic therapy but are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation. The submission and review of this application was conducted through an FDA Oncology Center of Excellence initiative named Project Orbis whereby the FDA, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and Health Canada were able to simultaneously review and collaborate, rendering simultaneous approval decisions in all countries. Accelerated approval of the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination was based on a single-arm trial of 94 patients, with previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer whose tumors were not MSI-H/dMMR. Efficacy was demonstrated on the basis of an objective response rate of 38.3% (95% confidence interval, 28.5%-48.9%) with 10 complete responses (10.6%) accompanied by supportive durations of response. Trials to confirm clinical benefit of this combination are ongoing. Here, we summarize the benefit-risk analysis supporting accelerated approval of the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination and describe the methodology for the first Project Orbis review.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Aprobación de Drogas , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) typically exhibit hyperdynamic cardiovascular hemodynamics, which may lead to increased medication clearance. The aims of this study were to evaluate the actual creatinine clearance (CrClA) in an aneurysmal SAH population and the effect of the development of cerebral vasospasm (CV) along with its treatment to better understand if this population exhibits augmented renal clearance (ARC). METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center study in a neurosciences ICU at a university hospital. A total of 20 patients were consented and provided a 24-h urine sample to measure the CrClA. If patients experienced CV, a 24-h urine collection was repeated during vasospasm treatment. CrClA was measured using a modified Jaffe assay. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients enrolled, the mean SAH CrClA was 325.93 ± 135.20 ml/min 1.73 m(2) and this differed significantly from the SAH estimated creatinine clearance (CrClE) 144.93 ± 42.82 ml/min 1.73 m(2) (p < 0.001). Four patients developed CV; the mean CV CrClA was 558.43 ± 356.12 ml/min 1.73 m(2) and there was no significant difference when compared to those patients' mean SAH CrClA (246.91 ± 84.14 ml/min 1.73 m(2), p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: ARC was present in 100 % of the patients with recent SAH enrolled. Although ARC remained present in the patients who experienced CV, their creatinine clearance was not significantly further augmented. Further work is needed to clarify the impact of such clearances on renally excreted medications and how the development and treatment of CV further augment these findings.
Asunto(s)
Creatinina/orina , Eliminación Renal/fisiología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/orina , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/orina , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosAsunto(s)
Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Cardiopatías/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Tiempo , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increased creatinine clearance and subsequent elevated antimicrobial clearance is evident in many traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients due to augmented renal clearance (ARC). Little is known about the effects of ARC on other renally-eliminated medications, such as the anti-epileptic drug levetiracetam. METHODS: This is a case report of serum monitoring of vancomycin and levetiracetam in a 22 year old female with ARC after severe TBI. RESULTS: The patient exhibited ARC of vancomycin as evidenced by her low serum concentrations with standard vancomycin dosing. Her estimated creatinine clearance based on vancomycin clearance was 243.9 ml/min. Serum concentrations also suggested ARC of levetiracetam. No toxicities for either medication were noted, even after dose adjustment to account for possible ARC. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin and levetiracetam both appear to be subject to ARC after TBI. Clinicians should be mindful that standard dosing of these agents may not achieve typical target concentrations in this clinical scenario.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/sangre , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/fisiología , Levetiracetam , Piracetam/sangre , Piracetam/farmacocinética , Piracetam/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/etiología , Convulsiones/prevención & control , Orina , Vancomicina/sangre , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Rab monomeric GTPases regulate specific aspects of vesicle transport in eukaryotes including coat recruitment, uncoating, fission, motility, target selection and fusion. Moreover, individual Rab proteins function at specific sites within the cell, for example the ER, golgi and early endosome. Importantly, the localization and function of individual Rab subfamily members are often conserved underscoring the significant contributions that model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans can make towards a better understanding of human disease caused by Rab and vesicle trafficking malfunction. With this in mind, a bioinformatics approach was first taken to identify and classify the complete C. elegans Rab family placing individual Rabs into specific subfamilies based on molecular phylogenetics. For genes that were difficult to classify by sequence similarity alone, we did a comparative analysis of intron position among specific subfamilies from yeast to humans. This two-pronged approach allowed the classification of 30 out of 31 C. elegans Rab proteins identified here including Rab31/Rab50, a likely member of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). Second, a molecular toolset was created to facilitate research on biological processes that involve Rab proteins. Specifically, we used Gateway-compatible C. elegans ORFeome clones as starting material to create 44 full-length, sequence-verified, dominant-negative (DN) and constitutive active (CA) rab open reading frames (ORFs). Development of this toolset provided independent research projects for students enrolled in a research-based molecular techniques course at California State University, East Bay (CSUEB).
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/clasificación , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolismo , Caenorhabditis elegans/enzimología , Biología Computacional/métodos , Familia de Multigenes , Proteínas de Unión al GTP rab/clasificación , Proteínas de Unión al GTP rab/metabolismo , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/química , Células Clonales , Secuencia Conservada/genética , Humanos , Intrones/genética , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Sistemas de Lectura Abierta/genética , Filogenia , Empalme del ARN/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Alineación de Secuencia , Proteínas de Unión al GTP rab/químicaRESUMEN
The physicochemical stability of protein therapeutics is of significant pharmaceutical interest. Immunoglobulin gamma (IgG) hinge region fragmentation has recently garnered attention as an important degradation route of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. In this work, the rates and relative amount of fragment species are compared for five different IgGs (IgG1-5) with widely varying solution properties. Native size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based SEC, and capillary electrophoresis-SDS were used to characterize IgG1 fragmentation after storage at 30°C, 40°C, and 50°C. Two-dimensional correlation analysis of the chromatograms as a function of time was used to illustrate the relative rates of cleavage. Interestingly, the relative rate of Fab cleavage was greater than that of other species. An average apparent energy of activation for IgG1 fragmentation was also measured for all five molecules. This work suggests that IgG1 fragmentation is primarily hinge sequence dependent and other IgG1 molecules should behave similarly within the limits of the solution conditions used.