A National Simulation-Based Study of Pediatric Critical Care Transport Teams Performance.

OBJECTIVES: To assess pediatric critical care transport (CCT) teams' performance in a simulated environment and to explore the impact of team and center characteristics on performance. STUDY DESIGN: This observational, multicenter, simulation-based study enlisted a national cohort of pediatric transport centers. Teams participated in 3 scenarios: nonaccidental abusive head injury, sepsis, and cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was teams' simulation performance score. Secondary outcomes were associations between performance, center and team characteristics. RESULTS: We recruited 78 transport teams with 196 members from 12 CCT centers. Scores on performance measures that were developed were 89% (IQR 78-100) for nonaccidental abusive head injury, 63.3% (IQR 45.5-81.8) for sepsis, and 86.6% (IQR 66.6-93.3) for cardiac arrest. In multivariable analysis, overall performance was higher for teams including a respiratory therapist (0.5 points [95% CI: 0.13, 0.86]) or paramedic (0.49 points [95% CI: 0.1, 0.88]) and dedicated pediatric teams (0.37 points [95% 0.06, 0.68]). Each year increase in program age was associated with an increase of 0.04 points (95% CI: 0.02, 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated pediatric teams, inclusion of respiratory therapists and paramedics, and center age were associated with higher simulation scores for pediatric CCT teams. These insights can guide efforts to enhance the quality of care for children during interfacility transports.

Improving Pediatric Readiness in General Emergency Departments: A Prospective Interventional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of a national interventional collaborative on pediatric readiness within general emergency departments (EDs). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, interventional study measured pediatric readiness in general EDs before and after participation in a pediatric readiness improvement intervention. Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) on a 100-point scale. The study protocol extended over 6 months and involved 3 phases: (1) a baseline on-site assessment of pediatric readiness and simulated quality of care; (2) pediatric readiness interventions; and (3) a follow-up on-site assessment of WPRS. The intervention phase included a benchmarking performance report, resources toolkits, and ongoing interactions between general EDs and academic medical centers. RESULTS: Thirty-six general EDs were enrolled, and 34 (94%) completed the study. Four EDs (11%) were located in Canada, and the rest were in the US. The mean improvement in WPRS was 16.3 (P < .001) from a baseline of 62.4 (SEM = 2.2) to 78.7 (SEM = 2.1), with significant improvement in the domains of administration/coordination of care; policies, protocol, and procedures; and quality improvement. Six EDs (17%) were fully adherent to the protocol timeline. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a collaborative intervention model including simulation and quality improvement initiatives is associated with improvement in WPRS when disseminated to a diverse group of general EDs partnering with their regional pediatric academic medical centers. This work provides evidence that innovative collaboration facilitated by academic medical centers can serve as an effective strategy to improve pediatric readiness and processes of care.