Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 323, 2024 May 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761310

OBJECTIVES: White spot lesions are the most common iatrogenic effect observed during orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to compare the surface characteristics and antibacterial action of uncoated and coated orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty commercially available stainless steel brackets were coated with TiO2 nanotubes and methacryloyloxyethylphosphorylcholine. The sample was divided into Group 1: uncoated orthodontic brackets, Group 2: Stainless steel brackets with TiO2 nanotubes coating, Group 3: Stainless steel brackets with methacryloyloxyethylphosphorylcholine coating, and Group 4: Stainless steel brackets with TiO2 nanotubes combined with methacryloyloxyethylphosphorylcholine coating. Surface characterization was assessed using atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Streptococcus mutans was selected to test the antibacterial ability of the orthodontic brackets, total bacterial adhesion and bacterial viability were assessed. The brackets were subjected to scanning electron microscopy to detect the presence of biofilm. RESULTS: The surface roughness was the greatest in Group 1 and least in Group 2 followed by Group 4 and Group 3 coated brackets. The optical density values were highest in Group 1 and lowest in Group 4. Comparison of colony counts revealed high counts in Group 1 and low counts in Group 4. A positive correlation between surface roughness and colony counts was obtained, however, was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The coated orthodontic brackets exhibited less surface roughness than the uncoated orthodontic brackets. Group 4 coated orthodontic brackets showed the best antibacterial properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Coated orthodontic brackets prevent adhesion of streptococcus mutans and reduces plaque accumulation around the brackets thereby preventing formation of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment.


Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacterial Adhesion , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Nanotubes , Orthodontic Brackets , Phosphorylcholine , Streptococcus mutans , Surface Properties , Titanium , Titanium/chemistry , Phosphorylcholine/analogs & derivatives , Phosphorylcholine/pharmacology , Phosphorylcholine/chemistry , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Nanotubes/chemistry , Bacterial Adhesion/drug effects , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Materials Testing , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Methacrylates/pharmacology , Methacrylates/chemistry , Biofilms/drug effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/pharmacology , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistry
2.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 22(4): 930-937, 2023 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105833

Introduction: Primary cleft lip repair techniques do not address the nasal deformity adequately resulting in nasal asymmetry. Maneuvers employed to minimize this have varying degrees of success. Aim: To assess the outcome of different treatment modalities employed to establish nasal symmetry in unilateral cleft lip. Methods: 100 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip/ palate operated for primary cheiloplasty with modified Millard's rotation advancement technique were divided into five groups. Group 1: lip repair alone, Group 2: NAM followed by lip repair, Group 3: lip repair followed by placement of conformers, Group 4: NAM followed by lip repair and placement of conformers, Group 5: lip repair with semi-open rhinoplasty. Objective assessment was done using measurable parameters after 12 months post-operatively on a 1:1 standard photograph. Results: Group 5 showed statistical significance in all parameters assessed. Progressive improvement in nasal symmetry was noted from Group 1 to Group V. Conclusion: In our study, group V, i.e., modified Millard's repair with semi-open rhinoplasty improved the results in terms of all the objective parameters assessed. The results of the other groups showed improvement though not consistent in all parameters. Naso-alveolar molding is an effective adjunct. Additionally, nasal conformers proved to be of great value in retaining the results obtained post-surgery.

3.
Case Rep Dent ; 2022: 2635167, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36338010

The purpose behind the innovation of modified nasoalveolar moulding appliance was to achieve simultaneous anteroposterior and transverse correction in bilateral cleft cases with minimal vomeroid bending. This paper presents a 3D Versascrew appliance that has been used for presurgical nasoalveolar moulding in a 15-day-old neonate with bilateral cleft. Treatment was initiated at 30 days and continued for 90 days following which mild expansion of posterior maxilla with establishment of arch continuity and concomitant improvement in nasal morphology was achieved towards the end.

...