Recruitment of medical graduates from Prague to foundation programme jobs in a UK hospital: results of a 6-year project.

Introduction: International medical graduates (IMGs) are required to fill foundation-level posts in the NHS. Recruiting for these posts is difficult and time consuming. In 2016, we created a link between the Great Western Hospital, Swindon and Charles University, Prague to recruit to these posts. Here, we describe in detail the recruitment process, level of support and outcomes after 6 years, including the success rate of completion of foundation training and their career progression. Methods: Formal structured interviews occurred in Prague or online. Support included tailored educational/clinical supervision and additional simulation sessions. Data collected included exception reports and sick leave records. In 2022, a survey established satisfaction levels with the project and subsequent career progression. Results: All 51 doctors (100%) recruited as IMGs completed foundation training. Exception reporting and sick leave were below the Trust average. Of those doctors, 39 (76%) replied to the survey. All reported that the appointments helped them progress in their careers and 23 (45%) have subsequently been appointed successfully to a national Specialty Training Scheme. Conclusions: This project improved recruitment of non-deanery foundation doctors, prevented rota gaps and provided adequate staffing of junior doctors in our hospital. Concerns around employment of IMGs can be offset by providing a supportive and developmental environment.

Calculating with Permanent Marker: How Blockchains Record Immutable Mistakes in Computational Chemistry.

Computational science experiments within an open blockchain environment have recently been demonstrated and can improve transparency, reproducibility, and censorship resistance in theoretical scientific work. However, the append-only nature of these records also means that historical calculation errors cannot be effectively removed or changed. This process preserves otherwise unavailable data on the scientific process of error correction and is shown here for simulations of carbon monoxide.

Computational chemistry experiments performed directly on a blockchain virtual computer.

Blockchain technology has had a substantial impact across multiple disciplines, creating new methods for storing and processing data with improved transparency, immutability, and reproducibility. These developments come at a time when the reproducibility of many scientific findings has been called into question, including computational studies. Here we present a computational chemistry simulation run directly on a blockchain virtual machine, using a harmonic potential to model the vibration of carbon monoxide. The results demonstrate for the first time that computational science calculations are feasible entirely within a blockchain environment and that they can be used to increase transparency and accessibility across the computational sciences.

Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Reduces Wear and Revision Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) was developed to address the problem of wear and osteolysis associated with metal-on-conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) bearing surfaces. The purpose of this study was to compare in vivo wear rates and clinical and radiographic outcomes between XLPE and UHMWPE in a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. METHODS: We randomized 122 patients to receive either a conventional UHMWPE liner (Enduron; DePuy) or an XLPE liner (Marathon; DePuy). Ninety-one patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at a minimum of 10 years (range, 10.08 to 12.17 years). Oxford Hip Scores and Short Form-12 Health Survey scores were collected. The radiographs were analyzed for osteolysis and for 2-dimensional (2-D), 3-dimensional (3-D), and volumetric wear using validated software. RESULTS: All 122 patients were accounted for at the 10-year follow-up evaluation. Twelve patients had undergone revision surgery, 21 patients had died (1 of whom had previously undergone revision surgery), and 2 patients were unable to return for follow-up, leaving 91 patients available for clinical and radiographic evaluation. At a minimum of 10 years, 3-D wear rates were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the XLPE group (mean, 0.03 mm/yr) than in the conventional UHMWPE group (mean, 0.27 mm/yr). The prevalence of osteolysis was also significantly lower in the XLPE group (38% versus 8%, p < 0.005), as was the revision rate (14.6% versus 1.9%, p = 0.012), with 10 of the 12 revisions being in the Enduron group. There was no significant difference between the clinical scores of the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: XLPE liners have significantly reduced wear and are associated with a greater implant survival rate at 10 years compared with conventional UHMWPE liners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraoperative complications using the Bio-Transfix femoral fixation implant in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The use of biodegradable Transfix femoral fixation technique is a safe and well-accepted method when performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We report on three cases of deformation and back out of the Bio-Transfix implant over the lateral, distal femoral cortex, with failure of the passing wire when advancing the graft into the femoral tunnel in one of these patients. Two of the patients presented with symptoms of iliotibial band friction syndrome, while the third patient was asymptomatic. The graft had clinically integrated demonstrating AP and rotational stability. The symptoms relieved after removal of the failed Bio-Transfix implants in the symptomatic patients. The aetiology of the implant failure and the alternative methods to avoid such complications are discussed.

Orthopaedic procedure coding. Does accuracy matter?

PURPOSE: Coding clinical work should allow accurate and precise methods of assessing individual or department activity. The NHS financial reforms have increased correct diagnostic coding importance by introducing "payment by results" so that funding is directly linked to patient activity. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of procedure codes (OPCS 4.4), and its effect on Healthcare Resource Group tariff codes that directly affect revenue. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A total of ten procedures from ten consultants were randomly selected over one month. Each consultant coded his or her own procedures. From these codes, Healthcare Resource Group tariff codes were assigned to each patient. These were compared with procedure and Healthcare Resource Group tariff codes generated by coding department staff. FINDINGS: Of 100 procedures, four were un-coded by coding department staff. There was concordance in 35 per cent of cases. Coders only gave one code for each procedure, whereas 35 per cent of procedures coded by consultants were assigned multiple codes. This resulted in 27 per cent of cases generating a different Healthcare Resource Group tariff code. Of the cases, five resulted in a difference of pound 4,000 or more; however, the overall difference was a pound 3,367 revenue loss if coder's codes were used. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Study numbers were limited to 100 with five cases showing excessive financial gain or loss significantly influencing the overall result. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Present procedure coding practice is inaccurate and results in Healthcare Resource Group tariff codes that do not accurately represent clinical activity and productivity. Under payment by results, this can result in a significant revenue loss and possibly ultimately future referrals. Therefore, coding practice needs to be improved as a matter of urgency. Arguably, this could be achieved by closer communication between coders and clinicians. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper identifies a flaw in the way clinical activity and productivity is assessed at present. This is fundamental to the process on which "payment by results" is based, and therefore must be addressed if trusts are to be financially successful.

Use of the Liverpool Elbow Score as a postal questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total elbow arthroplasty.

The Liverpool Elbow Score (LES) is a newly developed, validated elbow-specific score. It consists of a patient-answered questionnaire (PAQ) and a clinical assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the PAQ portion of the LES could be used independently as a postal questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total elbow arthroplasty and to correlate the LES and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). A series of 51 total elbow replacements were reviewed by postal questionnaire. Patients then attended the clinic for assessment by use of both the LES and the MEPS. There was an excellent response rate to the postal questionnaire (98%), and 44 elbows were available for clinical review. Good correlation was shown between the LES and the MEPS (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.84; P < .001) and between the PAQ portion of the LES and the MEPS (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.76; P < .001). We conclude that there is good correlation between the LES PAQ component and the MEPS, suggesting that outcome assessment is possible by postal questionnaire.