Real-world evaluation of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity with and without concurrent serotonergic agents.

BACKGROUND: The risk of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients who received linezolid with or without concurrent serotonergic agents (SAs). Secondary outcomes were to assess the dose, agent selection and number of SAs. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years who received at least one dose of linezolid with or without SAs between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2021 was performed. Patients were excluded if they were aged <18 years, had linezolid ordered but not administered, were pregnant or were incarcerated. Up to five concurrent SAs were assessed, and dose category was classed as low, moderate or high (dose <33%, 33-66% or >66% of maximum daily dose, respectively). Serotonin toxicity was identified by searching patients' electronic medical records. If identified, the Sternbach criteria and Hunter criteria were applied. RESULTS: Of 2022 patients screened, 1743 were included in this study. Mean age, weight and linezolid duration were 58.5 years, 90.7 kg and 3.8 days, respectively. Approximately 67% (1168/1743) of patients received linezolid with at least one SA, and several patients received multiple SAs. Most patients (53.8%; 616/1144) received moderate- and/or high-dose SAs. Only two patients (0.11%) were identified as possible cases of serotonin toxicity based on the electronic medical record search. However, the incidence of serotonin toxicity was 0.06% (1/1743) based on the Sternbach criteria and 0% (0/1743) based on the Hunter criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients who received linezolid with or without SAs was exceedingly rare, even among those who received multiple and high-dose SAs.

Perceived access to PrEP as a critical step in engagement: A qualitative analysis and discrete choice experiment among young men who have sex with men.

Young Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) continue to face disproportionate HIV risk. Despite its well accepted role in HIV prevention, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake remains below desired goals. Systemic barriers to PrEP access, including insurance complexity, cost, and wait times to start PrEP may contribute to low PrEP engagement. We conducted in-depth interviews and designed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess preferences for and barriers to PrEP access in the United States. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 18 MSM aged 18-30 years old who were not on PrEP and created a DCE based on the results. For the DCE, a convenience sample of young MSM in the United States who reported recent condomless anal sex was recruited through social media applications. Consenting participants provided sociodemographic information and responded to a series of 10 choice tasks about PrEP access. Preferences were analyzed utilizing marginal willingness-to-pay (mWTP) methods. RESULTS: In-depth interviews revealed preferences for highly effective PrEP and concerns about barriers to access due to insurance coverage and privacy. The online DCE was completed by 236 eligible MSM aged 18-30. The most-preferred PrEP package-with all elements significantly preferred over other options-was insurance covered, could be maintained confidential from parents and employers, was available immediately, and had an online option. Need to take out new insurance or add a supplemental insurance in order to cover PrEP significantly detracted from willingness to pay for a PrEP program. Attributes most associated with willingness to pay for PrEP were PrEP being covered by an insurance the client already has and insurance coverage that was private. CONCLUSIONS: Young MSM at high risk for HIV in the United States who are not currently on PrEP showed strong preferences for PrEP options that were covered by insurance and could be kept confidential from parents and employers. Lack of these options may present major barriers to PrEP access among young MSM who are at particularly high risk. Rapid access to PrEP, as well as the option of receiving some care online, may also enhance PrEP uptake.

Successful treatment with secnidazole for trichomoniasis in the setting of metronidazole hypersensitivity.

Limited effective treatment options currently exist for trichomoniasis management among patients with metronidazole hypersensitivity. We report a patient with a documented history of metronidazole hypersensitivity who initially was treated with nitazoxanide but demonstrated clinical and microbiological failure. Secnidazole was subsequently used for treatment, which resulted in clinical and microbiological cure without observation of cross-reactivity. Secnidazole may represent a potential treatment option for trichomoniasis in patients with metronidazole hypersensitivity after consultation with an infectious disease specialist.