Exercise Test Predicts Both Noncardiovascular and Cardiovascular Death in a Primary Prevention Population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify specific causes of death and determine the prevalence of noncardiovascular (non-CV) deaths in an exercise test referral population while testing whether exercise test parameters predict non-CV as well as CV deaths. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Non-imaging exercise tests on patients 30 to 79 years of age from September 1993 to December 2010 were reviewed. Patients with baseline CV diseases and non-Minnesota residents were excluded. Mortality through January 2016 was obtained through Mayo Clinic Records and the Minnesota Death Index. Exercise test abnormalities included low functional aerobic capacity (ie, less than 80%), heart rate recovery (ie, less than 13 beats/min), low chronotropic index (ie, less than 0.8), and abnormal exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) of greater than or equal to 1.0 mm ST depression or elevation. We also combined these four abnormalities into a composite exercise test score (EX_SCORE). Statistical analyses consisted of Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, current and past smoking, and heart rate-lowering drug. RESULTS: The study identified 13,382 patients (females: n=4736, 35.4%, 50.5±10.5 years of age). During 12.7±5.0 years of follow-up, there were 849 deaths (6.3%); of these 162 (19.1%) were from CV; 687 (80.9%) were non-CV. Hazard ratios for non-CV death were significant for low functional aerobic capacity (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.69; P<.0001), abnormal heart rate recovery (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.61; P<.0033), and low chronotropic index (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.77; P<.0001), whereas abnormal exercise ECG was not significant. All exercise test abnormalities including EX_SCORE were more strongly associated with CV death versus non-CV death except abnormal exercise ECG. CONCLUSION: Non-CV deaths predominated in this primary prevention cohort. Exercise test abnormalities not only predicted CV death but also non-CV death.

Interpreting the ECG in patients with chest pain and right bundle branch block: A case report.

A patient with right bundle branch block (RBBB) presented with chest pain. An ECG showed ST-elevation in leads V1, V2, and aVR, with widespread ST-depression in leads II, aVF, I, aVL, and V4-6. The initial ECG interpretation missed ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), as ST-elevation thresholds were not reached. Non-urgent angiography showed severe left anterior descending artery stenosis requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. The course was complicated by cardiac arrest necessitating resuscitation and dual chamber pacemaker placement with left bundle branch pacing. This case report outlines the deficiencies of the current voltage criteria for identification of anterior STEMI in patients with RBBB.

Amyloid transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis with different manifestations, test findings and types.

Amyloid transthyretin amyloidosis usually presents with cardiac amyloidosis manifestations, most commonly with a heart failure syndrome. The history and physical examination offer clues of other cardiac and extracardiac manifestations. Taking a detailed history is essential in elucidating pertinent family and medical history that may increase suspicion for amyloidosis. Further, certain findings on electrocardiogram and imaging should raise suspicion and trigger further workup that can confirm the diagnosis, since treatment is evolving.

Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Rheumatic Heart Disease.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is challenging owing to leaflet thickening and calcification but is performed in select cases. Limited data exist on its outcomes. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mitral TEER in patients with severe symptomatic rheumatic mitral regurgitation. We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database for hospitalizations for mitral TEER between 2016 and 2018. Propensity score-weighted regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association of RHD with in-hospital outcomes and 90-day readmissions after mitral TEER. A total of 18,240 procedures were included in the analysis, including 1,779 in patients with RHD. Mitral TEER in patients with RHD was associated with similar in-hospital mortality to that in patients without RHD (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 2.30, p = 0.089). However, RHD was associated with higher acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.56), acute kidney injury (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.94), ventricular arrhythmia (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.01), high-degree heart block (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.23), and conversion to open surgical repair/replacement (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.02 to 6.30). Mitral TEER in RHD was also associated with higher 90-day all-cause readmission (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.47, p = 0.012). In conclusion, mitral TEER in patients with RHD is associated with higher rates of hospital complications, crossover to surgery, and readmissions but could be performed selectively in patients at high surgical risk who have favorable anatomy.

Utilization Rate and Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging in Elderly Patients Presenting With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) represent a vulnerable population with comorbid conditions and complex coronary anatomy. We aimed to describe the utilization rate and outcomes of intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this population. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for all hospitalizations for STEMI involving PCI from 2018 to 2019. Hospitalizations were stratified by patient age into a younger cohort <75 years (mean age 58.7 ± 9.5 years) and an older cohort ≥75 years. Propensity score-weighed regression analysis was used to identify the association of intravascular imaging with in-hospital mortality, 90-day all-cause readmission, and readmission for myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: A total of 299,619 STEMI PCI hospitalizations were included. Intravascular imaging was utilized less frequently in the older cohort (6.8 % vs 7.8 %, odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95 % CI 0.82-0.92, p < 0.001). In both cohorts, intravascular imaging was more likely to be used with anterior STEMI, complex PCI, mechanical support, and thrombectomy. Propensity score analysis showed the use of intravascular imaging was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in both cohorts (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.52-0.68, p < 0.001 in the younger cohort and OR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.51-0.72, p < 0.001 in the older cohort). There was no difference in 90-day all-cause readmission or readmission for MI with intravascular imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular imaging during STEMI PCI is associated with lower in-hospital mortality regardless of age. Further studies are needed to understand the low utilization rates especially among elderly patients.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Coexisiting Amyloidosis: Mortality, Stroke, and Readmission.

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis can coexist in patients with severe aortic stenosis. There are limited outcomes data on whether this impacts the risk of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Objectives: The authors aimed to investigate the effect of amyloidosis on outcomes of TAVR. Methods: We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify hospitalizations for TAVR between 2016 and 2019. The presence of a diagnosis of amyloidosis was identified. Propensity score-weighted regression analysis was used to identify the association of amyloidosis with in-hospital mortality, acute ischemic stroke, and 30-day readmission rate after TAVR. Results: We identified 245,020 hospitalizations for TAVR, including 273 in patients with amyloidosis. The mean age was 79.4 ± 8.4 years. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality or 30-day readmission rate in patients with and without amyloidosis (1.8% vs 1.5%, P = 0.622; and 12.9% vs 12.5%, P = 0.858; respectively). However, there was a higher rate of acute ischemic stroke in patients with amyloidosis (6.2% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001). Propensity score-weighted logistic regression analysis showed the presence of amyloidosis was associated with greater odds of acute ischemic stroke (odds ratio: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.41-6.71, P = 0.005), but no difference in mortality (odds ratio: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.28-2.27, P = 0.666) or 30-day readmission rate after TAVR (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.41-1.25, P = 0.241). Conclusions: This analysis suggests amyloidosis may be associated with a higher thromboembolic risk after TAVR that merits further investigation.

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Vasopressin During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of vasopressin versus standard of care during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have yielded conflicting results. An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted through February 2022 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the outcomes of vasopressin versus standard of care during CPR among patients with cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was the likelihood of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) return. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. The final analysis included 11 trials with 6,609 patients. The weighted mean age was 65.5 years, and 68.2% were men. There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and control groups in the likelihood of ROSC (33.1% vs 31.9%, odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98 to 1.55). Subgroup analyses suggested that the use of vasopressin versus control increased the likelihood of ROSC when used in combination with steroids (pinteraction = 0.01) and in cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest (pinteraction = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and control groups in the likelihood of favorable neurological outcome (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.71), in-hospital mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.31), or ventricular arrhythmias (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.97). In conclusion, compared with the standard of care, the use of vasopressin during CPR did not increase the likelihood of ROSC among patients with cardiac arrest. There was no difference between the vasopressin and control groups in the likelihood of the favorable neurological outcome, in-hospital mortality, or ventricular arrhythmias.

Digital health intervention in patients with recent hospitalization for acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

AIM: To examine the efficacy of digital health interventions (DHI) versus standard of care among patients with prior heart failure (HF) hospitalization. METHODS: An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, OVID, CINHAL and ERIC, databases was performed through August 2021 for randomized clinical trials that evaluated the outcomes with DHI among patients with HF. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 10 randomized trials were included in our analysis, with a total of 7204 patients and a weighted follow up duration of 15.6 months. Compared with the reference group, patients in the DHI group had lower all-cause mortality (8.5% vs. 10.2%, risk ratio-RR 0.80; 95% confidence interval-CI 0.66 to 0.96; P = 0.02), as well as lower cardiovascular mortality (7.3% vs. 9.6%, RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.94; P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in HF-related hospitalizations (23.4% vs. 26.2%, RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.02; P = 0.07) and all-cause hospitalizations (48.3% vs. 49.9%, RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03; P = 0.11) in the DHI versus reference groups. Patients in the DHI group had fewer days lost due to HF-related hospitalizations (mean difference-MD: -1.77; 95% CI -3.06,-0.48, p = 0.01; I2 = 51), but similar days lost to all-cause hospitalizations (MD: -0.76; 95% CI -3.07,-1.55, p = 0.52; I2 = 69) compared with patients in the reference group. CONCLUSION: Compared with usual care, DHI among patients with HF provided significant reduction of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and had fewer total days lost to HF hospitalizations. There were no differences in all-cause hospitalizations, and HF hospitalizations.

Peak Systolic Blood Pressure During the Exercise Test: Reference Values by Sex and Age and Association With Mortality.

[Figure: see text].

Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Coenzyme Q10, or ubiquinone, is a non-prescription nutritional supplement. It is a fat-soluble molecule that acts as an electron carrier in mitochondria, and as a coenzyme for mitochondrial enzymes. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency may be associated with a multitude of diseases, including heart failure. The severity of heart failure correlates with the severity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Emerging data suggest that the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species are increased in people with heart failure, and coenzyme Q10 may help to reduce these toxic effects because of its antioxidant activity. Coenzyme Q10 may also have a role in stabilising myocardial calcium-dependent ion channels, and in preventing the consumption of metabolites essential for adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Coenzyme Q10, although not a primary recommended treatment, could be beneficial to people with heart failure. Several randomised controlled trials have compared coenzyme Q10 to other therapeutic modalities, but no systematic review of existing randomised trials was conducted prior to the original version of this Cochrane Review, in 2014. OBJECTIVES: To review the safety and efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and AMED on 16 October 2020; ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 July 2020, and the ISRCTN Registry on 11 November 2019. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of either parallel or cross-over design that assessed the beneficial and harmful effects of coenzyme Q10 in people with heart failure. When we identified cross-over studies, we considered data only from the first phase. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods, assessed study risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and GRADE methods to assess the quality of the evidence. For dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR); for continuous data, the mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where appropriate data were available, we conducted meta-analysis. When meta-analysis was not possible, we wrote a narrative synthesis. We provided a PRISMA flow chart to show the flow of study selection. MAIN RESULTS: We included eleven studies, with 1573 participants, comparing coenzyme Q10 to placebo or conventional therapy (control). In the majority of the studies, sample size was relatively small. There were important differences among studies in daily coenzyme Q10 dose, follow-up period, and the measures of treatment effect. All studies had unclear, or high risk of bias, or both, in one or more bias domains. We were only able to conduct meta-analysis for some of the outcomes. None of the included trials considered quality of life, measured on a validated scale, exercise variables (exercise haemodynamics), or cost-effectiveness. Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces the risk of all-cause mortality more than control (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; 1 study, 420 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 13.3; moderate-quality evidence). There was low-quality evidence of inconclusive results between the coenzyme Q10 and control groups for the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.27 to 9.59; 1 study, 420 participants), and stroke (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.48; 1 study, 420 participants). Coenzyme Q10 probably reduces hospitalisation related to heart failure (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.78; 2 studies, 1061 participants; NNTB 9.7; moderate-quality evidence). Very low-quality evidence suggests that coenzyme Q10 may improve the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 1.77, 95% CI 0.09 to 3.44; 7 studies, 650 participants), but the results are inconclusive for exercise capacity (MD 48.23, 95% CI -24.75 to 121.20; 3 studies, 91 participants); and the risk of developing adverse events (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.10; 2 studies, 568 participants). We downgraded the quality of the evidence mainly due to high risk of bias and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The included studies provide moderate-quality evidence that coenzyme Q10 probably reduces all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure. There is low-quality evidence of inconclusive results as to whether coenzyme Q10 has an effect on the risk of myocardial infarction, or stroke. Because of very low-quality evidence, it is very uncertain whether coenzyme Q10 has an effect on either left ventricular ejection fraction or exercise capacity. There is low-quality evidence that coenzyme Q10 may increase the risk of adverse effects, or have little to no difference. There is currently no convincing evidence to support or refute the use of coenzyme Q10 for heart failure. Future trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Predictors of ventricular pacing burden after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: In the era of an expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), conduction disturbances and the requirement for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains a clinical concern. HYPOTHESIS: Using a single-center experience, we sought to identify predictors of ventricular pacing burden after TAVR in patients who required PPM implantation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 359 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis who underwent TAVR at our institution between September 2013 and July 2019. Thirty patients (8.4%) required a PPM within 30 days after TAVR. Pre and post-TAVR electrocardiograms, pre-TAVR echocardiograms and computed tomography (CT), TAVR procedural details and post-TAVR device interrogation records at 1, 3, and 6 months were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean percentage of ventricular pacing (VP%) at 1, 3, and 6 months was 58%, 59%, and 56% respectively. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, patients who had low VP% < 5% at 6 months were more likely to have a prosthesis/echocardiography-derived left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter ratio < 1.3 (OR 7.00, P-value .048), prosthesis/CT-derived aortic annulus diameter ratio < 1.02 (OR 7.11, P-value .047), post-TAVR new-onset LBBB (OR 16.80, P-value .019), time to PPM implantation greater than 2 days post-TAVR (OR 9.38, P-value .026) and pre-TAVR use of a beta blocker (OR 9.40, P-value .026). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who required a PPM implantation post-TAVR, a lower TAVR prosthesis/LVOT or aortic annulus diameter ratio, post-TAVR new-onset LBBB and later time of PPM implantation showed a trend toward predicting a low VP% at 6 months.

Pulmonary Embolism Following Incomplete Surgical Resection of a Right Ventricular Myxoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Right ventricular (RV) myxomas are extremely rare, but may have dreadful clinical sequelae including pulmonary embolism (PE). We present a case of a patient who had an RV myxoma that was attached to the tricuspid valve, and therefore could not be resected completely during surgery, and remnants of the tumor were seen on transthoracic echocardiogram during post-operative follow-up. Five months after surgery, the patient had PE, which could be due to tumor emboli or thromboemboli. Since repeat surgical resection was not feasible, the patient was started on warfarin. The patient is doing well and has had no PE recurrence over the past 20 months of follow-up. We have complemented the current case report with a comprehensive literature search and review on RV myxomas associated with PE in order to shed light on this uncommon but potentially lethal disorder. We concluded that right-sided cardiac myxomas, including RV myxomas, should be considered while dealing with PE, particularly in young patients with no risk factors, and that follow-up with echocardiography after surgery is important due to the possibility of recurrence, especially if complete resection was difficult to perform. Plain language summary available for this article.