Transperineal Ultrasound for Perianal Fistulas and Abscesses - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is a practical tool for assessing perianal inflammatory lesions. We systematically review its accuracy for detecting and classifying perianal fistulae and abscesses. Method The National Library of Medicine and Embase were searched for articles on TPUS for the assessment of idiopathic and Crohn's perianal fistulae and abscesses. Two reviewers independently reviewed eligible studies and rated them for quality using the QUADAS tool. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of TPUS as measured by its sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) in detecting and classifying perianal fistulae, internal openings and perianal abscesses. Results We included 12 studies (565 patients). Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was suboptimal. 3 studies were retrospective and 4 showed significant risks of bias in the application of the reference standard. The sensitivity of TPUS in detecting perianal fistulae on a per-lesion basis was 98 % (95 % CI 96 - 100 %) and the PPV was 95 % (95 % CI 90 - 98 %). The detection of internal openings had a sensitivity of 91 % (95 % CI 84 - 97 %) with a PPV of 87 % (95 % CI 76 - 95 %). The classification of fistulae yielded a sensitivity of 92 % (95 % CI 85 - 97 %) and a PPV of 92 % (95 % CI 83 - 98 %). TPUS had a sensitivity of 86 % (95 % CI 67 - 99 %) and PPV of 90 % (95 % CI 76 - 99 %) in the detection of perianal abscesses. Conclusion The current literature on TPUS illustrates good overall accuracy in the assessment of perianal fistulae and abscesses. However, many studies had methodological flaws suggesting that further research is required.

Failure of gastroenterologists to apply intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease in the Asia-Pacific: a need for action.

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a cheap, noninvasive, risk-free procedure that is significantly underutilized in the diagnosis and management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the Asia-Pacific region. More cost-effective methods of monitoring disease activity are required in light of the increasing global burden of IBD (especially in Asia), the advent of personalized medicine, and the rising cost of healthcare. IUS is a prime example of a technique that meets these needs. Its common clinical applications include assessing the activity and complications of IBD. In continental Europe, countries such as Germany and Italy use this imaging tool as the standard of care and have integrated it into management protocols. There are formal training programs in these countries to train gastroenterologists in IUS, and it is used in an outpatient setting during patient consultations. Barriers to its use in the Asia-Pacific region include lack of experience and research data, and there are few established centers with active training programs. These concerns can be addressed by investing more in IUS service provision and by increasing allocation of resources toward local research and training. Increased uptake of IUS will ultimately benefit patients with IBD.

Optimizing conventional medical therapies in inflammatory bowel disease in 2014.

Goals of therapy for inflammatory bowel disease have advanced beyond symptom control to the normalization of biomarkers of inflammation, and mucosal healing in particular, with the expectation that this will change the natural history of these diseases. Concurrent with higher treatment expectations has come an expanded therapeutic armamentarium to achieve these goals, and a greater ability to optimize each therapeutic class to maximize therapeutic benefits and minimize unnecessary treatment failures. In addition to these advances has come the evolution of therapeutic drug monitoring which is increasingly being utilized to optimize the use of immunomodulators and biologic therapies in particular. This review will outline the principals of optimization of the conventional medical therapies available to the clinician today.

Ulcerative colitis: current pharmacotherapy and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing disease, characterised by alternating of acute and remission phases. Although the aetiology is unknown, in recent years, there has progressively been greater knowledge of the various pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the disease itself. Thus, from therapy based on generically anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive agents, treatment is gradually moving towards drugs that selectively block specific inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α. AREAS COVERED: This review provides the most significant data about the therapeutic role of different drugs currently available for the treatment of UC. In addition, the critical therapeutic areas on which research could focus in the near future are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: UC is a disease affecting young patients, whose quality of life may be strongly compromised by the progression of disease. Over time, the disease may lead to an impairment of the normal anatomy and physiology of the colon, and the cumulative incidence of dysplasia and colorectal cancer increases with the time. Thus, the main aims of the near future should be both a better definition of patients at risk for a poor clinical course and progression of disease, and the development of a much more aggressive treatment for patients with a poor prognosis.