Simultaneous catheter and multicriteria optimization for HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy with a complex intracavity/interstitial applicator.

BACKGROUND: Complex intracavity and interstitial (IC/IS) applicators, such as the Venezia applicator, can improve the HR-CTV coverage while adequately protecting organs at risk in the treatment of cervical cancer with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Although the Venezia applicator offers more choice for catheter selection, commercially available catheter and dose optimization algorithms are still missing for complex applicators. Moreover, studies on catheter and dose optimization for IC/IS implants in the treatment of cervical cancer are still limited. PURPOSE: This work aims to combine a GPU-based multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm with a sparse catheter (SC) optimization algorithm for the Venezia applicator. METHODS: Fifty-eight cervical cancer patients who received 28 Gy in 4 fx of HDR brachytherapy with the Venezia applicator (combination to external beam radiation therapy) are retrospectively revisited. The modelization of the applicator is done by virtually reconstructing all the IS catheters passing through the ring. Template catheters are reconstructed using an in-house python script. To perform simultaneous MCO and SC optimization (SC+MCO), the objective function includes aggregated dose objectives in a weighted sum and a group sparsity term that individually penalizes the contribution of IS catheters. Plans generated with the SC+MCO algorithm are compared with plans generated with MCO using clinical catheters (CC+MCO) and the clinical plans (CP). The EMBRACE II soft constraints (planning aims) and hard constraints (limits for prescribed dose) are used as plan evaluation criteria. RESULTS: CC+MCO gives the most important gain with an increase up to 20.7% in meeting all EMBRACE II soft constraints compared with CP. The SC+MCO algorithm (adding catheter optimization to MCO) provides a second order increase (up to 12.1% with total acceptance rate of 60.3% or 35/58) in the acceptance rate versus CC+MCO (total increase of 32.8% vs. CP). Acceptance rate in EMBRACE II hard constraints is 98.3% (57/58) for both CC+MCO and SC+MCO versus 91.4% (53/58) for CP. The median SC+MCO optimization time is 11 s to generate a total of 5000 Pareto-optimal plans with different catheter configurations (position and number) for each fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous catheter and MCO optimization is clinically feasible for HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy using the Venezia applicator. Clinical catheter configurations could be improved and/or the catheter number could be reduced without decreasing plan quality using SC+MCO compared with the CP.

US-guided EM tracked system for HDR brachytherapy: A first in-men randomized study for whole prostate treatment.

PURPOSE: An electromagnetic tracking device (EMT) has been integrated in an HDR 3D ultrasound guidance system for prostate HDR. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of HDR workflows with and without EM tracking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 58 patients with a 15 Gy HDR prostate boost were randomized in two arms and two operation room (OR) procedures using: (1) the EMT investigational device, and (2) the Oncentra prostate system (OCP). OR times were compared for both techniques. RESULTS: The overall procedure median time was about 20% shorter for EMT (63 min) compared to OCP (79 min). The US acquisition and contouring was longer for OCP compared to EMT (23 min vs. 16 min). The catheter reconstruction's median times were 23 min and 13 min for OCP and EMT respectively. For the automatic reconstruction with EMT, 62% of cases required no or few manual corrections. Using the EM technology in an OR environment was challenging. In some cases, interferences or the stiffness of the stylet introduced errors in the reconstruction of catheters. The last step was the dosimetry with median times of 11 min (OCP) and 15.5 min (EMT). Finally, it was observed that there was no learning curve associated with the introduction of this new technology. CONCLUSIONS: The EMT device offers an efficient solution for automatic catheter reconstruction for HDR prostate while reducing the possibility of mis-reconstructed catheters caused by issues of visualization in the US images. Because of that, the overall OR times was shorter when using the EMT system.

Commissioning of GPU-based multi-criteria optimizer combined with plan navigation tools for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Purpose: Recently, our GPU-based multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm has been integrated in a graphical user interface (gMCO-GUI) that allows real-time plan navigation through a gMCO-generated set of Pareto-optimal plans for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. This work reports on the commissioning of the gMCO algorithm into clinical workflow. Material and methods: Our MCO workflow was validated against Oncentra Prostate v. 4.2.2 (OcP) and Oncentra Brachy v. 4.6.0 (OcB). 40 HDR prostate brachytherapy patients (20 with OcP and 20 with OcB) were retrospectively re-planned with gMCO algorithm by generating 2,000 Pareto-optimal plans. A single gMCO treatment plan was exported using gMCO-GUI plan navigation tools. The optimized dwell positions and dwell times of gMCO plans were exported via DICOM RTPLAN files to OcP/OcB, where final dosimetry was calculated. TG43 implementation in gMCO was validated against the consensus data of flexisource. Five analytical shapes were used as the ground truth for volume calculations. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) curves generated by gMCO were compared with the ones generated by OcP/OcB. 3D dose distributions (and isodose lines) were validated against OcP/OcB using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% undirected Hausdorff distance (95% HD), and γ analysis. Results: Differences between -0.4% and 0.3% were observed between gMCO calculated dose rates and the flexisource consensus data. gMCO volumes were within ±2% agreement in 3/5 volumes (deviations within -2.9% and 0.1%). For 9 key DVH indices, the differences between gMCO and OcP/OcB were within ±1.2%. Regarding the accuracy of key isodose lines, the mean DSC was greater than 0.98, and the mean 95% HD was below 0.4 mm. The fraction of voxels with γ ≤ 1 was greater than 99% for all cases with 1%/1 mm threshold. Conclusions: The GPU-based MCO workflow was successfully integrated into the clinical workflow and validated against OcP and OcB.

Inter-observer evaluation of a GPU-based multicriteria optimization algorithm combined with plan navigation tools for HDR brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Recently, a GPU-based multicriteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm was integrated in a graphical user interface (gMCO-GUI) that allowed real-time plan navigation through a set of Pareto-optimal plans for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. This work reports on the inter-observer evaluation of the gMCO algorithm into the clinical workflow. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty HDR brachytherapy prostate cancer patients were retrospectively replanned with the gMCO algorithm. The reference clinical plans were each generated by experienced physicists using inverse planning followed by graphical optimization and approved by a radiation oncologist (RO). Each case was replanned with the gMCO algorithm by generating 2000 Pareto-optimal plans with four different objective functions. Two physicists were asked to rank the objective functions according to their preferences by choosing one preferred plan for each plans pool and ranking them using gMCO-GUI. The optimized dwell positions and dwell times of the gMCO plans that were ranked first were exported to Oncentra Prostate where a blinded comparison of the gMCO plans with the clinical plans was conducted by three ROs. RESULTS: The median planning time of the two physicists was 9 min. Both physicists preferred the objective function with target sub-regions to cover specific target regions. Regarding the blinded comparison, the gMCO plans were preferred 19, 17, and 12 times by the three ROs, in which eight gMCO plans were unanimously preferred compared with the clinical plans. CONCLUSIONS: The plan quality and the planning time were similar between the two physicists and within what is observed in the clinic. Moreover, the gMCO plans evaluated favorably by ROs compared to the reference clinical plans.

Dose to the bladder neck is not correlated with urinary toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with HDR brachytherapy boost.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the dose to bladder neck (BN) is a predictor of acute and late urinary toxicity after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) boost for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2014 and 2016, patients with prostate cancer treated at our institution with external beam radiation therapy and 15 Gy single-fraction HDRB boost for intermediate- and high-risk disease according to D'Amico definition were reviewed. Intraoperative CT scan-based inverse planning and ultrasound-based inverse planning were performed in 173 and 136 patients, respectively. The following structures were prospectively contoured: prostate, urethra, rectum, bladder, and the BN defined as 5 mm around the urethra between the catheter balloon and the prostatic urethra. Dose to the BN was reported only, no constraint was applied. Acute and late urinary toxicity were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0. Clinical and dosimetry factors associated with urinary toxicity were analyzed using generalized linear models. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients with median age of 71 years (range 50-89) were included. Median followup was 25 months (range 0-39 months). Using D'Amico definition, 71% of the patients had intermediate-risk disease, whereas 29% had high-risk disease. The mean pretreatment prostate-specific antigen value was 9.65 ng/mL. The mean pretreatment, after 6 weeks and over 6 months IPSSs were 8.34, 12.14, and 10.02, respectively. Urinary obstruction was reported in 14 cases (4.5%). Pretreatment IPSS (p = 0.003) and prostate volume (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with acute and late urinary toxicity. The dose for the most exposed 2 cc (D2cc) of BN was not correlated with acute (p = 0.798) or late urinary toxicity (p = 0.859). BN D2cc was not correlated with urinary obstruction (p = 0.272), but bladder V75 was (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: High pretreatment IPSS, large prostate volume and bladder V75 were the only predictors of acute and late urinary toxicity after HDRB boost in our study. Although BN D2cc was associated with acute and late urinary toxicity after low-dose-rate brachytherapy, no correlation was found after HDRB. A prospective study comparing dose to the BN in HDRB monotherapy would validate the impact of BN dose on acute and late urinary toxicity.

The association of intraprostatic calcifications and dosimetry parameters with biochemical control after permanent prostate implant.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of intraprostatic calcifications (IC) on long-term tumor control in patients treated with permanent implant prostate brachytherapy (PIPB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 609 I-125 patients treated with PIPB were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of IC was determined by reviewing postimplant CT images. Doses delivered were determined using the Monte Carlo (model-based) calculations and the TG43 approach. Biochemical relapses at 7 and 10 years were determined according to Phoenix definition. Long-term biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates with log rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis of predictor factors of biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: IC were observed for 11.1% of patients. Clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score, D'Amico risk group, and ADT use were comparable between IC and no IC groups. The 7- and 10-year bRFS for the entire cohort were 94.1% and 90.6%, respectively. The bRFS at 7 years was 90.5% (with IC) vs. 94.5% (without IC) (p = 0.198); the corresponding values at 10 years were 78.8% vs. 91.8% (p = 0.046). On Cox model, only prostatic calcifications were a significant risk factor for biochemical relapse (HR: 2.30, IC 95%: 1.05-5.00, p = 0.037; and HR: 3.94; IC 95%: 1.00-15.38; p = 0.049 for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of IC in patients treated with PIPB decreases V100 and D90 for postimplant Monte Carlo dosimetry (compared with TG43); correspondingly, IC are associated with a lower 10-y bRFS. Model-based dose calculations are critical to evaluate potential cold spots due to calcifications.

Does Seed Migration Increase the Risk of Second Malignancies in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Iodine-125 Loose Seeds Brachytherapy?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk of second malignancies after migration of seeds (MS) in prostate cancer patients treated with 125I loose seeds brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 2802 prostate cancer patients treated with 125I loose seeds brachytherapy in 3 Canadian centers were reviewed. After seeds implant, all patients underwent postimplant pelvic radiography and computed tomography scan for postimplant dosimetry. These images were used to assess whether seed migration occurred. The incidence of second malignancies was determined through the review of patient charts. The 7- and 10-year cumulative incidences of second malignancies and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fine and Gray competing risk regression analysis was used to assess the factors associated with the development of second malignancies. RESULTS: Mean age and median follow-up were 63.5 years and 74 (range, 12-246) months, respectively. Migration of seeds occurred in 263 of 2802 patients (9.4%). Second malignancy occurred in 87 patients (3.1%) for the entire cohort and was not different between patients who experienced MS (9, 3.4%) and those who did not (78, 3.1%) (P = .755). The 7-year cumulative incidence rates of second malignancies were 2.95% (95% CI 1.20%-6.00%) (with MS) versus 2.82% (2.10%-3.70%) (without MS) (P = .756). The corresponding values at 10 years were 6.16% (2.20%-12.3%) versus 4.51% (3.20%-5.50%) (P = .570). Migration of seeds did not seem to be a significant predictive factor for second malignancies development (adjusted hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 0.63-2.55]; P = .510). In both models, only advanced age was significantly associated with second malignancies development. CONCLUSIONS: These results did not show an increased risk of second malignancies associated with MS after 125I loose seeds brachytherapy for prostate cancer patients. Longer follow-up and more events are required to better correlate MS and second malignancies.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer treatment: Different combinations of hypofractionated regimens and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of our high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost experience in localized prostate cancer treated with different combinations of radiation doses and fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2011, 832 patients were treated with different regimens of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and HDR-BT. These regimens were converted into three biologically effective dose (BED) groups. The biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), reported with the phoenix definition and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2ng/ml at 5-year, genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The 5-, 10-year BFFS for the entire cohort were 94.6% and 92.5%, for overall survival (OS) 96.1% and 80.3% and for prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) 99.5% and 97.8%. The percentage of patients with a 5-year PSA level <0.2ng/ml was 68.6%, 78.7% and 86.7% in the BED group of <250, 250-260 and >260Gy (p=0.005) while the 5-year BFFS rates according to phoenix definition were 97.3%, 94.3% and 94.9% for BED group <250, 250-260 and >260Gy (p=0.453). On multivariate logistic regression, patients in the BED>260Gy group were significantly more likely to remain free from 5-year PSA values ≥0.2ng/mL compared with those in the BED<250Gy group (OR: 0.350, p=0.011). Grade≥3 acute GU toxicity was reported in 2 patients (4.7%) for BED>260Gy while grade≥3 late GU toxicity was reported in 6 (1.7%) and 9 (4.9%) patients for 250-260Gy and >260Gy BED groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in BED with the hypofractionated regimens correlates with an improvement in biochemical control with of urinary toxicity. This increase in urinary toxicity is small and clinically acceptable.

Use of 3D transabdominal ultrasound imaging for treatment planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy: Comparison to magnetic resonance and computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if the addition of 3D transabdominal ultrasound (3DTAUS) imaging to computed tomography (CT) can improve treatment planning in 3D adaptive brachytherapy when compared with CT-based planning alone, resulting in treatment plans closer to the ones obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with cervical cancer undergoing brachytherapy underwent three imaging modalities: MRI, CT, and CT-3DTAUS. Volumes were delineated by a radiation oncologist and treatment plans were optimized on each imaging modality. To compare treatment plans, the dwell times optimized on MRI were transferred on CT and CT-3DTAUS images and dose parameters were reported on volumes of the receiving imaging modality. The plans optimized on CT and CT-3DTAUS were also copied and evaluated on MRI images. RESULTS: Treatment plans optimized and evaluated on the same imaging modalities were clinically acceptable but statistically different (p < 0.05) from one another. MR-based plans had the highest target coverage (98%) and CT-based plans the lowest (93%). For all treatment plans evaluated on MRI, the target coverage was equivalent. However, a decrease in target coverage (V100) was observed when MR-based plans were applied on CT-3DTAUS (6%) and CT (13%) with p < 0.05. An increase in the rectum/sigmoid dose (D2cc) was observed with both CT-3DTAUS-based (0.6 Gy) and CT-based planning (1 Gy) when compared with MR-based plans, whereas bladder dose stayed similar. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CT-based planning, the addition of 3DTAUS to CT results in treatment plans closer to MR-based planning. Its use reduces the high-risk clinical target volume overestimation typically observed on CT, improving coverage of the target volume while reducing dose to the organs at risk.

Does prostate volume has an impact on biochemical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR boost?

PURPOSE: To compare biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) of patients with small and large prostate glands treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and HDR (high dose rate) brachytherapy boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2012, 548 patients were treated with EBRT followed by HDR boost. The effect of covariates and prostate volume on biochemical failure was analyzed by survival analysis and Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median follow-up and age were not different between the two groups. The mean prostate gland volume at the time of CT planning was 48.1 and 76.0cc in small (<60cc) and large (⩾ 60cc) prostate volume, respectively (p<0.001). When PSA bounces were excluded, there was no significant difference between the two groups with a 5-years BFFS of 95.8% vs 92.3%, p=0.094. There were no significant differences between the two groups for urinary symptoms (IPSS) as well as acute and late GI toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a HDR brachytherapy boost in large prostate gland cases is feasible at the price of increased PSA bounces. When the benign bounces are excluded, there is no significant difference between the two groups for tumor control and toxicity. Therefore, in our experience, there is no rational precluding the use of HDR boost in patients with a prostate size of 60 cc or more so long as an adequate dosimetry is achievable.

Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare the hybrid inverse treatment planning optimization (HIPO), inverse dose-volume histogram-based optimization (DVHO), and fast simulated annealing stochastic algorithm (IPSA). The catheter optimization algorithm HIPO was also compared with the Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, eight high-dose-rate prostate cases were randomly selected from an anonymized bank of patients. Oncentra Prostate v4.1 was used to run DVHO and the HIPO catheter optimization (HIPO_cat), whereas Oncentra Brachy v4.3 was used for the remaining. For fixed catheter configurations, DVHO plans were compared with IPSA and HIPO. For catheter positions optimization, CVT and HIPO_cat algorithms were compared with standard clinical template plans. CVT catheters were further restrained to the template grid (CVT_grid) and compared with HIPO_cat. RESULTS: For dose optimization, IPSA and HIPO were not different from each other. The urethra D10 and the computation time were found significantly better with IPSA and HIPO compared with DVHO (p < 0.0001). All other dosimetric indices were not statistically different from each others (p > 0.05). For catheter placement, CVT plans were better, whereas HIPO_cat plans were significantly worse (p < 0.05) than standard clinical plans. CVT_grid plans were similar to clinical plans and fulfilling American Brachytherapy Society guidelines down to 12 catheters, whereas HIPO_cat plans do not for all catheter numbers. The CVT algorithm run time was significantly faster than HIPO_cat (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Dose optimization engines IPSA, DVHO, and HIPO give similar dosimetric results. The CVT approach was found to be better than HIPO_cat and was able to reduce the number of catheters significantly.

Management of Bartholin's gland carcinoma using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost.

PURPOSE: To describe the patterns of use, clinical outcomes, and dose-volume histogram parameters of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) in the management of Bartholin's gland cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with Stage II-III Bartholin's gland carcinoma treated with CT-based HDR-ISBT boost were reviewed. Plans were generated using an inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm. Dose-volume histogram parameters were assessed. The total doses of HDR-ISBT and EBRT were converted to total equivalent dose in 2Gy (EQD2). RESULTS: All 5 patients received HDR-ISBT as a boost (median dose, 30Gy) after EBRT (median dose, 45Gy). Three patients received postoperative irradiation for gross residual tumor or positive surgical margins and 2 patients were treated by primary chemoradiotherapy. The median V100, D90, and D100 for the CTV were 98.3%, 89Gy10, and 64Gy10 (EQD2), respectively. A complete response was observed in all patients. No local recurrence occurred. All patients remain alive and free of disease (median followup, 78 months; range, 8-93). Severe vaginal toxicities were observed, including vaginal necrosis that resolved with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-ISBT boost after EBRT offers excellent long-term local control in patients with Bartholin's gland carcinoma. HDR-ISBT should be considered for positive surgical margins or residual tumor after surgery and for locally advanced malignancies treated by primary chemoradiotherapy.

Inverse-planned gynecologic high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy: clinical outcomes and dose--volume histogram analysis.

PURPOSE: To present clinical outcomes and dose-volume histogram parameters of three-dimensional image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) in patients with primary or recurrent gynecologic cancer unsuitable for intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of 43 women treated between 2001 and 2009 with iridium-192 gynecologic HDR-ISBT boost, using a Syed-Neblett template and inverse planning simulated annealing dose optimization, were reviewed. Median HDR-ISBT dose was 30Gy, delivered in 4-6Gy/fraction. Dose-volume histogram parameters recommended by the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology for image-based ICB were analyzed. Total doses were normalized to 2Gy fractions (biologically equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions). Local control (LC) and survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were defined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. RESULTS: There were 34 primary malignancies (cervix=12, vagina=15, Bartholin's gland=5, and vulva=2) and 9 recurrences. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution for primary cancers was I=2, II=13, III=15, and IV=4. Median followup was 19.3 months (range, 0-92.2). Two-year LC was 87% for primary cancers, and 45% for recurrent cancers, respectively (p=0.0175). Median V(100), D(90), and D(100) for clinical target volume were 97.6%, 90.2, and 68.7Gy(10), respectively. Median bladder and rectal D(2)(cc) were 76.6 and 79.5Gy(3), respectively. Median urethral D(10) was 80.6Gy(3). Twelve patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 late morbidity, but toxicities were transient. Only 2 patients had persistent severe toxicities. A trend toward increased risk for vaginal necrosis was observed with a clinical target volume >84cc. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-ISBT may achieve good LC in gynecologic cancer unsuitable for ICB, especially in primary malignancies with a 2-year LC rate higher than 85%. Delivery of such high doses has potential advantages but may predispose to adverse effects, reversible in most cases.

3D heterogeneous dose distributions for total body irradiation patients.

One major objective of total body irradiation (TBI) treatments is to deliver a uniform dose in the entire body of the patient. Looking at 3D dose distributions for constant speed (CstSpeed) and variable speed (VarSpeed) translating couch TBI treatments, dose uniformity and the effect of body heterogeneities were evaluated. This study was based on retrospective dose calculations of 10 patients treated with a translating couch TBI technique. Dose distributions for CstSpeed and VarSpeed TBI treatments have been computed with Pinnacle3 treatment planning system in homogeneous (Homo) and heterogeneous (Hetero) dose calculation modes. A specific beam model was implemented in Pinnacle3 to allow an accurate dose calculation adapted for TBI special aspects. Better dose coverages were obtained with Homo/VarSpeed treatments compared to Homo/CstSpeed cases including smaller overdosage areas. Large differences between CstSpeed and VarSpeed dose calculations were observed in the brain, spleen, arms, legs, and lateral parts of the abdomen (differences between V100% mean values up to 57.5%). Results also showed that dose distributions for patients treated with CstSpeed TBI greatly depend on the patient morphology, especially for pediatric and overweight cases. Looking at heterogeneous dose calculations, underdosages (2%-5%) were found in high-density regions (e.g., bones), while overdosages (5%-15%) were found in low-density regions (e.g., lungs). Overall, Homo/CstSpeed and Hetero/VarSpeed dose distributions showed more hot spots than Homo/VarSpeed and were greatly dependent on patient anatomy. CstSpeed TBI treatments allow a simple optimization process but lead to less dose uniformity due to the patient anatomy. VarSpeed TBI treatments require more complex dose optimization, but lead to a better dose uniformity independent of the patient morphology. Finally, this study showed that heterogeneities should be considered in dose calculations in order to obtain a better optimization and, therefore, to improve dose uniformity.

A phantom study of an in vivo dosimetry system using plastic scintillation detectors for real-time verification of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: The goal of the present work was to evaluate the accuracy of a plastic scintillation detector (PSD) system to perform in-phantom dosimetry during 192Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatments. METHODS: A PSD system capable of stem effect removal was built. A red-green-blue photodiode connected to a dual-channel electrometer was used to detect the scintillation light emitted from a green scintillation component and transmitted along a plastic optical fiber. A clinically relevant prostate treatment plan was built using the HDR brachytherapy treatment planning system. An in-house fabricated template was used for accurate positioning of the catheters, and treatment delivery was performed in a water phantom. Eleven catheters were inserted and used for dose delivery from 192Ir radioactive source, while two others were used to mimic dosimetry at the rectum wall and in the urethra using a PSD. The measured dose and dose rate data were compared to the expected values from the planning system. The importance of removing stem effects from in vivo dosimetry using a PSD during 192Ir HDR brachytherapy treatments was assessed. Applications for dwell position error detection and temporal verification of the treatment delivery were also investigated. RESULTS: In-phantom dosimetry measurements of the treatment plan led to a ratio to the expected dose of 1.003 +/- 0.004 with the PSD at different positions in the urethra and 1.043 +/- 0.003 with the PSD inserted in the rectum. Verification for the urethra of dose delivered within each catheter and at specific dwell positions led to average measured to expected ratios of 1.015 +/- 0.019 and 1.014 +/- 0.020, respectively. These values at the rectum wall were 1.059 +/- 0.045 within each catheter and 1.025 +/- 0.028 for specific dwell positions. The ability to detect positioning errors of the source depended of the tolerance on the difference to the expected value. A 5-mm displacement of the source was detected by the PSD system from 78% to 100% of the time depending on the acceptable range value. The implementation of a stem effect removal technique was shown to be necessary, particularly when calculating doses at specific dwell positions, and allowed decreasing the number of false-error detections-the detection of an error when it should not be the case--from 19 to 1 for a 5% threshold out of 43 measurements. The use of the PSD system to perform temporal verification of elapsed time by the source in each catheter--generally on the order of minutes--was shown to be in agreement within a couple of seconds with the treatment plan CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the PSD system used in this study, which was capable of stem effect removal, can perform accurate dosimetry during 192Ir HDR brachytherapy treatment in a water phantom. The system presented here shows some clear advantages over previously proposed dosimetry systems for HDR brachytherapy, and it has the potential for various online verifications of treatment delivery quality.

Dose escalation to the dominant intraprostatic lesion defined by sextant biopsy in a permanent prostate I-125 implant: a prospective comparative toxicity analysis.

PURPOSE: Using real-time intraoperative inverse-planned permanent seed prostate implant (RTIOP/PSI), multiple core biopsy maps, and three-dimensional ultrasound guidance, we planned a boost volume (BV) within the prostate to which hyperdosage was delivered selectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential negative effects of such a procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with RTIOP/PSI for localized prostate cancer with topographic biopsy results received an intraprostatic boost (boost group [BG]). They were compared with patients treated with a standard plan (reference group [RG]). Plans were generated using a simulated annealing inverse planning algorithm. Prospectively recorded urinary, rectal, and sexual toxicities and dosimetric parameters were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 120 patients treated with boost technique who were compared with 70 patients treated with a standard plan. Boost technique did not significantly change the number of seeds (55.1/RG vs. 53.6/BG). The intraoperative prostate V150 was slightly higher in BG (75.2/RG vs. 77.2/BG, p = 0.039). Urethra V100, urethra D90, and rectal D50 were significantly lower in the BG. No significant differences were seen in acute or late urinary, rectal, or sexual toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Because there were no differences between the groups in acute and late toxicities, we believe that BV can be planned and delivered to the dominant intraprostatic lesion without increasing toxicity. It is too soon to say whether a boost technique will ultimately increase local control.

Commissioning and evaluation of an extended SSD photon model for PINNACLE3: an application to total body irradiation.

Total body irradiations (TBIs) are unusual radiation therapy techniques used to treat specific hematological diseases. Most TBI techniques use extended source to patient distances [source-to-skin distance (SSD)] to provide lateral or anteroposterior irradiations. Those techniques differ from one institution to the other since they need to be customized to accommodate for local material constraints. However, with those unusual techniques come additional challenges for dose calculation. The purpose of this study was to obtain an accurate (better than 4%) dose calculation model for extended source-to-skin distance (eSSD) treatment techniques, which will be used for TBI planning. The studied dynamic TBI technique has special aspects (eSSD, beam spoiler, large field, and out of field dose contribution) that need to be considered in dose calculation. The first part of this study presents an eSSD beam model commissioning in PINNACLE3 and its validation. The second part looks at the comparison between two dose calculation algorithms, the 3D pencil beam and the superposition-convolution algorithms implemented in THERAPLAN PLUS and PINNACLE3, respectively. A regular linac beam was commissioned in each treatment planning system and an additional dedicated TBI beam model was implemented in PINNACLE3. The comparison results indicate that the quality of the TBI treatment greatly depends on the treatment planning system and its beam commissioning. The superposition-convolution algorithm (PINNACLE3) provides a better dose calculation tool for TBI than the 3D pencil beam algorithm (THERAPLAN PLUS) with a maximum mean error of 2.2% on a dynamic treatment. The TBI specific beam model of PINNACLE3 (ESSP-P3) also improves the dose calculation. The maximum difference between calculations and measurements (depth doses and beam profiles) was 2% except for extreme cases (build-up region and depth of 20 cm) where the error was higher. Output factor determination and the dose contribution outside the primary beam weaknesses were found in PINNACLE3. Methods are proposed to overcome these limitations. With the correction method applied, the TBI specific beam model allows a maximum mean error of -0.68% on a dynamic treatment. Accurate TBI dose computation necessitates a good dose calculation algorithm combined with a realistic beam model. Inappropriate dose calculation could lead to an important over- or underdose estimation. No perfect algorithm and beam model were found, but methods are proposed to overcome some of the limitations. Those methods are simple and can be used for other eSSD treatment types.

Attenuator design for organs at risk in total body irradiation using a translation technique.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is an efficient part of the treatment for malignant hematological diseases. Dynamic TBI techniques provide great advantages (e.g., dose homogeneity, patient comfort) while overcoming treatment room space restrictions. However, with dynamic techniques come additional organs at risk (OAR) protection challenges. In most dynamic TBI techniques, lead attenuators are used to diminish the dose received by the OARs. The purpose of this study was to characterize the dose deposition under various shapes of attenuators in static and dynamic treatments. This characterization allows for the development of a correction method to improve attenuator design in dynamic treatments. The dose deposition under attenuators at different depths in dynamic treatment was compared with the static situation based on two definitions: the coverage areas and the penumbra regions. The coverage area decreases with depth in dynamic treatment while it is stable for the static situation. The penumbra increases with depth in both treatment modes, but the increasing rate is higher in the dynamic situation. Since the attenuator coverage is deficient in the dynamic treatment mode, a correction method was developed to modify the attenuator design in order to improve the OAR protection. The correction method is divided in two steps. The first step is based on the use of elongation charts, which provide appropriate attenuator coverage and acceptable penumbra for a specific depth. The second point is a correction method for the thoracic inclination, which can introduce an orientation problem in both static and dynamic treatments. This two steps correction method is simple to use and personalized to each patient's anatomy. It can easily be adapted to any dynamic TBI techniques.

Bypassing the learning curve in permanent seed implants using state-of-the-art technology.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate, based on clinical postplan dose distributions, that technology can be used efficiently to eliminate the learning curve associated with permanent seed implant planning and delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose distributions evaluated 30 days after the implant of the initial 22 consecutive patients treated with permanent seed implants at two institutions were studied. Institution 1 (I1) consisted of a new team, whereas institution 2 (I2) had performed more than 740 preplanned implantations over a 9-year period before the study. Both teams had adopted similar integrated systems based on three-dimensional (3D) transrectal ultrasonography, intraoperative dosimetry, and an automated seed delivery and needle retraction system (FIRST, Nucletron). Procedure time and dose volume histogram parameters such as D90, V100, V150, V200, and others were collected in the operating room and at 30 days postplan. RESULTS: The average target coverage from the intraoperative plan (V100) was 99.4% for I1 and 99.9% for I2. D90, V150, and V200 were 191.4 Gy (196.3 Gy), 75.3% (73.0%), and 37.5% (34.1%) for I1 (I2) respectively. None of these parameters shows a significant difference between institutions. The postplan D90 was 151.2 Gy for I1 and 167.3 Gy for I2, well above the 140 Gy from the Stock et al. analysis, taking into account differences at planning, results in a p value of 0.0676. The procedure time required on average 174.4 min for I1 and 89 min for I2. The time was found to decrease with the increasing number of patients. CONCLUSION: State-of-the-art technology enables a new brachytherapy team to obtain excellent postplan dose distributions, similar to those achieved by an experienced team with proven long-term clinical results. The cost for bypassing the usual dosimetry learning curve is time, with increasing team experience resulting in shorter treatment times.

Performing daily prostate targeting with a standard V-EPID and an automated radio-opaque marker detection algorithm.

Online prostate positioning using gold markers and a standard video-based electronic portal imaging device is reported. The average systematic (random) errors have been reduced from 2.1 mm (2.7 mm) to 0.5 mm (1.5 mm) in AP direction, 1.1 mm (1.7 mm) to 0.7 mm (1.2 mm) SI and 1.2 mm (1.7 mm) to 0.6 mm (1.3 mm) LR.