RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric surgery performed worldwide. The Titan stapler aims to standardize the sleeve gastrectomy by eliminating inconsistencies and simplifying the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients > 18 years of age undergoing LSG using the Titan. Pre-operative demographics, perioperative findings, and post-operative complications were all abstracted from the MBSAQIP database. RESULTS: A total of 807 LSG have been performed using the latest iteration of the Titan stapler since November 2022. Data from these patients was compared to 3829 patients who underwent LSG using a sequential staple firing technique from September 2016-September 2021. The median age of Titan patients was 42 years (IQR 33-52) compared to 44 years (IQR 35-54) for sequential firing. The median pre-operative BMI was 47.1 (IQR 43.5-52.1) for Titan versus 47.6 (IQR 43.1-53.3) for sequential staple firing. After propensity matching, operative duration was significantly less for the Titan. Titan patients had decreased hospital length of stay, experienced fewer 30-day readmissions, and had less post-operative nausea/vomiting. Post-op bleed rates were similar between the two cohorts. Weight loss at 6 months favored the sequential fire arm, but our preliminary data shows this difference diminishes at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Here we report our data on patients undergoing LSG using the latest Titan stapler. We show the device is safe, effective, and has resulted in an improvement in length of stay, readmissions, and post-operative nausea/vomiting. We also noted reduced operative time with this technique.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that patients with abdominal pain and biliary dyskinesia (low ejection fraction <35 â%) have significant improvement of symptoms following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but there is lack of evidence that demonstrates whether patients with biliary symptoms and a normal ejection fraction (>35 â%) will have similar results. METHODS: Retrospective, single center study of patients with biliary pain and negative workup, including HIDA with EF>35 â%, who were treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 2017 to 2022. RESULTS: There were 117 total patients. The mean age was 45.49 â± â15.5 years and 101 (86 â%) were female. 101 (86 â%) of patients underwent a right upper quadrant ultrasound, 91 had normal findings, 9 difficult to visualize anatomy and 1 had adenomyomatosis. All patients had a normal HIDA scan and ejection fraction 104 (89 â%) of patients followed up in clinic within 30 days of surgical intervention. 87 (84 â%) reported resolution of pre-operative symptomatology after surgical intervention. There was no statistically significant correlation between pain with CCK administration during HIDA (p â= â0.803) scan or ejection fraction (p â= â0.0977) with resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be a beneficial intervention for patients with abdominal pain and normokinetic biliary disease. Offering surgical intervention early on can potentially save patients from exhaustive diagnostic investigations and possibly misdiagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Discinesia Biliar , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Iminoácidos , Discinesia Biliar/diagnóstico , Discinesia Biliar/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The impact of a visual pain medication schedule on opioid use among hospitalized trauma patients is unknown. We examined whether removal of this displayed schedule would decrease oral morphine equivalent (OME) use. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared OME use in trauma patients in the inpatient setting before and after removing the patient-facing pain medication schedule that is typically displayed on the patient's white board for all trauma admissions. RESULTS: 707 patients were included. The control (n = 308, 43.6%) and intervention (n = 399, 56.4%) groups were similar in age (p = 0.06). There was no difference in total inpatient OME use between the control and intervention groups, median 50 (IQR: 22.5-118) vs 60 (IQR: 22.5-126), p = 0.79, respectively. No difference in total OME use was observed when patients were stratified by age, sex, race, ISS, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Removing a visual display of the pain medication schedule did not decrease OME use in inpatient trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Potential concussive events (PCEs) are a major health concern in football. Though there are protocols set in place for assessments of PCEs, there has been no evidence of adherence in major football tournaments. METHODS: Our research goal is to determine if PCEs in elite football are professionally assessed according to the International Conference on Concussion in Sport (ICCS) consensus statement recommendations. Identification and analysis of PCEs in the 2018 World Cup (WC) were accomplished through standardised observation of video footage by trained observers. Results were contrasted with data from the 2014 WC and 2016 Euro Cup. Our primary outcomes include frequency and professional assessment of PCEs, signs of concussions and time stopped for assessments. FINDINGS: In the 64 games of the 2018 WC, 87 PCEs (1.36 per game) were identified. Thirty-one (35.6%) PCEs were professionally assessed, resulting in the removal of three (3.5%) players from the match. Six (6.9%) PCEs showed one sign of concussion, 60 (69.0%) showed two signs, 20 (23.0%) showed three signs and 1 (1.2%) showed four or more signs. The mean time stopped for assessment was 63.3 s. No significant change in the percentage of professional assessments (mean=33.4%, 95% CI 20.7% to 46.1%) were identified across tournaments (p=0.42). INTERPRETATION: These findings demonstrate a need for adherence to concussion protocols in order to improve the brain-health of athletes. Proper enforcement of the ICCS protocols during these tournaments and promoting player health and safety can influence the officiating, coaching and playing of football worldwide by promoting player safety.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Fútbol Americano , Fútbol , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Humanos , IncidenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Identify patterns in the nature and characteristics of potential concussive events (PCEs) in football. METHODS: This study analysed the incidence and characteristics of PCEs that occurred during the 2014 and 2018 Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cups, and the 2016 UEFA Euro Cup. PCEs were defined as direct head collision incidents resulting in the athlete being unable to immediately resume play for at least 5 sec following impact. RESULTS: A total of 218 incidents were identified in 179 matches (1.22 per match, 36.91 per 1000 hours of exposure). The most common mechanism of PCE was elbow-to-head (28.7%, n=68). The frontal region was the most frequently affected location of impact with 22.8% (n=54). CONCLUSION: Our study defined the identification, prevalence and nature of PCEs in professional international soccer tournaments. Our findings indicate the different contexts and mechanisms of head contact and contact to different regions of the head can be associated with varying signs of concussion. The results highlight targets for future injury prevention strategies.