Infections Associated with Medtronic Duet External Ventricular Drains - Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, January 2023-January 2024.

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are medical devices that are inserted into the ventricles of the brain to drain excess fluid, manage intracranial hypertension, monitor intracranial pressure, and administer medications. Unintentional disconnections and breaks or fractures (breaks) of EVDs or associated drainage system components can result in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and increased risk for EVD-associated infections. After replacement of Integra Life Sciences EVD systems with Medtronic Duet EVD systems at Rhode Island Hospital in mid-September 2023, a threefold increase was observed in the prevalence of positive CSF cultures, from 2.8 per 1,000 days with an EVD in place (EVD days) during January-September 2023 to 11.4 per 1,000 EVD days during October 2023-January 2024 (rate ratio [RR] = 5.7; 95% CI = 1.5-22.0; p = 0.01) and an eightfold increase in the prevalence of infections, from 0.7 to 6.5 per 1,000 EVD days (RR = 9.8; 95% CI = 1.1-87.3; p = 0.04). An investigation by Rhode Island Hospital Infection Control during December 2023-January 2024 identified frequent reports of disconnections and breaks of the Medtronic Duet EVD system. A search of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database identified 326 reports nationwide of disconnection and breaks of components of the Duet EVD system, including 175 during 2023. A Medical Product Safety Network report was filed. The Duet EVD product was ultimately recalled in January 2024, citing disconnections of the EVD system and reports of CSF leakage and infection. Given the widespread use of EVD systems by neurosurgery centers and the risk for EVD-associated infections, a strategy for future consideration by hospital infection prevention and control programs might be inclusion of EVD-associated infections in hospital surveillance programs to rapidly identify increases in these events and determine factors related to such infections to prevent additional infections.

Differences in microorganisms causing infection after cranial and spinal surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this retrospective study was to assess differences in the pathogens causing surgical site infections (SSIs) following craniectomies/craniotomies and open spinal surgery. The secondary aim was to assess differences in rates of SSI among these operative procedures. METHODS: ANOVA tests with Bonferroni correction and incidence risk ratios (RRs) were used to identify differences in pathogens by surgical site and procedure using retrospective, de-identified records of 19,993 postneurosurgical patients treated between 2007 and 2020. RESULTS: The overall infection rates for craniotomy/craniectomy, laminectomy, and fusion were 2.1%, 1.1%, and 1.5%, respectively, and overall infection rates for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine surgery were 0.3%, 1.6%, and 1.9%, respectively. Craniotomy/craniectomy was more likely to result in an SSI than spine surgery (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2, p < 0.0001). Cutibacterium acnes (RR 24.2, 95% CI 7.3-80.0, p < 0.0001); coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (methicillin-susceptible CoNS: RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.4, p = 0.0006; methicillin-resistant CoNS: RR 5.6, 95% CI 1.4-22.3, p = 0.02); Klebsiella aerogenes (RR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-25.1, p = 0.0003); Serratia marcescens (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-7.1, p = 0.01); Enterobacter cloacae (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.1, p = 0.02); and Candida albicans (RR 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.3, p = 0.02) were more commonly associated with craniotomy/craniectomy cases than fusion or laminectomy SSIs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more commonly associated with fusion SSIs than craniotomy SSIs (RR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3-14.8, p = 0.02), whereas Escherichia coli was nonsignificantly associated with fusion SSIs compared to craniotomy SSIs (RR 4.1, 95% CI 0.9-18.1, p = 0.06). Infections with E. coli and P. aeruginosa occurred primarily in the lumbar spine (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SSIs due to typical gastrointestinal or genitourinary gram-negative bacteria occur most commonly following lumbar surgery, particularly fusion, and are likely to be due to contamination of the surgical bed with microbial flora in the perianal area and genitourinary tract. Cutibacterium acnes in the skin flora of the head and neck increases risk of infection due to this microbe following surgical interventions in these body sites. The types of gram-negative bacteria associated with craniotomy/craniectomy SSIs suggest potential environmental sources of these pathogens. Based on the authors' findings, neurosurgeons should consider using a two-step skin preparation with benzoyl peroxide, in addition to a standard antiseptic such as alcoholic chlorhexidine for cranial, cervical, and upper thoracic surgeries. Additionally, broader gram-negative bacterial coverage, such as use of a third-generation cephalosporin, should be considered for lumbar/lumbosacral fusion surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Seasonality of healthcare-associated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

From April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2022, growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from clinical specimens at our academic medical center was significantly more likely during July-September than during other calendar quarters.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Presurgical Staphylococcus aureus PCR Assay Compared with Culture and Post-PCR Implementation Surgical Site Infection Rates.

Nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus is a well-referenced risk factor for postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs). Our health care system that performs >40,000 surgeries per year assessed both the diagnostic accuracy of the BD MAX StaphSR assay (MAX StaphSR), a PCR-based test that detects and differentiates S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), compared with our standard of care culture and the subsequent clinical impact on SSIs 1 year after implementation. In addition, residual specimens were tested by broth-enriched culture. Performance parameters for all methods were determined using latent class analysis. Direct culture was the least sensitive for S. aureus (85.1%) and MRSA (76.7%), whereas the MAX StaphSR assay and broth-enriched culture had similar sensitivities (96.7%) for MRSA. Prospective assessment using MAX StaphSR during a 1-year, postimplementation period revealed a lower rate of SSIs per 100 targeted surgeries (0.3) compared with MRSA-only screening (1.10) and no screening (2.28) (P < 0.05 for StaphSR versus MRSA-only screening and StaphSR versus no testing). MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus SSIs occurred equally (n = 14 each). The MAX StaphSR assay provided accurate detection of both S. aureus and MRSA nasal colonization in presurgical patients, allowing infection prevention measures, including presurgical prophylaxis, to be implemented in a timely and consistent manner to avoid SSIs.

Prevention of hospital-acquired respiratory viral infections: Assessment of a multimodal intervention program.

A multimodal program focused on preventing nosocomial respiratory viral infections. Definite cases per 1,000 discharges increased 1.3-fold in hospital units screening visitors for respiratory viral symptoms during the 2017-2018 respiratory virus season but not during the 2016-2017 season. Definite cases per 1,000 discharges increased 3.1-fold in hospital units that did not screen visitors either season.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in southern New England children.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to understand the epidemiology of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections in southern New England children. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of children 0 to 18 years old with MRSA isolated by the Rhode Island Hospital microbiology laboratory (Providence, RI) between 1997 and 2001. A case was classified as either health care-associated MRSA (HCA-MRSA) or CA-MRSA based on time of culture and other strict criteria. The spectrum of illness of the HCA-MRSA and CA-MRSA cases was compared, as were the antibiotic-susceptibility patterns of their isolates. Risk factors for CA-MRSA acquisition were identified, and molecular subtyping of selected isolates was performed. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2001, S aureus was isolated from 1063 children. Of these children, 57 had MRSA. During this period, both the absolute number of MRSA cases and the proportion of S aureus cases due to MRSA rose more than threefold due to increases in both CA-MRSA and HCA-MRSA infections. Of the 57 MRSA cases, 23 (40%) were CA-MRSA. CA-MRSA patients were more likely to have skin/soft-tissue infections than HCA-MRSA patients (83% vs 38%). Risk factors for acquisition of MRSA including intrafamilial spread, frequent antibiotic exposure, and child-care attendance were identified in 8 of the 23 (35%) CA-MRSA patients. CA-MRSA isolates were more likely to be susceptible to non-beta-lactam antibiotics than HCA-MRSA isolates. All isolates were vancomycin susceptible. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA accounts for an increasing proportion of all pediatric S aureus infections in southern New England. A significant percentage of these cases are due to CA-MRSA. Pediatricians should have heightened suspicion for CA-MRSA in children with presumed S aureus infections, especially if they have skin/soft-tissue infections or risk factors for MRSA acquisition.