Outcomes of pirtobrutinib for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in compassionate use program in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a type of B-cell lymphoma that is currently incurable. Pirtobrutinib shows promising response rates in heavily pretreated MCL patients according to the approval study, but the real-world data are scarce. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety profile of pirtobrutinib in 10 relapsed/refractory MCL patients from compassionate use program (CUP). RESULTS: On average, the patients underwent three lines of systemic therapy prior to pirtobrutinib and were predominantly BTKi exposed (9/10). The best overall response rate (BORR) was 67%. In a median follow-up of 8.6 months, the mean duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were not reached. No new safety signals were documented. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, pirtobrutinib represented a safe and effective treatment option in a small real-world population.

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy shows similar efficacy and toxicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma aged 70 and older compared to younger patients: A multicenter cohort study.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has become a standard treatment for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). While the benefits of CAR-T cell treatment are clear in the general patient population, there remains a relative scarcity of real-world evidence regarding its efficacy and toxicity in patients (pts) aged ≥70 years with DLBCL. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis including 172 r/r DLBCL pts with CAR-T cell treatment, axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel, between 2019 and 2023 at three tertiary centers. Pts were grouped by age at CAR-T infusion (<70 vs. ≥70 years). Subsequently, descriptive and survival analyses, including propensity score matching, were performed to compare outcomes between both age groups. We identified 109 pts aged <70 and 63 pts aged ≥70 years. Overall response rates for both age groups were comparable (77.7% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.63). With a median follow-up of 8.3 months, median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-21.8) and 11.1 months (95% CI: 4.9-NR) (p = 0.93) for both cohorts. Median overall survival reached 21.8 months (95% CI: 11.8-NR) and 34.4 months (95% CI: 10.1-NR) (p = 0.97), respectively. No significant differences in the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (p = 0.53) or grade ≥3 neurotoxicity (p = 0.56) were observed. Relapse and nonrelapse mortality were not significantly different between both groups. Our findings provide additional support that CAR-T cell therapy is feasible and effective in patients with r/r DLBCL aged 70 years or older, demonstrating outcomes comparable to those observed in younger patients. CAR-T cell therapy should be not withheld for elderly patients with r/r DLBCL.

Methotrexate Drug Monitoring From Central Access: Can Blood Sample Collection From Central Venous Access Replace Peripheral Venipuncture in Adults?

BACKGROUND: Intravenous high-dose methotrexate (MTX ≥ 1 g/m 2 ) is frequently used in patients with cerebral lymphoma or other malignancies. In addition to its potent efficacy, it is known to have pronounced toxicity and life-threatening side effects. Regular-level monitoring at short and defined intervals is mandatory. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of replacing peripheral blood sampling with blood samples from central venous catheters for therapeutic monitoring of MTX in adults. METHODS: A total of 6 patients and 7 cycles of chemotherapy (6 females; 5 with cerebral non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 1 with osteosarcoma, median age 51 years; range 33-62 years) were included. An immunoassay was used for quantitative analysis of MTX levels. The measurement points were obtained in the time intervals of 24, 42, 48, and 72 hours, and afterward, every 24 hours until the level was below <0.1 µmol/L. After flushing with 10 mL of saline solution and discarding 10 mL of venous blood, blood was drawn from the central venous access through which MTX had previously been administered. Simultaneously, MTX levels were obtained from peripheral venipuncture. RESULTS: Methotrexate levels from central venous access and MTX levels from peripheral venipuncture showed a significant correlation (r = 0.998; P < 0.01; n = 35). During withdrawal from the central access group, 17 values showed a lower MTX level, 10 showed a higher level, and 8 showed no difference. However, the MTX level difference was not significant ( P = 0.997, linear mixed model). No increase in the dose of calcium folinate was necessary based on the collected MTX levels. CONCLUSIONS: In adults, MTX monitoring from central venous access is not inferior to monitoring from peripheral venipuncture. Repeated venipuncture to measure MTX levels can be replaced after establishing standardized instructions for proper sampling by a central venous catheter.

Impact of Elevated LDH on Cystatin C-Based Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimates in Patients with Cancer.

Background: The determination of renal function is crucial for the clinical management of patients with cancer. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) serves as a key parameter, estimated by creatinine clearance determination in 24-h collected urine (CrCl) as well as equation-based approaches (eGFR) relying on serum creatinine (eGFR CKD EPIcrea) or serum cystatin C (eGFR cystatin C). Serum creatinine and serum cystatin C levels differentially depend on muscle and tumor mass, respectively. Although muscle and tumor mass may thus represent confounding factors, comparative studies for eGFR estimate approaches in cancer patients are lacking. Methods: The present study retrospectively analyzed GFR estimates based on equations of creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys) and combined creatinine-cystatin C levels (eGFRcr-cys) in a subset of patients. The associations of LDH with cystatin C or LDH with eGFRcr, eGFRcys and GFRcr-cys were explored. Results: The laboratory values of 123 consecutive patients were included. The median age was 59 (24−87) and 47.2% were female. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean of CKD EPIcrea (85.17 ± 21.63 mL/min/1.73 m2), CKD EPIcys (61.16 ± 26.03 mL/min/1.73 m2) and CKD EPIcrea-cys (70.42 ± 23.89 mL/min/1.73 m2) (p < 0.0001). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation of elevated plasma LDH >1.5 UNV and cystatin C values (r = 0.270, p < 0.01, n = 123). LDH values >1.5 UNV were associated with significantly lower CKD EPIcys (r = 0.184, p < 0.01) or CKD EPIcrea-cys (r = 0.226, p < 0.05) estimates compared to CKD EPIcrea. Conclusions: The inclusion of cystatin C as a biomarker led to a lower eGFR estimates compared to creatinine alone or in a combination of both cystatin C and creatinine. The level of cystatin C correlated with the level of LDH, suggesting that the use of cystatin C-based calculations of GFR in cancer patients with elevated LDH should be used with caution.