RESUMEN
Background: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is currently considered the gold standard method for adrenal surgery. Open surgery is the most frequent technique preferred amongst surgeons who are faced with tumours of larger sizes or challenging lesions. Despite the increasing interest in laparoscopy, most centres still utilise open surgery for challenging adrenal cases. and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated our successive 30 robotic adrenalectomies performed in the past 10 years and assigned the patients into 'difficult' and 'easy' groups. Patients with malignant tumours or tumour size of over 8 cm were assigned to the 'difficult group' and others to the 'easy group'. Groups were evaluated according to the demographic features of the patients, side of the operation, the body mass index (BMI) and laparotomy history. The duration of anaesthesia, amount of bleeding during surgery and the hospitalisation periods were also evaluated. Results: There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups considering age, gender, BMI value, operation side, presence or absence of a laparotomy history, the amount of bleeding during the operation and hospitalisation duration (P > 0.05). The anaesthesia duration was found to be higher in the 'difficult' patient group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Our results present robust evidence to support the idea that robotic adrenalectomy is not only a doable but also a safe option for malignant and large adrenal masses.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The current study aims to analyze the risk factors for the failure of ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: All patients who underwent a laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with a diverting ileostomy between 2007 and 2014 were abstracted. The patients who underwent and did not undergo a diverting ileostomy procedure were compared regarding patient, tumor, treatment related parameters, and survival. RESULTS: Among 160 (103 males [64.4%], mean [± standard deviation] age was 58.1 ± 11.9 years) patients, stoma reversal was achieved in 136 cases (85%). Anastomotic stricture (n = 13, 52.4%) was the most common reason for stoma reversal. These were the risk factors for the failure of stoma reversal: Male sex (P = 0.035), having complications (P = 0.01), particularly an anastomotic leak (P < 0.001), or surgical site infection (P = 0.019) especially evisceration (P = 0.011), requirement for reoperation (P = 0.003) and longer hospital stay (P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 7.82; P = 0.022) and additional organ resection (OR, 6.71; P = 0.027) were the risk factors. Five-year survival rates were similar (P = 0.143). CONCLUSION: Fifteen percent of patients cannot receive a stoma reversal after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Anastomotic stricture is the most common reason for the failure of stoma takedown. Having complications, particularly an anastomotic leak and the necessity of reoperation, limits the stoma closure rate. Male sex and additional organ resection are the risk factors for the failure in multivariate analyses. These patients require a longer hospitalization period, but have similar survival rates as those who receive stoma closure procedure.