Effect of home parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our research was to determine the impact of clinical nutrition in the form of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in patients with nutritional disorders, most often caused by diseases of the digestive tract, with the risk of developing malnutrition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients from the Gastroenterology Clinic and the Home Parenteral Nutrition Center of the University Hospital Bratislava, whose nutritional status was evaluated based on the determination of the body mass index (BMI), the completed nutritional risk screening (NRS) questionnaire and the determination of performance status. Subsequently, after fulfilling the criteria for HPN, the initiation of parenteral nutrition (PN) followed, implemented in a domestic environment for the following two years as HPN. During this period, we did a monthly check-up of the objective condition and laboratory parameters of the enrolled patients, which were the basis for adjusting the nutritional treatment. We also evaluated the occurrence of infectious and thrombotic complications clinically and on the basis of laboratory parameters focused on culture and hemocoagulation examination. After two years, we performed control exit examinations, which we compared with the entrance examinations and statistically evaluated the success of the treatment. We evaluated the obtained data using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: During HPN, there was a statistically significant elevation of the individual monitored values ​​(BMI, absolute lymphocytes count, cholesterol, cholinesterase, total proteins, albumins), which clearly proves correctly indicated and managed HPN. We recorded vein thrombosis in v. subclavia and v. jugularis in 6 (15 %) patients. Subsequent catheter extraction was necessary after unsuccessful catheter insertion. In 13 (33 %) patients, tunneled catheter replacement was required due to infection. The mortality rate in our group was 8 % (3 patients). These were female patients aged 39, 42, and 66 years. The cause of death in all of these patients was the underlying diagnosis (oncohematological disease, systemic connective tissue disease, and repeated resections of the digestive tract for inflammatory GIT disease with the development of severe malnutrition). We recorded a positive effect of applied HPN in all three patients until death.We did not register any factors that would have a relevant influence on the success of administered HPN. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we can conclude that the patients included in the HPN were correctly indicated, and all of them, based on the monitored parameters (regardless of gender, age, initial diagnosis, or BMI value), benefited from the applied treatment, which was correctly chosen based on their individual needs. Our results clearly document the irreplaceable role of HPN in the management of patients with nutritional intake disorders leading to the development of malnutrition (Tab. 2, Fig. 10, Ref. 44). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: malnutrition, nutritional risk screening, clinical nutrition, home parenteral nutrition, complications.

Antibiotic therapy in acute pancreatitis: From global overuse to evidence based recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Unwarranted administration of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis presents a global challenge. The clinical reasoning behind the misuse is poorly understood. Our aim was to investigate current clinical practices and develop recommendations that guide clinicians in prescribing antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Four methods were used. 1) Systematic data collection was performed to summarize current evidence; 2) a retrospective questionnaire was developed to understand the current global clinical practice; 3) five years of prospectively collected data were analysed to identify the clinical parameters used by medical teams in the decision making process, and finally; 4) the UpToDate Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was applied to provide evidence based recommendations for healthcare professionals. RESULTS: The systematic literature search revealed no consensus on the start of AB therapy in patients with no bacterial culture test. Retrospective data collection on 9728 patients from 22 countries indicated a wide range (31-82%) of antibiotic use frequency in AP. Analysis of 56 variables from 962 patients showed that clinicians initiate antibiotic therapy based on increased WBC and/or elevated CRP, lipase and amylase levels. The above mentioned four laboratory parameters showed no association with infection in the early phase of acute pancreatitis. Instead, procalcitonin levels proved to be a better biomarker of early infection. Patients with suspected infection because of fever had no benefit from antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The authors formulated four consensus statements to urge reduction of unjustified antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis and to use procalcitonin rather than WBC or CRP as biomarkers to guide decision-making.

Gene polymorphisms involved in manifestation of leucopenia, digestive intolerance, and pancreatitis in azathioprine-treated patients.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10-28 % of patients experience adverse drug reactions related to treatment with thiopurines. The most serious reaction is myelosuppression, typically manifested as leucopenia, which occurs in approximately 2-5 % of patients. Other adverse drug reactions that often accompany thiopurine therapy are pancreatitis, hepatotoxicity, allergic reactions, digestive intolerance, arthralgia, febrile conditions, and rash. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between variant alleles of thiopurine S-methyltransferase (SNPs 238G > C, 460G > A and 719A > G), inosine triphosphate diphosphatase (SNPs 94C > A and IVS2 + 21A > C), and xanthine dehydrogenase (837C > T) and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions to azathioprine therapy. METHODS: Genotype was determined for 188 Caucasians diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease treated with a standard dose of azathioprine (1.4-2.0 mg/kg/day). Allelic variants were determined by PCR-REA and real-time PCR methods. Results were statistically evaluated by use of Fisher's test and by odds ratio calculation. RESULTS: Variant genotype thiopurine S-methyltransferase predisposes to development of leucopenia (P = 0.003, OR = 5, CI 95 %, 1.8058-13.8444). Although not statistically significant, we observed a trend that suggested correlation between the occurrence of digestive intolerance and the variant genotype inosine triphosphate diphosphatase (P = 0.1102; OR 15.63, CI 95 %, 1.162-210.1094), and between the occurrence of pancreatitis and the variant allele xanthine dehydrogenase 837T (P = 0.1124; OR 12,1, CI 95 %, 1.15-126.37). CONCLUSION: The variant genotype thiopurine S-methyltransferase has been associated with the occurrence of leucopenia. The involvement of polymorphisms in inosine triphosphate diphosphatase and xanthine dehydrogenase genes in the development of digestive intolerance and pancreatitis will require further verification.

Budesonide 9 mg is at least as effective as mesalamine 4.5 g in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Comparative data on budesonide vs mesalamine for the treatment of mild-to-moderately active Crohn's disease (CD) are sparse. We assessed the efficacy and safety of each therapy in patients with mildly to moderately active CD. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 8-week, multicenter study in which 309 patients with mildly to moderately active CD received pH-modified-release oral budesonide (9 mg/day once daily or 3 mg/day 3 times daily) or Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalamine (4.5 g/day). RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable, clinical remission (defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index ≤150), at the final visit occurred in 69.5% (107 of 154) of patients given budesonide vs 62.1% (95 of 153) of patients given mesalamine (difference, 7.4%; 95% repeated confidence interval, -4.6% to 18.0%; P = .001 for noninferiority). Clinical remission rates did not differ significantly between the 2 budesonide groups. Treatment response, defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index of 150 or less and/or a decrease of 70 or more (Δ70) or 100 or more (Δ100) points from baseline to final visit, did not differ significantly between patients given budesonide vs mesalamine (Δ70, P = .11; Δ100, P = .15), or between the 2 budesonide groups (Δ70, P = .38; Δ100, P = .78). No other efficacy end points differed significantly between groups. Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 3% and 5% of budesonide- and mesalamine-treated patients, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in adverse events between the 2 budesonide groups. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide (9 mg/day) was numerically, but not statistically, more effective than Eudragit-L-coated mesalamine (4.5 g/day) in patients with mildly to moderately active CD. Budesonide (9 mg/day), administered once daily, was as effective as the standard (3 times daily) regimen.

Importance of thiopurine S-Methyltransferase gene polymorphisms for prediction of azathioprine toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to find the relationship between metabolic enzyme thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene polymorphisms and clinical output of the therapy with azathioprine. We focused on patients who experienced leucopenia caused by high blood levels of active azathioprine metabolites. DESIGN: Our group consists of 87 patients who have been treated by azathioprine. 21 individuals experienced leucopenia during treatment with standard dose of azathioprine. We have used PCR-REA and "real-time" PCR methods for genotype detection G238C, G460G and A719G substitutions in TPMT gene. RESULTS: We have found statistical association between the presence of non-standard TPMT alleles and adverse event associated with azathioprine treatment - leucopenia (p=0.0033). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that TPMT genotyping prior to the treatment with azathioprine could predict patients with genetic predisposition for serious leucopenia and seems to be a useful genetic marker for individualisation of the therapy.