Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy for focal liver lesions: Adverse events and diagnostic yield in a single-centre analysis.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided biopsy of focal liver lesions (FLL) is a well-established procedure with crucial impact on therapeutic decisions. The safety and accuracy depend on needle type, tumour location and comorbidities. Modern oncological concepts often require large tumour specimens which may increase the procedural risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from consecutively scheduled ultrasound-guided FLL biopsies performed in an interdisciplinary ultrasound unit at a university hospital from 2015-2020. We analysed complication rates, diagnostic accuracy, and patient outcome in a one-year period. RESULTS: Of 426 scheduled interventions, 339 were included: 322 primary biopsies (40% female, median age 65 years, median BMI 25.4 kg/m2) and 17 rebiopsies in cases with undetermined diagnosis. Indications comprised 309 (96%) cases with suspected malignant lesions. Important comorbidities were type 2 diabetes (n = 107, 33%) and cirrhosis (n = 64, 20%). A conclusive histopathological diagnosis was achieved in 270 (84%) cases with a weak association with lesion size (OR 1.12 per cm, 95%CI 0.99-1.27). Greater BMI (OR 0.60 per 10 BMI points, 95%CI 0.34-1.05) showed a trend towards an insufficient diagnosis. Relevant complications occurred in 8 (2.5%) cases (2 major; 1 life-threatening). Multiple passes showed a trend towards adverse events (OR 2.32 for > 1 pass, 95%CI 0.99-5.42). 93 (29%) patients died during a median follow-up of 171 days. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided FLL biopsy is an efficient and safe diagnostic measure. The limitations of the procedure and its associated risks should be considered in patients with advanced malignancies.

The Liver Maximum Capacity Test (LiMAx) Is Associated with Short-Term Survival in Patients with Early Stage HCC Undergoing Transarterial Treatment.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are recommended to treat patients with early or intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The liver maximum capacity test (LiMAx) has been supposed to predict the risk of post-interventional liver failure. We investigated the correlation of LiMAx with short-term survival as primary endpoint and the occurrence of adverse events after therapy as secondary endpoint. Our study cohort prospectively included 69 patients receiving TACE (n = 57) or TARE (n = 12). LiMAx test and serological analyses were performed on the day before and 4 weeks after treatment. Hepatic and extrahepatic complications were monitored for 4 weeks. The LiMAx results were not associated with altered liver function and the occurrence of adverse events. The survival rates of patients with BCLC A with LiMAx ≤ 150 µg/kg/h were lower after 30 days (75.0 ± 15.3% vs. 100%, p = 0.011), 90 days (62.5 ± 17.7% vs. 95.8 ± 4.1%, p = 0.011) and 180 days (50.0 ± 17.7% vs. 95.8 ± 4.1%, p = 0.001) compared to those with higher LiMAx levels. The LiMAx test is not suitable to predict liver function abnormalities or the occurrence of complications 4 weeks after therapy but enables the identification of patients with early stage HCC and reduced short-term survival after treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Bulevirtide plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Real-World Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and D Co-Infection.

Background: The hepatitis B and D virus (HBV/HDV) hepatocyte entry inhibitor bulevirtide (BLV) has been available in Europe since July 2020, after the registrational trial MYR202. Real-life data on the efficacy and safety of BLV are sparse. Methods: We have analysed the course of treatment with BLV (2 mg/day) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (245 mg/day) in patients with chronic hepatitis delta (CHD). Virologic (≥2 log reduction in HDV RNA or suppression of HDV RNA below the lower limit of detection) and biochemical (normalisation of serum ALT) treatment responses after 24 weeks were defined according to the MYR202 trial. Results: Seven patients were recruited (four with liver cirrhosis Child−Pugh A). After 24 weeks, a virologic response was observed in five of seven and a biochemical response was seen in three of six patients with elevated serum ALT at baseline. Extended treatment data > 48 weeks were available in three cases: two presented with continuous virologic and biochemical responses and in one individual an HDV-RNA breakthrough was observed. Adverse effects were not recorded. Conclusions: The first real-life data of the approved dosage of 2 mg of BLV in combination with TDF confirm the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the registrational trial MYR202 for a treatment period of 24 weeks and beyond.

Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Fatty Liver Disease.

Hepatic steatosis is a commonly seen phenomenon in clinical practice and is the result of the accumulation of lipids in the hepatocytes. In most cases steatosis refers to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but it also occurs in other diseases of the liver parenchyma of a different etiology and is the result of the dysregulation of metabolic processes. Consequently, inflammatory processes can induce progressive fibrosis. Due to the high prevalence of fatty liver disease, a further increase in metabolic liver cirrhosis with corresponding complications can be expected in the near future. Due to its broad availability, ultrasound is particularly important, especially for the management of NAFLD. In addition to diagnosis and risk stratification, the monitoring of high-risk patients in NAFLD is becoming increasingly clinically important. Multimodality ultrasound includes B-mode and duplex methods, analysis of tissue stiffness (elastography), contrast-enhanced imaging (CEUS), and steatosis quantification. When using ultrasound in fatty liver disease, a standardized approach that takes into account the limitations of the method is essential.

Current NAFLD guidelines for risk stratification in diabetic patients have poor diagnostic discrimination.

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and associated complications. This study evaluated the performance of international (EASL-EASD-EASO) and national (DGVS) guidelines for NAFLD risk stratification. Patients with T2D prospectively underwent ultrasound, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and serum-based fibrosis markers. Guideline-based risk classification and referral rates for different screening approaches were compared and the diagnostic properties of simplified algorithms, genetic markers and a new NASH surrogate (FAST score) were evaluated. NAFLD risk was present in 184 of 204 screened patients (age 64.2 ± 10.7 years; BMI 32.6 ± 7.6 kg/m2). EASL-EASD-EASO recommended specialist referral for 60-77% depending on the fibrosis score used, only 6% were classified as low risk. The DGVS algorithm required LSM for 76%; 25% were referred for specialised care. The sensitivities of the diagnostic pathways were 47-96%. A simplified referral strategy revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 46/88% for fibrosis risk. Application of the FAST score reduced the referral rate to 35%. This study (a) underlines the high prevalence of fibrosis risk in T2D, (b) demonstrates very high referral rates for in-depth hepatological work-up, and (c) indicates that simpler referral algorithms may produce comparably good results and could facilitate NAFLD screening.

Biopsy rate and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Background: Licensed therapies for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) do not yet exist, but clinical trials are testing treatment options. Inclusion criteria often require liver biopsy showing fibrosis (F2/3) or cirrhosis (F4) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, histological criteria pose a serious obstacle for recruitment.Aims: Characterize the relevance of liver biopsies in the selection of patients with NAFLD.Methods: Patients between 2013 and 2018 with the ICD-10 code K76.0 were analyzed. Fibrosis was defined by the NASH clinical research network (CRN) fibrosis staging system, NASH by a NAFLD activity score (NAS) ≥4. Predictive factors were determined by logistic regression.Results: Liver biopsy was performed in 87/638 (13.6%) patients (49% female, age 52.5 ± 14.0, BMI 30.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2). Fibrosis stage F0/F1/F2/F3/F4 was observed in N = 7/47/7/17/9, an NAS ≥4 in N = 27. Fibrosis stage F2/F3 and F4 along with NAS ≥4 was found in 1.7% and 0.5% of cases. Liver stiffness measurement, LSM (OR 2.3 per doubling of value; CI 1.3-4.4, p = .005) and FIB-4 (OR 2.3 per doubling of value; CI 1.2-4.4, p = .012) were significant predictors for fibrosis ≥ F2. Predictive factors for NASH were not identified.Conclusion: The biopsy rate in NAFLD patients is low and fibrosis ≥ F2 along with NAS ≥4 only present in a few cases. Transient elastography and FIB-4 are useful to select patients at risk for fibrosis for liver biopsy.