Infrarenal versus supraceliac aorto-hepatic arterial revascularisation in adult liver transplantation: multicentre retrospective study.

When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (≤ 30 days) HAT was in 6.2% (4/64) in the SC-AHAR and 10.7% (6/56) IR-AHAR group (p = 0.512) whilst incidence of late HAT was significantly lower in the SC-AHAR group (4.7% (3/64) vs 19.6% (11/56) - p = 0.024). IR-AHAR was the only independent risk factor for HAT (exp[B] = 3.915; 95% CI 1.400-10.951; p = 0.009). When AHAR is necessary at liver transplantation, the use of the supraceliac aorta significantly reduces the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis and should therefore be recommended whenever possible.

Tacrolimus Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Stable Kidney Transplantation and Individuation of CYP3A5 Genotype.

The posology of tacrolimus (TAC) is usually guided by its therapeutic drug monitoring. Some patients reach target concentrations (CTs) quickly, others more slowly. In a retrospective study, 20 kidney transplant recipients were included (mean age, 50.7 ± 14.1 years; weight 64.0 ± 14.2 kg; patients clinically stable for over a year). We studied cytochrome CYP3A5 genotype, in particular CYP3A5 6986A>G, the most important polymorphism related to the metabolism of TAC (wild genotype CYP3A5 *1 genotype, and CYP3A5 *3 variants). One year after transplantation, the CTs were 5.0 to 8.0 ng/mL. The patients were divided into group A (TAC doses < 6.0 mg/d) and group B (TAC doses > 6.0 mg/d). All were tested for the CYP3A5 gene sequence to characterize their polymorphism. Patients with CYP3A5 *1/*1 and *1/*3 were extensive metabolizers, and those with CYP3A5 *3/*3 were poor metabolizers. In group A and group B, the average TAC doses at the time of therapeutic drug monitoring were 3.0 ± 1.4 ng/mL (0.05 ± 0.03 mg/kg) and 12.8 ± 3.7 ng/mL (0.2 ± 0.1 mg/kg), respectively (P < .001). Group A was the poor metabolizers genotype, while in group B, the extensive metabolizers genotype was present. Patients with the CYP3A5 *1/*1 or *1/*3 genotype required 1.5 to 2 times higher doses than patients *3/*3 to reach CT. This genetic test allows clinicians to know, before the kidney transplant, the patient's TAC metabolism pattern and then to optimize the drug exposure.

Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

In this retrospective single-center study we evaluated the outcome after kidney transplant in recipients older than 65 years in terms of patient and graft survival and causes of death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 2016, 109 consecutive first single kidney transplants in recipients older than 65 years were included. Furthermore, 2 age groups have also been identified (group A, 65-70 years old vs group B, 71-76 years old). Donor and recipient characteristics were analyzed. Other parameters were cold and warm ischemia times, delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and causes of death. Induction immunosuppressive therapy was performed with basiliximab or thymoglobulin. Baseline triple immunosuppression included calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite, and steroids. The results of preimplantation biopsies, which were performed in all expanded criteria donors were analyzed and graded according to Karpinski 2009 classification. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 39.4%: 23.2% women and 76.8% men. Causes of death were infections in 42%, tumors in 23%, cardiovascular disease in 14%, cerebrovascular disease in 7%, and unknown in 14%. The most common cause of death in men was infections (52%), and the most common cause in women was tumors (55%). At 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, overall patient survival was 89%, 84%, 72%, and 45%, and overall graft survival was 100%, 97%, 89%, and 84%, respectively. Patient and graft survival were statistically different between group A vs group B (P = .006 and P = .02, respectively). At univariate analysis significant risk factors for increased mortality were age, delayed graft function, and cold ischemia time. At multivariate analysis, delayed graft function maintained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation in patients older than 65 years is safe, feasible, and has good graft survival. Mortality is statistically significant in patients older than 71 years, despite a persistent low graft loss.

Indigo Thrombectomy System for Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic artery thrombosis still represents a major complication after liver transplantation responsible for graft failure, possibly resulting in the need for retransplantation. CASE REPORT: We describe a case of a patient undergoing liver transplant complicated by hepatic artery thrombosis, successfully treated with an endovascular approach using the Indigo System. This new system allows mechanical fragmentation and aspiration of the thrombus, with no injection of any thrombolytic agents, thereby reducing the risk of bleeding. Hepatic artery flow was immediately restored, with no complications for the patient and the graft. DISCUSSION: The Indigo System appears to be a safe, affordable, and manageable technique for endovascular management of late hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplant.

Splenic Artery Syndrome as a Possible Cause of Late Onset Refractory Ascites After Liver Transplantation: Management With Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Portal hyperperfusion (PHP) is a hemodynamic condition which may develop after liver transplantation and cause refractory ascites (RA). The diagnosis is established by exclusion of other causes of increased sinusoidal pressure/resistance such as cellular rejection or toxicity and outflow obstruction. PHP as part of the pathogenesis of the splenic artery syndrome (SAS) can be treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE). METHODS: This is a retrospective study on a cohort of first-time whole-size liver transplant recipients diagnosed with RA due to PHP and treated by proximal SAE (pSAE) at the Liver Transplant Unit of the University Hospital of Udine between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: For this study, 23 patients were identified (prevalence 8%) and treated. Preliminary clinical workup to diagnose SAS was based on exclusion of other possible causes of RA with graft biopsy, cavogram with hepatic venous pressure measurement, computed tomography scan, and angiography. The pSAE was performed 110 ± 61 days after transplantation, and no procedure-related complications occurred. pSAE resulted in a significant decrease of portal vein velocity (P = .01) and wedge hepatic venous pressure (P = .03). The diameter of the spleen showed a slightly significant reduction (P = .047); no modification of hepatic artery resistive index were encountered (P = .34). Moreover, pSAE determined the resolution of RA in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: pSAE is a safe and effective procedure to modulate the hepatic inflow and thus to treat RA secondary to SAS, with a low incidence of complications and a high rate of clinical response.

Postsplenectomy recurrence of idiopathic thrombocitopenic purpura: role of laparoscopic splenectomy in the treatment of accessory spleen.

AIM: Idiopatic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is the most common indication for splenectomy. The failure rate of surgery is about 8% and the failure rate after splenectomy is approximately 28% for all patients. When the presence of an accessory spleen is diagnosed, splenectomy is recommended. Laparoscopic approach is considered the first choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our Department, between July and November 2011 two patients underwent laparoscopic accessory splenectomy for recurrence of ITP. Both patients had a previously laparoscopic splenectomy. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance (MR) was performed in both the cases revealing the presence of an accessory spleen. RESULTS: The operative time was 105 and 100 minutes respectively. No perioperative complications occured. Hospital stay was four days in both cases. The first patient had a disease free period of two months; the second one of one month. Both patients restarted immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The relapse of thrombocytopenia post-splenectomy can be associated with the presence of an accessory spleen. The laparoscopic accessory splenectomy should be considered the first choice approach. Surgical accessory splenectomy allows a transitory remission of the disease.

De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transplant population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the current accepted guidelines for the pre-transplantation study and the post-transplantation follow-up have been effective, in our kidney transplant population, regarding early detection and treatment, improving prognosis, and reducing mortality of some curable neoplastic diseases. METHODS: We considered de novo tumors in kidney transplant patients from 1995 to 2010 (n = 636) excluding hematologic and nonmelanoma skin tumors from our study. RESULTS: There were 64 de novo tumors in 59 patients out of 636 kidney transplant patients; 29.68% were urogenital cancer, 26.56% gastrointestinal cancer, 12.5% melanoma, 6.25% lung cancer, 6.25% biliopancreatic cancer, 4.68% visceral Kaposi sarcoma, 4.68% breast cancer, 4.68% thyroid cancer, 1 pleural mesothelioma, 1 meningioma, 1 merkeloma. Twenty patients died because of cancer. Ten patients had a late de novo tumor diagnosis, when the stage of tumor was advanced and not suitable for curative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the increased neoplastic risk, we consider it mandatory to carry out a meticulous screening and to implement pre-transplantation study concerning this increased neoplastic risk population to detect a subgroup of patients presenting the highest risk to improve their outcome.

Improved survival in liver transplant recipients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus in the European Liver Transplant Registry.

This study was a retrospective analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) performed to compare long-term outcomes with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus tacrolimus BD in liver transplantation (January 2008-December 2012). Clinical efficacy measures included univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors influencing graft and patient survival at 3 years posttransplant. Efficacy measures were repeated using propensity score-matching for baseline demographics. Patients with <1 month of follow-up were excluded from the analyses. In total, 4367 patients (prolonged-release tacrolimus: n = 528; BD: n = 3839) from 21 European centers were included. Tacrolimus BD treatment was significantly associated with inferior graft (risk ratio: 1.81; p = 0.001) and patient survival (risk ratio: 1.72; p = 0.004) in multivariate analyses. Similar analyses performed on the propensity score-matched patients confirmed the significant survival advantages observed in the prolonged-release tacrolimus- versus tacrolimus BD-treated group. This large retrospective analysis from the ELTR identified significant improvements in long-term graft and patient survival in patients treated with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus tacrolimus BD in primary liver transplant recipients over 3 years of treatment. However, as with any retrospective registry evaluation, there are a number of limitations that should be considered when interpreting these data.

Antiretroviral blood levels in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis after liver transplant: a report of three cases.

Since the introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is no longer a contraindication for solid organ transplantation. In HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients undergoing liver transplantation, HCV-related cirrhosis, drug-drug interactions, and calcineurin inhibitors-related toxicity affect clinical outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring can be useful to assess antiretroviral over- or underexposure in this cohort. We report the clinical characteristics along with antiretroviral trough levels of maraviroc, darunavir, and etravirine in 3 HIV/HCV-coinfected liver transplant recipients who developed post-transplant liver cirrhosis.

Necrosis percentage of radiologically treated hepatocellular carcinoma at hepatectomy for liver transplantation.

Among a cohort of 414 liver transplantations (OLT) performed form 1996 to 2009, we analyzed 86 patients (20.7%) who were affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) superimposed on cirrhosis, including 82 with a preoperative diagnosis of tumor; 4 cases had the diagnosis established upon histologic examination after hepatectomy. The gender of 75 patients was male (91.5%), and female in 7 cases (8.5%). The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 10 (range, 6-23). The underlying liver disease was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis (41.46%), hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis (15.6%), or alcohol-related cirrhosis (29.3%); cryptogenic; HCV+HIV; HBV+HIV; or HCV+HBV+HIV cirrhosis were present in an other few patients. The diagnosis of HCC and the preoperative staging were defined through radiologic evaluations, without biopsy confirmation in any case. All patients underwent pretransplant radiologic treatments to reduce the drop-out risk while a waiting OLT; OLT was performed for HCC patients within the Milan criteria. Upon histologic examination, the median HCC necrosis was 57 ± 36%; in 22 cases (26.8%), there were no necrotizing effects. Forty patients (48.8%) display a satisfying degree of disease control with 26 patients (31.7%) downstaged effect; 15 patients (18.3%) showed neoplastic progression with advanced neoplastic disease exceeding the Milan criteria at hepatectomy. One patient had nonevaluable necrosis (1.2%). Our experience showed preoperative radiologic treatments to be not curative but serving as a bridge to OLT.

Perioperative intra- and extravascular volume in liver transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: Assessing adequate volemia to avoid fluid overload and pulmonary edema perioperatively in liver transplantation (LT) is a challenge both for the anesthetist and the intensivist. Volumetric preload indices, such as intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), measured by transpulmonary thermodilution, and continuous end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), measured by pulmonary artery thermodilution, were shown to better reflect preload than central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). An ITBVI increase soon after the graft reperfusion influenced pulmonary perfusion without an alteration of extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and without impaired oxygenation. This study was designed to evaluate relationships between CVP, PAOP, ITBVI, EDVI, and stroke volume index (SVI) within 48 hours after LT. We also investigated the relationship between EVLWI and arterial partial pressure of oxygen and inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO(2)/FiO(2)). METHODS: We enrolled 125 patients (103 men and 22 women) undergoing LT. All patients were monitored with the PiCCO system (Pulsion Medical System) and with advanced pulmonary artery catheter connected to the Vigilance System. Hemodynamic-volumetric data were collected upon intensive care unit admission and every 8 hours up to 48 hours. Univariate and multivariate regression models were fitted to assess associations between SVI and EDVI, ITBVI, and filling pressures after adjusting for the right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF, categorized as ≤30, 31-40, or >40) and the phase of the observation period. We also assessed associations between PaO(2)/FiO(2) and EVLWI. RESULTS: SVI was associated with EDVI, ITBVI, and RVEF. The models showing the best fit to the data were those including EDVI and ITBVI. Neither CVP nor PAOP showed correlation with SVI. EVLWI inversely correlated with PaO(2)/FiO(2). CONCLUSIONS: In the first 48 hours after LT, ITBVI and EDVI were associated with SVI assessment, whereas CVP and PAOP were not related. EVLWI significantly inversely correlated with PaO(2)/FiO(2).

Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation.

Although sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (OLT), contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr) has been used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1; n=19) versus CPAr (group 2; n=21) among 40 consecutive OLT from heart-beating donors. There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, indication for OLT and donor parameters between the groups. OLT was performed using the piggyback technique. The biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases by a duct-to-duct technique with a T-tube in 32% versus 29% of cases without a T tube (P=.83). In the CPAr group, the liver was reperfused simultaneously via the portal vein and hepatic artery. CPAr showed a longer warm ischemia (66 ± 8 vs 37 ± 7 minutes; P<.001), while SPAr had a longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 vs 66 ± 8 minutes (P=.0004). Recovery of graft function was similar. There was no primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred among 10% versus 9%. Liver function tests were similar between the two groups up to 90 days case of follow-up- One-year graft and patient survivals were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P=.29). At a median follow-up of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months, biliary complications included anastomotic stenoses in 15% versus 19% (P=.78) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P=.01) for SPAr and CPAr, respectively. CPAr was safe and feasible, reducing the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.

Long-term outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and comparison with human immunodeficiency virus-negative cases.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity is no longer a contraindication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) due to the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy. The aim of this study was to compare OLT among HIV-positive and HIV-negative cohorts; the results were also stratified for hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. Between 2004 and 2009, all HIV-infected patients undergoing OLT from heart-beating deceased donors (n=27) were compared with an HIV-negative cohort (n = 27). The pure HCV infection rate was similar between HIV-positive and HIV-negative subjects (63% each). HIV-positive recipients were younger (P=.013). The CD4 count for HIV-positive subjects was 376 ± 156 at transplantation. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at transplantation was 15 ± 7 in both groups (P=.92). No differences were observed for donor age (P=.72) or time on the waiting list (P=.56). The median follow-up was 26 (range, 1-64) and 27 months (range, 1-48) for HIV and non-HIV recipients, respectively (P=.85). The estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 83% versus 100%, 73%, and 73% (P=.95), and 92%, 87%, and 87% versus 95%, 88%, and 88% (P=.59) for HIV and non-HIV cases, respectively. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were younger, namely 47 (range, 40-53) versus 52 years (range, 37-68; P=.003), and displayed lower MELD scores at transplantation compared with HCV-mono-infected patients 10 (range, 7-19) versus 17 (range, 8-30) (P=.008). For HIV/HCV-coinfected and HCV-mono-infected cases the estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year patients and graft survival rates were respectively 93%, 76%, and 76% versus 100%, 70%, and 60% (P=.99) and 93%, 84%, and 84% versus 100%, 70%, and 60% (P=.64), respectively. No difference was observed in the histological severity of HCV recurrence. In conclusion, under specific, well-determined conditions, OLT can be a safe, efficacious procedure in HIV patients.

Preemptive liver-kidney transplantation in von Gierke disease: a case report.

Type 1a glycogen storage disease (GSD 1a), or von Gierke disease, is a rare, autosomal-recessive disease caused by a deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase, which leads to glycogen accumulation in the liver, kidney, and intestinal mucosa. Clinical manifestations include hypoglycemia, growth retardation, hepatomegaly, lactic acidemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperuricemia. Long-term complications include renal disease, gout, osteoporosis, pulmonary hypertension, short stature, and hepatocellular adenomas, which may undergo malignant transformation. Herein we have described the management and the clinical course of a GSD1a patient who underwent simultaneous preemptive liver- kidney transplantation (SPLKT), which solved the liver and renal disease. We confirmed the rapid normalization of glucose metabolism, and correction of hyperlipemia after liver transplantation. In our opinion uremic patients with GSD 1a with or without adenomas must be considered for SPLKT. To our knowledge this is the fifth case of SPLKT and the first preemptive one to be described in the literature.

Contemporaneous Portal-Arterial Reperfusion during Liver Transplantation: Preliminary Results.

We prospectively compared sequential portal-arterial revascularization (SPAr, group 1 no. 19) versus contemporaneous portal-hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr, group 2 no. 21) in 40 consecutive liver transplantation (LT). There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, MELD score, indication to LT, and donor's parameters between the two groups. CPAr had longer warm ischemia 66 ± 8 versus 37 ± 7 min (P < .001), while SPAr had longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 min (P = .0004). One-year patient's and graft survival were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P = .29). At median followup of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months biliary complications were anastomotic stenosis in 15% versus 19% (P = .78), and intrahepatic nonanastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P = .01), respectively, in SPAr and CPAr. CPAr reduces the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia.

Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (PROGRAF) in liver transplantation.

The efficacy and safety of dual-therapy regimens of twice-daily tacrolimus (BID; Prograf) and once-daily tacrolimus (QD; Advagraf) administered with steroids, without antibody induction, were compared in a multicenter, 1:1-randomized, two-arm, parallel-group study in 475 primary liver transplant recipients. A double-blind, double-dummy 24-week period was followed by an open extension to 12 months posttransplant. The primary endpoint, event rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 weeks, was 33.7% for tacrolimus BID versus 36.3% for tacrolimus QD (Per-protocol set; p = 0.512; treatment difference 2.6%, 95% confidence interval -7.3%, 12.4%), falling within the predefined 15% noninferiority margin. At 12 months, BPAR episodes requiring treatment were similar for tacrolimus BID and QD (28.1% and 24.7%). Twelve-month patient and graft survival was 90.8% and 85.6% for tacrolimus BID and 89.2% and 85.3% for tacrolimus QD. Adverse event (AE) profiles were similar for both tacrolimus BID and QD with comparable incidences of AEs and serious AEs. Tacrolimus QD was well tolerated with similar efficacy and safety profiles to tacrolimus BID.

Cardiovascular risk factors and immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation.

Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases represent important long-term complications after liver transplantation (LT), impairing long-term and disease-free survivals. A few mechanisms underlie the development of those complications, but the role of immunosuppressive drugs is major. Although several patients develop temporary metabolic diseases, which normalize after a short postoperative period and do not need long-term drug therapy, the incidences of de novo long-lasting arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus are high during the first year after LT. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate new-onset arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes among 100 LT patients at a single institution. We used chi-square statistical analysis to compare incidences during tacrolimus versus cyclosporine therapy. Hypertension did not seem to be more strongly related to tacrolimus than to cyclosporine, nor did diabetes, whereas there was a difference for the development of hyperlipidemia.

Apurinic apyrimidinic endonuclease/redox effector factor 1 immunoreactivity and grading in hepatocellular carcinoma risk of relapse after liver transplantation.

Apurinic apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1)/redox effector factor 1 (Ref-1), which is a multifunction protein involved in both transcriptional regulation of gene expression during adaptive cellular responses to oxidative stress and in the base excision repair pathway of DNA lesions generated as a consequence of oxidant-induced base damage, contributes to the maintenance of genome stability. APE1/Ref-1 is normally localized in the nucleus; cytoplasmic localization observed in several tumors has been correlated with a poor prognosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) grading is an essential tool to predict the risk of relapse and patient prognosis, particularly in patients undergoing liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to identify the role of APE1/Ref-1 in predicting a posttransplant HCC relapse. We studied 48 patients transplanted for HCC to define grading as well as nuclear and cytoplasmic APE1/Ref-1 expression within neoplastic versus nonneoplastic parenchyma. We defined a cutoff of 60% of cytoplasmic APE1/Ref-1 expression to identify positive cases. At a minimum of 1.5-year follow-up after transplantation, 32 patients are alive and 16 patients are deceased after HCC relapse. Among low-grade HCC (grades 1 and 2), 76% of cases are alive; only 34% showed cytoplasmic APE1/Ref-1 immunoreactivity. Among the high-grade cases (grades 3 and 4), 50% were alive with 64% showing cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Nuclear reactivity was generally similar either in neoplastic or in cirrhotic livers, irrespective of the grade. These data seemed to support the hypothesis of a predictive role of APE1/Ref-1 for HCC risk of relapse, which together with tumor grade by analysis of a pretransplant needle biopsy should aid decision making for OLT.

Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients.

Nonadherence to immunosuppressive regimens among solid organ transplantation to range has been estimated from 15% to 55%. This problem has been identified as a leading cause of preventable graft loss. Tacrolimus once daily Advagraf has been developed to provide a more convenient dosing regimen to improve adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety of a 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to Advagraf in 36 stable liver transplant recipients. The tacrolimus whole blood trough level at T0 was 6.7 +/- 2.9 ng/mL with a daily dose of 3.7 +/- 1.8 mg. The mean tacrolimus blood trough levels at T1 (7 days) and T2 (14 days) were 5.8 +/- 2.5 and 5.8 +/- 1.8 ng/mL with mean daily doses of 3.9 +/- 1.9 and 4.1 +/- 1.8 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference between T0, T1, and T2, either for tacrolimus blood trough levels or for tacrolimus daily dosages. Liver and renal function tests remained stable; no episodes of acute rejection were encountered after the conversion. A switching policy using a dose ratio of 1:1 from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus was safely applied to stable liver transplant recipients.