Low tension recruits the yeast Aurora B protein Ipl1 to centromeres in metaphase.

Accurate genome segregation in mitosis requires that all chromosomes are bioriented on the spindle. Cells monitor biorientation by sensing tension across sister centromeres. Chromosomes that are not bioriented have low centromere tension, which allows Aurora B (yeast Ipl1) to perform error correction that locally loosens kinetochore-microtubule attachments to allow detachment of microtubules and fresh attempts at achieving biorientation. However, it is not known whether low tension recruits Aurora B to centromeres or, alternatively, whether low tension directly activates Aurora B already localized at centromeres. In this work, we experimentally induced low tension in metaphase Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells, then monitored Ipl1 localization. We find low tension recruits Ipl1 to centromeres. Furthermore, low tension-induced Ipl1 recruitment depended on Bub1, which is known to provide a binding site for Ipl1. In contrast, Top2, which can also recruit Ipl1 to centromeres, was not required. Our results demonstrate cells are sensitive to low tension at centromeres and respond by actively recruiting Ip1l for error correction.

Yeast Stn1 promotes MCM to circumvent Rad53 control of the S phase checkpoint.

Treating yeast cells with the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea activates the S phase checkpoint kinase Rad53, eliciting responses that block DNA replication origin firing, stabilize replication forks, and prevent premature extension of the mitotic spindle. We previously found overproduction of Stn1, a subunit of the telomere-binding Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1 complex, circumvents Rad53 checkpoint functions in hydroxyurea, inducing late origin firing and premature spindle extension even though Rad53 is activated normally. Here, we show Stn1 overproduction acts through remarkably similar pathways compared to loss of RAD53, converging on the MCM complex that initiates origin firing and forms the catalytic core of the replicative DNA helicase. First, mutations affecting Mcm2 and Mcm5 block the ability of Stn1 overproduction to disrupt the S phase checkpoint. Second, loss of function stn1 mutations compensate rad53 S phase checkpoint defects. Third Stn1 overproduction suppresses a mutation in Mcm7. Fourth, stn1 mutants accumulate single-stranded DNA at non-telomeric genome locations, imposing a requirement for post-replication DNA repair. We discuss these interactions in terms of a model in which Stn1 acts as an accessory replication factor that facilitates MCM activation at ORIs and potentially also maintains MCM activity at replication forks advancing through challenging templates.

The yeast Dbf4 Zn2+ finger domain suppresses single-stranded DNA at replication forks initiated from a subset of origins.

Dbf4 is the cyclin-like subunit for the Dbf4-dependent protein kinase (DDK), required for activating the replicative helicase at DNA replication origin that fire during S phase. Dbf4 also functions as an adaptor, targeting the DDK to different groups of origins and substrates. Here we report a genome-wide analysis of origin firing in a budding yeast mutant, dbf4-zn, lacking the Zn2+ finger domain within the C-terminus of Dbf4. At one group of origins, which we call dromedaries, we observe an unanticipated DNA replication phenotype: accumulation of single-stranded DNA spanning ± 5kbp from the center of the origins. A similar accumulation of single-stranded DNA at origins occurs more globally in pri1-m4 mutants defective for the catalytic subunit of DNA primase and rad53 mutants defective for the S phase checkpoint following DNA replication stress. We propose the Dbf4 Zn2+ finger suppresses single-stranded gaps at replication forks emanating from dromedary origins. Certain origins may impose an elevated requirement for the DDK to fully initiate DNA synthesis following origin activation. Alternatively, dbf4-zn may be defective for stabilizing/restarting replication forks emanating from dromedary origins during replication stress.

Comparison of concanavalin A and poly-l-lysine as cell adhesives for routine yeast microscopy applications.

A frequently encountered problem with imaging budding yeast specimens by light microscopy is that the cells do not adhere well to glass microscope slides. Frustratingly, cells that initially appear stationary in the visual field often become displaced and float away. The development of immunofluorescence microscopy methods for yeast led to the widespread use of poly-l-lysine as an adhesive for cell immobilization. More recently, the lectin-binding protein concanavalin A has also been used as an adhesive that may be less familiar to yeast investigators. Here, we directly compare the ability of poly-l-lysine and concanavalin A to adhere yeast to glass microscope slides using several different assays. Using a simple coating procedure, we find that 1-mg/ml concanavalin A proves superior to various concentrations of poly-l-lysine under all conditions tested and that concanavalin A can be used as an adhesive for live cell imaging without impairing yeast proliferation or cell division kinetics. Importantly, we also delineate forms of sample preparation that are or are not compatible with concanavalin A. Overall, we hope our findings will bring concanavalin A to the attention of a broad spectrum of the yeast community for their microscopy needs.

Inhibition of spindle extension through the yeast S phase checkpoint is coupled to replication fork stability and the integrity of centromeric DNA.

Budding yeast treated with hydroxyurea (HU) activate the S phase checkpoint kinase Rad53, which prevents DNA replication forks from undergoing aberrant structural transitions and nuclease processing. Rad53 is also required to prevent premature extension of the mitotic spindle that assembles during a HU-extended S phase. Here we present evidence that checkpoint restraint of spindle extension is directly coupled to Rad53 control of replication fork stability. In budding yeast, centromeres are flanked by replication origins that fire in early S phase. Mutations affecting the Zn2+-finger of Dbf4, an origin activator, preferentially reduce centromere-proximal origin firing in HU, corresponding with suppression of rad53 spindle extension. Inactivating Exo1 nuclease or displacing centromeres from origins provides a similar suppression. Conversely, short-circuiting Rad53 targeting of Dbf4, Sld3, and Dun1, substrates contributing to fork stability, induces spindle extension. These results reveal spindle extension in HU-treated rad53 mutants is a consequence of replication fork catastrophes at centromeres. When such catastrophes occur, centromeres become susceptible to nucleases, disrupting kinetochore function and spindle force balancing mechanisms. At the same time, our data indicate centromere duplication is not required to stabilize S phase spindle structure, leading us to propose a model for how monopolar kinetochore-spindle attachments may contribute to spindle force balance in HU.

A noncatalytic function of the topoisomerase II CTD in Aurora B recruitment to inner centromeres during mitosis.

Faithful chromosome segregation depends on the precise timing of chromatid separation, which is enforced by checkpoint signals generated at kinetochores. Here, we provide evidence that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of DNA topoisomerase IIα (Topo II) provides a novel function at inner centromeres of kinetochores in mitosis. We find that the yeast CTD is required for recruitment of the tension checkpoint kinase Ipl1/Aurora B to inner centromeres in metaphase but is not required in interphase. Conserved CTD SUMOylation sites are required for Ipl1 recruitment. This inner-centromere CTD function is distinct from the catalytic activity of Topo II. Genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that Topo II recruits Ipl1 via the Haspin-histone H3 threonine 3 phosphorylation pathway. Finally, Topo II and Sgo1 are equally important for Ipl1 recruitment to inner centromeres. This indicates H3 T3-Phos/H2A T120-Phos is a universal epigenetic signature that defines the eukaryotic inner centromere and provides the binding site for Ipl1/Aurora B.

The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2p is required to prevent recombination-induced chromosome segregation lethality following DNA replication stress.

SUMO conjugation is a key regulator of the cellular response to DNA replication stress, acting in part to control recombination at stalled DNA replication forks. Here we examine recombination-related phenotypes in yeast mutants defective for the SUMO de-conjugating/chain-editing enzyme Ulp2p. We find that spontaneous recombination is elevated in ulp2 strains and that recombination DNA repair is essential for ulp2 survival. In contrast to other SUMO pathway mutants, however, the frequency of spontaneous chromosome rearrangements is markedly reduced in ulp2 strains, and some types of rearrangements arising through recombination can apparently not be tolerated. In investigating the basis for this, we find DNA repair foci do not disassemble in ulp2 cells during recovery from the replication fork-blocking drug methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), corresponding with an accumulation of X-shaped recombination intermediates. ulp2 cells satisfy the DNA damage checkpoint during MMS recovery and commit to chromosome segregation with similar kinetics to wild-type cells. However, sister chromatids fail to disjoin, resulting in abortive chromosome segregation and cell lethality. This chromosome segregation defect can be rescued by overproducing the anti-recombinase Srs2p, indicating that recombination plays an underlying causal role in blocking chromatid separation. Overall, our results are consistent with a role for Ulp2p in preventing the formation of DNA lesions that must be repaired through recombination. At the same time, Ulp2p is also required to either suppress or resolve recombination-induced attachments between sister chromatids. These opposing defects may synergize to greatly increase the toxicity of DNA replication stress.

The yeast SUMO isopeptidase Smt4/Ulp2 and the polo kinase Cdc5 act in an opposing fashion to regulate sumoylation in mitosis and cohesion at centromeres.

Post-translation modification through the SUMO pathway is cell cycle regulated, with specific SUMO conjugates accumulating in mitotic cells. The basis for this regulation, however, and its functional significance remain poorly understood. We present evidence that in budding yeast sumoylation during mitosis may be controlled through the SUMO deconjugating enzyme Smt4/Ulp2. We isolated the polo kinase Cdc5 as an Ulp2-interacting protein, and find a C-terminal region of Ulp2 is phosphorylated during mitosis in a Cdc5-dependent manner. cdc5 mutants display reduced levels of mitotic SUMO conjugates, suggesting Cdc5 may negatively regulate Ulp2 to promote sumoylation. Previously, we found one phenotype associated with ulp2 mutants is an inability to maintain chromatid cohesion at centromere-proximal chromosomal regions. We now show this defect is rescued by inactivating Cdc5, indicating Ulp2 maintains cohesion by counter-acting Cdc5 activity. The cohesinregulator Pds5 is a likely target of this pathway, as Cdc5 overproduction forces Pds5 dissociation from chromosomes and Pds5 overproduction restores cohesion in ulp2 mutants. Overall, these observations reveal Cdc5 is a novel regulator of the SUMO pathway and suggest the outlines of a broader circuitry in which Ulp2 and Cdc5 act in a mutually antagonistic fashion to modulate maintenance and dissolution of cohesion at centromeres.

Centromere replication timing determines different forms of genomic instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint mutants during replication stress.

Yeast replication checkpoint mutants lose viability following transient exposure to hydroxyurea, a replication-impeding drug. In an effort to understand the basis for this lethality, we discovered that different events are responsible for inviability in checkpoint-deficient cells harboring mutations in the mec1 and rad53 genes. By monitoring genomewide replication dynamics of cells exposed to hydroxyurea, we show that cells with a checkpoint deficient allele of RAD53, rad53K227A, fail to duplicate centromeres. Following removal of the drug, however, rad53K227A cells recover substantial DNA replication, including replication through centromeres. Despite this recovery, the rad53K227A mutant fails to achieve biorientation of sister centromeres during recovery from hydroxyurea, leading to secondary activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), aneuploidy, and lethal chromosome segregation errors. We demonstrate that cell lethality from this segregation defect could be partially remedied by reinforcing bipolar attachment. In contrast, cells with the mec1-1 sml1-1 mutations suffer from severely impaired replication resumption upon removal of hydroxyurea. mec1-1 sml1-1 cells can, however, duplicate at least some of their centromeres and achieve bipolar attachment, leading to abortive segregation and fragmentation of incompletely replicated chromosomes. Our results highlight the importance of replicating yeast centromeres early and reveal different mechanisms of cell death due to differences in replication fork progression.

Analyzing Top2 distribution on yeast chromosomes by chromatin immunoprecipitation.

In vertebrate cells, DNA topoisomerase II (Topo II), named Top2 in yeast, localizes along chromosome axes early in mitosis and concentrates within centromeric chromatin during metaphase. The factors controlling these changes in enzyme distribution are largely unknown. Insight into Topo II dynamics could potentially be derived through genetic approaches in yeast. In practice, however, the small size and limited compaction of yeast chromosomes has precluded a detailed analysis of Top2 localization along mitotic chromosomes. As an alternative approach, we describe a method for examining Top2 distribution using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). By adding a detergent solubilization step, this method allows efficient recovery of DNA sequences associated with Top2 in the insoluble chromosome scaffold fraction.

Top2 SUMO conjugation in yeast cell lysates.

DNA topoisomerase II (Topo II), named Top2 in budding and fission yeast, is a conserved target of the SUMO modification pathway, with SUMO-conjugated forms of Topo II accumulating specifically during mitosis in both yeast and vertebrate cells (Bachant et al., Mol Cell 9, 1169-82, 2002; Azuma et al., J Cell Biol 163, 477-87, 2003; Dawlaty et al., Cell 133, 103-15, 2008). As with many SUMO substrates, the functional significance of this modification is still incompletely understood and, perhaps surprisingly, better characterized in vertebrates than yeasts. It seems likely, however, that continued analysis of yeast Top2 SUMO modification will reveal commonalities with vertebrate cells, leading to a deeper understanding of how sumoylation regulates Topo II function. Toward this end, we describe a protocol for analyzing yeast Top2 SUMO conjugates in vivo.

SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is an essential determinant of chromosome structure and function, acting to resolve topological problems inherent in recombining, transcribing, replicating and segregating DNA. In particular, the unique decatenating activity of topo II is required for sister chromatids to disjoin and separate in mitosis. Topo II exhibits a dynamic localization pattern on mitotic chromosomes, accumulating at centromeres and axial chromosome cores prior to anaphase. In organisms ranging from yeast to humans, a fraction of topo II is targeted for SUMO conjugation in mitotic cells, and here we review our current understanding of the significance of this modification. As we shall see, an emerging consensus is that in metazoans SUMO modification is required for topo II to accumulate at centromeres, and that in the absence of this regulation there is an elevated frequency of chromosome non-disjunction, segregation errors, and aneuploidy. The underlying molecular mechanisms for how SUMO controls topo II are as yet unclear. In closing, however, we will evaluate two possible interpretations: one in which SUMO promotes enzyme turnover, and a second in which SUMO acts as a localization tag for topo II chromosome trafficking.

Yeast telomere capping protein Stn1 overrides DNA replication control through the S phase checkpoint.

Telomere integrity is maintained through end-protection proteins that block nuclease degradation and prevent telomeres from being recognized as DNA breaks. Although less well understood, end protection proteins may also play a role in facilitating telomere replication. Here, we show that overproduction (OP) of the yeast telomere capping protein Stn1 makes cells highly sensitive to the replication inhibitors hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl-methane sulfonate (MMS). Unexpectedly, this sensitivity corresponds with Stn1 OP blocking most, if not all, aspects of the S phase checkpoint. The checkpoint kinase Rad53 is phosphorylated with normal timing in Stn1 OP cells, indicating Stn1 does not interfere with signaling steps involved in activating the checkpoint. Part of the role of Stn1 in telomere integrity is mediated through the Pol12 subunit of DNA polymerase alpha (Pol alpha). We show that overproduced Stn1 generally associates with chromosomes in HU treated and untreated cells, and, remarkably, Stn1 chromosome binding and OP checkpoint defects are rescued in pol12 mutants. We propose Stn1 normally promotes Pol alpha activity at telomeres but can be recruited through Pol12 to nontelomeric sites when overproduced. During replication stress, the mislocalized Stn1 may inappropriately promote Pol alpha in a manner that interferes with Rad53 effector mechanisms controlling replication fork integrity.

DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint.

Centromeric (CEN) chromatin is placed under mechanical tension and stretches as kinetochores biorient on the mitotic spindle. This deformation could conceivably provide a readout of biorientation to error correction mechanisms that monitor kinetochore-spindle interactions, but whether CEN chromatin acts in a tensiometer capacity is unresolved. Here, we report observations linking yeast Topoisomerase II (Top2) to both CEN mechanics and assessment of interkinetochore tension. First, in top2-4 and sumoylation-resistant top2-SNM mutants CEN chromatin stretches extensively during biorientation, resulting in increased sister kinetochore separation and preanaphase spindle extension. Our data indicate increased CEN stretching corresponds with alterations to CEN topology induced in response to tension. Second, Top2 potentiates aspects of the tension checkpoint. Mutations affecting the Mtw1 kinetochore protein activate Ipl1 kinase to detach kinetochores and induce spindle checkpoint arrest. In mtw1top2-4 and mtw1top2-SNM mutants, however, kinetochores are resistant to detachment and checkpoint arrest is attenuated. For top2-SNM cells, CEN stretching and checkpoint attenuation occur even in the absence of catenation linking sister chromatids. In sum, Top2 seems to play a novel role in CEN compaction that is distinct from decatenation. Perturbations to this function may allow weakened kinetochores to stretch CENs in a manner that mimics tension or evades Ipl1 surveillance.

Kinetochore structure and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) delays the onset of anaphase until every chromosome is properly bioriented at the spindle equator. Mutations in SAC genes have been found in tumors and compromised SAC function can increase the incidence of some carcinomas in mice, providing further links between cancer etiology, chromosome segregation defects and aneuploidy. Here we review recent developments in our understanding of SAC control with particular emphasis on the role of the kinetochore, the nature of the tension sensing mechanism and the possibility that the SAC encompasses more than just stabilization of securin and/or cyclin-B via inhibition of the APC/C to delay anaphase initiation. Our primary emphasis is on the SAC in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, relevant findings in other cells are also discussed to highlight the generally conserved nature of SAC signaling mechanisms.

RanBP2: a tumor suppressor with a new twist on TopoII, SUMO, and centromeres.

In vertebrate cells, the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO plays a poorly defined role in targeting DNA topoisomerase II (TopoII) to centromeres (CENs) during mitosis, presumably to facilitate the untangling of sister chromatids as cells transition into anaphase. A new study by Dawlaty in the April 4 issue of Cell identifies the nucleoporin RanBP2 as a novel tumor suppressor that acts as a SUMO ligase for TopoII. Analysis of this interaction reveals TopoII recruitment to CENs is likely to play an important role in preventing chromosome segregation errors that lead to cancer.

One step construction of PCR mutagenized libraries for genetic analysis by recombination cloning.

Recombination cloning encompasses a set of technologies that transfer gene sequences between vectors through site-specific recombination. Due in part to the instability of linear DNA in bacteria, both the initial capture and subsequent transfer of gene sequences is often performed using purified recombination enzymes. However, we find linear DNAs flanked by loxP sites recombine efficiently in bacteria expressing Cre recombinase and the lambda Gam protein, suggesting Cre/lox recombination of linear substrates can be performed in vivo. As one approach towards exploiting this capability, we describe a method for constructing large (>1 x 10(6) recombinants) libraries of gene mutations in a format compatible with recombination cloning. In this method, gene sequences are cloned into recombination entry plasmids and whole-plasmid PCR is used to produce mutagenized plasmid amplicons flanked by loxP. The PCR products are converted back into circular plasmids by transforming Cre/Gam-expressing bacteria, after which the mutant libraries are transferred to expression vectors and screened for phenotypes of interest. We further show that linear DNA fragments flanked by loxP repeats can be efficiently recombined into loxP-containing vectors through this same one-step transformation procedure. Thus, the approach reported here could be adapted as general cloning method.

The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress.

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore-spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

Complementary functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad2 family nucleases in Okazaki fragment maturation, mutation avoidance, and chromosome stability.

Rad2 family nucleases, identified by sequence similarity within their catalytic domains, function in multiple pathways of DNA metabolism. Three members of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad2 family, Rad2, Rad27, and exonuclease 1 (Exo1), exhibit both 5' exonuclease and flap endonuclease activities. Deletion of RAD27 results in defective Okazaki fragment maturation, DNA repair, and subsequent defects in mutation avoidance and chromosomal stability. However, strains lacking Rad27 are viable. The expression profile of EXO1 during the cell cycle is similar to that of RAD27 and other genes encoding proteins that function in DNA replication and repair, suggesting Exo1 may function as a back up nuclease for Rad27 in DNA replication. We show that overexpression of EXO1 suppresses multiple rad27 null mutation-associated phenotypes derived from DNA replication defects, including temperature sensitivity, Okazaki fragment accumulation, the rate of minichromosome loss, and an elevated mutation frequency. While generally similar findings were observed with RAD2, overexpression of RAD2, but not EXO1, suppressed the MMS sensitivity of the rad27 null mutant cells. This suggests that Rad2 can uniquely complement Rad27 in base excision repair (BER). Furthermore, Rad2 and Exo1 complemented the mutator phenotypes and cell cycle defects of rad27 mutant strains to differing extents, suggesting distinct in vivo nucleic acid substrates.

The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II.

In S. cerevisiae, posttranslational modification by the ubiquitin-like Smt3/SUMO-1 protein is essential for survival, but functions and cellular targets for this modification are largely unknown. We find that one function associated with the Smt3/SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is to control chromosome cohesion at centromeric regions and that a key Smt3/SUMO-1 substrate underlying this function is Top2, DNA Topoisomerase II. Top2 modification by Smt3/SUMO-1 is misregulated in smt4 strains, and top2 mutants resistant to Smt3/SUMO-1 modification suppress the smt4 cohesion defect. top2 mutants display aberrant chromatid stretching at the centromere in response to mitotic spindle tension and altered chromatid reassociation following microtubule depolymerization. These results suggest Top2 modification by Smt3/SUMO-1 regulates a component of chromatin structure or topology required for centromeric cohesion.