Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Lichtheimia species in bandages associated with cutaneous mucormycosis in burn patients.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous mucormycoses, mainly due to Lichtheimia (Absidia), have occurred on several occasions in the Burn Unit of the University Hospital of Lille, France. AIM: To investigate the potential vector role of non-sterile bandages used to hold in place sterile gauze used for wound dressing. METHODS: Mycological analysis by conventional culture, Mucorales real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and Lichtheimia species-specific qPCR were performed on eight crepe and six elasticized bandages that were sampled on two independent occasions in March 2014 and July 2016. Characteristics of the seven Lichtheimia mucormycoses which occurred in burn patients between November 2013 and July 2016 were also collected to assess the epidemiological relationship between potentially contaminated bandages and clinical infections. FINDINGS: One Lichtheimia corymbifera strain was isolated from a crepe bandage by culture, and Lichtheimia spp. qPCR was positive in six out of eight crepe and four out of six elasticized bandages. Using species-specific qPCR, Lichtheimia ramosa, Lichtheimia ornata, and L. corymbifera were identified in six out of ten, five out of ten, and four out of ten bandages, respectively. In patients with mucormycosis, L. ramosa and L. ornata were present in five and two cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data support the utility of Mucorales qPCR for epidemiological investigations, the potential role of these bandages in cutaneous mucormycoses in burn patients in our centre, and, consequently, the need for sterile bandages for the dressing of extensive wounds.

Compliance with evidence-based clinical management guidelines in bleeding trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the multidisciplinary European Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma published guidelines for the management of the bleeding trauma patient. The present study aimed to assess compliance with the European guidelines during the first 24 h in a level I trauma centre and to determine whether compliance impacts mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive bleeding trauma patients referred to a university hospital in France between 2010 and 2014. A reference document was developed on the basis of the European guidelines to transform the guidelines pragmatically into 22 objectively measurable criteria. We measured per-patient and per-criterion compliance rates and assessed the impact of guideline compliance on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 121 bleeding trauma patients were included. The median (interquartile range) per-patient compliance rate was 75 (65-82)% and the per-criterion compliance rate 64 (57-81)%. Mortality rates were 18 and 32% at 24 h and 30 days, respectively. After adjusting for injury severity, per-patient compliance rates were associated with decreased mortality at 24 h (odds ratio per 10% increase in patient compliance score, 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.71; P = 0.0001) and at 30 days (odds ratio per 10% increase in patient compliance score, 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.72; P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: We found that compliance with protocols based on European guidelines impacts trauma outcome, because patient compliance was associated with survival. Further work is needed to improve adherence to these guidelines, with ongoing monitoring to ensure best practice and optimal patient outcome.