Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of Implementing Psychological Strategies for Patient Management: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the best available evidence regarding the perceptions and current clinical practices of athletic trainers (ATs) in integrating psychological skills into patient management. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (via EBSCOhost), PsycInfo (via EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (via EBSCOhost), Scopus (via Elsevier). STUDY SELECTION: Studies had to investigate the current clinical practices and perceptions of certified ATs in integrating psychologically informed practice for patient management. Studies that were Level 4 evidence or higher were included. Studies were excluded if they were published before 1999, the primary language was not English, they involved athletic training students or other rehabilitation specialists, or if the studies explored the athlete and/or patient's perception of psychosocial techniques or strategies. DATA EXTRACTION: This systematic review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Statement in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science (PERSiST) guidance. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 1,857 articles were reviewed, and 8 met inclusion criteria. Two studies had level 2a evidence, four studies had level 4a evidence, and two studies had level 4b evidence. Six studies were rated as good quality, and two studies were rated as lesser quality. The included studies demonstrated a high-quality body of evidence with consistent results which strengthens the review findings. CONCLUSIONS: Ats have the knowledge to identify when athletes are psychologically affected by injury and can identify common psychological responses. Although Ats acknowledge the value of implementing psychosocial strategies, lack of confidence in implementing basic or advanced techniques, feeling underprepared by their educational program, and lack of clinical training appear to impact the use of psychosocial techniques in clinical practice and the rate of mental health recognition and referral amongst ATs.

No Association Between Injury-Related Fear and Isokinetic Quadriceps Strength in Individuals With a History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Injury-related fear and quadriceps strength are independently associated with secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. It is not known whether injury-related fear and quadriceps strength are associated, despite their individual predictive capabilities of secondary ACL injury. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between injury-related fear and quadriceps strength in individuals at least 1 year after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty participants between the ages of 18 and 35 years at least 1 year post unilateral primary ACLR. Participants completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) and a standard isokinetic quadriceps strength assessment using the Biodex Isokinetic Dynamometer. Pearson Product-Moment correlations were used to examine the linear association between the TSK-11 scores and peak torque (in nanometers per kilogram) for each limb and between the TSK-11 scores and limb symmetry indices for each limb. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients (r) were interpreted as very high (.90-1.00), high (.70-.90), moderate (.50-.70), low (.30-.50), and no correlation (.00-.30). RESULTS: The average TSK-11 score was 18.2 (5.3), average ACLR peak quadriceps torque was 1.9 (0.50) N·m/kg, average contralateral peak quadriceps torque was 2.3 (0.48) N·m/kg, and average limb symmetry index was 85.3% (12.6%). There was no statistically significant correlation between the TSK-11 and peak quadriceps torque on the ACLR limb (r = .12, P = .46), the TSK-11 and contralateral limb (r = .29, P = .07), or the TSK-11 and limb symmetry index (r = -.18, P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between kinesiophobia and peak isokinetic quadriceps strength in individuals at least 1 year post-ACLR. Both factors, independently, have been shown to influence risk of secondary injury in patients after ACLR.

Persistent Early Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms in the First Two Years After ACL Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Early identification of knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) could enable timely interventions to improve long-term outcomes. However, little is known about the change in early OA symptoms from 6 to 12 months following ACLR. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change over time in meeting classification criteria for early knee OA symptoms from 6 to 12 months following ACLR. DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 82 participants aged 13-35 years who underwent unilateral primary ACLR. On average, participants' 1st and 2nd visits were 6.2 and 12.1 months post-ACLR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early OA symptoms were classified using generic (Luyten Original) and patient population-specific (Luyten PASS) thresholds on Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales. Changes in meeting early OA criteria were compared between an initial and follow-up visit at an average of 6 and 12 months post-ACLR, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of participants exhibited persistent early OA symptoms across both visits using both the Luyten Original and PASS criteria. From initial to follow-up visit, 18-27% had resolution of early OA symptoms while 4-9% developed incident symptoms. In total, 48-51% had no early OA symptoms at either visit. There were no differences between change in early OA status between adults and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one quarter of participants exhibited persistent early knee OA symptoms based on KOOS thresholds from 6 to 12 months post-ACLR. Determining if this symptom persistence predicts worse long-term outcomes could inform the need for timely interventions after ACLR. Future research should examine if resolving persistent symptoms in this critical window improves later outcomes. Tracking early OA symptoms over time may identify high-risk patients who could benefit from early treatment.

Lower Extremity Reaction Time in Individuals With Contact Versus Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries After Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Deficits in perceptual-motor function, like visuomotor reaction time (VMRT), are risk factors for primary and secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Noncontact ACL injuries have been associated with slower reaction time, but whether this association exists for patients with contact ACL injuries is unknown. Exploring differences in VMRT among individuals with contact versus noncontact ACL injuries may provide a more comprehensive understanding of modifiable risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To compare lower extremity VMRT (LEVMRT) in individuals with contact or noncontact ACL injuries after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 36 participants with primary, unilateral ACLR completed an LEVMRT assessment (contact ACL injury = 20 [56%], noncontact ACL injury = 16 [44%]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The LEVMRT was assessed bilaterally and collected using a series of wireless light discs deactivated by individuals with their feet. The ACLR-active LEVMRT (ie, ACLR limb is deactivating lights) and ACLR-stable LEVMRT were compared using separate analyses of covariance to determine the association with contact or noncontact injury using time since surgery as a covariate. RESULTS: After controlling for time since surgery, a difference and large effect size between groups was found for the ACLR-stable LEVMRT (P = .010; η2 = 0.250) but not for the ACLR-active (P = .340; η2 = 0.065) condition. The contact group exhibited slower ACLR-stable LEVMRT (521.7 ± 59.3 milliseconds) than the noncontact group (483.4 ± 83.9 milliseconds). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with contact ACL injury demonstrated a slower LEVMRT while their ACLR limb was stabilizing. The group differences during the ACLR-stable LEVMRT task might indicate deficits in perceptual-motor function when the surgical limb maintains postural control during a reaction time task. After ACLR, individuals with contact injuries may need additional motor learning interventions to enhance perceptual-motor functioning.

Psychological Readiness, Injury-Related Fear, and Persistent Knee Symptoms After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Poor psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with a failure to return to sport and increased secondary injury risk. However, we do not know whether poor psychological responses after ACLR influence patient-reported knee function and knee symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between psychological factors (ie, psychological readiness and injury-related fear) and the presence of persistent knee symptoms in individuals 6 to 12 months after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: In total, 101 participants, aged 13 to 25 years old, between 6 and 12 months after primary unilateral ACLR were enrolled in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Persistent knee symptoms were identified using an established criterion based on the subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Participants also completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to assess psychological readiness and injury-related fear, respectively. Higher ACL-RSI scores indicate higher psychological readiness, and higher TSK-11 scores indicate higher injury-related fear. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants (29%) met the criteria for persistent knee symptoms. For every 1 SD lower in the ACL-RSI score, participants had 2.1 times greater odds of persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (95% CI = 1.3, 3.6). For every 1 SD higher in the TSK-11 score, participants had 1.9 times greater odds of persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (95% CI = 1.1, 3.3). Both the ACL-RSI and TSK-11 were considered good at classifying persistent knee symptoms, as the areas under the curve were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a lower level of psychological readiness and more injury-related fear after ACLR had greater odds of persistent knee symptoms. Overall, these results highlight the potential clinical benefit of a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to managing health and wellness for individuals after ACLR.

Social support and the stress-buffering hypothesis: Effects on stress and mental health in adolescent football athletes.

CONTEXT: Football sports participation has been linked to both positive and negative effects on overall health. Social support, a network which provides individuals with resources to effectively cope, may positively influences one's stress and mental health. However, little research has been conducted in this population. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between social support, psychological stress, and mental health in adolescent football athletes. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional. SETTING: High school athletes, pre-and-post-competitive football season in XXX. PARTICIPANTS: Black/African American adolescent athletes (N=93) competing for a school-sponsored football team. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed a battery of social support, psychological stress, and mental health symptom measures using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Application and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System following a competitive season. T-score means, Pearson correlations, and multiple regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Social support was negatively correlated with psychological stress (Emotional support r=-.386, Family relationships r=-.412, Peer relationships r=-.265) and mental health (Depression r=-.367 and r=-.323 for Emotional support and Family relationships, respectively), whereas psychological stress and mental health (Depression r=.751 and Anxiety r=.732) were positively correlated with one another. In regression analyses, social support measures (i.e., Emotional Support, Family Relationships, and Peer Relationships) were used to predict psychological stress (F=7.094, p<.001, R2=0.191), depression symptoms (F=5.323, p<.001, R2=0.151), and anxiety symptoms (F=1.644, p=.190, R2=0.052). CONCLUSIONS: In line with the stress buffering hypothesis, social support in the form of family relationships and overall emotional support garnered through sport participation may reduce psychological stress and help to preserve mental health of football athletes. Findings indicate perceived social support may act as a positive resource for the coping of Black/African American adolescent athletes. Further research is warranted to understand the effects of stress and social support on the mental health of adolescents, particularly racial and ethnic minorities who are underrepresented in athletic training literature.

Current Clinical Concepts: Integration of Psychologically Informed Practice for Management of Patients With Sport-Related Injuries.

Psychologically informed practice is an approach to patient management that encourages clinicians to treat patients from a biopsychosocial perspective and can be adopted by athletic trainers to manage sport-related injuries. As described in the domains of athletic training clinical practice, athletic trainers are expected to identify, address, and make appropriate referrals regarding psychosocial responses to injuries and mental health symptoms. Psychologically informed practice suggests addressing physical impairments in addition to screening and intervening for psychosocial responses with patients. In this Current Clinical Concepts paper, we discuss appropriate patient-reported outcome measures used to screen for mental health symptoms and psychosocial responses, provide recommendations on psychological interventions that can be integrated to enhance patient outcomes, and describe how to effectively refer a patient to an appropriate mental health professional.

Effectiveness of interventions for the improvement of mental health and well-being post-concussion: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess the effectiveness and quality of interventions targeted at improving mental health, well-being, and psychosocial impairments post-concussion. DATA SOURCES: EBSCOHost, SPORTSDiscus, PsychINFO, Medline (Web of Science), PubMed, and Embase databases. REVIEW METHODS: This systematic review is reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement in exercise, rehabilitation, sport medicine and sports science (PERSiST). Articles were included if they: (1) were randomized controlled trials or repeated measures pre-posttest study designs, (2) reported mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or concussion injury, and (3) evaluated interventions targeting mental health, well-being, and psychosocial impairments post-injury. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included which evaluated interventions targeting mental health, well-being, and psychosocial impairments post-concussion. Interventions included cognitive rehabilitation (n = 7), psychotherapy (n = 7), psychoeducational (n = 3), neurocognitive training (n = 4), neurocognitive training combined with cognitive rehabilitation (n = 1), and psychotherapy combined with cognitive rehabilitation (n = 1). The seven (100%) cognitive rehabilitation intervention studies and four of the five (80%) neurocognitive training intervention studies observed significant improvements in mental health and well-being outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive rehabilitation and neurocognitive training may be the most effective interventions for mental health and well-being impairments post-concussion. Researchers and clinicians should continue to explore the effectiveness of these interventions, specifically in populations most impacted by concussion (i.e. athletes).

Psychological Readiness and Injury-Related Fear are Associated with Persistent Knee Symptoms after ACL Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Poor psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with failure to return to sport and increased secondary injury risk. However, we do not know whether poor psychological responses after ACLR influence patient-reported knee function and knee symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between psychological factors (i.e., psychological readiness and injury-related fear) and the presence of persistent knee symptoms in individuals 6-12 months after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional. SETTING: Research Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and two participants, ages 13-25 years old, between 6 and 12 months post primary, unilateral ACLR were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS(S): Persistent knee symptoms was identified using an established criterion based on the subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants also completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophhobia-11 (TSK-11) to assess psychological readiness and injury-related fear, respectfully. Higher ACL-RSI scores indicate higher psychological readiness and higher TSK-11 scores indicate higher injury-related fear. RESULTS: Seventy participants (69%) met the criteria for persistent knee symptoms. For every standard deviation (SD) lower in ACL-RSI, a participants had 8.6 times greater odds of having persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (CI95: 3.3, 22.4). For every SD higher in TSK-11, a participants had 3.9 times greater odds of having persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (CI95: 2.1, 7.4). Both the ACL-RSI and TSK-11 were considered "good" at classifying persistent knee symptoms as areas under the curve were 0.88 and 0.83, respectfully. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with lower psychological readiness and higher injury-related fear after ACLR have greater odds of experiencing persistent knee symptoms. Overall, these results highlight the potential clinical benefit for a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to managing health and wellness for individuals after ACLR.

Preventing Osteoarthritis After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Consensus Statement.

After an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, people need secondary prevention strategies to identify osteoarthritis at its earliest stages so that interventions can be implemented to halt or slow the progression toward its long-term burden. The Osteoarthritis Action Alliance formed an interdisciplinary Secondary Prevention Task Group to develop a consensus on recommendations to provide clinicians with secondary prevention strategies that are intended to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a person has an ACL injury. The group achieved consensus on 15 out of 16 recommendations that address patient education, exercise and rehabilitation, psychological skills training, graded-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral counseling (lacked consensus), outcomes to monitor, secondary injury prevention, system-level social support, leveraging technology, and coordinated care models. We hope this statement raises awareness among clinicians and researchers on the importance of taking steps to mitigate the risk of osteoarthritis after an ACL injury.

Evidence Review for Preventing Osteoarthritis After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Consensus Statement.

CONTEXT: The Osteoarthritis Action Alliance formed a secondary prevention task group to develop a consensus on secondary prevention recommendations to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a knee injury. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide clinicians with secondary prevention recommendations that are intended to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a person has sustained an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Specifically, this manuscript describes our methods, literature reviews, and dissenting opinions to elaborate on the rationale for our recommendations and to identify critical gaps. DESIGN: Consensus process. SETTING: Virtual video conference calls and online voting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The Secondary Prevention Task Group consisted of 29 members from various clinical backgrounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The group initially convened online in August 2020 to discuss the target population, goals, and key topics. After a second call, the task group divided into 9 subgroups to draft the recommendations and supportive text for crucial content areas. Twenty-one members completed 2 rounds of voting and revising the recommendations and supportive text between February and April 2021. A virtual meeting was held to review the wording of the recommendations and obtain final votes. We defined consensus as >80% of voting members supporting a proposed recommendation. RESULTS: The group achieved consensus on 15 of 16 recommendations. The recommendations address patient education, exercise and rehabilitation, psychological skills training, graded-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral counseling (lacked consensus), outcomes to monitor, secondary injury prevention, system-level social support, leveraging technology, and coordinated care models. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus statement reflects information synthesized from an interdisciplinary group of experts based on the best available evidence from the literature or personal experience. We hope this document raises awareness among clinicians and researchers to take steps to mitigate the risk of osteoarthritis after an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

The Relationship Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Lower-Extremity Visuomotor Reaction Time in Young Adult Women Following Ankle Sprain.

CONTEXT: Many individuals who sustain a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) fail to return to prior activity due to residual symptoms; and report elevated levels of injury-related fear, decreased function, and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Additionally, individuals with history of LAS exhibit deficits in neurocognitive functional measures like visuomotor reaction time (VMRT), which contributes to worse patient-reported outcome scores. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between HRQOL and lower-extremity (LE) VMRT in individuals with LAS history. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Young adult female volunteers with history of LAS (n = 22; age = 24 [3.5] y; height = 163.1 [9.8] cm; mass = 65.1 [11.5] kg; and time since last LAS = 67.8 [50.5] mo) completed HRQOL outcomes including the following: (1) Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, (2) Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, (3) Penn State Worry Questionnaire, (4) modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale, and (5) Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). Additionally, participants completed a LE-VMRT task by responding to a visual stimulus using their foot to deactivate light sensors. Participants completed trials bilaterally. Separate Spearman rho correlations were performed to assess the relationship between patient-reported outcomes assessing constructs of HRQOL and LE-VRMT bilaterally. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: There was a strong, significant negative correlation between FADI-Activities of Daily Living (ρ = -.68; P = .002) and FADI-Sport (ρ = -.76; P = .001) scores and injured limb LE-VMRT; moderate, significant negative correlations between the uninjured limb LE-VMRT and FADI-Activities of Daily Living (ρ = -.60; P = .01) and FADI-Sport (ρ = -.60; P = .01) scores; and moderate, significant positive correlations between the injured limb LE-VMRT and modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale-Physical Summary Component (ρ = .52; P = .01) and modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale-Total (ρ = .54; P = .02) scores. All other correlations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Young adult women with history of LAS demonstrated an association between self-reported constructs of HRQOL and LE-VMRT. As LE-VMRT is a modifiable injury risk factor, future studies should examine the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve LE-VMRT and the impact on self-reported HRQOL.

Kinesiophobia Is Associated with Peak Knee Abduction Angle during Jump Landing after ACL Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the associations between kinesiophobia, knee abduction angle (KAA) during the first 100 ms of landing, and knee flexion excursion (KFE) in individuals 5-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We hypothesized that greater kinesiophobia would be associated with greater peak KAA and lesser KFE during landing on the ACLR limb, but not on the contralateral limb. METHODS: Thirty-six participants between 14 and 35 yr old (females = 19, age = 19.9 ± 5.1 yr, height = 172.5 ± 9.4 cm, weight = 76.7 ± 20.0 kg, time since surgery =7.2 ± 1.7 months) were recruited from a sports medicine clinic at 5-12 months after primary unilateral ACLR. Participants completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to measure kinesiophobia and three successful trials of a standard drop vertical jump task. A 10-camera three-dimensional motion capture system synchronized with two embedded force plate platforms was used to capture jump-landing kinematics. Separate stepwise linear regression models were used to examine the associations between kinesiophobia, peak KAA, and KFE on the ACLR and contralateral limbs after accounting for time since surgery and biological sex. RESULTS: When accounting for time since surgery and biological sex, every 1-point increase on the TSK-11 (i.e., increase in kinesiophobia) associated with a 0.37° increase (i.e., a 7.1% increase) in ACLR limb KAA ( P = 0.02). Kinesiophobia was not associated with contralateral limb KAA, ACLR limb KFE, or contralateral limb KFE. CONCLUSIONS: Higher kinesiophobia was related to greater amounts of peak KAA during landing in individuals 5-12 months post-ACLR. Modifying kinesiophobia may help to decrease KAA and lead to reduced secondary ACL injury risk. Future research should investigate feasible psychological interventions to reduce kinesiophobia and improve KAA in patients post-ACLR.

Age-, Sex-, and Graft-Specific Reference Values From 783 Adolescent Patients at 5 to 7 Months After ACL Reconstruction: IKDC, Pedi-IKDC, KOOS, ACL-RSI, Single-Leg Hop, and Thigh Strength.

OBJECTIVE: To describe age-, sex-, and graft source-specific reference values for patient-reported, physical function, and strength outcome measures in adolescents at 5 to 7 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data were collected at 3 universities and 2 children's hospitals. The participants completed at least one of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Evaluation Form, Pediatric IKDC (Pedi-IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale. Participants also completed single-leg hop tests and/or isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength assessments (at 60°/s). Reference values were summarized using descriptive statistics and stratified for age, sex, and graft source. RESULTS: Reference values were reported for common patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function and strength from 783 participants (56% females, age = 16. 4 ± 2.0 years) who were in early adolescence (12-14 years, N = 183, 52% females), middle adolescence (15-17 years, N = 456, 58% females), or late adolescence (18-20 years, N = 144, 55% females). Three hundred seventy-nine participants (48.4%) received a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, 292 participants (37.3%) received hamstring tendon autograft, and 112 participants (14.3%) received autograft or allograft from an alternative source. CONCLUSION: Reference values for common patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function and strength differed depending on a patient's age, sex, and graft source. Using patient-specific reference values, in addition to previously described age-appropriate cutoff values, may help clinicians monitor and progress patients through rehabilitation and return to physical activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(4):1-8. Epub: 23 January 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11389.

Application of Theory for Those With Sport-Related Concussion: Understanding the Effect of Athletic Identity on Health Outcomes.

Athletic identity is a psychological factor of concern for athletes after sport-related concussion (SRC). The integrated model of response to sport injury includes athletic identity as a psychological factor within its model, but it has often been overlooked as a consideration affecting outcomes of SRC. In this review, we applied the integrated model of response to sport injury to the current available evidence about the negative consequences of a stronger athletic identity on health outcomes after SRC. Theory-based research recommendations will be provided to facilitate research in this area. Recommendations for athletic training clinical practice to assess and consider athletic identity as part of routine clinical care for those after SRC will also be discussed.

Validation of a Survey to Characterize Barriers to Physical Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Although 84% of patients expected to return to activity within 1 year of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), as few as 24% will return to their preinjury level of activity. By considering a patient's perceptions of reengagement in activity after ACLR, clinicians and researchers may be better equipped to implement interventions that are patient centered. OBJECTIVE: To describe the validation of the ACL Reasons survey, a tool to aid clinicians and researchers in understanding patient perceptions of barriers to physical activity (PA) engagement after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The ACL Reasons survey was administered via Qualtrics to 78 patients 6 to 24 months after primary, unilateral ACLR. Patients were categorized as active, more challenging, or less active based on their responses to the ACL Reasons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of the ACL Reasons survey occurred via an iterative process of drafting and revising based on feedback from a team of external expert reviewers. Tegner activity level, Marx activity score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), ACL Return to Sport after Injury score, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score were compared among groups using analysis-of-variance and Kruskal Wallis tests. RESULTS: Groups differed based on Tegner activity level (P < .001), Marx activity score (P = .01), KOOS pain score (P = .02), KOOS symptom score (P = .04), KOOS sports and recreation score (P < .001), KOOS quality of life score (P < .001), ACL Return to Sport after Injury score (P < .001), and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score (P < .001), with the less active group performing worse on each. Knee symptoms, fear of knee symptoms or movement, and fear of injury were the most common reasons for the change in PA engagement. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the validity of the ACL Reasons survey as a tool for identifying barriers to PA engagement after ACLR. This tool may help facilitate communication between patients with ACLR and their health care providers to enhance patient-centered care.

Exploratory Examination of Knee Self-Efficacy in Individuals With a History of ACL Reconstruction and Sport-Related Concussion.

CONTEXT: Knee self-efficacy and injury-related fear are associated with poor self-reported knee function and decreased physical activity (PA) after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Limited research has explored contextual factors that may influence psychological responses in this population, such as history of sport-related concussion (SRC). After SRC, individuals may experience increased negative emotions, such as sadness and nervousness. However, it is unknown how SRC history may influence knee-self efficacy and injury-related fear in individuals with ACLR. The purpose of this study was to compare knee self-efficacy and injury-related fear in individuals after ACLR who present with and without history of SRC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty participants ≥1 year postunilateral ACLR were separated by history of SRC (no SRC = 29, SRC = 11). The Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (KSES) and subscales measured certainty regarding performance of daily activities (KSES-ADL), sports/leisure activities (KSES-Sport), physical activities (KSES-PA), and future knee function (KSES-Future). The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 measured injury-related fear. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine between-group differences. Hedges g effect sizes and 95% confidence interval were used to examine clinically meaningful group differences. RESULTS: Individuals with a history of ACLR and SRC demonstrated worse KSES-PA (7.5 [5.3]) compared with those without a history of SRC (8.1 [6.1], P = .03). No other statistically significant differences were observed. A medium effect size was present for the KSES-PA (0.62), KSES-ADL (0.42), KSES-Present (ADL + PA + Sport) (0.48), KSES-Total (0.53), and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (0.61) but must be interpreted with caution as 95% confidence interval crossed 0. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study indicated that individuals with a history of ACLR and SRC had worse knee self-efficacy for PA compared with those without history of SRC. Rehabilitation specialists should monitor knee self-efficacy deficits in the post-ACLR population and recognize the potential influence of cumulative injury history on rehabilitative outcomes.

Perceived Instability, Pain, and Psychological Factors for Prediction of Function and Disability in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.

CONTEXT: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with residual instability, pain, decreased function, and increased disablement. Injury-related fear has been associated with CAI, although its relationship to other impairments is unclear. The fear-avoidance model is a theoretical framework hypothesizing a relationship among pain catastrophizing, injury-related fear, chronic pain, and disability. It has been useful in understanding fear's influence in other musculoskeletal conditions but has yet to be studied in those with CAI. OBJECTIVE: To explore relationships among instability, pain catastrophizing, injury-related fear, pain, ankle function, and global disability in individuals with CAI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Anonymous online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 259 people, recruited via email and social media, with a history of ankle sprain completed the survey; of those, 126 participants (age = 32.69 ± 4.38 years, females = 84.92%, highly active = 73.81%) were identified as having CAI and were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Demographics of gender identity, age, and physical activity level were recorded. Assessments used were the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (instability), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (pain catastrophizing), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (injury-related fear), a numeric pain rating scale and activity-based question (pain presence), the Quick Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (ankle function), and the modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale (disability). Relationships among variables were explored through correlation and regression analyses. RESULTS: After we controlled for instability and pain, pain catastrophizing and injury-related fear were significantly related to function and disability ratings in individuals with CAI. Together, the variables predicted 48.7% (P < .001) of the variance in function and 44.2% (P < .001) of the variance in disability. CONCLUSIONS: Greater instability, pain catastrophizing, injury-related fear, and pain predicted decreased function and greater disability in those with CAI. These findings are consistent with the hypothesized relationships in the fear-avoidance model, although further investigation is needed to determine causality of these factors in the development of CAI.

Adolescents Are Less Physically Active Than Adults After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Sources of physical activity (PA) and motivation for return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) differ between adolescents and adults. It is unclear whether these differences influence participation in PA during the first year after ACLR when individuals are transitioning from rehabilitative care to unrestricted activity. PURPOSE: To compare device-assessed measures of PA between adolescents and adults at 6 to 12 months after ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included were 22 adolescents (age, 15.9 ± 1.2 years; time since surgery = 8.0 ± 2.1 months) and 23 adults (age, 22.5 ± 5.0 years; time since surgery = 8.2 ± 2.1 months) who were cleared for unrestricted PA after primary unilateral ACLR. Participants were considered physically active if they met their age-specific United States Department of Health and Human Services PA guidelines. Participants wore an accelerometer-based PA monitor for at least 7 days. Daily minutes of moderate to vigorous-PA (MVPA) and daily step counts were reported and compared between age groups using analysis of covariance, with monitor wear time and sex included as covariates. The association between age group and meeting age-specific PA guidelines was assessed using binary logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. RESULTS: Adults with ACLR participated in 16 minutes more MVPA per day (49 ± 22 vs 33 ± 16 minutes per day; P < .001) and took 2212 more steps per day (8365 ± 2294 vs 6153 ± 1765 steps per day; P < .001) when compared with adolescent participants. In addition, 83% of adults were physically active, compared with 9% of adolescents (odds ratio = 60.2; 95% CI, 7.6-493.4). CONCLUSION: Adolescents with ACLR were less physically active than adults with ACLR, and only 9% of adolescents met aerobic PA guidelines. This is concerning because PA patterns adopted early in life are predictive of PA patterns in adulthood. Our findings indicate a need to better understand underlying causes of reduced PA among adolescents with ACLR and to develop intervention strategies that promote engagement in adequate PA after rehabilitation.