Immunogenicity of ALVAC-HIV vCP1521 in infants of HIV-1-infected women in Uganda (HPTN 027): the first pediatric HIV vaccine trial in Africa.

OBJECTIVE: Maternal-to-child-transmission of HIV-1 infection remains a significant cause of HIV-1 infection despite successful prevention strategies. Testing protective HIV-1 vaccines remains a critical priority. The immunogenicity of ALVAC-HIV vCP1521 (ALVAC) in infants born to HIV-1-infected women in Uganda was evaluated in the first pediatric HIV-1 vaccine study in Africa. DESIGN: HIV Prevention Trials Network 027 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ALVAC in 60 infants born to HIV-1-infected mothers with CD4 counts of >500 cells per microliter, which were randomized to the ALVAC vaccine or placebo. ALVAC-HIV vCP1521 is an attenuated recombinant canarypox virus expressing HIV-1 clade E env, clade B gag, and protease gene products. METHODS: Infants were vaccinated at birth and 4, 8, and 12 weeks of age with ALVAC or placebo. Cellular and humoral immune responses were evaluated using interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester proliferation, intracellular cytokine staining, and binding and neutralizing antibody assays. Fisher exact test was used to compare positive responses between the study arms. RESULTS: Low levels of antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses (intracellular cytokine assay) were detected at 24 months (CD4-6/36 vaccine vs. 1/9 placebo; CD8-5/36 vaccine vs. 0/9 placebo) of age. There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher cellular immune response rates in vaccine recipients compared with placebo. There were minimal binding antibody responses and no neutralizing antibodies detected. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-1-exposed infants are capable of generating low levels of cellular immune responses to ALVAC vaccine, similar to responses seen in adults.

Feasibility and safety of ALVAC-HIV vCP1521 vaccine in HIV-exposed infants in Uganda: results from the first HIV vaccine trial in infants in Africa.

BACKGROUND: The development of a safe and effective vaccine against HIV type 1 for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV would significantly advance the goal of eliminating HIV infection in children. Safety and feasibility results from phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ALVAC-HIV vCP1521 in infants born to HIV type 1-infected women in Uganda are reported. METHODS: HIV-exposed infants were enrolled at birth and randomized (4:1) to receive vaccine or saline placebo intramuscular injections at birth, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of age. Vaccine reactogenicity was assessed at vaccination and days 1 and 2 postvaccination. Infants were followed until 24 months of age. HIV infection status was determined by HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: From October 2006 to May 2007, 60 infants (48 vaccine and 12 placebo) were enrolled with 98% retention at 24 months. One infant was withdrawn, but there were no missed visits or vaccinations among the 59 infants retained. Immune responses elicited by diphtheria, polio, hepatitis B, haemophilus influenzae type B, and measles vaccination were similar in the 2 arms. The vaccine was well tolerated with no severe or life-threatening reactogenicity events. Adverse events were equally distributed across both study arms. Four infants were diagnosed as HIV infected [3 at birth (2 vaccine and 1 placebo) and 1 in vaccine arm at 2 weeks of age]. CONCLUSION: The ALVAC-HIV vCP1521 vaccination was feasible and safe in infants born to HIV-infected women in Uganda. The conduct of high-quality infant HIV vaccine trials is achievable in Africa.

A randomized therapeutic vaccine trial of canarypox-HIV-pulsed dendritic cells vs. canarypox-HIV alone in HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy.

Targeting canarypox (CP)-HIV vaccine to dendritic cells (DCs) elicits anti-HIV-1 immune responses in vitro. We conducted a phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate whether adding DC to a CP-HIV vaccine improved virologic control during analytic treatment interruption (ATI) in HIV-1-infected subjects. Twenty-nine subjects on suppressive antiretroviral therapy were randomized to vaccination with autologous DCs infected with CP-HIV+keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) (arm A, n=14) or CP-HIV+KLH alone (arm B, n=15). The mean viral load (VL) setpoint during ATI did not differ between subjects in arms A and B. A higher percentage of subjects in the DC group had a VL setpoint < 5,000 c/mL during ATI (4/13 or 31% in arm A compared with 0/13 in arm B, p=0.096), but virologic control was transient. Subjects in arm A had a greater increase in KLH lymphoproliferative response than subjects in arm B; however, summed ELISPOT responses to HIV-1 antigens did not differ by treatment arm. We conclude that a DC-CP-HIV vaccine is well-tolerated in HIV-1-infected patients, but does not lower VL setpoint during ATI compared with CP-HIV alone. New methods to enhance the immunogenicity and antiviral efficacy of DC-based vaccines for HIV-1 infection are needed.

A phase 1/2 comparative vaccine trial of the safety and immunogenicity of a CRF01_AE (subtype E) candidate vaccine: ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) prime with oligomeric gp160 (92TH023/LAI-DID) or bivalent gp120 (CM235/SF2) boost.

BACKGROUND: The development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine is critical to control the pandemic. A prime-boost HIV-1 vaccine trial assessing safety and immunogenicity was conducted in Thailand as part of an evaluation of candidate regimens for a phase 3 efficacy trial. METHODS: ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521), expressing circulating recombinant form 01_AE (CRF01_AE) gp120/subtype B LAI and subtype B Gag/Protease boosted with recombinant envelope oligomeric CRF01_AE gp160 (ogp160) or bivalent CRF01_AE/subtype B gp120 CM235/SF2, was evaluated in a phase 1/II trial of 130 HIV-negative Thai adults. RESULTS: One hundred forty volunteers were enrolled, and 130 completed all safety and immunogenicity visits. Reactogenicity was common but generally mild, and there was no significant difference in the adverse event rate between vaccine and placebo recipients (P = 0.26). There were 7 serious adverse events during the follow-up period, none of which were vaccine related. Cumulative HIV-specific, CD8-mediated, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses were observed in 11 (25%) of 44 subjects who received ALVAC boosted by bivalent gp120 and in 5 (11%) of 45 subjects who received ALVAC boosted by ogp160, but these differences were not statistically significant compared with those in placebo recipients (P = 0.62 and P = 0.37, respectively). HIV-specific lymphoproliferative responses were detected in 84% of subunit-boosted vaccine recipients and in 10% of placebo recipients. Neutralizing antibody responses to CRF01_AE and subtype B laboratory strains were seen in 95% of ogp160-boosted and 100% of gp120 B/E-boosted vaccinees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These 2 different prime-boost regimens seem to be safe and displayed cell-mediated immune responses consistent with those in other trials of canarypox vectors.

Phase 2 study of an HIV-1 canarypox vaccine (vCP1452) alone and in combination with rgp120: negative results fail to trigger a phase 3 correlates trial.

BACKGROUND: A goal of T-cell HIV vaccines is to define the correlation between a vaccine-induced immune response and protection from HIV infection. We conducted a phase 2 trial to determine if a canarypox vaccine candidate (vCP1452) administered with rgp120 subunit protein would "qualify" for a trial to define a correlate of efficacy. METHODS: A total of 330 healthy volunteers were enrolled into 4 groups: 120 received vCP1452 alone (0, 1, 3, and 6 months), 120 received vCP1452 with 2 different regimens of rgp120 coadministration, and 90 received placebo. HIV-specific antibody responses were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and neutralizing activity. T-cell responses were measured by chromium release and interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. RESULTS: Significant neutralizing antibody responses to the HIV MN strain were detected in all vaccine groups, with net responses ranging from 57% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40% to 71%) to 94% (95% CI: 85% to 99%). Net cumulative HIV-specific CD8 IFNgamma ELISpot assay responses were 13% (95% CI: -1% to 26%) for recipients of vCP1452 alone and 16% (95% CI: 2% to 29%) for recipients of vCP1452 plus rgp120. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the HIV-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response was not sufficient to qualify the regimen for a subsequent trial designed to detect an immune correlate of protection requiring a minimum CD8 CTL frequency of 30%.

Poxvirus-based vaccine candidates for HIV: two decades of experience with special emphasis on canarypox vectors.

Poxvirus vectors have emerged as important vectors for licensed veterinary vaccines and candidate vaccines for humans. Vaccinia, highly-attenuated vaccinia strains and avipoxviruses have been assessed extensively in preclinical models, as well as in humans, to determine their immunogenicity and protective efficacy against HIV. The attenuated vaccinia strains and avipoxviruses have been shown to be safe and able to carry HIV genes and express their proteins to induce both antibodies and cellular immune responses. Preclinical studies show protection against HIV challenge. When using a live attenuated vector system, one must be cognizant of the potential for immune dampening because of vector-specific immunity. In this regard, avipoxviruses, such as canarypox, appear free of the inhibitory effects of vector immunity and repeated use. Unlike vaccinia-based vectors derived from classical vaccine strains, NYVAC and modified vaccinia Ankara may be less susceptible to this effect. In the coming 5 to 10 years, we will certainly know whether this class of vaccine candidates, either alone or in a prime-boost format with other vectors or proteins, will contribute to HIV disease management either from a preventive or therapeutic perspective. Additional Phase I and II studies, as well as human efficacy trials will provide new information. Furthermore, it is hoped that this body of data will contribute to a better understanding of the relevance of specific immunogenicity end points to protection and the predictive value of available animal models in HIV vaccine development.