RESUMEN
Objectives: To assess the ability of the aortic aneurysm volume (AAV), aneurysmal lumen volume (ALV), and aneurysmal thrombus volume (ATV) to predict the need for aortic reintervention when using the maximal aortic diameter as a reference. Methods: This monocentric retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients who underwent successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat an atheromatous thoracic aortic aneurysm. All patients underwent clinical and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for 3 years after TEVAR. The patients were categorized into group 0 if no aortic reintervention was required during the follow-up period and categorized into group 1 if they experienced a type I or III endoleak or aneurysm diameter increase requiring intervention. The maximum aneurysm sac diameter and the AAV, ALV, and ATV were calculated using CTA images obtained preoperatively (T0) and at 6-12 months (T1), 24 months (T2), and 36 months (T3) postoperatively, and their changes over time were analyzed. Correlations between diameter and changes in AAV, ALV, and ATV were assessed, and the association between diameter and volume changes and reintervetion was examined. The cutoff values for predicting the need for reintervention was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The accuracy of volume change versus diameter change for predicting the need for reintervention was analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in terms of the mean aneurysm diameter or AAV, ALV or ATV between the groups at preoperative CTA or after one year of follow-up imaging. The mean ATV was higher in group 1 than in group 0 at 2 years (187.6 ± 86.3 mL vs. 114.7 ± 64.7 mL; p = 0.057) and after 3 years (195.0 ± 86.7 mL vs. 82.1 ± 39.9 mL; p = 0.013). The maximal diameter was greater in group 1 than in group 0 at 3 years (67.3 ± 9.5 mm vs. 55.3 ± 12.6 mm; p = 0.044). The rate of AAV change between T0 and T1 was significantly higher in group 1 (7 ± 4.5%) than in group 0 (-6 ± 6.8%; p < 0.001). The rate of ATV change between T1-T3 was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 0 (34 ± 40.9% vs. -13 ± 14.4% (p = 0.041)); similar results were observed for the rate of ATV change between T2 and T3 (27 ± 50.1% for group 1 vs. -8 ± 49.5% in group 0 (p < 0.001)). According to our multivariate analysis, the annual growth rate for AAV between T0 and T1 was the only independent factor that was significantly associated with aortic reintervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.84, OR = 1.57, p = 0.025; optimal cutoff +0.4%). An increase in the annual growth rate of the ATV between T0 and T3 was independently associated with the need for aortic reintervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90, OR = 1.11, p = 0.0347; optimal cutoff +10.1%). Conclusions: Aortic volume analysis can predict the need for aortic reintervention more accurately and earlier than maximal aortic diameter.
RESUMEN
Objectives: Aortic dissection in patients with Marfan and related syndromes (HTAD) is a serious pathology whose treatment by thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the results of the TEVAR for aortic dissection in patients with HTAD as compared to a young population without HTAD. Methods: The study received the proper ethical oversight. We performed an observational exposed (confirmed HTAD) vs. non-exposed (<65 years old) study of TEVAR-treated patients. The preoperative, 1 year, and last available CT scans were analyzed. The thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters, aortic length, and volumes were measured. The entry tears and false lumen (FL) status were assessed. The demographic, clinical, and anatomic data were collected during the follow-up. Results: Between 2011 and 2021, 17 patients were included in the HTAD group and 22 in the non-HTAD group. At 1 year, the whole aortic volume increased by +21.2% in the HTAD group and by +0.2% the non-HTAD groups, p = 0.005. An increase in the whole aortic volume > 10% was observed in ten cases (58.8%) in the HTAD group and in five cases (22.7%) in the non-HTAD group (p = 0.022). FL thrombosis was achieved in nine cases (52.9%) in the HTAD group vs. twenty (90.9%) cases in the non-HTAD group (p < 0.01). The risk factors for unfavorable anatomical evolution were male gender and the STABILISE technique. With a linear model, we observed a significantly different aortic volume evolution between the two groups (p < 0.01) with the STABILISE technique; this statistical difference was not found in the TEVAR subgroup. In the HTAD patients, there was a significant difference in the total aortic volume evolution progression between the patients treated with the STABILISE technique and the patients treated with TEVAR (+160.1 ± 52.3% vs. +47 ± 22.5%, p < 0.01 and +189.5 ± 92.5% vs. +58.6 ± 34.8%, p < 0.01 at 1 year and at the end of follow-up, respectively). Conclusions: TEVAR in the HTAD patients seemed to be associated with poorer anatomical outcomes at 1 year. This result was strongly related to the STABILISE technique which should be considered with care in these specific patients.
RESUMEN
Background After a type A aortic dissection repair, a patent false lumen in the descending aorta is the most common situation encountered, and is a well-known risk factor for aortic growth, reinterventions and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of residual aortic dissection (RAD) at a high-volume aortic center with prospective follow-up. Methods In this prospective single-center study, all patients operated for type A aortic dissection between January 2017 and December 2022 were included. Patients without postoperative computed tomography scans or during follow-up at our center, and patients without RAD were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up for patients with RAD. The secondary endpoints were perioperative mortality, rate of distal aneurysmal evolution, location of distal aneurysmal evolution, rate of distal reinterventions, outcomes of distal reinterventions, and aortic-related death during follow-up. Results In total, 200 survivors of RAD comprised the study group. After a mean follow-up of 27.2 months (1-66), eight patients (4.0%) died and 107 (53.5%) had an aneurysmal progression. The rate of distal reintervention was 19.5% (39/200), for malperfusion syndrome in seven cases (3.5%) and aneurysmal evolution in 32 cases (16.0%). Most reinterventions occurred during the first 2 years (82.1%). Twenty-seven patients were treated for an aneurysmal evolution of RAD including aortic arch with hybrid repair in 21 cases and branched aortic arch endoprosthesis in six cases. In the hybrid repair group, there was no death, and the rate of morbidity was 28.6% (6/21) (one minor stroke, one pulmonary complication, one recurrent paralysis with complete recovery and three major bleeding events). In the branched endograft group, there was no death, no stroke, and no paraplegia. There was one case (16.7%) of carotid dissection. Complete aortic remodeling or complete FL thrombosis on the thoracic aorta was found in 18 cases (85.7%) and in five cases (83.3%) in the hybrid and branched endograft groups, respectively. Conclusions: Despite a critical course in most cases of RAD, with a high rate of aneurysmal evolution and reintervention, the long-term mortality rate remains low with a close follow-up and a multidisciplinary management in an expert center.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: The vascular type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a rare genetic connective tissue disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the COL3A1 gene that result in arterial and organ fragility and premature death. We present five cases of vEDS that highlight the diagnosis and treatment challenges encountered by clinicians with these patients. (2) Case presentations: we present the cases of five patients with vascular complications of vEDS who were successfully managed using endovascular interventions or hybrid techniques at our institution from 2005 to 2022. (3) Conclusions: These data emphasize that a multidisciplinary approach is needed for vEDS patients and that when endovascular or hybrid treatment is performed in a timely manner by a skilled team of interventional radiologists, good results can be achieved. Our report also demonstrates that the prognosis of vEDS patients has improved over the past 20 years with a new prevention program including celiprolol therapy, physical activity adaptation and limitation, and scheduled monitoring by expert clinicians.
RESUMEN
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the aortic diameter and volume during the first year after a type A repair to predict the long-term prognosis of a residual aortic dissection (RAD). Methods: All patients treated in our center for an acute type A dissection with a RAD and follow-up > 3 years were included. We defined two groups: group 1 with dissection-related events (defined as an aneurysmal evolution, distal reintervention, or aortic-related death) and group 2 without dissection-related events. The aortic diameters and volume analysis were evaluated on three postoperative CT scans: pre-discharge (T1), 3−6 months (T2) and 1 year (T3). Results: Between 2009 and 2016, 54 patients were included. Following a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (SD 31.5), the rate of dissection-related events was 62.9% (34/54). The total aortic diameters of the descending thoracic aorta were greater in group 1 at T1, T2 and T3, with greater diameters in the FL (p < 0.01). The aortic diameter evolution at 3 months was not predictive of long-term dissection-related events. The total thoracic aortic volume was significantly greater in group 1 at T1 (p < 0.01), T2 (p < 0.01), and T3 (p < 0.01). At 3 months, the increase in the FL volume was significantly greater in group 1 (p < 0.01) and was predictive for long-term dissection-related events. Conclusion: This study shows that an initial CT scan volume analysis coupled with another at 3 months is predictive for the long-term evolution in a RAD. Based on this finding, more aggressive treatment could be given at an earlier stage.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hybrid aortic arch repair in patients with chronic residual aortic dissection (RAD) is a less invasive alternative to conventional surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the short-term and long-term results of hybrid treatment for RAD after type A repair. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, all patients treated for chronic RAD with hybrid aortic arch repair were included. Indications for treatment were rapid aortic growth, aortic diameter > 55 mm, or aortic rupture. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2020, we performed 29 hybrid treatments for chronic RAD. Twenty-four patients were treated for complete supra-aortic debranching in zones 0 and 5 with left subclavian artery debranching alone in zone 2. There was 1 perioperative death (3.4%): The patient was treated for an aortic rupture. There was no spinal cord ischemia and 1 minor stroke (3.4%). After a median follow-up of 25.4 months (range 3-97 months), the long-term mortality was 10.3% (3/29) with no late aortic-related deaths. Twenty-seven patients (93.1%) developed FL thrombosis of the descending thoracic aorta; the rate of aneurysmal progression on thoraco-abdominal aorta was 41.4% (12/29), and the rate of aortic reintervention was 34.5% (10/29). CONCLUSION: In a high-volume aortic center, hybrid repair of RAD is associated with good anatomical results and a low risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, including that of patients treated in zone 0. A redo replacement of the ascending aortic segment is sometimes necessary to provide a safer proximal landing zone and reduce the risk of type 1 endoleak after TEVAR.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica , Disección Aórtica , Rotura de la Aorta , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: FLNA Loss-of-Function (LoF) causes periventricular nodular heterotopia type 1 (PVNH1), an acknowledged cause of seizures of various types. Neurological symptoms are inconstant, and cardiovascular (CV) defects or connective tissue disorders (CTD) have regularly been associated. We aimed at refining the description of CV and CTD features in patients with FLNA LoF and depicting the multisystemic nature of this condition. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated FLNA variants and clinical presentations in FLNA LoF patient with at least one CV or CTD feature, from three cohorts: ten patients from the French Reference Center for Rare Vascular Diseases, 23 patients from the national reference diagnostic lab for filaminopathies-A, and 59 patients from literature review. RESULTS: Half of patients did not present neurological symptoms. Most patients presented a syndromic association combining CV and CTD features. CV anomalies, mostly aortic aneurysm and/or dilation were present in 75% of patients. CTD features were present in 75%. Variants analysis demonstrated an enrichment of coding variants in the CH1 domain of FLNA protein. CONCLUSION: In FLNA LoF patients, the absence of seizures should not be overlooked. When considering a diagnosis of PVNH1, the assessment for CV and CTD anomalies is of major interest as they represent interlinked features. We recommend systematic study of FLNA within CTD genes panels, regardless of the presence of neurological symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo , Heterotopia Nodular Periventricular , Tejido Conectivo/metabolismo , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/genética , Filaminas/genética , Filaminas/metabolismo , Humanos , Heterotopia Nodular Periventricular/complicaciones , Heterotopia Nodular Periventricular/genética , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the anatomical evolution of residual aortic dissection after type A repair and factors associated with poor prognosis at a high-volume aortic centre. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, all type A aortic dissections were included for prospective follow-up. Patients without follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan available for radiological analysis and patients without residual aortic dissection were excluded from this study. The primary end point was a composite end point defined as dissection-related events including aneurysmal evolution (increased diameter > 5 mm/year), aortic reintervention for malperfusion syndrome, aortic diameter >55 mm, rapid aortic growth >10 mm/year or aortic rupture and death. The secondary end points were risk factors for dissection-related events and reintervention analysis. All immediate and last postoperative CT scans were analysed. RESULTS: Among 104 patients, after a mean follow-up of 20.4 months (8-41), the risk of dissection-related events was 46.1% (48/104) and the risk of distal reintervention was 17.3% (18/104). Marfan syndrome (P < 0.01), aortic bicuspid valve (P = 0.038), innominate artery debranching (P = 0.025), short aortic cross-clamp time (P = 0.011), initial aortic diameter >40 mm (P < 0.01) and absence of resection of the primary entry tear (P = 0.015) were associated with an increased risk of dissection-related events or reintervention during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Residual aortic dissection is a serious disease requiring close follow-up at an expert centre. This study shows higher reintervention and aneurysmal development rates than currently published. To improve long-term outcomes, the early demographic and anatomic poor prognostic factors identified may be used for more aggressive treatment at an early phase.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica , Disección Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/complicaciones , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: There are no recommendations for screening for thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs), even in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of TAAs in patients with AAAs and to analyse the risk factors for this association. METHODS: This was a multicentre prospective study. The Aortic Concomitant Thoracic and Abdominal Aneurysm (ACTA) study included 331 patients with infrarenal AAAs > 40 mm between September 2012 and May 2016. These patients were prospectively enrolled in three French academic hospitals. RESULTS: Patients were classified as having a normal, aneurysmal, or ectatic (non-normal, non-aneurysmal) thoracic aorta according to their maximum aortic diameter indexed by sex, age, and body surface area. Thoracic aortic ectasia (TAE) was defined as above or equal to the 90th percentile of normal aortic diameters according to gender and body surface area. Descending TAA was defined as ≥ 150% of the mean normal value, and ascending TAA as > 47 mm in men and 42 mm in women; 7.6% (n = 25) had either an ascending (seven cases; 2.2%) or descending aortic TAA (18 cases; 5.4%), and 54.6% (n = 181) had a TAE. Among the 25 patients with TAAs, five required surgery; two patients had TAAs related to penetrating aortic ulcers < 60 mm in diameter, and three had a TAA > 60 mm. In the multinomial regression analysis, atrial fibrillation (AF) (odds ratio [OR] 11.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.18 - 59.13; p = .004) and mild aortic valvulopathy (OR 2.89, 1.04-8.05; p = .042) were independent factors associated with TAAs. Age (OR 1.06, CI 1.02 - 1.09; p = .003) and AF (OR 4.36, 1.21 - 15.61; p = .024) were independently associated with ectasia. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that TAAs coexisting with AAAs are not rare, and one fifth of these TAAs are treated surgically. Systematic screening by imaging the whole aorta in patients with AAAs is clinically relevant and should lead to an effective prevention policy.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica , Dilatación Patológica/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/patología , Superficie Corporal , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamaño de los Órganos , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
Periodontal Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (pEDS) is a rare condition caused by pathogenic variants in the C1R and C1S genes, encoding subunits C1r and C1s of the first component of the classical complement pathway. It is characterized by early-onset periodontitis with premature tooth loss, pretibial hyperpigmentation and skin fragility. Rare arterial complications have been reported, but venous insufficiency is rarely described. Here we report 13 novel patients carrying heterozygous pathogenic variants in C1R and C1S including three novel C1S variants (c.962G > C, c.961 T > G and c.961 T > A). In addition to the pEDS phenotype, three patients and one relative displayed widespread venous insufficiency leading to persistent varicose leg ulcers. One patient suffered an intracranial aneurysm with familial vascular complications including thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm and dissection and intracranial aneurysm rupture. This work confirms that vascular complications can occur, although they are not frequent, which leads us to propose to carry out a first complete non-invasive vascular evaluation at the time of the diagnosis in pEDS patients. However, larger case series are needed to improve our understanding of the link between complement pathway activation and connective tissue alterations observed in these patients, and to better assess the frequency, type and consequences of the vascular complications.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/etiología , Mutación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/genética , Preescolar , Complemento C1r/genética , Complemento C1s/genética , Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/genética , Femenino , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Varicosa/etiología , Úlcera Varicosa/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) has already demonstrated improved reproducibility with a high degree of agreement (intermodality variability), reproducibility (interoperator variability), and repeatability (intraoperator variability) compared with conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) when estimating the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The aim of the present study was, in a clinical, multicenter setting, to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-US with aneurysm model quantification software (3D-US abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA] model) for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) sac diameter assessment vs that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 2D-US. METHODS: A total of 182 patients who had undergone EVAR from April 2016 to December 2017 and were compliant with a standardized EVAR surveillance program were enrolled from five different vascular centers (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; L'hospital de la Timone, Paris, France; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio) in four countries. All image acquisitions were performed at the local sites (ie, 2D-US, 3D-US, CTA). Only the 2D-US and CTA readings were performed both locally and centrally. All images were read centrally by the US and CTA core laboratory. Anonymized image data were read in a randomized and blinded manner. RESULTS: The sample used to estimate the accuracy of the 3D-US AAA model and 2D-US included 164 patients and 177 patients, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference between CTA and 3D-US was -2.43 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.20 to 0.14; P = .07) with a lower and upper limit of agreement of -8.9 mm (95% CI, -9.3 to -8.4) and 2.7 mm (95% CI, 2.3-3.2), respectively. For 2D-US and CTA, the mean difference was -3.62 mm (95% CI, -6.14 to -1.10; P = .002), with a lower and upper limit of agreement of -10.3 mm (95% CI, -10.8 to -9.8) and 2.5 mm (95% CI, 2-2.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-US AAA model showed no significant difference compared with CTA for measuring the anteroposterior diameter, indicating less bias for 3D-US compared with 2D-US. Thus, 3D-US with AAA model software is a viable modality for anteroposterior diameter assessment for surveillance after EVAR.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Imagenología Tridimensional , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background Despite known limitations, the decision to operate on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is primarily on the basis of measurement of maximal aneurysm diameter. Purpose To identify volumetric and computational fluid dynamics parameters to predict AAAs that are likely to progress in size. Materials and Methods This study, part of a multicenter prospective registry (NCT01599533), included 126 patients with AAA. Patients were sorted into stable (≤10-mL increase in aneurysm volume) and progression (>10-mL increase in aneurysm volume) groups. Initial AAA characteristics of the derivation cohort were analyzed (maximal diameter and surface, thrombus and lumen volumes, maximal wall pressure, and wall shear stress [WSS]) to identify relevant parameters for a logistic regression model. Model and maximal diameter diagnostic performances were assessed in both cohorts and for AAAs smaller than 50 mm by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Eighty-one patients were included (mean age, 73 years ± 7 years [standard deviation]; 78 men). The derivation and validation cohorts included, respectively, 50 and 31 participants. In the derivation cohort, there was higher mean lumen volume and lower mean WSS in the progression group compared with the stable group (60 mL ± 14 vs 46 mL ± 18 [P = .005] and 66% ± 6 vs 53% ± 9 [P = .02], respectively). Mean lumen volume and mean WSS at baseline were correlated to total volume growth (r = 0.47 [P = .002] and -0.42 [P = .006], respectively). In the derivation cohort, a regression model including lumen volume and WSS to predict aneurysm enlargement was superior to maximal diameter alone (AUC, 0.78 vs 0.52, respectively; P = .003); although no difference was found in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.79 vs 0.71, respectively; P = .51). For AAAs smaller than 50 mm, a regression model that included both baseline WSS and lumen volume performed better than maximal diameter (AUC, 0.79 vs 0.53, respectively; P = .01). Conclusion Combined analysis of lumen volume and wall shear stress was associated with enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysms at 1 year, particularly in aneurysms smaller than 50 mm in diameter. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Mitsouras and Leach in this issue.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The natural history of type B intramural hematomas is little-known. Aneurysmal progression or an aortic dissection occurs in 15 to 20% of the cases. The study of the natural anatomical evolution could help identify the patients at risk of unfavorable evolution. METHODS: All the patients monitored for a type B intramural hematoma between 2009 and 2018 were included in this monocentric retrospective study. Computed tomography angiography centerline measurement of diameters was obtained in various points of aortic segmentation on day (D) 0 and at one month (M1). Aortic volumes (lumen, intramural hematoma, and total volume) were calculated. The circulating volume was calculated using the volume rendering method. The volume of the intramural hematoma was measured using a manual section-by-section segmentation tool, and the total volume was obtained by summing up the two preceding volumes. Two groups of patients were compared: group 1 (favorable anatomical evolution) and group 2 (unfavorable anatomical evolution). RESULTS: Between January 2008 and August 2018, 25 patients were managed for a type B intramural hematoma in our center. After an average follow-up of 15.5 months (1-52), 13 patients (52%) presented a favorable evolution and 12 (48%) an unfavorable evolution. At M1, a significant increase of the luminal diameters (37 mm vs. 32 mm; P < 0.01) and a significant reduction in the longitudinal extension (19 mm vs. 26 mm; P < 0.01) were observed. The maximum aortic diameter evolved significantly between D0 and M1 in the unfavorable evolution group (49 mm vs. 44 mm, respectively; P = 0.038). Such a difference was not found in the favorable evolution group (37.4 vs. 37.1, respectively; P = 0.552). An overall significant reduction in the total aortic volume (166 cm3 vs. 219 cm3; P < 0.01), the circulating volume (124 cm3 vs. 145 cm3; P = 0,026), and the volume of the hematoma (42 cm3 vs. 39 cm3; P < 0.01) was observed. The circulating volume decreased significantly between D0 and M1 in the favorable evolution group (110 cm3 vs. 135 cm3; P = 0.05), whereas no difference was noted in the unfavorable group (142 cm3 vs, 157 cm3; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The progression of the maximum aortic diameter and of the circulating volume after one month of follow-up could be predictive factors of the poor long-term evolution of type B intramural hematomas.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hematoma/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) and their associated risk markers in children with Marfan syndrome (MFS). AIMS: To assess the incidence of CVEs and determine risk markers in a cohort diagnosed with Marfan syndrome during childhood and followed for several years. METHODS: From a French multicentre nationwide database, 462 patients with MFS diagnosed during childhood were included prospectively. Patients' files were screened for a period of 20 years (1993-2013). CVEs (e.g. death, aortic dissection, cardiac valve or aortic root surgery) were assessed during the prospective follow-up. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) age at the end of follow-up was 17.2 (11.1-21.3) years. CVEs were reported for 35 participants (7.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-10.4%). First CVEs were prophylactic aortic root surgery (n=29), aortic dissection (n=4; two aged <18 years) and death (n=2). Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence of CVEs was 5.3% (95% CI 3.3-8.7%) during childhood (aged≤18 years) and 19.4% (95% CI 13.3-27.9%) at 25years of age. The cumulative rate of CVEs was higher in case of Valsalva sinus Z-score increase of≥0.1 per year (P=0.0003), maximal Valsalva sinus diameter growth speed ≥5mm per year (P=0.03), aortic regurgitation≥2 (P=0.0005) and maximal Valsalva sinus Z-score≥3 before 16 years of age (P<0.0001). In a multivariable Cox proportional analysis, the Valsalva sinus Z-score remained significantly related to outcome. Considering aortic root evolution, aortic regurgitation, age at diagnosis and beta-blocker therapy were related to Valsalva sinus Z-score evolution during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CVEs in children with MFS are mainly related to prophylactic aortic root surgery. Aortic dissections are rarely observed in children. The Valsalva sinus Z-score is a strong indicator of subsequent CVEs in children with MFS. Attention to follow-up and beta-blocker observance may be warranted in high-risk children.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Síndrome de Marfan/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Síndrome de Marfan/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Marfan/mortalidad , Síndrome de Marfan/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Type II endoleaks are the most common complications after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVARs). Some studies have shown the benefit of preventive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization, but its efficacy and cost-effectiveness continue to be controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure on the increase in aneurysmal sac diameter during follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent the embolization of the IMA before EVAR in our center, between January 2014 and July 2016, were included. We retrospectively compared the diameter of the aortic aneurysm sac, the rate of endoleak and reinterventions, and the theoretical cost of management between these patients (group 2) and a historical cohort of patients treated for EVAR before January 2014 who did not undergo prior IMA embolization (group 1). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four patients were retrospectively analyzed. After exclusion, we compared a group of 37 embolized patients with a control group of 46 patients. The rate of enlargement in the aneurysmal sac diameter was significantly higher in the control group at 2 years (27.9% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.025). The type II endoleak rate at 2 years was significantly higher in the control group (53.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.012), as was the aneurysm-related reintervention rate (31.1% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis confirmed these results. At 2 years of follow-up, there was no difference in the overall cost of patient management between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive IMA embolization is an effective, reliable, and cost-effective technique that seems to reduce the rate of the aneurysmal sac diameter enlargement, type II endoleak, and reinterventions after EVAR.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Endofuga/prevención & control , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/economía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/economía , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Endofuga/economía , Endofuga/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Circulación Esplácnica , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/etiología , Enfermedad de Erdheim-Chester/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad de Erdheim-Chester/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Heritable thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (hTAAD) are life-threatening complications of well-known syndromic diseases or underdiagnosed nonsyndromic heritable forms (nshTAAD). Both have an autosomal dominant transmission and are genetically heterogeneous. Our objective was to describe the relevance of molecular diagnosis in these patients and the contribution of each gene in nshTAAD. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six consecutive nshTAAD probands, either young (<45 years) sporadic or familial cases were included. A next-generation sequencing capture panel comprising 23 known disease-causing genes was performed. RESULTS: Class 4 or 5 variants were identified in 18% of the nshTAAD probands, while class 3 variants were found in 10% of them. The yield in familial cases was greater than in sporadic cases. SMAD3 and FBN1 genes were the major disease-causing genes. Unexpectedly, no premature termination codon variant was identified in the FBN1 gene. Furthermore, we report for the first time that aortic dissection or surgery occurred significantly more often and earlier in probands with a class 4 or 5 pathogenic variant. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that genetic screening using NGS is efficient in young and familial nshTAAD. The presence of a pathogenic variant has a possible predictive value, which needs to be further investigated because it may influence care.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/genética , Disección Aórtica/genética , Fibrilina-1/genética , Proteína smad3/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Niño , Codón sin Sentido/genética , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Patología Molecular/métodos , Linaje , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of exercise cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (RTOF) and to assess right and left ventricular adaptation and aortic wall response to exercise in comparison with volunteers. METHODS: 11 RTOF and 11 volunteers underwent prospective CMR at rest and during exercise. A supine bicycle ergometer was employed to reach twice the resting heart rate during continuous exercise, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Bi-ventricular parameters and aortic stiffness were assessed using accelerated cine sequences and flow-encoding CMR. A t-test was used to compare values between groups. A Mann Whitney test was used to compare values within groups. RESULTS: In RTOF both ventricles showed an impaired contractile reserve (RVEF rest 36.2±8.3%, +1.3±3.9% increase after exercise; LVEF rest 53.8±6.1%, +5.7±6.4% increase after exercise) compared to volunteers (RVEF rest 50.5±5.0%, +10.4±7.1% increase after exercise, p = 0.039; LVEF rest 61.9±3.1%, +12.2±4.7% increase after exercise, p = 0.014). RTOF showed a reduced distensibility of the ascending aorta during exercise compared to volunteers (RTOF: 3.4±1.9 10-3.mmHg-1 vs volunteers: 5.1±1.4 10-3.mmHg-1; p = 0.027). Ascending aorta distensibility was correlated to cardiac work in the volunteers but not in RTOF. CONCLUSION: RTOF showed an impaired contractile reserve for both ventricles. The exercise unmasked a reduced distensibility of the ascending aorta in RTOF, which may be an early sign of increased aortic rigidity.
Asunto(s)
Aorta/fisiopatología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tetralogía de Fallot/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatología , Adulto , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Elasticidad , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Descanso , Estrés Fisiológico/fisiología , Tetralogía de Fallot/diagnóstico por imagen , Tetralogía de Fallot/cirugía , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal-dominant connective tissue disorder usually associated with heterozygous mutations in the gene encoding fibrillin-1 (FBN1). Homozygous and compound heterozygous cases are rare events and have been associated with a clinical severe presentation. OBJECTIVES: Report unexpected findings of homozygosity and compound heterozygosity in the course of molecular diagnosis of heterozygous MFS and compare the findings with published cases. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the context of molecular diagnosis of heterozygous MFS, systematic sequencing of the FBN1 gene was performed in 2500 probands referred nationwide. 1400 probands carried a heterozygous mutation in this gene. Unexpectedly, among them four homozygous cases (0.29%) and five compound heterozygous cases (0.36%) were identified (total: 0.64%). Interestingly, none of these cases carried two premature termination codon mutations in the FBN1 gene. Clinical features for these carriers and their families were gathered and compared. There was a large spectrum of severity of the disease in probands carrying two mutated FBN1 alleles, but none of them presented extremely severe manifestations of MFS in any system compared with carriers of only one mutated FBN1 allele. This observation is not in line with the severe clinical features reported in the literature for four homozygous and three compound heterozygous probands. CONCLUSION: Homozygotes and compound heterozygotes were unexpectedly identified in the course of molecular diagnosis of MFS. Contrary to previous reports, the presence of two mutated alleles was not associated with severe forms of MFS. Although homozygosity and compound heterozygosity are rarely found in molecular diagnosis, they should not be overlooked, especially among consanguineous families. However, no predictive evaluation of severity should be provided.