An IQ Consortium Perspective on Best Practices for Bioanalytical and Immunogenicity Assessment Aspects of CAR-T and TCR-T Cellular Therapies Development.

CAR-T therapies have shown remarkable efficacy against hematological malignancies in the clinic over the last decade and new studies indicate that progress is being made to use these novel therapies to target solid tumors as well as treat autoimmune disease. Innovation in the field, including TCR-T, allogeneic or "off the shelf" CAR-T, and autoantigen/armored CAR-Ts are likely to increase the efficacy and applications of these therapies. The unique aspects of these cell-based therapeutics; patient-derived cells, intracellular expression, in vivo expansion, and phenotypic changes provide unique bioanalytical challenges to develop pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assessments. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG) has brought together a group of industry experts to discuss and consider these challenges. In this white paper, we present the IQ consortium perspective on the best practices and considerations for bioanalytical and immunogenicity aspects toward the optimal development of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies.

Comparison of Pre-existing Anti-AAV8 Total Antibody Screening and Confirmatory Assays with a Cell-Based Neutralizing Assay in Normal Human Serum.

Pre-existing adeno-associated viruses (AAV) neutralizing antibodies (NAb) can prevent AAV vectors from transducing target tissues. The immune responses can include binding/total antibodies (TAb) and neutralizing antibodies (NAb). This study is aimed at comparing total antibody assay (TAb) and cell-based NAb assay against AAV8 to help inform the best assay format for patient exclusion criteria. We developed a chemiluminescence-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to analyze AAV8 TAb in human serum. The specificity of AAV8 TAb was determined using a confirmatory assay. A COS-7-based assay was used to analyze anti-AAV8 NAbs. The TAb screening cut point factor was determined to be 2.65, and the confirmatory cut point (CCP) was 57.1%. The prevalence of AAV8 TAb in 84 normal subjects was 40%, of which 24% were NAb positive and 16% were NAb negative. All NAb-positive subjects were confirmed to be TAb-positive and also passed the CCP-positive criteria. All 16 NAb-negative subjects did not pass the CCP criterion for the positive specificity test. There was a high concordance between AAV8 TAb confirmatory assay and NAb assay. The confirmatory assay improved the specificity of the TAb screening test and confirmed neutralizing activity. We proposed a tiered assay approach, in which an anti-AAV8 screening assay should be followed by a confirmatory assay during pre-enrollment for patient exclusions for AAV8 gene therapy. This approach can be used in lieu of developing a NAb assay and can be also implemented as a companion diagnostic assay for post-marketing seroreactivity assessments due to ease of development and use.

An ELISA-based platform for rapid identification of structure-dependent nucleic acid-protein interactions detects novel DNA triplex interactors.

Unusual nucleic acid structures play vital roles as intermediates in many cellular processes and, in the case of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated triplexes, are leveraged as tools for therapeutic gene editing. However, due to their transient nature, an understanding of the factors that interact with and process dynamic nucleic acid structures remains limited. Here, we developed snapELISA (structure-specific nucleic acid-binding protein ELISA), a rapid high-throughput platform to interrogate and compare up to 2688 parallel nucleic acid structure-protein interactions in vitro. We applied this system to both triplex-forming oligonucleotide-induced DNA triplexes and DNA-bound PNA heterotriplexes to describe the identification of previously known and novel interactors for both structures. For PNA heterotriplex recognition analyses, snapELISA identified factors implicated in nucleotide excision repair (XPA, XPC), single-strand annealing repair (RAD52), and recombination intermediate structure binding (TOP3A, BLM, MUS81). We went on to validate selected factor localization to genome-targeted PNA structures within clinically relevant loci in human cells. Surprisingly, these results demonstrated XRCC5 localization to PNA triplex-forming sites in the genome, suggesting the presence of a double-strand break intermediate. These results describe a powerful comparative approach for identifying structure-specific nucleic acid interactions and expand our understanding of the mechanisms of triplex structure recognition and repair.

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model of hUGT1A1-modRNA Encoding for the UGT1A1 Enzyme to Treat Crigler-Najjar Syndrome Type 1.

Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 (CN1) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by a marked decrease in uridine-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) enzyme activity. Delivery of hUGT1A1-modRNA (a modified messenger RNA encoding for UGT1A1) as a lipid nanoparticle is anticipated to restore hepatic expression of UGT1A1, allowing normal glucuronidation and clearance of bilirubin in patients. To support translation from preclinical to clinical studies, and first-in-human studies, a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model was developed. The QSP model was calibrated to plasma and liver mRNA, and total serum bilirubin in Gunn rats, an animal model of CN1. This QSP model adequately captured the observed plasma and liver biomarker behavior across a range of doses and dose regimens in Gunn rats. First-in-human dose projections made using the translated model indicated that 0.5 mg/kg Q4W dose should provide a clinically meaningful and sustained reduction of >5 mg/dL in total bilirubin levels.

Challenges and opportunities in bioanalytical support for gene therapy medicinal product development.

Gene and nucleic acid therapies have demonstrated patient benefits to address unmet medical needs. Beside considerations regarding the biological nature of the gene therapy, the quality of bioanalytical methods plays an important role in ensuring the success of these novel therapies. Inconsistent approaches among bioanalytical labs during preclinical and clinical phases have been observed. There are many underlying reasons for this inconsistency. Various platforms and reagents used in quantitative methods, lacking of detailed regulatory guidance on method validation and uncertainty of immunogenicity strategy in supporting gene therapy may all be influential. This review summarizes recent practices and considerations in bioanalytical support of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity evaluations in gene therapy development with insight into method design, development and validations.