Treatment of type B insulin resistance: a novel approach to reduce insulin receptor autoantibodies.

BACKGROUND: Type B insulin resistance belongs to a class of diseases caused by an autoantibody to a cell surface receptor. Blockade of insulin action results in hyperglycemia, hypercatabolism, severe acanthosis nigricans, and hyperandrogenism in women. This rare autoimmune disorder has been treated with various forms of immunosuppression with mixed success. METHODS: We describe 14 patients with type B insulin resistance referred to the National Institutes of Health, adding to an existing cohort of 24 patients. This report focuses on seven patients who were treated with an intensive combination protocol of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and pulse corticosteroids aimed at control of pathogenic autoantibody production. Hematological, metabolic, and endocrine parameters, including fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin dose, lipids, and testosterone, were monitored before and after treatment. RESULTS: All seven treated patients achieved remission, defined as amelioration of hyperglycemia, discontinuation of insulin therapy, and resolution of hyperandrogenism. Glycated hemoglobin has normalized in all seven treated patients. Remission was achieved on average in 8 months from initiation of treatment. The medication regimen was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In seven patients with type B insulin resistance, standardized treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and pulse steroids results in remission of the disease. Future studies will determine whether this treatment protocol can be applied to other autoantibody/cell surface receptor disease states.

Long-term effects of combination treatment with fludarabine and low-dose pulse cyclophosphamide in patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a short course of fludarabine combined with cyclophoshamide in lupus nephritis. METHODS: A phase I/II open label pilot study. Thirteen patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis received monthly oral boluses of low-dose cyclophoshamide (0.5 gm/m(2) on day 1) and subcutaneous fludarabine (30 mg/m(2) on days 1-3) for 3-6 cycles. Concomitant prednisone was aggressively tapered from 0.5 mg/kg/day to a low-dose, alternate-day schedule. Patients were followed for at least 24 months after therapy. The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving renal remission defined as stable creatinine, proteinuria <1 gm/day and inactive urine sediment for at least 6 months. RESULTS: The study was terminated early because of bone marrow toxicity. Eleven patients who received at least three cycles were evaluated for efficacy. Ten patients improved markedly with seven patients achieving complete remission and three patients achieving partial remission. There were three serious haematological adverse events during the treatment with one death due to transfusion-associated graft vs host disease. Profound and prolonged CD4 (mean CD4: 98/microl at 7 months and 251/microl at 12 months) and CD20 lymphocytopenia was noted in most patients. Three patients developed Herpes zoster infections. CONCLUSIONS: A short course of low-dose fludarabine and cyclophoshamide can induce long-lasting remissions in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, but severe myelosuppression limits its widespread use.

Nephrotic syndrome: an under-recognised immune-mediated complication of non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation.

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is an extremely rare complication of myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) that usually occurs in association with chronic graft-versus-host disease (C-GVHD). We observed an unexpectedly high incidence of NS in a cohort of 163 consecutive patients undergoing non-myeloablative HCT from a related human leucocyte antigen-compatible donor. Seven patients developed NS at a median 318 d post-transplant (range 119-1203 d; cumulative incidence 6.1%). The median age at onset of NS was 46 years (range 33-59 years); three of the seven patients had no evidence of C-GVHD while four had accompanying limited C-GVHD. At diagnosis, median proteinuria was 16.5 g/24 h (range 3-24 g/24 h). Renal biopsy was performed in four cases and revealed membranous nephropathy. NS was not always associated with other symptoms of C-GVHD, and in contrast to previous reports, usually did not improve with the re-initiation of aggressive immunosuppression, resulting in progressive renal failure necessitating dialysis in three of seven cases. Membranous nephropathy resulting in NS is a previously unrecognised and clinically significant complication of non-myeloablative HCT.

Clinical presentation and monitoring of lupus nephritis.

The diversity of clinical presentations of lupus nephritis parallel the diversity of pathologic lesions seen in the kidneys of patients with SLE. Renal manifestations range from asymptomatic hematuria or proteinuria to overt nephritic and nephrotic syndromes, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, and chronic renal failure. Subclinical nephropathy both during presentation and during monitoring of disease activity is frequently missed because of the notorious unreliability of routine screening urinalyses performed in high-throughput clinical pathology laboratories. Requisitions for urine microscopy should be flagged for special attention in patients at risk for lupus nephritis. Depression of classic complement pathway components and high titers of anti-DNA, anti-nucleosome, or anti-Clq antibodies identify patients are increased risk of renal involvement or flares of nephritis. Several disease activity and damage indexes are available, but they are mostly used in clinical research setting and none has achieved wide use for standard clinical practice.

Renal flares are common in patients with severe proliferative lupus nephritis treated with pulse immunosuppressive therapy: long-term followup of a cohort of 145 patients participating in randomized controlled studies.

OBJECTIVE: Immunosuppressive agents have become the standard of therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis, but some patients may relapse after discontinuing treatment. We reviewed the cases of renal flares in a cohort of patients who participated in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials at the National Institutes of Health and explored the prevalence, outcome, and predictive factors of renal flares. METHODS: Data were obtained on 145 patients treated with pulse cyclophosphamide, pulse methylprednisolone, or the combination of both. Patients had not received immunosuppressive therapy for at least 6 months and had experienced complete or partial response according to defined criteria. Renal flares were classified as either proteinuric or nephritic based on changes in urinary protein and sediment. Most patients who experienced a flare received additional immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients had a complete response, and 19 had partial response/stabilization. Forty-one of these patients (45%) experienced renal flares (nephritic in 33, proteinuric in 8) after a mean followup of 117 months; 31 of them received additional immunosuppressive therapy. The median time to renal flare was 36 months in the complete responders and 18 months in the partial responders. Eleven of the 41 patients (27%) progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD); 9 had nephritic flares (all severe except for 1) and 2 had proteinuric flares (1 in each responder group). Compared with patients who had a complete response, those with a partial response were more likely to experience a flare, to have a severe nephritic flare, or to progress to ESRD. Low C4 at the time of response and African American ethnicity were significant independent risk factors for renal flare, by multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. CONCLUSION: Nephritic flares are common in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, even in those with a complete response to therapy, but they do not necessarily result in loss of renal function if treated with additional immunosuppressive agents. Renal flares are an important feature of the natural history of lupus nephritis and provide an opportunity for additional preventive strategies, as well as measures of efficacy in future therapeutic trials.

Combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide plus pulse methylprednisolone improves long-term renal outcome without adding toxicity in patients with lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: Controlled trials in lupus nephritis have demonstrated that cyclophosphamide therapy is superior to corticosteroid therapy alone. The long-term effectiveness and side-effect profiles of pulse immunosuppressive regimens warrant further study. OBJECTIVE: To define the long-term risk and benefit of monthly treatment with boluses of methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, or both. DESIGN: Extended follow-up (median, 11 years) of a randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: U.S. government research hospital. PATIENTS: 82 patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of treatment failure (defined as need for supplemental immunosuppressive therapy or doubling of serum creatinine concentration, or death) and adverse events. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat survival analysis, the likelihood of treatment failure was significantly lower in the cyclophosphamide (P = 0.04) and combination therapy (P = 0.002) groups than in the methylprednisolone group. Combination therapy and cyclophosphamide therapy alone did not differ statistically in terms of effectiveness or adverse events. Of patients who completed the protocol (n = 65), the proportion of patients who had doubling of serum creatinine concentration was significantly lower in the combination group than in the cyclophosphamide group (relative risk, 0.095 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.842]). CONCLUSION: With extended follow-up, pulse cyclophosphamide continued to show superior efficacy over pulse methylprednisolone alone for treatment of lupus nephritis. The combination of pulse cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone appears to provide additional benefit over pulse cyclophosphamide alone and does not confer additional risk for adverse events.

Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Fabry disease is a metabolic disorder without a specific treatment, caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-galactosidase A (alpha-gal A). Most patients experience debilitating neuropathic pain and premature mortality because of renal failure, cardiovascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous alpha-gal A for Fabry disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: Double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted from December 1998 to August 1999 at the Clinical Research Center of the National Institutes of Health. PATIENTS: Twenty-six hemizygous male patients, aged 18 years or older, with Fabry disease that was confirmed by alpha-gal A assay. INTERVENTION: A dosage of 0.2 mg/kg of alpha-gal A, administered intravenously every other week (12 doses total). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Effect of therapy on neuropathic pain while without neuropathic pain medications measured by question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). RESULTS: Mean (SE) BPI neuropathic pain severity score declined from 6.2 (0.46) to 4.3 (0.73) in patients treated with alpha-gal A vs no significant change in the placebo group (P =.02). Pain-related quality of life declined from 3.2 (0.55) to 2.1 (0.56) for patients receiving alpha-gal A vs 4.8 (0.59) to 4.2 (0.74) for placebo (P =.05). In the kidney, glomeruli with mesangial widening decreased by a mean of 12.5% for patients receiving alpha-gal vs a 16.5% increase for placebo (P =.01). Mean inulin clearance decreased by 6.2 mL/min for patients receiving alpha-gal A vs 19.5 mL/min for placebo (P =.19). Mean creatinine clearance increased by 2.1 mL/min (0.4 mL/s) for patients receiving alpha-gal A vs a decrease of 16.1 mL/min (0.3 mL/s) for placebo (P =.02). In patients treated with alpha-gal A, there was an approximately 50% reduction in plasma glycosphingolipid levels, a significant improvement in cardiac conduction, and a significant increase in body weight. CONCLUSION: Intravenous infusions of alpha-gal A are safe and have widespread therapeutic efficacy in Fabry disease.

Increased levothyroxine requirements presenting as "inappropriate" TSH secretion syndrome in a patient with nephrotic syndrome.

Patients with primary thyroid failure on levothyroxine (LT4) replacement who develop nephrotic syndrome (NS) may rarely present with an increase in LT4 requirements. In this report, we describe a patient with thyroid failure following radioactive iodine ablation for Graves' disease who required an escalation of LT4 doses following the onset of NS. The case presented with disproportionately elevated TSH levels in the presence of normal (or slightly subnormal) thyroid hormone levels, thus, masquerading as a state of "inappropriate" TSH secretion. This pattern of extreme dysregulation in thyroid function indices due to urinary loss of thyroid hormones has not been previously described in NS, and, therefore, extends the spectrum of endocrine manifestations of NS.

Treatment of lupus nephritis.

Patients with lupus nephritis pose a therapeutic challenge and stimulate investigation of innovative treatment strategies. Although patient survival and renal function outcomes have improved over the last 4 decades, contemporary immunosuppressive regimens are not consistently effective and often require extended courses associated with insidious toxicities. Several strategies are under investigation to induce remissions more rapidly and to reduce the risk of long courses of cytotoxic drug therapy. The combination of pulse methylprednisolone and pulse cyclophosphamide may be more effective than pulse cyclophosphamide alone for patients with relatively severe proliferative lupus nephritis. Ongoing clinical studies evaluate the risk/benefit of other intensive induction regimens (eg, combination fludarabine with relatively low-dose pulse cyclophosphamide). A particularly vigorous strategy employs immunoablative cyclophosphamide with or without stem cell rescue. Several studies of sequential immunosuppressive therapy are in progress. It is anticipated that long-term toxicities can be lessened by substituting various maintenance agents (eg, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) after initial cyclophosphamide therapy has induced a renal response. Additional information is needed to determine the role of this strategy. Furthermore, a number of standard and experimental immunosuppressive regimens (that do not include cyclophosphamide) are under investigation as well. Innovative approaches (eg, costimulatory blockade) offer the hope of more effective treatments without the risks of contemporary regimens.

Progress in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.

Lupus nephritis is often well developed at the time of diagnosis. High-dose corticosteroids are universally accepted as the initial approach to the control of severe inflammation in the kidney. Long-term disease control and the minimization of iatrogenic risk usually require adjunctive therapies that target the more fundamental immunoregulatory disturbances of lymphoid cells. Of the available cytotoxic drugs, cyclophosphamide is currently among the most effective, although it cannot be considered ideal in terms of efficacy or toxicity. New prospects for the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis include novel immunosuppressive agents (e.g. mycophenolate, cyclosporine, fludarabine), combination chemotherapy (e.g. cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine), and sequential chemotherapy (e.g. cyclophosphamide-azathioprine), immunological reconstitution using intensive cytoreductive chemotherapy (with or without stem cell rescue), co-stimulatory molecule inhibition (e.g. humanized anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody, CTLA4-Ig). Gene therapy remains an attractive prospect, but its feasibility clearly depends on the further definition of lupus-promoting genes and the availability of methods to establish stable expression of disease-corrective genes in the appropriate lymphoid cells.

New prospects for treatment of lupus nephritis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is envisioned to arise from hyperactivate helper T-cells that cause polyclonal B-cell secretion of pathogenic autoantibodies and formation of immune complexes which deposit in sites such as the kidney. The most widely used immunosuppressive drugs, notably corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, are often criticized as being nonspecific. In fact, these agents may be effective in SLE and lupus nephritis because broad, rather than highly selective, effects are required to control the aberrant immune system. Nonetheless, these agents are not uniformly effective and are associated with substantial toxicities. The lack of universal efficacy raises the specter that lupus is a heterogeneous disorder with different etiopathogenesis in different subsets of patients (as in lupus-prone mice). Therapeutic prospects for the upcoming millennium include new forms and combinations of chemotherapeutic agents (mycophenolate and adenosine analogues), attempts to achieve immunological reconstitution using near-ablative chemotherapy (with or without bone marrow or stem cell rescue), monoclonal antibodies, and other inhibitors of T-cell costimulatory pathways (e.g., anti-CD154 and/or CTLA4-Ig). The prospect for gene therapy has already been realized in some animal models of SLE. In human SLE, the feasibility of gene therapy will depend on further definition of lupus-promoting genes and availability of methods to establish stable expression of potentially corrective genes.

A pilot study of low-dose fludarabine in membranous nephropathy refractory to therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lymphocytes are believed to play a role in the induction and perpetuation of membranous nephropathy. Fludarabine is a purine nucleoside analog with selective activity against both dividing and resting lymphocytes. We evaluated the tolerance, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunologic, and clinical effects of fludarabine in patients with membranous nephropathy in an single arm pilot study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients with idiopathic (n = 7) or lupus (n = 1) membranous nephropathy who had failed high-dose prednisone (n = 8) and/or alkylating agents (n = 2), or cyclosporine (n = 1) were treated with 6-monthly cycles of fludarabine (cycles 1-2, 20 mg/m2/day x 2 days, cycles 3-6, 20 mg/m2/day x 3 days). Mean proteinuria was 9 g/day with a mean duration of disease of 25 months (range 12-48). Proteinuria, GFR and effective renal plasma flow were compared before and after completing the treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients completed the protocol. CD3, CD4, CD8 and B cell counts decreased by 53%, 46%, 61% and 84%, respectively, at the end of treatment and remained at lower than pretreatment levels 6 months after completing the trial. Despite lymphopenia, serum immunoglobulin levels remained unchanged. Both naive (CD45RA+) and memory CD4+ T cells (CD45RO+) were reduced (naive > memory). Proteinuria decreased by > or = 50% in 5 out of 7 patients (p = 0.11). Filtration fraction improved in all patients with decreased filtration fraction at baseline. The only side-effect observed was one episode of acute bacterial sinusitis that responded promptly to antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-dose fludarabine treatment in patients with membranous nephropathy is well tolerated and results in significant lymphopenia involving B more than T cells. In this pilot study improvement in proteinuria and filtration rate were observed. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal dose and clinical efficacy of fludarabine.

Natural history and treatment of lupus nephritis.

Renal involvement occurs in the majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Contemporary therapeutic regimens for immunosuppression and for the treatment of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, infections, and seizures have likely contributed to improvements in the prognosis of these patients over the last four decades. Corticosteroids usually ameliorate the manifestations of lupus nephritis but achieve less complete and sustained remissions than do cytotoxic drugs. Among the cytotoxic drugs, pulse cyclophosphamide has one of the best profiles of efficacy and toxicity. Because each episode of exacerbation of lupus nephritis results in cumulative scarring, atrophy and fibrosis, we recommend continued maintenance treatment for 1 year beyond the point of complete remission of proliferative lupus nephritis. Studies are in progress to determine whether innovative treatment strategies will enhance efficacy and minimize toxicity associated with cytotoxic drug therapies. Lupus membranous nephropathy poses a lower risk of renal failure, but persistent nephrotic syndrome confers risks of cardiovascular events; this form of lupus nephritis is usually treated with less intensive regimens of corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, or cyclosporine. The prognosis and overall success of treatment for lupus nephritis seem to vary widely among geographically and racially diverse populations. The causes for the apparently worse prognosis and poorer responses to treatment of lupus nephritis in Black patients are currently unexplained and require further study. Until such data are available, caution is clearly warranted in extrapolating evidence, particularly about prognosis and effects of treatment, among different populations of patients with lupus nephritis.

Angiotensin I converting enzyme gene polymorphisms in systemic lupus erythematosus: decreased prevalence of DD genotype in African American patients.

The presence of the D (deletion) allele at the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with a) adverse vascular events contributing to early mortality and b) progressive deterioration of renal function in a variety of chronic glomerular diseases. We investigated the potential role of ACE polymorphisms in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Two hundred and sixteen (216) SLE patients (121 Caucasians; 78 African Americans; and 17 other) and 200 normal controls were studied; 134 patients had evidence of renal disease. ACE genotypes were determined by a polymerase chain reaction based assay. The frequency of genotype DD was increased in African American normal controls compared to Caucasians (55% vs. 37%, p = 0.017) and in African American normal controls vs. African American lupus patients (55% vs. 30%, p = 0.008). Trend analysis of the genotype distribution across the three African American groups (renal, non-renal, controls) revealed a trend of increased frequency of I and decreased frequency of D as likelihood of renal disease increases (p = 0.008). No association between any ACE genotype with parameters of renal disease and/or response to therapy was identified. African American patients with lupus have a lower frequency of DD genotype as compared to African American normal controls. Further studies will be necessary to address whether this is due to decreased survival of these patients, a protective effect of DD genotype from developing the disease or a chance sample effect.

Use of cytotoxic agents and cyclosporine in the treatment of autoimmune disease. Part 2: Inflammatory bowel disease, systemic vasculitis, and therapeutic toxicity.

When cytotoxic agents were introduced, their ability to disrupt nucleic acid and protein synthesis led to their effective use for the treatment of neoplastic disease. During the course of this use, however, it became apparent that these agents also suppress the immune system. This usually unwelcome effect was subsequently studied and beneficially directed toward the treatment of non-neoplastic diseases in which autoimmune mechanisms were considered important to pathogenesis. As a result of these investigations, cytotoxic agents and, more recently, cyclosporine have emerged to become an important part of the therapeutic regimen for many autoimmune diseases. Nonetheless, these medications may still cause treatment-induced illness or even death. It is therefore particularly important to weigh the benefits and risks of cytotoxic therapy when treating a non-neoplastic disease. This two-part Clinical Staff Conference reviews data on the efficacy and toxicity of cytotoxic drugs and cyclosporine in selected autoimmune diseases. In part 2, we focus on the role of these agents in treating inflammatory bowel disease and systemic vasculitis and review the toxic effects of these agents.

Use of cytotoxic agents and cyclosporine in the treatment of autoimmune disease. Part 1: rheumatologic and renal diseases.

When cytotoxic agents were initially introduced, their ability to disrupt nucleic acid and protein synthesis led to their effective use for the treatment of neoplastic disease. During the course of this use, however, it became apparent that these agents also suppress the immune system. This usually unwelcome effect was subsequently studied and beneficially directed toward the treatment of non-neoplastic diseases in which autoimmune mechanisms were considered important to pathogenesis. As a result of these investigations, cytotoxic agents and, more recently, cyclosporine have emerged to become an important part of the therapeutic regimen for many autoimmune diseases. Nonetheless, these medications may still cause treatment-induced illness or even death. It is therefore particularly important to weigh the benefits and risks of cytotoxic therapy when treating a non-neoplastic disease. This two-part Clinical Staff Conference reviews data on the efficacy and toxicity of cytotoxic drugs and cyclosporine in selected autoimmune diseases. Part 1 examines the manner in which these agents have been used to treat rheumatologic and renal diseases.

Clinical differences between North African and Iraqi Jews with familial Mediterranean fever.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disease causing attacks of fever and serositis. The gene causing this disease, designated MEFV, was mapped to the short arm of chromosome 16, but has not yet been cloned. North African and Iraqi Jews constitute the two largest population groups suffering from the disease in Israel. In this report we compared the severity of the disease between these two populations. North African Jews were found to have a more severe disease manifested by an earlier age of onset, an increase in frequency and severity of joint involvement, a higher incidence of erysipelas-like erythema, and a higher dose of colchicine required to control symptoms. The involvement of additional genes, environmental factors, and different mutations in MEFV, may explain the clinical variation in disease severity between these two population groups.

Renal biopsy in lupus nephritis.

Renal biopsy can be extremely valuable in the management of patients with lupus nephritis. It is remarkably common to find pathological evidence of substantial nephron loss in patients with low-grade laboratory abnormalities. This is due to compensatory hypertrophy and hemodynamic adjustments within the less-diseased nephron mass. It has been shown that the decision to institute immunosuppressive therapy is highly informed by the results of renal biopsy and offers the prospect of achieving more favorable renal outcomes. Kidney biopsies should be evaluated by dedicated renal pathology services experienced in diagnostic light, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. Biopsies should be classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) system and specific lesions semiquantitatively scored against a checklist of features comprising activity (reversible) and chronicity (irreversible damage) indices. The renal biopsy findings should be reviewed jointly by pathologists and the clinicians caring for patients with lupus nephritis.

Outcome criteria for lupus nephritis trials: a critical overview.

Lupus nephritis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Traditional outcome criteria such as doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease and death have been used in controlled therapeutic trials, but are limited by their low incidence and the extended period of time required to reach them. More recently, discussions have focused on composite outcome measures, such as remission and relapse, as well as measures of health-related quality of life, general lupus activity and cumulative damage indexes. We review the strengths and weaknesses of several outcome criteria, and we propose criteria for both small pilot studies and large definitive trials.