Development and validation of the sitting balance assessment for spinal cord injury (SitBASCI).

STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric psychometric study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to introduce the development of the Sitting Balance Assessment for Spinal Cord Injury (SitBASCI) and assess its inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. SETTING: The study was developed among the three Spinal Units of San Bortolo Hospital in Vicenza, Niguarda Hospital in Milan and AOU Careggi in Florence. METHODS: SitBASCI is a 13-item scale developed to evaluate trunk control in individuals with SCI. Subjects were filmed while performing the 13 items of the scale. The videotapes were submitted to 25 examiners who evaluated patients' performances with the scale. The power of the study was estimated. The interclass correlational coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the inter-rater reliability of the examiner's evaluations regarding each item and the total. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency of the scale and internal consistency of the scale on the eliminated item. RESULTS: The study showed to have a significant power. The inter-rater reliability for the total score was ptot = 0.997 (item's values were p = 0.876-0.998). The internal consistency of the scale was alpha = 0.925, while the internal consistency of the scale on the eliminated item was alpha = 0.912-0.930. CONCLUSION: SitBASCI had a high inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Items had also good inter-rater reliability and item-total correlation. Therefore, SitBASCI could be proposed as a good and reliable instrument for Italian clinicians to evaluate sitting balance and trunk control in patient with SCI despite of aetiology and level of injury.

Self-care in spinal cord injuries inventory (SC-SCII) and self-care self-efficacy scale in spinal cord injuries (SCSES-SCI): development and psychometric properties.

STUDY DESIGN: Validation cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess the psychometric properties of two instruments based on the middle-range theory of self-care in chronic illness: the Self-Care in Spinal Cord Injuries Inventory (SC-SCII) and the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in Spinal Cord Injuries (SCSES-SCI). SETTING: Multicenter study in five spinal units across Italy and Ireland. METHODS: Instrument development was based on self-care behaviours identified in the scientific literature. Behaviours were grouped into four dimensions during a consensus conference: self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, self-care management and self-care self-efficacy. Sixty-seven items were subsequently generated based on these dimensions. A multidisciplinary group of 40 experts evaluated content validity. Dimensionality of the final items was tested by confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) with a sample of 318 participants. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated for each dimension. Construct validity was assessed using correlations between items and scoring differences amongst participants with more severe conditions and secondary complications. RESULTS: Content validity of the SC-SCII and SCSES-SCI was satisfactory for thirty-five of the previously generated items, which were further refined. CFA showed comparative fit indexes ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 and root mean square errors of approximation from 0.03 to 0.07. Internal consistency ranged from 0.71 to 0.85, and intraclass correlation coefficients were higher than 0.70. Correlations among dimensions were moderate, and the theoretical hypotheses formulated when designing the instruments were largely confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The SC-SCII and the SCSES-SCI represent valid and reliable theoretically-grounded instruments to assess self-care in people with spinal cord injury.

Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Italian version of the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale.

STUDY DESIGN: Validation cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To adapt the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS) to Italian and to assess the validity and reliability of this instrument. SETTING: Multicentre study in outpatient clinics of three urban spinal units across Italy. METHODS: After a five-step translation/validation process, the Italian SCI-SCS was administered in a toolset composed of a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Modified Barthel Index, the Short-Form 8, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9, and the General Anxiety Disorder 7. The Italian SCI-SCS construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the instrument were evaluated using Cronbach's α and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total scale and its subscales. Pearson's correlation coefficient with all administered instruments was calculated to evaluate the concurrent validity. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty-six participants were recruited from February to October 2018. EFA suggested a three-factor structure explaining 45% of the total variance. After experts' consideration about the clinical relevance of its components, a final version of the Italian SCI-SCS with four different subscales and 15 items was proposed. The total scale Cronbach's α was 0.73. The ICC agreement for test-retest reliability was 0.91. Correlations of the Italian SCI-SCS with the administered instruments were statistically significant (p < 0.05), highlighting congruent hypothesized relations. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study provided a first psychometric evaluation of the SCI-SCS. The modified Italian version of this tool may represent a valuable instrument for the longitudinal assessment of the impact of secondary conditions in people with SCI.

Adaptation and validation of the Caregiver Burden Inventory in Spinal Cord Injuries (CBI-SCI).

DESIGN: Validation cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: Even though caregiver burden (CB) represents a well-recognised concern among caregivers of people with a spinal cord injury (SCI), there are no specific questionnaires designed for its evaluation. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Caregiver Burden Inventory in Spinal Cord Injury (CBI-SCI), which was modified from its original version, and specifically its construct and reliability. SETTING: Multicentre study in four urban spinal units across Italy. The CBI-SCI was administered to family caregivers in outpatient clinics. METHODS: CBI-SCI was administered in a toolset composed of a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Family Strain Questionnaire-Short Form (FSQ-SF), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI). The CBI-SCI construct validity was assessed through an exploratory factor analysis. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was examined using Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient for the total scale and its subscales. Concurrent validity was evaluated performing Pearson's correlation coefficient with all instruments included in the toolset. RESULTS: The CBI-SCI was administered to 176 participants from February 2016 to September 2017. Factor analysis highlighted the five-factored structure of the questionnaire. The total scale Cronbach's α was 0.91 (p < 0.001). All the five subscales of CBI-SCI showed an acceptable internal consistency, ranging from 0.76 to 0.91 (p < 0.001). Pearson's correlation coefficients of the CBI-SCI with all the administered instruments were statistically significant (p < 0.001), showing congruent relations. CONCLUSION: The CBI-SCI, due to its validity and reliability, may represent a valuable instrument to evaluate the CB longitudinally in SCI.