The effects on ovarian activity of delaying versus immediately restarting combined oral contraception after missing three pills and taking ulipristal acetate 30 mg.

OBJECTIVE: Among combined oral contraception (COC) users, to determine the effect on ovarian activity and ovulation of waiting five days before restarting COC, versus restarting immediately, having taken ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA, the dose used for emergency contraception) after missing three consecutive COC pills. STUDY DESIGN: Women already using COC were enrolled for two cycles of COC use (21/7 regimen). In cycle 2, all women omitted COC pills for three consecutive days (days 5,6,7), and on day 8 took UPA 30 mg. They were randomized either to restart their COC pills that same day (immediate restart) or to wait five days (delayed restart). Transvaginal ultrasound, and blood sampling for estradiol and progesterone were undertaken on days 4,8,11,13,15,18,22 and 26. A modified Hoogland score was used to quantify ovarian activity/ovulation and to assess whether luteal phase progesterone concentrations were sufficiently 'adequate' to have conferred a theoretical risk of pregnancy. RESULTS: No one ovulated with risk of pregnancy during the five days following UPA. Among 26 women with immediate restart, none ovulated with a theoretical risk of pregnancy at any time in the cycle. Four of 23 women (17.4% CI [5.0; 38.8]) with delayed restart ovulated with theoretical risk of pregnancy before the end of the cycle. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Women who delay restarting COC for five days after taking UPA 30 mg are at much greater risk of ovulation, and therefore theoretically of pregnancy, than if they restart their COC on the same day as taking UPA. Current recommendations should be revisited. IMPLICATIONS: Women who take UPA-EC after having missed combined oral contraceptive pills are advised to wait five days before restarting the COC. This delay puts them at risk of ovulation and, if intercourse occurs, theoretically therefore of pregnancy. Women who restart their COC pills immediately are much less likely to ovulate. The label for UPA-EC and clinical guidelines on using EC after missed pills should be revisited.

Efficacy and safety of mitotane in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: A retrospective study in 34 Belgian patients.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of patient characteristics and mitotane use in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) over a 4-year period in Belgium. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective review of the outcome of 34 patients treated with mitotane for ACC during the period [01/2008-12/2011] (12 diagnosed before and 22 diagnosed during the study period) and evaluated up to 06/2013. RESULTS: Patient and tumour characteristics were consistent with those generally described for ACC. Mean age at diagnosis was 46.5 years, most patients were female (62%), had functioning ACC (65%) and advanced tumours (ENSAT stages III or IV: 82%). Therapeutic mitotane plasma levels (14-20 mg/L) were achieved at least once in 70% of the cohort, after a median of 4 months, and were maintained for more than 2 months in 61% of evaluable patients. Mitotane-related adverse effects were observed in 66% of patients, were never serious, and included gastrointestinal, neurological, neuropsychological, hormonal, dermatologic and metabolic effects. Most patients (88%) discontinued mitotane, mainly due to tumour progression. Multivariate analysis showed that ENSAT stage was a prognostic factor for overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS); OS was also influenced independently by achievement of therapeutic mitotane plasma levels for at least two consecutive months. CONCLUSION: Patient and tumour characteristics were consistent with previously published data. OS and DFS were mostly influenced by ENSAT stage at diagnosis. Achieving therapeutic levels of mitotane for at least two consecutive months seemed to positively influence OS, but such levels were not reached or sustained in some patients.