Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Anaesthesia ; 78(6): 712-721, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37010959

RESUMEN

Ventilator-associated pneumonia commonly occurs in critically ill patients. Clinical suspicion results in overuse of antibiotics, which in turn promotes antimicrobial resistance. Detection of volatile organic compounds in the exhaled breath of critically ill patients might allow earlier detection of pneumonia and avoid unnecessary antibiotic prescription. We report a proof of concept study for non-invasive diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care (the BRAVo study). Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients commenced on antibiotics for clinical suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia were recruited within the first 24 h of treatment. Paired exhaled breath and respiratory tract samples were collected. Exhaled breath was captured on sorbent tubes and then analysed using thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to detect volatile organic compounds. Microbiological culture of a pathogenic bacteria in respiratory tract samples provided confirmation of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Univariable and multivariable analyses of volatile organic compounds were performed to identify potential biomarkers for a 'rule-out' test. Ninety-six participants were enrolled in the trial, with exhaled breath available from 92. Of all compounds tested, the four highest performing candidate biomarkers were benzene, cyclohexanone, pentanol and undecanal with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 and negative predictive values from 85% to 88%. Identified volatile organic compounds in the exhaled breath of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients show promise as a useful non-invasive 'rule-out' test for ventilator-associated pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Sistema Respiratorio/química , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/análisis
2.
Intensive Care Med ; 48(1): 36-44, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34811567

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Bone marrow-derived, allogeneic, multipotent adult progenitor cells demonstrated safety and efficacy in preclinical models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This phase 1/2 trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cells in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS in 12 UK and USA centres. Cohorts 1 and 2 were open-label, evaluating acute safety in three subjects receiving 300 or 900 million cells, respectively. Cohort 3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial infusing 900 million cells (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) within 96 h of ARDS diagnosis. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes, quality of life (QoL) and plasma biomarkers. RESULTS: No allergic or serious adverse reactions were associated with cell therapy in any cohort. At baseline, the cohort 3 cell group had less severe hypoxia. For cohort 3, 28-day mortality was 25% for cell vs. 45% for placebo recipients. Median 28-day free from intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days in the cell vs. placebo group were 12.5 (IQR 0,18.5) vs. 4.5 (IQR 0,16.8) and 18.5 (IQR 0,22) vs. 6.5 (IQR 0,18.3), respectively. A prospectively defined severe ARDS subpopulation (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg (20 kPa); n = 16) showed similar trends in mortality, ICU-free days and ventilator-free days favouring cell therapy. Cell recipients showed greater recovery of QoL through Day 365. CONCLUSIONS: Multipotent adult progenitor cells were safe and well tolerated in ARDS. The clinical outcomes warrant larger trials to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and optimal patient population.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Células Madre , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 70(12): 725, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20081625

RESUMEN

One of the longest running debates in obstetric anaesthesia surrounds the prevention and treatment of maternal hypotension during caesarean section. Anaesthetic techniques have evolved and maternal mortality and morbidity is markedly reduced, but hypotension remains a problem, particularly following neuraxial blockade. Despite over 30 years of research no definitive consensus has been reached on the best treatment strategy and particular controversy surrounds the use of vasopressive agents. This article explores the evidence relating to the three most commonly used agents in the UK: ephedrine, phenylepherine and metaraminol.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Obstétrica , Cesárea , Hipotensión/prevención & control , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Efedrina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Metaraminol/uso terapéutico , Fenilefrina/uso terapéutico , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA