Rabies risk behaviour in a cohort of Dutch travel clinic visitors: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Travellers to rabies endemic countries should be counselled on rabies risk and, in case of high-risk, pre-exposure vaccination is advised. However, it is not clear which travellers exactly are at high risk. In this study we determined the incidence of possible rabies exposure in travel clinic visitors and compliance with pre-travel advice. METHODS: Travellers to rabies endemic countries who visited a Dutch travel clinic between September 2017 and May 2018, were invited to participate. RESULTS: Of 980 travellers, one percent was injured by a potentially rabid animal. Compliance with advice was low as 59% reported proximity to a potentially rabid animal and only half of those exposed sought medical advice. The most important predictors of proximity to a potentially rabid animal were young age, long travel duration, visiting a monkey forest and hiking for more than one day. Travel for business was associated with lower risk. CONCLUSION: Despite pre-travel advice, rabies risk behaviour was high. Therefore, we would recommend to keep the threshold for pre-travel vaccination low. Pending more data on rabies exposure risk, the identified predictors of proximity to potentially rabid animals could be used to tailor indications for pre-travel rabies vaccination.

First autochthonous human West Nile virus infections in the Netherlands, July to August 2020.

In October 2020, the first case of autochthonous West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease was diagnosed in the Netherlands with a presumed infection in the last week of August. Investigations revealed five more cases of local West Nile virus (WNV) infection. The cases resided in a region where WNV was detected in a bird and mosquitoes in August 2020. Molecular analysis was successful for two cases and identified the presence of WNV lineage 2.

Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation.

BackgroundThe risk of contracting rabies is low for travellers. However, the number of Dutch travellers potentially exposed abroad following an animal-associated injury and needing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has increased, resulting in increased costs.AimHere, we evaluated the costs and the cost-effectiveness of different pre- and post-exposure interventions in the Netherlands, taking into account the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for the prevention of rabies.MethodsA decision tree-based economic model was constructed. We calculated and compared the cost of different WHO pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommendations, intramuscular vs intradermal vaccination and PEP subsequent to increased vaccination coverage in risk groups. We estimated cost-effectiveness, expressed as incremental costs per rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) administration averted, using a societal perspective. Statistical uncertainty regarding number of travellers and vaccination coverage was assessed.ResultsTotal costs at the national level were highest using previous WHO recommendations from 2012, estimated at EUR 15.4 million annually. Intradermal vaccinations in combination with the current recommendations led to the lowest costs, estimated at EUR 10.3 million. Higher vaccination uptake resulted in higher overall costs. The incremental costs per RIG administration averted varied from EUR 21,300-46,800.ConclusionsThe change in rabies PrEP and PEP recommendations in 2018 reduced total costs. Strategies with increased pre-travel vaccination uptake led to fewer RIG administrations and fewer vaccinations after exposure but also to higher total costs. Although larger scale intradermal administration of rabies vaccine can reduce total costs of PrEP and can positively influence vaccination uptake, it remains a costly intervention.