Maternal and Neonatal Morbidities by Race in College-Educated Women.

Objective Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women experience significantly higher adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with non-Hispanic white women. The purpose of this study is to explore whether disparities in obstetric outcomes exist by race among women who are college-educated. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study from a multicenter observational cohort of women undergoing cesarean delivery. Women were defined as "college-educated" if they reported completion of a 4-year college degree. Race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or unknown. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity, and a composite of neonatal morbidity was evaluated as a secondary outcome. A multivariable logistic regression model was then utilized to assess associations of race with the primary and secondary outcomes. Results A total of 2,540 women were included in the study. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, maternal morbidity was found to be significantly higher for college-educated non-Hispanic black women compared with non-Hispanic white women (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.80). The incidence of neonatal morbidity was significantly higher for non-Hispanic black (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31-2.79) and Hispanic (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.23-5.01) women. Conclusion In this cohort, the odds of cesarean-related maternal and neonatal morbidities were significantly higher for college-educated non-Hispanic black women, compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts. This demonstrates that even among women with higher level education, racial and ethnic disparities persist in obstetric outcomes.

Monogenic conditions and central nervous system anomalies: A prospective study, systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the incremental diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) over chromosome microarray (CMA) or G-banding karyotype in fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities. METHODS: Data were collected via electronic searches from January 2010 to April 2022 in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE. The NHS England prenatal exome cohort was also included. Incremental yield was calculated as a pooled value using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included (n = 1583 cases). The incremental yield with pES for any CNS anomaly was 32% [95%CI 27%-36%; I2 = 72%]. Subgroup analysis revealed apparent incremental yields in; (a) isolated CNS anomalies; 27% [95%CI 19%-34%; I2 = 74%]; (b) single CNS anomaly; 16% [95% CI 10%-23%; I2 = 41%]; (c) more than one CNS anomaly; 31% [95% Cl 21%-40%; I2 = 56%]; and (d) the anatomical subtype with the most optimal yield was Type 1 malformation of cortical development, related to abnormal cell proliferation or apoptosis, incorporating microcephalies, megalencephalies and dysplasia; 40% (22%-57%; I2 = 68%). The commonest syndromes in isolated cases were Lissencephaly 3 and X-linked hydrocephalus. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal exome sequencing provides a high incremental diagnostic yield in fetuses with CNS abnormalities with optimal yields in cases with multiple CNS anomalies, particularly those affecting the midline, posterior fossa and cortex.

The Contribution of Commonly Diagnosed Genetic Disorders to Small for Gestational Age Birth and Subsequent Morbidity and Mortality in Preterm Infants.

Objective: Preterm infants born small, vs. appropriate for gestational age (SGA, AGA) are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality. The contribution of genetic disorders to preterm SGA birth, morbidity, and mortality is unknown. We sought to determine the association between genetic disorders and preterm SGA birth, and the association between genetic disorders and morbidity or mortality within preterm SGA infants. We hypothesized that genetic disorders were significantly associated with both. Study Design: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 409 339 infants, born 23-33 weeks' gestation between 2000 and 2020. The odds of preterm SGA (vs AGA) birth, and the odds of severe morbidity or mortality within SGA preterm infants were determined for infants with genetic disorders, after adjusting for known risk factors. Results: Genetic disorders were present in 3.0 and 1.3% of SGA and AGA preterm infants respectively; genetic disorders conferred an aOR (95% CI) of 2.06 (1.92, 2.21) of SGA birth. Genetic disorders were present in 4.3 of preterm SGA infants with morbidity or mortality and 2.1% of preterm SGA infants that did not experience morbidity or mortality. Genetic disorders conferred an aOR (95% CI) of 2.12 (2.66, 3.08) of morbidity or mortality. Conclusions: Genetic disorders are strongly associated with preterm SGA birth, morbidity, and mortality. Clinicians should consider genetic testing of preterm SGA infants, particularly in the setting of other comorbidities or anomalies. Prospective, genomic research is needed to clarify the contribution of genetic disorders to disease in this population.

Diagnostic yield with exome sequencing in prenatal severe bilateral ventriculomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing after negative chromosomal microarray analysis results in prenatally diagnosed bilateral severe ventriculomegaly or hydrocephalus; another objective was to categorize the associated genes and variants. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published until June 2022 using 4 databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and MEDLINE). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies in English reporting on the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing following negative chromosomal microarray analysis results in cases of prenatally diagnosed bilateral severe ventriculomegaly were included. METHODS: Authors of cohort studies were contacted for individual participant data, and 2 studies provided their extended cohort data. The incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing was assessed for pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings in cases of: (1) all severe ventriculomegaly; (2) isolated severe ventriculomegaly (as the only cranial anomaly); (3) severe ventriculomegaly with other cranial anomalies; and (4) nonisolated severe ventriculomegaly (with extracranial anomalies). To be able to identify all reported genetic associations, the systematic review portion was not limited to any minimal severe ventriculomegaly case numbers; however, for the synthetic meta-analysis, we included studies with ≥3 severe ventriculomegaly cases. Meta-analysis of proportions was done using a random-effects model. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the modified STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies had 1988 prenatal exome sequencing analyses performed following negative chromosomal microarray analysis results for various prenatal phenotypes; this included 138 cases with prenatal bilateral severe ventriculomegaly. We categorized 59 genetic variants in 47 genes associated with prenatal severe ventriculomegaly along with their full phenotypic description. There were 13 studies reporting on ≥3 severe ventriculomegaly cases, encompassing 117 severe ventriculomegaly cases that were included in the synthetic analysis. Of all the included cases, 45% (95% confidence interval, 30-60) had positive pathogenic/likely pathogenic exome sequencing results. The highest yield was for nonisolated cases (presence of extracranial anomalies; 54%; 95% confidence interval, 38-69), followed by severe ventriculomegaly with other cranial anomalies (38%; 95% confidence interval, 22-57) and isolated severe ventriculomegaly (35%; 95% confidence interval, 18-58). CONCLUSION: There is an apparent incremental diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing following negative chromosomal microarray analysis results in bilateral severe ventriculomegaly. Although the greatest yield was found in cases of nonisolated severe ventriculomegaly, consideration should also be given to performing exome sequencing in cases of isolated severe ventriculomegaly as the only brain anomaly identified on prenatal imaging.

Should we offer prenatal exome sequencing for intrauterine growth restriction or short long bones? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing over chromosomal microarray or G-banding karyotype in fetuses with: (1) intrauterine growth restriction related to placental insufficiency or (2) short long bones, in isolated and nonisolated instances for both scenarios. DATA SOURCES: Data were collected via electronic searches for relevant citations from January 2010 to April 10, 2022 in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and using relevant bibliographies and data generated in-house. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included were prospective or retrospective cohort studies and/or case series with: (1) n>5 cases of short long bones and/or intrauterine growth restriction undergoing prenatal sequencing with a clearly defined phenotype including assessment of placental function; (2) testing based on prenatal phenotype only; (3) a nondiagnostic chromosomal microarray/karyotype; and (4) known results of genetic testing. METHODS: Incremental yield was calculated for each study and as a pooled value for the aforementioned groups using a random-effects model. Results were displayed in forest plots with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed statistically using Higgins' I2. Publication bias was assessed graphically using funnel plots. Quality assessment was performed using modified Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number CRD42022324680). RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included (n=452 cases). The apparent incremental yields with prenatal sequencing were: (1) 4% (95% confidence interval, -5.0 to 12; I2=0%) in isolated intrauterine growth restriction with evidence of placental insufficiency, (2) 30% (95% confidence interval, 13-47; I2=1%) in intrauterine growth restriction with additional structural anomalies, (3) 48% (95% confidence interval, 26-70; I2=73%) in isolated short long bones, and (4) 68% (95% confidence interval, 58-77; I2=51%) in short long bones with additional skeletal anomalies. Of the 37 short long bone cases with a diagnosis, 32 had a skeletal dysplasia, with thanatophoric dysplasia and osteogenesis imperfecta being the most common (both 21.6% [n=8/37]). In fetuses with short long bones and additional skeletal features, osteogenesis imperfecta was the most common diagnosis (28% [n=57/204]). Where documented, the inheritance patterns were de novo in 75.4% (n=150) of cases. CONCLUSION: Prenatal sequencing adds substantially to incremental yield over chromosomal microarray in fetuses with short long bones or multisystem intrauterine growth restriction. Robust studies are required to assess the utility of fetal sequencing in isolated intrauterine growth restriction with evidence of placental insufficiency, which cannot be recommended on the basis of current evidence.

Fetal central nervous system anomalies: When should we offer exome sequencing?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the detection of pathogenic variants using exome sequencing in an international cohort of fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. METHODS: We reviewed trio exome sequencing (ES) results for two previously reported unselected cohorts (Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) and CUIMC) to identify fetuses with CNS anomalies with unremarkable karyotypes and chromosomal microarrays. Variants were classified according to ACMG guidelines and association of pathogenic variants with specific types of CNS anomalies explored. RESULTS: ES was performed in 268 pregnancies with a CNS anomaly identified using prenatal ultrasound. Of those with an isolated, single, CNS anomaly, 7/97 (7.2%) had a likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variant. This includes 3/23 (13%) fetuses with isolated mild ventriculomegaly and 3/10 (30%) fetuses with isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum. Where there were multiple anomalies within the CNS, 12/63 (19%) had LP/P variants. Of the 108 cases with CNS and other organ system anomalies, 18 (16.7%) had LP/P findings. CONCLUSION: ES is an important tool in the prenatal evaluation of fetuses with any CNS anomaly. The rate of LP/P variants tends to be highest in fetuses with multiple CNS anomalies and multisystem anomalies, however, ES may also be of benefit for isolated CNS anomalies.

Disparities in obstetric morbidity by maternal level of education.

BACKGROUND: Maternal race and socioeconomic status are predictors of obstetric morbidity and mortality in the U.S. A better understanding of the role that maternal education plays in these disparities could enable and target better interventions to improve obstetric outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of the level of education on morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective nested cohort study from a multicenter observational cohort of women undergoing cesarean delivery. Nulliparous women with live, non-anomalous singleton gestations who underwent primary cesarean section and had education status recorded were included. Education level was categorized as none, elementary, high school, some college, and a college degree. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal cesarean complications including hysterectomy, uterine atony, blood transfusion, surgical injury, arterial ligation, infection, wound complication, and ileus. A composite of neonatal morbidity was evaluated as a secondary outcome. We then created a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for selected demographic and obstetric variables that may influence the likelihood of the primary outcome. RESULTS: 10,344 women met inclusion criteria with a 20.3% incidence of the primary outcome. After adjusting for potential confounding variables including race and medical co-morbidities, the incidence of maternal cesarean complications was found to be higher for women with only elementary (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.78) and high school (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.48) education, compared to women with a college degree. There was also higher neonatal morbidity among women with high school (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.62) and some college (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.46) education, compared to women with a college degree. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that efforts to alleviate adverse outcomes in obstetrics should target patient counseling and health literacy as differences in educational background are closely associated with disparities in maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Potential Target for In Utero Therapy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a life-threatening autosomal recessive disease that leads to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, respiratory insufficiency and scoliosis. SMA is currently the most common monogenic cause of infant mortality. Amazing advancements have been made in the therapeutic options available for these children since 2016. What has also become clear is that the earlier the treatment is administered, the better the clinical outcome. For several reasons, which we will review in this chapter, SMA may be an excellent disease candidate for in utero therapy.

Outcomes of Neonates Born to Mothers With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection at a Large Medical Center in New York City.

Importance: Limited data on vertical and perinatal transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and health outcomes of neonates born to mothers with symptomatic or asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are available. Studies are needed to inform evidence-based infection prevention and control (IP&C) policies. Objective: To describe the outcomes of neonates born to mothers with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection and the IP&C practices associated with these outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis reviewed the medical records for maternal and newborn data for all 101 neonates born to 100 mothers positive for or with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 13 to April 24, 2020. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed using Cobas (Roche Diagnostics) or Xpert Xpress (Cepheid) assays. Newborns were admitted to well-baby nurseries (WBNs) (82 infants) and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) (19 infants) in 2 affiliate hospitals at a large academic medical center in New York, New York. Newborns from the WBNs roomed-in with their mothers, who were required to wear masks. Direct breastfeeding after appropriate hygiene was encouraged. Exposures: Perinatal exposure to maternal asymptomatic/mild vs severe/critical COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was newborn SARS-CoV-2 testing results. Maternal COVID-19 status was classified as asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic vs severe/critical. Newborn characteristics and clinical courses were compared across maternal COVID-19 severity. Results: In total, 141 tests were obtained from 101 newborns (54 girls [53.5%]) on 0 to 25 days of life (DOL-0 to DOL-25) (median, DOL-1; interquartile range [IQR], DOL-1 to DOL-3). Two newborns had indeterminate test results, indicative of low viral load (2.0%; 95% CI, 0.2%-7.0%); 1 newborn never underwent retesting but remained well on follow-up, and the other had negative results on retesting. Maternal severe/critical COVID-19 was associated with newborns born approximately 1 week earlier (median gestational age, 37.9 [IQR, 37.1-38.4] vs 39.1 [IQR, 38.3-40.2] weeks; P = .02) and at increased risk of requiring phototherapy (3 of 10 [30.0%] vs 6 of 91 [7.0%]; P = .04) compared with newborns of mothers with asymptomatic/mild COVID-19. Fifty-five newborns were followed up in a new COVID-19 Newborn Follow-up Clinic at DOL-3 to DOL-10 and remained well. Twenty of these newborns plus 3 newborns followed up elsewhere had 32 nonroutine encounters documented at DOL-3 to DOL-25, and none had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including 6 with negative retesting results. Conclusions and Relevance: No clinical evidence of vertical transmission was identified in 101 newborns of mothers positive for or with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, despite most newborns rooming-in and direct breastfeeding practices.

Building an obstetric intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary hospital and selected maternal-fetal and delivery considerations.

During the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, New York City became an international epicenter for this highly infectious respiratory virus. In anticipation of the unfortunate reality of community spread and high disease burden, the Anesthesia and Obstetrics and Gynecology departments at NewYork-Presbyterian / Columbia University Irving Medical Center, an academic hospital system in Manhattan, created an Obstetric Intensive Care Unit on Labor and Delivery to defray volume from the hospital's preexisting intensive care units. Its purpose was threefold: (1) to accommodate the anticipated influx of critically ill pregnant and postpartum patients due to novel coronavirus, (2) to care for critically ill obstetric patients who would previously have been transferred to a non-obstetric intensive care unit, and (3) to continue caring for our usual census of pregnant and postpartum patients, who are novel Coronavirus negative and require a higher level of care. In this chapter, we share key operational details for the conversion of a non-intensive care space into an obstetric intensive care unit, with an emphasis on the infrastructure, personnel and workflow, as well as the goals for maternal and fetal monitoring.

The clinical course of COVID in pregnancy.

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic poses unique challenges to the medical community as the optimal treatment has not been determined and is often at the discretion of institutional guidelines. Pregnancy has previously been described as a high-risk state in the context of infectious diseases, given a particular susceptibility to pathogens and adverse outcomes. Although ongoing studies have provided insight on the course of this disease in the adult population, the implications of COVID-19 on pregnancy remains an understudied area. The objective of this study is to review the literature and describe clinical presentations among pregnant women afflicted with COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: early lessons.

The worldwide incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is rapidly increasing, but there exists limited information on coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy. Here, we present our experience with 7 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy presenting to a single large New York City tertiary care hospital. Of the 7 patients, 5 presented with symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019, including cough, myalgias, fevers, chest pain, and headache. Of the 7 patients, 4 were admitted to the hospital, including 2 who required supportive care with intravenous hydration. Of note, the other 2 admitted patients who were asymptomatic on admission to the hospital, presenting instead for obstetrically indicated labor inductions, became symptomatic after delivery, each requiring intensive care unit admission.

Telehealth Uptake into Prenatal Care and Provider Attitudes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) determine to what degree prenatal care was able to be transitioned to telehealth at prenatal practices associated with two affiliated hospitals in New York City during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and (2) describe providers' experience with this transition. STUDY DESIGN: Trends in whether prenatal care visits were conducted in-person or via telehealth were analyzed by week for a 5-week period from March 9 to April 12 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC)-affiliated prenatal practices in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Visits were analyzed for maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) and general obstetrical faculty practices, as well as a clinic system serving patients with public insurance. The proportion of visits that were telehealth was analyzed by visit type by week. A survey and semistructured interviews of providers were conducted evaluating resources and obstacles in the uptake of telehealth. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 4,248 visits, of which approximately one-third were performed by telehealth (n = 1,352, 31.8%). By the fifth week, 56.1% of generalist visits, 61.5% of MFM visits, and 41.5% of clinic visits were performed via telehealth. A total of 36 providers completed the survey and 11 were interviewed. Accessing technology and performing visits, documentation, and follow-up using the telehealth electronic medical record were all viewed favorably by providers. In transitioning to telehealth, operational challenges were more significant for health clinics than for MFM and generalist faculty practices with patients receiving public insurance experiencing greater difficulties and barriers to care. Additional resources on the patient and operational level were required to optimize attendance at in-person and video visits for clinic patients. CONCLUSION: Telehealth was rapidly implemented in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and was viewed favorably by providers. Limited barriers to care were observed for practices serving patients with commercial insurance. However, to optimize access for patients with Medicaid, additional patient-level and operational supports were required. KEY POINTS: · Telehealth uptake differed based on insurance.. · Medicaid patients may require increased assistance for telehealth.. · Quick adoption of telehealth is feasible..

Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

As New York City became an international epicenter of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth was rapidly integrated into prenatal care at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, an academic hospital system in Manhattan. Goals of implementation were to consolidate in-person prenatal screening, surveillance, and examinations into fewer in-person visits while maintaining patient access to ongoing antenatal care and subspecialty consultations via telehealth virtual visits. The rationale for this change was to minimize patient travel and thus risk for COVID-19 exposure. Because a large portion of obstetric patients had underlying medical or fetal conditions placing them at increased risk for adverse outcomes, prenatal care telehealth regimens were tailored for increased surveillance and/or counseling. Based on the incorporation of telehealth into prenatal care for high-risk patients, specific recommendations are made for the following conditions, clinical scenarios, and services: (1) hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and chronic hypertension; (2) pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus; (3) maternal cardiovascular disease; (4) maternal neurologic conditions; (5) history of preterm birth and poor obstetrical history including prior stillbirth; (6) fetal conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction, congenital anomalies, and multiple gestations including monochorionic placentation; (7) genetic counseling; (8) mental health services; (9) obstetric anesthesia consultations; and (10) postpartum care. While telehealth virtual visits do not fully replace in-person encounters during prenatal care, they do offer a means of reducing potential patient and provider exposure to COVID-19 while providing consolidated in-person testing and services. KEY POINTS: · Telehealth for prenatal care is feasible.. · Telehealth may reduce coronavirus exposure during prenatal care.. · Telehealth should be tailored for high risk prenatal patients..

Symptoms and Critical Illness Among Obstetric Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize symptoms and disease severity among pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, along with laboratory findings, imaging, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Pregnant women with COVID-19 infection were identified at two affiliated hospitals in New York City from March 13 to April 19, 2020, for this case series study. Women were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection based on either universal testing on admission or testing because of COVID-19-related symptoms. Disease was classified as either 1) asymptomatic or mild or 2) moderate or severe based on dyspnea, tachypnea, or hypoxia. Clinical and demographic risk factors for moderate or severe disease were analyzed and calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Laboratory findings and associated symptoms were compared between those with mild or asymptomatic and moderate or severe disease. The clinical courses and associated complications of women hospitalized with moderate and severe disease are described. RESULTS: Of 158 pregnant women with COVID-19 infection, 124 (78%) had mild or asymptomatic disease and 34 (22%) had moderate or severe disease. Of 15 hospitalized women with moderate or severe disease, 10 received respiratory support with supplemental oxygen and one required intubation. Women with moderate or severe disease had a higher likelihood of having an underlying medical comorbidity (50% vs 27%, OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.26-6.02). Asthma was more common among those with moderate or severe disease (24% vs 8%, OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.26-9.75). Women with moderate or severe disease were significantly more likely to have leukopenia and elevated aspartate transaminase and ferritin. Women with moderate or severe disease were at significantly higher risk for cough and chest pain and pressure. Nine women received ICU or step-down-level care, including four for 9 days or longer. Two women underwent preterm delivery because their clinical status deteriorated. CONCLUSION: One in five pregnant women who contracted COVID-19 infection developed moderate or severe disease, including a small proportion with prolonged critical illness who received ICU or step-down-level care.

Coronavirus disease 2019 infection among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals.

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 is rapidly spreading throughout the New York metropolitan area since its first reported case on March 1, 2020. The state is now the epicenter of coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in the United States, with 84,735 cases reported as of April 2, 2020. We previously presented an early case series with 7 coronavirus disease 2019-positive pregnant patients, 2 of whom were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 after an initial asymptomatic presentation. We now describe a series of 43 test-positive cases of coronavirus disease 2019 presenting to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals for more than 2 weeks, from March 13, 2020, to March 27, 2020. A total of 14 patients (32.6%) presented without any coronavirus disease 2019-associated viral symptoms and were identified after they developed symptoms during admission or after the implementation of universal testing for all obstetric admissions on March 22. Among them, 10 patients (71.4%) developed symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 over the course of their delivery admission or early after postpartum discharge. Of the other 29 patients (67.4%) who presented with symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019, 3 women ultimately required antenatal admission for viral symptoms, and another patient re-presented with worsening respiratory status requiring oxygen supplementation 6 days postpartum after a successful labor induction. There were no confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 detected in neonates upon initial testing on the first day of life. Based on coronavirus disease 2019 disease severity characteristics by Wu and McGoogan, 37 women (86%) exhibited mild disease, 4 (9.3%) severe disease, and 2 (4.7%) critical disease; these percentages are similar to those described in nonpregnant adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (about 80% mild, 15% severe, and 5% critical disease).

Applying Patient Safety to Reduce Maternal Mortality.

Maternal morbidity and mortality is on the rise in the United States. Several local, state, and nationwide organizations have worked toward reducing maternal mortality by improving patient safety. Early warning systems unique to the obstetric population have been developed to provide early intervention and to prevent patients from decompensating. Patient care bundles, supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, as well as The Council on Patient Safety, provide a standardized approach to obstetric care. Monitoring outcomes through root cause analysis is key to improving patient safety and outcomes.

Racial disparities in young women with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Although racial disparities in treatment and outcome for endometrial cancer are well recognized, little work has explored disparities in young women. We performed a population-based analysis to compare survival between black and white women with endometrial cancer at <50years of age. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify women <50years of age with endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2012. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared between black and white women and survival by race analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified a total of 35,850 women <50years of age including 31,947 (89.1%) white and 3903 (10.9%) black patients. Black women were more likely to have advanced stage, poorly differentiated, and non-endometrioid histology neoplasms (P<0.05 for all). In a multivariable model, survival was 19% worse for black patients than white patients (HR=1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.32). A similar effect was seen when limited to women with early-stage tumors (HR=1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49), while among patients with advanced stage tumors, no association between race and survival was seen (HR=1.12; 95% CI, 0.89-1.41). Five-year survival rates were 90.6% (95% CI, 88.6-92.3%) for white and 81.5% (95% CI, 73.0-87.5%) for black women with stage IB tumors, and 75.1% (95% CI, 72.5-77.5%) and 63.3% (95% CI, 54.1-71.2%) for white and black women with stage III tumors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Young black women are more likely to present with pathologically aggressive, advanced stage tumors. Even after adjusting for these pathologic differences, young black women with endometrial cancer have higher mortality than white women.

Port Site Metastases: A Survey of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Commentary on the Clinical Workup and Management of Port Site Metastases.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic port site metastases (PSMs) have an incidence of .5% to 2%. The management of an isolated PSM (iPSM), without evidence of recurrence elsewhere, remains unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate practices regarding iPSMs. DESIGN: A 23-item survey was created using commercially available survey software. Over the course of January 2016 the survey was e-mailed to the members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology with 2 follow-up reminder e-mails. (Canadian Task Force classification III.) SETTING: Online survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 709 surveys sent, 132 were returned. Providers practicing for <5 years saw fewer PSMs and those who performed more minimally invasive surgeries (MISs) saw more PSMs. Comparing providers who have or have not seen PSMs, no differences in pneumoinsufflation pressure, the mode of delivery of the specimen, the use of local anesthesia at port site incisions, or the method of deflation were seen. If an iPSM was suspected, most providers indicated they would obtain imaging (computed tomography, 51%, or positron emission tomography/computed tomography, 43%) followed by an interventional radiology-guided biopsy (29%) or resection of the mass. Tendency for treatment is to surgically resect the lesion followed by adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: After controlling for time in practice, we did not find a strong risk factor for iPSMs other than performing >75% of oncologic surgeries by MIS. Most respondents performed imaging when suspecting iPSMs and use systemic adjuvant therapy after confirming iPSMs.