Biomechanical outcomes of pharmacological therapies for post-traumatic arthrofibrosis in preclinical animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE/AIM OF THE STUDY: There is still no evidence of which drug has the greatest therapeutic potential for post-traumatic arthrofibrosis. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature for quality evidence and perform a meta-analysis about the pharmacological therapies of post-traumatic arthrofibrosis in preclinical models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic search strategy was performed in three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science) retrieving studies on the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies in the management of post-traumatic arthrofibrosis using preclinical models in terms of biomechanical outcomes. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted if a minimum of three studies reported homogeneous outcomes for drugs with the same action mechanism. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were included in the systematic review and evaluated for risk of bias. Drugs from 6 different action mechanisms of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was poor. Statistically significant overall effect in favor of reducing contracture was present for anti-histamines (Chi2 p = 0.75, I2 = 0%; SMD (Standardized Mean Difference) = -1.30, 95%CI: -1.64 to -0.95, p < 0.00001) and NSAIDs (Chi2 p = 0.01, I2 = 63%; SMD= -0.93, 95%CI: -1.58 to -0.28, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-histamines, particularly ketotifen, have the strongest evidence of efficacy for prevention of post-traumatic arthrofibrosis. Some studies suggest a potential role for NSAIDs, particularly celecoxib, although heterogeneity among the included studies is significant.

Open and Arthroscopic Elbow Contracture Release: Tips and Pearls.

Elbow stiffness is a common consequence of trauma and can significantly limit the functionality of the affected arm. Intervention may be necessary for those with a motion arc less than 100°, but the decision to intervene should be based on individual patient needs. Restoration of joint motion in a stiff elbow can be challenging, time consuming, and costly. Nonsurgical treatment is the primary management option, and surgical intervention is considered for refractory stiffness. However, recurrent stiffness is a common issue following surgical elbow contracture release. An overview of relevant elbow anatomy, principles and technical pearls of arthroscopic and open contracture release, and postoperative rehabilitation methods to reduce the risk of recurrent stiffness is provided. It is important to tailor the treatment plan to each patient's unique needs and functional expectations.

Acute elbow dislocation: a critical appraisal of the literature.

Background: The purpose of this study was to perform a narrative review of acute elbow dislocation (AED). There are certain aspects of the management of AED that are controversial, including type and length of immobilization, indications for surgery, type of surgery, and new evidence available. Material and methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies regarding AED. Preference was given to studies according to their level of evidence. Studies regarding the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment, including patient-reported outcomes, complications, and conversion to stabilization or revision surgery were included. Results: We found only 1 level I study and 3 level II randomized clinical trials. The rest consisted of level III-V evidence. Conservative care continues to be the standard of care for stable AEDs. Shorter immobilization periods are favored when possible. A consensus definition of an unstable elbow still needs to be improved. Unstable simple elbow dislocation may benefit from surgical intervention with different techniques showing similar outcomes. Advances in surgical procedures and suture designs, including tapes, and ligament augmentation, need to prove their role in managing acute elbow instability. Conclusion: There is a need for higher quality studies after the reduction of an AED, including discerning the outcome of specific patterns of injury and particular groups of patients like high-level athletes or people with preoperative laxity. Comparison between different surgical techniques is warranted, including arthroscopic techniques and types of ligament augmentation to promote early motion and reduce postoperative stiffness.

Radial head replacement for acute complex elbow instability: a long-term comparative cohort study of 2 implant designs.

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures not amenable to reconstruction should be treated by radial head replacement (RHR) when there is associated elbow or forearm instability. There are multiple RHR designs with different philosophies, but 2 of the most commonly used implants include the anatomic press-fit radial head system and the loose-fit metallic spacer. There is little information available specifically comparing the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of these 2 systems. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of 2 RHR designs in the context of complex acute elbow instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients with an average age of 54 years (range, 21-87 years) underwent an acute RHR (46 press-fit Acumed anatomic and 49 loose-fit Evolve metallic spacer) and were prospectively followed for an average of 61 months (range, 24-157 months). There were 34 terrible triads; 36 isolated RH fractures with medial, lateral, or longitudinal instability; and 25 RH fractures associated with a proximal ulnar fracture. Clinical outcome and disability were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Oxford Elbow Score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Pain and satisfaction were assessed using a visual analog scale. Radiographic analysis included presence of loosening, bone loss, and overstuffing related to the RHR. RESULTS: Eight patients with an anatomic RHR (2 with overstuffing, 3 for stiffness, and 3 with loose implants) and 1 patient with a spacer (with stiffness) required implant removal. There were no significant differences between spacer RHR and anatomic RHR in arc of motion (120° vs. 113°, P = .14), pain relief (1 vs. 1.7, P = .135), MEPS (94 vs. 88; P = .07), Oxford Elbow Score (42.3 vs. 42.2, P = .4), or DASH score (12.2 vs. 14.4, P = .5). However, patients with a spacer RHR were significantly more satisfied (9 vs. 7.7; P = .004) than those with an anatomic implant. Radiographically, 19 anatomic implants had significant proximal bone loss and 10 showed complete lucent lines around the stem. Lucent lines were common around the spacer RHR. These radiographic changes were not always related to worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Both the anatomic and spacer RHR designs can provide good clinical long-term outcomes. However, patients with a spacer showed a higher degree of satisfaction and those with an anatomic press-fit RHR had a higher revision rate, with radiographic changes that warrant continued follow-up.

Influence of Coronoid fixation on the functional outcome and rate of complications in surgically treated acute complex elbow instability.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the coronoid commonly present in elbow fracture-dislocations. Despite the evidence that the coronoid plays an important role in elbow stability, there is still controversy on which fractures should be surgically fixed. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and rate of complications of patients with elbow fracture-dislocations in which the coronoid was fixed or left untreated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with an elbow fracture-dislocation involving a coronoid fracture were prospectively followed for an average of 90 months (range 24-190). According to Morrey´s classification there were 22 type II and 8 type III. Nine patients had an anteromedial fracture of the coronoid. In 24 patients the coronoid was repaired (suture fixation in 9, screws fixation in 10 and plate fixation in 5) and in 15 patients the coronoid was not fixed. In 18 patients the radial head was replaced and in 8 patients it was fixed. All patients underwent repair of the lateral ligament complex. Clinical evaluation was performed with the MEPS. Radiographically, the rate of coronoid nonunion was specifically analyzed. Postoperative neurological complications were recorded. RESULTS: At the most recent follow up, the average arc of flexion-extension was 120° (range 70°-140°) with a mean MEPS of 90 (range 25-100). No statistically significant differences were found in the MEPS and flexion-extension arc between the patients in whom synthesis was performed (117° ROM, and 89 MEPS) and those in whom it was not (122° ROM, 94 MEPS) (p = 0.42; p = 0.34). Coronoid fracture healing could be assessed in 36 patients: in 19 patients the coronoid was radiographically healed, and in 17 a nonunion was present, with no difference in the final clinical outcome between both groups. Nine patients, 6 of whom had undergone coronoid fixation, had a neurological complication related to the ulnar nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Coronoid fractures affecting around 50% of its height can be treated without internal fixation as long as the rest of the osteo-ligamentous structures are adequately repaired. Osteosynthesis of the coronoid through a medial approach may carry a non-negligible risk of associated neurological injury.

Drain use can be avoided in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Drains have demonstrated no clear benefits and some potentially harmful effects in hip and knee replacements. There is little evidence about the effects of its use in shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that drain use would increase postoperative blood loss without reducing wound complications. METHODS: We included 103 reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA), 71 were operated for degenerative pathology, 32 due to a fracture. All complications were recorded. Hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Htc.) level were collected and compared to postoperative data. Length of hospitalization and volume output were also noted. RESULTS: 45 patients received a closed-suction drain. Patients with coagulopathy had significant higher bleeding and were excluded (p = 0.03). Patients operated for a fracture were older (80.1y.o vs 72.1 p < 0.01) and had higher blood drop (∆Hb p = 0.01; ∆Htc p = 0.03). There were neither differences between drain and control group in ∆Hb or ∆Htc in the degenerative RSA group (1.84+/-0.89 vs 1.68+/-0.84, p = 0.36; 5.78+/-2.89 vs 5.53+/-2.87 p = 0.50) nor in the fracture RSA group (2.65+/-0.94 vs 2.65+/-1.01, p = 0.90; 7.91+/-2.99 vs. 7.09+/-4.21, p = 0.56). There were neither differences in complications (degenerative p = 0.33; fracture p = 0.21). Drain use was related to a longer hospital stay in elective surgery (2.6 vs 1.8 days; p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The rate of complication is similar between patients with and without drain use. Drain use after shoulder arthroplasty does not affect postoperative bleeding but increases the length of hospital stay. Drains seems to be an unnecessary intervention after RSA that may increase associated costs and can be safely abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.

Role of the interosseous membrane in post-traumatic forearm instability: instructional review.

PURPOSE: In the last two decades, a strong interest on the interosseous membrane (IOM) has developed. METHODS: The authors present a review of the new concepts regarding the understanding of forearm physiology and pathology, with current trends in the surgical management of these rare and debilitating injuries. RESULTS: Anatomical and biomechanical studies have clarified the anatomy of forearm constrains and their role in forearm longitudinal and transverse stability. The radial pull test, a new intraoperative test, has been developed that might increase the detection on IOM injuries. The forearm is now considered a "functional unit" and, consequently, a new classification has been proposed. Uncommon variants and rare patterns of forearm fracture dislocations have been reported in the literature and could not be classified to those commonly referred to using eponyms (Monteggia, Galeazzi, Essex-Lopresti). The new Artiaco et al. classification includes all injury patterns, thus avoids confusion in the nomenclature, and helps surgeon with detection of lesions and guiding surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on the new classification and after current literature review, authors propose a management flowchart for treatment of forearm instability injuries.

Does Sawbone-Based Arthroscopy Module (SBAM) Can Help Elbow Surgeons?

INTRODUCTION: The use of elbow arthroscopy is becoming increasingly common in orthopaedic practice; nevertheless, it is still considered a difficult procedure with a long learning curve. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of a new elbow Sawbone-Based Arthroscopy Module (e-SBAM) in the training of elbow surgeons. METHODS: Fourteen surgeons were classified as "Expert" (n: 7; more than 10 years of experience in arthroscopic surgery) and "Not-expert" surgeons (n: 7; less than 10 years of experience). During a dedicated arthroscopic session, using the Sawbones Elbow model (Sawbones Europe AB®), all participants were asked to perform an arthroscopic round and to touch three specific landmarks. An independent observer measured the time that each participant needed to perform this task (Performance 1). The same measurement was repeated after two weeks of eSBAM training (Performance 2). RESULTS: "Not-expert" surgeons needed significantly more time (41 s; range 26-120) than "Expert" ones (13 s; range 8-36) to complete Performance 1. One "Not-expert" surgeon did not complete Performance 1 and needed more than 120 s for Performance 2. The whole study group required a median of 5 s less to complete Performance 2. A tendency towards an improvement was observed in the group of the non-experienced surgeons as compared with the experienced ones. CONCLUSIONS: The simulation training can be advantageous in the learning curve of young elbow surgeons and helpful for experienced surgeons. E-SBAM can be used as an effective tool for the current stepwise arthroscopic elbow training programs with the aim of improving arthroscopic elbow skills. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study.

Latarjet Cerclage: The All-Arthroscopic Metal-Free Fixation.

The Bristow-Latarjet procedure has been one of the most recognized procedures for the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation with anterior glenoid bone loss, revision surgery after failed Bankart repair, contact and collision sport injuries, and patients with a high risk of recurrence. Open and arthroscopic approaches have recently shown similar outcomes by several authors. However, complications related to metal implants, despite being low, are still a matter of concern. We describe an all-arthroscopic Latarjet technique with a metal-free fixation method using 2 ultra-high-strength sutures, creating a cerclage construct through 2.4mm glenoid and coracoid tunnels with a final capsulolabral complex reconstruction.

Latarjet Cerclage: The Metal-Free Fixation.

The Latarjet technique is a widely used technique for anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone defects, irreparable capsuloligamentous lesion, or in patients at greater risk of recurrence. The use of this technique has been reported to obtain satisfactory clinical and biomechanical results. Although other methods exist, the coracoid process is typically fixed with 2 metal screws. Complications related to metal fixation are very frequently reported. In an attempt to avoid these complications, we developed this arthroscopically assisted metal-free Latarjet technique in which we fix a coracoid graft using four cerclage tapes to achieve a strong, stable fixation, thus mimicking a plate.

Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Correct sizing is challenging in radial head replacement and no consensus exists on the implant's optimal height and width to avoid elbow stiffness and instability. Studies exists, suggesting how to appropriately choose the implant size, but the manner by which the fracture pattern influences the surgeons' operative choices was not investigated. METHODS: The radial heads of four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were excised, measured, and fractured to simulate four patterns: three fragments (A); four fragments (B); comminuted (C); comminuted with bone loss (D). Nine examiners were asked to indicate first the maximum diameter of the radial heads with the help of dedicated sizing dishes and then the appropriate implant size with trial implants. Accuracy and precision were determined. A coefficient of variation was calculated and agreement was evaluated with the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with dedicated sizing dish were 96.73% and 93.64%, (best pattern, D; worst, C). Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with trial implants were 99.71% and 90.66% (best pattern, A; worst, D). Frequent modifications occurred between the initial radial head size proposal based on the sizing dish and the radial head size chosen after use of the trial implants (47.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Diameter estimation of radial heads with dedicated sizing dishes may be underestimated in comminuted fractures; when bone loss is present, this may lead to an overestimation, especially when using trial implants. Care is essential to determine the optimal size of the implant and to avoid overlenghtening and oversizing, which can be responsible for implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the manner by which the fracture pattern influences radial head replacement size estimation can help preventing overlenghtening and oversizing during this procedure.

Musculo-skeletal problems of the hand in haemophilia.

Musculo-skeletal complications of the hand in the haemophilia patient are rare, and they include synovitis, arthropathy, pseudotumours, carpal tunnel syndrome and vascular aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.The best way to prevent the aforementioned musculo-skeletal complications is early continuous haematological primary prophylaxis (intravenous infusion of the deficient coagulation factor, ideally from cradle to death).There is a wide range of procedures that a hand surgeon treating these patients should be able to manage, including synovectomy, prosthetic replacement of small joints, removal or curettage of pseudotumours, release of carpal tunnel and, occasionally, vascular reconstruction of aneurysms.The treatment of these patients should be made at an institution with close collaboration between haematologists and hand surgeons (all surgical procedures must always be performed under cover of the deficient coagulation factor). Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:328-333. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190078.

Neurologic complications after surgical management of complex elbow trauma requiring radial head replacement.

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has become a successful procedure for addressing acute unreconstructible radial head fractures that compromise elbow stability in complex elbow trauma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for the development of neurologic complications after surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures that require an RHA. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with an unreconstructible radial head fracture and complex elbow instability treated with RHA were included. There were 33 men and 29 women, with a mean age of 54 years (range, 22-87 years). The average follow-up period was 5.2 years (range, 3-16 years). All patients were neurologically intact before surgery. The arthroplasty was implanted through a Kocher approach in 55 cases, whereas a Kaplan approach was used in 7. An uncemented smooth stem arthroplasty (Evolve) was used in 27 patients, and an anatomic ingrowth system (Anatomic Radial Head), in 35. At the time of surgery, 23 patients underwent fixation of a coronoid fracture and 15 underwent plating of the proximal ulna. All patients were clinically examined immediately after surgery and during follow-up to detect any degree of neurologic deficit. Radial and ulnar nerve injuries were classified according to the Hirachi and McGowan classifications, respectively. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. RESULTS: A complete posterior interosseous nerve palsy occurred postoperatively in 2 patients. Hand function had completely recovered in both at 2 months after surgery without sequelae. Nine patients complained of ulnar nerve symptoms (immediately after surgery in 6 and as delayed ulnar neuropathy in 3). Most patients with ulnar nerve deficits had undergone additional surgical procedures to address ulnar fractures. Among patients with ulnar neuropathies, only 3 complained of mild sensory symptoms at the latest follow-up. No significant differences in range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were found between patients with and without neurologic complications. Associated olecranon or coronoid fixation and a prolonged tourniquet time were identified as risk factors for neurologic complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the incidence of neurologic complications associated with the surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures requiring implantation of a radial head prosthesis may be underestimated in the literature. Inappropriate retraction in the anterior aspect of the radial neck, a prolonged ischemia time, and concomitant coronoid or olecranon fracture fixation represent the main risk factors for the development of this complication. Although the great majority of patients have full recovery of their nerve function, they should be advised on the risk of this stressful complication.

Morphometry of the radiocapitellar joint: is humeral condyle diameter a reliable predictor of the size of the radial head prosthesis?

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is a reliable procedure to manage complex injuries of the elbow, but complications due to inadequate sizing have been observed. Radiocapitellar morphometry has been studied widely, but RHA preoperative planning is not yet well defined. We hypothesized that specific morphologic parameters of the radiocapitellar joint measured with simple clinical software for radiographic analysis could be useful tools for clinical practice to predict RHA size preoperatively. METHODS: Radiologic radiocapitellar joint dimensions (humeral condyle diameter [HCDi], radial head diameter [RHDi], and radial head height) were analyzed on true anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, using commercial picture archiving and communication system software, in 43 patients with non-osseous pathology of the elbow and 24 patients with RHA. Interobserver concordance was studied, and a regression model to relate different parameters was developed. RESULTS: Interobserver concordance was greater than 0.8 for HCDi and RHDi on the lateral view and RHDi on the anteroposterior view for the general population. The parameter with the best correlation with the radial head arthroplasty diameter (RHADi) size was HCDi on the lateral view. A regression model was calculated and defined as follows: RHADi = 6.99 + 0.733 × HCDi on lateral view. This model allows prediction of RHADi in 67% of cases. CONCLUSION: Radiologic radiocapitellar parameters show good interobserver reliability. RHADi can be calculated preoperatively from HCDi on the lateral view in 67% of cases.

Medial elbow pain.

Medial elbow pain is uncommon when compared with lateral elbow pain.Medial epicondylitis is an uncommon diagnosis and can be confused with other sources of pain.Overhead throwers and workers lifting heavy objects are at increased risk of medial elbow pain.Differential diagnosis includes ulnar nerve disorders, cervical radiculopathy, injured ulnar collateral ligament, altered distal triceps anatomy or joint disorders.Children with medial elbow pain have to be assessed for 'Little League elbow' and fractures of the medial epicondyle following a traumatic event.This paper is primarily focused on the differential diagnosis of medial elbow pain with basic recommendations on treatment strategies. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:362-371. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160006.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humeral Fractures: A Ten-Year-Minimum Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty is commonly considered for elderly patients with comminuted distal humeral fractures. Satisfactory short-term outcomes have been reported, but long-term outcomes are unknown. Our purpose was to assess the long-term outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty after distal humeral fracture and to determine differences between elbows with or without inflammatory arthritis at the time of fracture. METHODS: Forty-four total elbow arthroplasties were performed after distal humeral fracture; those patients were followed for a minimum of 10 years and were evaluated with regard to pain, motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores, complications, and reoperations. The outcomes in elbows with and without inflammatory arthritis were compared. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. RESULTS: Total elbow arthroplasty provided good pain relief and motion; the mean visual analog scale for pain was 0.6, the mean flexion was 123°, and the mean loss of extension was 24°. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 90.5 points, with 3 patients scoring <75 points. Five elbows (11%) developed deep infection, treated surgically with component retention (3 acute) or resection (2 chronic). Implant revision or resection was performed in 8 elbows (18%): 3 for infections (1 reimplantation and 2 resections), 3 for ulnar loosening (associated with periprosthetic fracture in 1), and 2 for ulnar component fractures. Additional periprosthetic fractures were observed in 5 elbows. The survival rates for elbows with rheumatoid arthritis were 85% at 5 years and 76% at 10 years, and the survival rates for elbows without rheumatoid arthritis were 92% at both 5 and 10 years. The most relevant risk factor for revision was male sex (hazard ratio, 12.6 [95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 93.6]). CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of total elbow arthroplasty to treat fractures of the distal part of the humerus for infirm, less active older patients and patients with inflammatory arthritis has acceptable longevity in surviving patients, but at the cost of a number of major complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The distal triceps tendon insertional anatomy-implications for surgery.

BACKGROUND: Improved knowledge of the distal triceps insertion is needed as a result of an increase in procedures involving this area, including distal triceps repair, posterior capsulectomy, and olecranon tip osteotomy for coronoid reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five pair-matched upper limbs were dissected to study the morphology and dimension of the distal triceps tendon, triceps tendon insertion, capsular insertion on the olecranon, and triceps lateral retinaculum. Muscle origins of the triceps insertions were identified proximally. RESULTS: Three distinct insertional areas were found in the olecranon corresponding to the posterior capsular insertion, the deep muscular portion, and the superficial tendinous portion of the triceps with areas of 1.5, 1.2, and 2.8 cm2, respectively. The deep muscular head corresponded to the medial head of the triceps and the tendinous portion corresponded to the long and lateral heads and correlated with the height of the specimen. The triceps width at insertion was 2.6 ± 0.5 cm (standard deviation), and the triceps lateral retinaculum extended the tendon laterally for 2.5 ± 0.7 cm. The tendinous portion of the triceps tendon extended proximally 15.3 ± 1.4 cm. The triceps inserted at a mean of 1.1 cm from the tip of the olecranon. CONCLUSIONS: The distinct insertional heads of the triceps provides additional knowledge that can aid in diagnosing and treating partial triceps tears. In addition, a safe zone for capsulectomy and olecranon tip osteotomy is described that can be used to increase the safety of these procedures.

Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow.

Lateral epicondylitis, also known as 'tennis elbow', is a very common condition affecting mainly middle-aged patients.The pathogenesis remains unknown but there appears to be a combination of local tendon pathology, alteration in pain perception and motor impairment.The diagnosis is usually clinical but some patients may benefit from additional imaging for a specific differential diagnosis.The disease has a self-limiting course of between 12 and 18 months, but in some patients, symptoms can be persistent and refractory to treatment.Most patients are well-managed with non-operative treatment and activity modification. Many surgical techniques have been proposed for patients with refractory symptoms.New non-operative treatment alternatives with promising results have been developed in recent years. Cite this article: Vaquero-Picado A, Barco R, Antuña SA. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:391-397. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000049.

Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

The reported rate of complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) seems to be higher than the complication rate of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty.The reported overall complication rate of primary RSA is approximately 15%; when RSA is used in the revision setting, the complication rate may approach 40%.The most common complications of RSA include instability, infection, notching, loosening, nerve injury, acromial and scapular spine fractures, intra-operative fractures and component disengagement.Careful attention to implant design and surgical technique, including implantation of components in the correct version and height, selection of the best glenosphere-humeral bearing match, avoidance of impingement, and adequate management of the soft tissues will hopefully translate in a decreasing number of complications in the future. Cite this article: Barco R, Savvidou OD, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:72-80. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160003.

Management of Elbow Trauma: Anatomy and Exposures.

The elbow is a complex joint from the anatomic and biomechanical point of view. A thorough understanding of elbow anatomy greatly aids the surgeon in dealing with elbow trauma. The close vicinity of neurovascular structures should always be kept in mind when selecting a surgical approach. Any approach to the elbow needs to be safe and versatile. Knowledge of the attachment and orientation of elbow ligaments reduces the risk of inadvertent intraoperative injury and/or postoperative instability. Surgeons dealing with elbow trauma should have a good working understanding of elbow anatomy and the available approaches to effectively and efficiently conduct the surgical procedure to maximize outcomes and minimize complications.