Rehabilitation interventions delivered via telehealth to support self-management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A scoping review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation is a term to describe rehabilitation services delivered via information and communication technology. Such services are an increasingly important component for the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Telerehabilitation has the potential to expand the long-term self-management options for individuals with RMDs, improve symptoms, and relieve pressures on health care services. Yet, little is known about the variety of interventions implemented, and how they are being evaluated. Thus, this scoping review aims to identify and describe existing rehabilitation interventions delivered via telehealth for RMDs. Specifically, we aim to identify and summarize the key components of rehabilitation, the technology used, the level of health care professional interaction, and how the effectiveness of interventions is evaluated. METHODS: We will conduct this review following the latest JBI scoping review methodology and the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The 'Population-Concept-Context (PCC)' framework will be used, whereby the 'Population' is RMDs (≥18 years); the 'Concept' is rehabilitation; and the 'Context' is telehealth. Developed in collaboration with a subject Librarian, refined PCC key terms will be utilized to search (from 2011-2021) three electronic databases (i.e., Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) for articles published in English. Search results will be exported to the citation management software (EndNote), duplicates removed, and eligibility criteria applied to title/abstract and full-text review. Relevant information pertaining to the PCC framework will be extracted. Data will be summarized qualitatively, and if appropriate, quantitatively via frequency counts of the components comprising the 'Concept' and 'Context' categories of the PCC framework. DISCUSSION: Findings from the proposed scoping review will identify how telehealth is currently used in the delivery of rehabilitation interventions for RMDs. The findings will develop our understanding of such interventions and provide a platform from which to inform future research directions.

Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis: A lost battle?

Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) remains an unacceptable worldwide problem; with evidence suggesting significant detrimental impact both clinically on the individual, and economically on society. There is therefore, a need for global action across various healthcare professions that come into contact with patients living, and suffering, with undiagnosed axSpA. Recent estimates of the median diagnostic delay suggest that globally, individuals with axSpA wait between 2 and 6 years for a diagnosis - revealing a clear benchmark for improvement. This timespan presents a window of opportunity for earlier diagnosis and intervention, which will likely improve patient outcomes. This review describes the current diagnostic delay as estimated across countries and over time, before presenting evidence from published strategies that may be implemented to improve this delay across primary and secondary care, including for specialties treating extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA (ophthalmology, gastroenterology, dermatology). Ongoing campaigns tackling delayed diagnosis in axSpA are also highlighted.

Protocol for a systematic literature review of smartphone apps to support the self-management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: development strategies, theoretical underpinnings and barriers to engagement.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) cause significant burden to the individual and society, requiring lifelong management and specialist healthcare resource use. Costing over 200 billion euros per year in Europe, RMDs are the most expensive of all diseases for European healthcare systems. The incidence and burden of RMDs are projected to rise with the ageing global population and increase in sedentary, obesogenic lifestyles. In parallel, there is a global crisis in the rheumatology workforce, whereby capacity to deliver specialist care is being exceeded by demand. Pervasive, scalable mobile health technologies, such as apps, are being developed to support the self-management of RMDs and reduce pressure on healthcare services. However, it is unknown whether these apps are informed by theory or their use supported by an appropriate evidence base. The purpose of this review is therefore to provide a comprehensive overview of the development strategies, interventional components and theoretical underpinnings of existing smartphone apps, designed to support the self-management of RMDs. METHODS: Searches will be conducted within PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Reference lists and citing articles of the included studies will be searched. Identified publications will be screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Any discrepancies between reviewers will be resolved by consensus, with input from a third reviewer if required. Data will be extracted on study designs, methods, populations, setting, utilised theoretical frameworks, intervention components, behaviour change techniques, methods to evaluate effectiveness and barriers/facilitators to intervention engagement. Exploratory outcomes include reported effectiveness, acceptability and usability. A systematic, narrative synthesis of evidence will be presented. If appropriate (depending on quality and pool of evidence identified), qualitative meta-summary techniques will be used to combine and summarise qualitative findings regarding barriers/facilitators to intervention engagement. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic literature review will provide insights for healthcare professionals, researchers, app designers and policy makers, to inform future development and implementation of smartphone apps to support self-management of RMDs. Evidence gaps for future research will be identified. Findings will be disseminated through a final manuscript/publication of results and via a conference abstract, patient organisations and social media. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022359704.

Healthcare resource utilization and cost of pneumococcal disease in children in Germany, 2014-2019: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of higher valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in 2009, recent estimates on the economic burden of pediatric pneumococcal disease (PD) in Germany have been lacking. This study estimates healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and medical cost associated with PDs in children < 16 years old in Germany from 2014-2019. METHODS: A nationally representative sample from the Institute for Applied Health Research (InGef) German claims database was used, covering approximately 5% of the total German population. Episodes of pneumococcal pneumonia (PP), all-cause pneumonia (ACP), invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), and acute otitis media (AOM) in children aged < 16 years were identified using ICD-10-GM codes. HCRU was estimated from annual rates of outpatient visits, outpatient antibiotic prescriptions and inpatient admissions, divided by person-years (PY) at-risk. Average direct medical costs per episode were estimated as the total cost of all HCRU, divided by the total number of episodes. The Mann-Kendall test was used to assess monotonic time trends from 2014-2019. RESULTS:  During 2014-2019, 916,805 children aged < 16 years were followed up for a total of 3,608,716 PY. The average costs per episode for out-versus inpatient care associated with PP and ACP were €67 (95% CI 58-76) versus €2,606 (95% CI 1,338-3,873), and €63 (95% CI 62-63) versus €620 (95% CI 598-641), respectively. For IPD, the average medical cost per episode for out-versus inpatients were €30 (95% CI 19-42) versus €6,051 (95% CI 3,323-8,779), respectively. There were no significant trends in HCRU or costs for IPD or pneumonia over the study period, except for a significant reduction in ACP outpatient visits. A significant decrease in rate of outpatient visits and antibiotic prescribing for recurrent AOM was observed, in addition to an increase in rates of hospital admissions for simple AOM. This was paralleled by a significant increase in inpatient costs per episode for treating AOM overall, and simple AOM, over the study period. CONCLUSIONS:  The HCRU and cost per episode of pneumonia and IPD did not vary significantly from 2014-2019, but increased for AOM. The economic burden of pneumonia, IPD, and AOM remains substantial in Germany.

The natural history of chronic widespread pain in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a cohort study with clinical and self-tracking data.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates longitudinal patterns, predictors and long-term impact of pain in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), using clinical and self-tracking data. METHODS: The presence of multisite pain (MSP), affecting at least six of nine body regions using a Margolis pain drawing, and subsequent chronic widespread pain (CWP), MSP at more than one timepoint, was assessed in a cohort of axSpA patients. Incident MSP (MSP at two consecutive visits or more), intermittent MSP (MSP at two or more non-consecutive visits) and persistent MSP (MSP at each visit) were described. Demographic, clinical and self-tracking measures were compared for the CWP vs non-CWP groups using Students t test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and χ2 test for normal, non-normal and categorical data, respectively. Predictors of CWP were evaluated using logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients, mean clinical study duration of 120 weeks (range 27-277 weeks) were included, with sufficient self-tracking data in 97 patients. Sixty-eight (50%) patients reported MSP during at least one clinical visit: eight (6%) incident MSP; 16 (12%) persistent MSP; and 44 (32%) intermittent MSP. Forty-six (34%) of the cohort had CWP. All baseline measures of disease activity, function, quality of life, sleep disturbance, fatigue and overall activity impairment were significant predictors of the development of CWP. BASDAI and BASFI scores were significantly higher in those with CWP and self-tracking data revealed significantly worse pain, fatigue, sleep quality and stress. CONCLUSIONS: The development of CWP is predicted by higher levels of disease activity and burden at baseline. It also impacts future disease activity and wellbeing.

Clinical and economic burden of pneumococcal disease among individuals aged 16 years and older in Germany.

This study assessed the incidence rate of all-cause pneumonia (ACP) and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and associated medical costs among individuals aged ≥16 in the German InGef database from 2016 to 2019. Incidence rate was expressed as the number of episodes per 100 000 person-years (PY). Healthcare resource utilisation was investigated by age group and by risk group (healthy, at-risk, high-risk). Direct medical costs per ACP/IPD episode were estimated as the total costs of all inpatient and outpatient visits. The overall incidence rate of ACP was 1345 (95% CI 1339-1352) and 8.25 (95% CI 7.76-8.77) per 100 000 PY for IPD. For both ACP and IPD, incidence rates increased with age and were higher in the high-risk and at-risk groups, in comparison to the healthy group. ACP inpatient admission rate increased with age but remained steady across age-groups for IPD. The mean direct medical costs per episode were €8075 (95% CI 7121-9028) for IPD and €1454 (95% CI 1426-1482) for ACP. The aggregate direct medical costs for IPD and ACP episodes were estimated to be €8.5 million and €248.9 million respectively. The clinical and economic burden of IPD and ACP among German adults is substantial regardless of age.

Pneumococcal vaccination coverage in individuals (16-59 years) with a newly diagnosed risk condition in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations from the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), pneumococcal vaccination coverage remains low in vulnerable populations. This study estimated the pneumococcal vaccination coverage rate (VCR) and timing among individuals aged 16-59 years in Germany who were recommended to receive pneumococcal vaccination, according to STIKO. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the German InGef database. Individuals aged 16 to 59 years diagnosed with at least one "at-risk" (chronic disease) or "high-risk" (e.g., immunocompromising) condition considered to be at-risk of pneumococcal infection were identified at the time of first diagnosis, between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, and followed up until December 31, 2019. The percentage of cumulative pneumococcal VCR with 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported for each calendar year of follow-up. RESULTS: There were 334,292 individuals followed for a median of 2.38 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.63-3.13) person years. For individuals aged 16-59 years diagnosed with an incident risk condition in 2016, pneumococcal VCR increased from 0.44% (95% CI 0.41-0.48) in 2016 to 1.24% (95% CI 1.18-1.30) in 2019. In 2019, VCRs were higher in individuals with high-risk conditions compared with at-risk conditions (2.24% (95% CI 2.09-2.40) vs. 0.90% (95% CI 0.85-0.96)). In 2019, VCRs were higher in individuals aged 50 to 59 years compared with individuals aged 16 to 49 years (2.25% (95% CI 2.10-2.41) vs. 0.90% (95% CI 0.84-0.96)). Similar trends were observed in individuals with newly diagnosed risk conditions identified in 2017 and in 2018. Older age, influenza vaccination and increasing number of risk conditions increased the likelihood of pneumococcal vaccination. Median time to vaccination from diagnosis of the risk condition was shorter for high-risk conditions (369.5 days (IQR 155.8-702.0)) compared to at-risk conditions (435.5 days (IQR 196.3-758.8)). CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations from STIKO, pneumococcal vaccination coverage remains very low and with long delays in vulnerable individuals aged 16-59 in Germany. Further efforts are required to increase immunization levels and shorten time to vaccination among individuals 16-59 years of age developing conditions with higher susceptibility to pneumococcal infection.

Incidence of acute otitis media in children < 16 years old in Germany during 2014-2019.

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) remains a common infection in children despite the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. This study estimated AOM incidence rates (IRs) over time in children < 16 years old in Germany following PCV13 introduction. METHODS: AOM episodes were identified in the InGef healthcare claims database from 2014-2019 in children aged < 16 years. Each AOM episode was classified as either simple or recurrent. Recurrent AOM was defined as 3 or more episodes identified within a 6-month period; or 4 or more episodes within a 12-month period with at least one episode in the prior 6 months. AOM-related surgical procedures within 12 months and complications within 21 days of an AOM episode were also identified. Annual IRs were calculated as number of episodes/child-years (CY) at risk. 95% Confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using the Wilson method. The Mann-Kendall test was used to assess trends over time. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, the study population comprised 916,805 children with 327,726 AOM episodes, of which 15% (49,011) of all episodes were identified as recurrent AOM and 85% (278,715) as simple AOM. There were significant declines in AOM (p = 0.003) in the study population overall and in all age groups over the study period; from 101 (95%CI 101-102)/1000 CY to 79 (95%CI 78-80)/1000 CY in the total study population, from 209 (95%CI 206-212)/1000 CY to 147 (95%CI 145-150)/1000 CY in < 2-year-olds, from 239 (95%CI 237-242) to 179 (95%CI 177-182)/1000 CY in 2-4-year-olds, and from 50 (95%CI 49-50) to 38 (95%CI 37-39)/1000 CY in 5-15-year-olds. No significant trends were identified for AOM-related surgical procedures over the study period; however, AOM-related complications overall increased (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Between 2014 and 2019, AOM incidence overall declined in children aged 0-15 years in Germany. Over the study period, the incidence of complicated AOM cases increased, however the incidence of AOM-related surgical procedures remained constant. Despite the impact of PCV13, the burden associated with AOM in Germany remains substantial.

The Future of Axial Spondyloarthritis Rehabilitation: Lessons Learned From COVID-19.

Supervised physical therapy and rehabilitation are vital for effective long-term management of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, the unprecedented year of 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a drastic change in health care provision across all disease areas. In this review, we summarize changes that have been introduced to support rehabilitation in axial SpA during the pandemic and considerations for the future of axial SpA rehabilitation in the wake of COVID-19. We have witnessed the launch of online virtual physical therapy and education, in addition to an emphasis on remote monitoring. We have been propelled into a new era of digital service provision; not only providing a temporary stop-gap in treatment for some patients, but in the future, potentially allowing for a wider reach and provision of care and resilience of vital services. Unique collaboration between patients, health care professionals, and researchers will be key to fostering relationships and trust and facilitating wider evaluation and implementation of digital services at each stage in a patient's journey, which is imperative for relieving pressure from health care providers. Despite the potential of such digital interventions, it is important to highlight the maintained critical need for face-to-face services, particularly for vulnerable patients or during diagnosis or a flare of symptoms. It is also vital that we remain vigilant regarding digital exclusion to avoid further widening of existing health inequalities. Optimization of digital infrastructure, staff skills, and digital education alongside promoting accessibility and engagement and building trust among communities will be vital as we enter this new age of blended in-person and digital service provision.

Understanding flare in axial spondyloarthritis: novel insights from daily self-reported flare experience.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to explore daily self-reported experiences of axial SpA (axSpA) flare based on data entered into the Project Nightingale smartphone app (www.projectnightingale.org), between 5 April 2018 and 1 April 2020. METHODS: Paired t-tests were conducted for mean_flare_on and mean_flare_off scores for each recorded variable. The mean estimated difference between flare and non-flare values for each variable was calculated with 95% CIs. Mean, S.d. and range were reported for flare duration and frequency. Participants with ≥10 days of data entry were included for affinity propagation cluster analysis. Baseline characteristics and mean flare on vs mean flare off values were reported for each cluster. Welch's t-test was used to assess differences between clusters. RESULTS: A total of 143/189 (75.7%) participants recorded at least one flare. Each flare lasted a mean of 4.30 days (S.d. 6.82, range 1-78), with a mean frequency of once every 35.32 days (S.d. 65.73, range 1-677). Significant relationships were identified between flare status and variable scores. Two clusters of participants were identified with distinct flare profiles. Group 1 experienced less severe worsening of symptoms during flare in comparison to group 2 (P < 0.01). However, they experienced significantly longer flare duration (7.2 vs 3.5 days; P < 0.01), perhaps indicating a prolonged, yet less intense flare experience. Groups were similar in terms of flare frequency and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Two clusters of participants were identified with distinct flare experiences but similar baseline clinical characteristics. Smartphone technologies capture subtle changes in disease experience not currently considered in clinical practice.

Axial spondyloarthritis 10 years on: still looking for the lost tribe.

Despite the publication of various recommendations, quality standards and referral strategies to promote early diagnosis in axial SpA (axSpA) over the last decade, there remains a significant delay to diagnosis, leading to a lost tribe of undiagnosed, untreated patients with persistent back pain and axSpA symptoms. This review discusses the various factors contributing to diagnostic delay in axSpA, while providing recommendations to improve the diagnostic pathway, for example use of the online Spondyloarthritis Diagnosis Evaluation (SPADE) tool (http://www.spadetool.co.uk/). Significant shortcomings exist at both the primary and secondary care level, with healthcare professionals often lacking knowledge and awareness of axSpA. Myths regarding the classical signs and symptoms still prevail, including the perception of axSpA as a male disease, only occurring in individuals who are HLA-B27 positive with raised inflammatory markers. Individuals within this lost tribe of undiagnosed patients are likely lacking adequate treatment and are thereby at risk of worse clinical outcomes. It is therefore vital that public health initiatives are implemented to improve education of healthcare professionals and to ensure early specialist referral, to ultimately improve the lives of patients with axSpA.