A Survey of Nephrologists Regarding Their Communication with Transplant Centers.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergo a transition of care between their primary nephrologist and the transplant center during evaluation for kidney transplantation. Due to medical complexity, high hospitalization rate, and involvement of multiple medical stakeholders, transitions of medical care among patients with ESRD are likely to be associated with suboptimal care and medical errors. Provider-to-provider communication improves outcomes among ESRD patients transitioning between dialysis and transplant. There is little data analyzing proper transition of care between the nephrologist and the transplant center (TC). OBJECTIVE: Using survey methodology, we examined nephrologists' current practice and experience regarding patient-related communication with the TC. METHODS: From among 822 nephrologists who were following at least 20 ESRD patients, we randomly selected 252 nephrologists to participate in the study. The survey consisted of 102 multiple choice and Likert-style items probing perceptions about various aspects of transplant, including communication between TC and nephrologist. Responses from 216 participants who submitted complete responses were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Depending on the phase of transplant, nephrologist-TC communication varied between 50%-81% of nephrologists. Factors associated with higher likelihood of nephrologist-TC communication included attending transplant-related educational activity, practicing in a group with more than 5 nephrologists, and having more than 50 patients on dialysis. The majority of nephrologists indicated satisfaction with access to an attending physician in the TC, receiving timely and adequate information from the TC about their patients. Factors associated with higher likelihood of nephrologist satisfaction regarding communication with the TC included attending national nephrology meetings, medical directorship of a dialysis unit, fellowship training at an institution with an on-site transplant program, and availability of more than 2 transplant centers within 50 miles. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for patient transfer of care between nephrologists and transplant centers during various phases of transplant referral, evaluation and post-transplant care. We found that the likelihood of the nephrologists' communication with the transplant center and their satisfaction with the communication are related to their training, participation in continuing educational meetings, their practice location and size, and the overall composition of their patient population.

Factors Considered by Nephrologists in Excluding Patients from Kidney Transplant Referral.

BACKGROUND: Provider perceptions about patient candidacy for kidney transplant (KT) are potentially significant contributors to disparities in KT. OBJECTIVE: To examine nephrologists' perceptions about factors that are important in excluding patients from KT referral, and to analyze the association between these perceptions and nephrologists' demographic and practice characteristics.Methods: Invitations were sent to 3180 nephrologists. Among those who consented, 822 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 250 were randomly invited to complete a questionnaire about perceptions of factors essential in deciding not to refer patients for KT. RESULTS: Responses from 216 participants with complete responses were analyzed. The 3 most common reasons for excluding patients were "patient's inadequate social support" (44%), "limited understanding of the process due to patient's inadequate education" (32%), and "patient's age above 65" (26%). Nephrologists practicing in rural settings were more likely to consider inadequate support and limited education of patients as reasons not to refer for KT. In multivariate analysis, physicians with 2 or fewer transplant centers within 50 miles were more likely to report inadequate social support (OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.59-6.24) and age greater than 65 years (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.49) as reasons to exclude patients from KT referral. Nephrologists whose practice included patients majority of whom had not completed high school were more likely to consider limited understanding due to inadequate education as an important reason to exclude patients from KT (OR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.60-6.86). CONCLUSION: Patient's social support, understanding, and age were the most common factors regarded by nephrologists as important in not referring patients for KT evaluation. Practice location, particularly rural setting, proximity to a transplant center, and the education level of a nephrologist's patient population were important determinants of referral for KT.