Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
1.
Perm J ; 28(1): 33-41, 2024 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38073313

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: For academic promotion, clinical faculty are expected to excel in clinical care, teaching, and scholarship. Ensuring adequate protected time and resources to engage in scholarly work in the face of competing clinical responsibilities is critical. The authors examined academic leaders' perspectives across affiliate hospitals of a large medical school regarding the definition of clinical full-time effort and academic time, best practices to enable academic success, and barriers to faculty advancement. METHODS: Open-ended, semistructured, individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of clinical department and division heads. Interview data were examined to illuminate the range and commonalities in practices and to identify successful approaches. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 17 academic leaders across 6 affiliate hospitals. There was considerable variability in clinical full-time effort definition. "Academic time," more accurately characterized as "nonclinical time," was typically 1 day a week for nonshift specialties and mostly used for administrative work or completing clinical documentation. Certain departments were more explicit in designating and protecting time for academic pursuits; some had invested resources in intensive programs for academic advancement with built-in expectations for accountability. The impact of documentation burden was considerable in certain departments. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Marked variability exists in time allocations for clinical and academic work, as well as in resources for academic success. This supports the potential value of establishing standards for defining and protecting academic time, motivating clinical faculty to engage in academic work, and building accountability expectations. Sharing best practices and setting standards may enhance academic advancement. Strategies to reduce documentation burden may enhance wellness.


Asunto(s)
Éxito Académico , Medicina , Humanos , Docentes , Responsabilidad Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Docentes Médicos
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(16): 4033-4034, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229761
6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(12): 3657-3658, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34807402
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(6): 1485-1486, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33782887
9.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(3): 575-576, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501529

Asunto(s)
Medicina , Humanos
10.
12.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(8): 2255, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32291714
17.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 15(12): 1382-1390, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30153425

RESUMEN

Despite the increasing proportion of women in U.S. medical schools, there are relatively few women in leadership positions, and a number of recent publications have highlighted many factors that could contribute to gender inequity and inequality in medicine. The Association of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Division Directors, an organization of Division Directors from across the United States, convened a workshop to review data and obtain input from leaders on the state of gender equity in our field. The workshop identified a number of factors that could contribute to gender inequality and inequity: gender climate (including implicit and perceived biases); disproportionate family responsibilities; lack of women in leadership positions; poor retention of women; and lack of gender equality in compensation. The panel members developed a roadmap of concrete recommendations for societies, leaders, and individuals that should promote gender equity to achieve gender equality and improve retention of women in the field of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Liderazgo , Administración de Personal , Neumología , Sexismo , Medicina del Sueño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos
19.
Ann Intern Med ; 168(3): 203-209, 2018 02 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404595

RESUMEN

Hormone therapy (HT) was widely prescribed in the 1980s and 1990s and has been controversial since the initial results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial in the early 2000s suggested that it increased risk for breast cancer and coronary heart disease and did not prolong life. However, more recent data and reexamination of the WHI results suggest that HT is safe and effective for many women when used around the time of menopause. Two experts debate the 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society, which recommends HT as first-line treatment of vasomotor symptoms, and apply it to the care of Ms. R, a 52-year-old woman with severe hot flashes, sleep disturbance, and irritability.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/métodos , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico , Menopausia , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...