Use of alternative care sites during the COVID-19 pandemic in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: In large cities, where a large proportion of the population live in poverty and overcrowding, orders to stay home to comply with isolation requirements are difficult to fulfil. In this article, the use of alternative care sites (ACSs) for the isolation of patients with confirmed COVID-19 or persons under investigation (PUI) in the City of Buenos Aires during the first wave of COVID-19 are described. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. METHODS: All patients with COVID-19 and PUI with insufficient housing resources who could not comply with orders to stay home and who were considered at low clinical risk in the initial triage were referred to refurbished hotels in the City of Buenos Aires (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires [CABA]). ACSs were divided into those for confirmed COVID-19 patients and those for PUI. RESULTS: From March to August 2020, there were 58,143 reported cases of COVID-19 (13,829 of whom lived in slums) in the CABA. For COVID-19 positive cases, 62.1% (n = 8587) of those living in slums and 21.4% (n = 9498) of those living outside the slums were housed in an ACS. In total, 31.1% (n = 18,085) of confirmed COVID-19 cases were housed in ACSs. In addition, 7728 PUI were housed (3178 from the slums) in an ACS. The average length of stay was 9.0 ± 2.5 days for patients with COVID-19 and 1.6 ± 0.7 days for PUI. For the individuals who were housed in an ACS, 1314 (5.1%) had to be hospitalised, 56 were in critical care units (0.22%) and there were 27 deaths (0.1%), none during their stay in an ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, about one-third of all people with COVID-19 were referred to an ACS in the CABA. For slum dwellers, the proportion was >60%. The need for hospitalisation was low and severe clinical events were rare. This strategy reduced the pressure on hospitals so their efforts could be directed to patients with moderate-to-severe disease.

Evaluation of the first level of care for tuberculosis control in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate primary health care functions from the perspective of patients with tuberculosis from slums in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study with adult patients with tuberculosis (TB) and without TB (NoTB), living in slums (S) and outside them (NoS). Participants' perceptions were evaluated using the Primary Care Assessment Tool for users (abbreviated version), which measures four main domains (first contact, ongoing care, coordination with specialists, and comprehensiveness) and selected secondary domains. A Likert scale was used, ranging from "No, not at all" (1 point) to "Yes, definitely" (4 points). Scores ≥ 3 were considered to indicate adequate performance of functions. Averages were calculated for each domain, as well as two overall scores: with and without secondary domains. RESULTS: 83 participants were included (20 TB-S, 21 TB-NoS, 19 NoTB-S, and 23 NoTB-NoS). The evaluated functions were perceived as inadequate. The TB-S group gave the lowest overall scores, not reaching 3 points in any domain. There were no significant differences in domains or overall scores between groups. Participants with TB gave lower scores in all domains, except in family-centered care, where they gave a significantly higher score than NoTB participants. The overall score without secondary domains was lower for TB participants than for the NoTB groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the perception of participants with TB and without TB, primary health care functions are not satisfactory, either in slums or outside them.

COVID-19 among the inhabitants of the slums in the city of Buenos Aires: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To summarise the unfolding of the COVID-19 epidemic among slum dwellers and different social strata in the city of Buenos Aires during the first 20 weeks after the first reported case. DESIGN: Observational study using a time-series analysis. Natural experiment in a big city. SETTING: Population of the city of Buenos Aires and the integrated health reporting system records of positive RT-PCR for COVID-19 tests. PARTICIPANTS: Records from the Argentine Integrated Health Reporting System for all persons with suspected and RT-PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between 31 January and 14 July 2020. OUTCOMES: To estimate the effects of living in a slum on the standardised incidence rate of COVID-19, corrected Poisson regression models were used. Additionally, the impact of socioeconomic status was performed using an ecological analysis at the community level. RESULTS: A total of 114 052 people were tested for symptoms related with COVID-19. Of these, 39 039 (34.2%) were RT-PCR positive. The incidence rates for COVID-19 towards the end of the 20th week were 160 (155 to 165) per 100 000 people among the inhabitants who did not reside in the slums (n=2 841 997) and 708 (674 to 642) among slums dwellers (n=233 749). Compared with the better-off socioeconomic quintile (1.00), there was a linear gradient on incidence rates: 1.36 (1.25 to 1.46), 1.61 (1.49 to 1.74), 1.86 (1.72 to 2.01), 2.94 (2.74 to 3.16) from Q2 to Q5, respectively. Slum dwellers were associated with an incidence rate of 14.3 (13.4 to 15.4). CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of the epidemic is socially conditioned. Slum dwellers are at a much higher risk than the rest of the community. Slum dwellers should not be considered just another risk category but an entirely different reality that requires policies tailored to their needs.

[Evaluation of the first level of care for tuberculosis control in Buenos Aires, ArgentinaAvaliação da atenção primária à saúde no controle da tuberculose em Buenos Aires, Argentina]. / Evaluación del primer nivel de atención para el control de la tuberculosis en Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate primary health care functions from the perspective of patients with tuberculosis from slums in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study with adult patients with tuberculosis (TB) and without TB (NoTB), living in slums (S) and outside them (NoS). Participants' perceptions were evaluated using the Primary Care Assessment Tool for users (abbreviated version), which measures four main domains (first contact, ongoing care, coordination with specialists, and comprehensiveness) and selected secondary domains. A Likert scale was used, ranging from "No, not at all" (1 point) to "Yes, definitely" (4 points). Scores ≥ 3 were considered to indicate adequate performance of functions. Averages were calculated for each domain, as well as two overall scores: with and without secondary domains. RESULTS: 83 participants were included (20 TB-S, 21 TB-NoS, 19 NoTB-S, and 23 NoTB-NS). The evaluated functions were perceived as inadequate. The TB-S group gave the lowest overall scores, not reaching 3 points in any domain. There were no significant differences in domains or overall scores between groups. Participants with TB gave lower scores in all domains, except in family-centered care, where they gave a significantly higher score than NoTB participants. The overall score without secondary domains was lower for TB participants than for the NoTB groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the perception of participants with TB and without TB, primary health care functions are not satisfactory, either in slums or outside them.

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar as funções da atenção primária à saúde da perspectiva de pacientes com tuberculose (TB) provenientes de comunidades desfavorecidas na cidade de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional transversal com pacientes adultos com ou sem TB (TB, NãoTB), residentes ou não de comunidades desfavorecidas (C, NãoC). Avaliamos as percepções dos participantes utilizando questionário Primary Care Assessment Tool-usuários (versão reduzida), que mede quatro dimensões principais (primeiro contato, longitudinalidade da atenção, coordenação entre serviços e integralidade), bem como algumas dimensões secundárias. Utilizamos uma escala de Likert de 4 pontos, variando de "definitivamente não" (1 ponto) a "definitivamente sim" (4 pontos). Considerou-se que pontuações ≥3 indicavam o cumprimento adequado das funções. Calculamos as médias para cada domínio e duas pontuações globais: com e sem domínios secundários. RESULTADOS: Ao todo, 83 participantes foram incluídos no estudo (20 TB-C, 21 TB-NãoC, 19 NãoTB-C e 23 NãoTB-NãoC). As funções avaliadas foram percebidas como inadequadas. O grupo TB-C apresentou a pontuação global mais baixa, não alcançando 3 pontos em nenhum domínio. Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos nos domínios nem na pontuação global. Os participantes com TB deram pontuações mais baixas em todos os domínios, exceto no enfoque familiar, no qual a pontuação foi significativamente mais alta que a dos participantes sem TB; a pontuação global sem domínios secundários foi mais baixa nos participantes com TB que nos sem TB. CONCLUSÕES: De acordo com as percepções dos participantes com e sem TB, as funções da atenção primária à saúde são insatisfatórias, tanto dentro como fora das comunidades desfavorecidas.

Evaluación del primer nivel de atención para el control de la tuberculosis en Buenos Aires, Argentina

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Evaluar las funciones de la atención primaria de salud desde la perspectiva de los pacientes con tuberculosis (TB) provenientes de villas de emergencia de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Métodos. Estudio observacional transversal con pacientes adultos con TB y sin TB (NoTB), residentes en villas de emergencia (V) y fuera de ellas (NoV). La percepción de los participantes se evaluó mediante el cuestionario Primary Care Assessment Tool-usuarios (versión abreviada) que mide cuatro dimensiones principales (primer contacto, longitudinalidad de los cuidados, coordinación entre servicios e integralidad) y algunas secundarias. Se utilizó una escala de Likert, desde “No, en absoluto” (1 punto) hasta “Sí, sin duda” (4 puntos). Puntajes ≥ 3 se consideraron como cumplimiento adecuado de las funciones. Se calcularon promedios para cada dominio y dos puntajes globales: con y sin dominios secundarios. Resultados. Se incluyeron 83 participantes (20 TB-V, 21 TB-NV, 19 NoTB-V y 23 NoTB-NV). Las funciones evaluadas se percibieron como no adecuadas. El grupo TB-V tuvo los puntajes globales más bajos y en ningún dominio alcanzó 3 puntos. No hubo diferencias significativas en los dominios ni los puntajes globales entre grupos. Los participantes con TB dieron menores puntajes en todos los dominios, excepto en enfoque familiar que fue significativamente mayor que los de los participantes NoTB; el puntaje global sin dominios secundarios fue menor en los participantes con TB que en los NoTB. Conclusiones. Según la percepción de los participantes con TB y sin TB, las funciones de la atención primaria de salud no son satisfactorias, tanto dentro de las villas de emergencia como fuera de ellas.

[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. Evaluate primary health care functions from the perspective of patients with tuberculosis from slums in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods. Cross-sectional observational study with adult patients with tuberculosis (TB) and without TB (NoTB), living in slums (S) and outside them (NoS). Participants’ perceptions were evaluated using the Primary Care Assessment Tool for users (abbreviated version), which measures four main domains (first contact, ongoing care, coordination with specialists, and comprehensiveness) and selected secondary domains. A Likert scale was used, ranging from “No, not at all” (1 point) to “Yes, definitely” (4 points). Scores ≥ 3 were considered to indicate adequate performance of functions. Averages were calculated for each domain, as well as two overall scores: with and without secondary domains. Results. 83 participants were included (20 TB-S, 21 TB-NoS, 19 NoTB-S, and 23 NoTB-NS). The evaluated functions were perceived as inadequate. The TB-S group gave the lowest overall scores, not reaching 3 points in any domain. There were no significant differences in domains or overall scores between groups. Participants with TB gave lower scores in all domains, except in family-centered care, where they gave a significantly higher score than NoTB participants. The overall score without secondary domains was lower for TB participants than for the NoTB groups. Conclusions. According to the perception of participants with TB and without TB, primary health care functions are not satisfactory, either in slums or outside them.

[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Avaliar as funções da atenção primária à saúde da perspectiva de pacientes com tuberculose (TB) provenientes de comunidades desfavorecidas na cidade de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Métodos. Estudo observacional transversal com pacientes adultos com ou sem TB (TB, NãoTB), residentes ou não de comunidades desfavorecidas (C, NãoC). Avaliamos as percepções dos participantes utilizando questionário Primary Care Assessment Tool-usuários (versão reduzida), que mede quatro dimensões principais (primeiro contato, longitudinalidade da atenção, coordenação entre serviços e integralidade), bem como algumas dimensões secundárias. Utilizamos uma escala de Likert de 4 pontos, variando de “definitivamente não” (1 ponto) a “definitivamente sim” (4 pontos). Considerou-se que pontuações ≥3 indicavam o cumprimento adequado das funções. Calculamos as médias para cada domínio e duas pontuações globais: com e sem domínios secundários. Resultados. Ao todo, 83 participantes foram incluídos no estudo (20 TB-C, 21 TB-NãoC, 19 NãoTB-C e 23 NãoTB-NãoC). As funções avaliadas foram percebidas como inadequadas. O grupo TB-C apresentou a pontuação global mais baixa, não alcançando 3 pontos em nenhum domínio. Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos nos domínios nem na pontuação global. Os participantes com TB deram pontuações mais baixas em todos os domínios, exceto no enfoque familiar, no qual a pontuação foi significativamente mais alta que a dos participantes sem TB; a pontuação global sem domínios secundários foi mais baixa nos participantes com TB que nos sem TB. Conclusões. De acordo com as percepções dos participantes com e sem TB, as funções da atenção primária à saúde são insatisfatórias, tanto dentro como fora das comunidades desfavorecidas.

Evaluation of the first level of care for tuberculosis control in Buenos Aires, Argentina

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. Evaluate primary health care functions from the perspective of patients with tuberculosis from slums in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods. Cross-sectional observational study with adult patients with tuberculosis (TB) and without TB (NoTB), living in slums (S) and outside them (NoS). Participants’ perceptions were evaluated using the Primary Care Assessment Tool for users (abbreviated version), which measures four main domains (first contact, ongoing care, coordination with specialists, and comprehensiveness) and selected secondary domains. A Likert scale was used, ranging from “No, not at all” (1 point) to “Yes, definitely” (4 points). Scores ≥ 3 were considered to indicate adequate performance of functions. Averages were calculated for each domain, as well as two overall scores: with and without secondary domains. Results. 83 participants were included (20 TB-S, 21 TB-NoS, 19 NoTB-S, and 23 NoTB-NoS). The evaluated functions were perceived as inadequate. The TB-S group gave the lowest overall scores, not reaching 3 points in any domain. There were no significant differences in domains or overall scores between groups. Participants with TB gave lower scores in all domains, except in family-centered care, where they gave a significantly higher score than NoTB participants. The overall score without secondary domains was lower for TB participants than for the NoTB groups. Conclusions. According to the perception of participants with TB and without TB, primary health care functions are not satisfactory, either in slums or outside them.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Evaluar las funciones de la atención primaria de salud desde la perspectiva de los pacientes con tuberculosis (TB) provenientes de villas de emergencia de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Métodos. Estudio observacional transversal con pacientes adultos con TB y sin TB (NoTB), residentes en villas de emergencia (V) y fuera de ellas (NoV). La percepción de los participantes se evaluó mediante el cuestionario Primary Care Assessment Tool-usuarios (versión abreviada) que mide cuatro dimensiones principales (primer contacto, longitudinalidad de los cuidados, coordinación entre servicios e integralidad) y algunas secundarias. Se utilizó una escala de Likert, desde “No, en absoluto” (1 punto) hasta “Sí, sin duda” (4 puntos). Puntajes ≥ 3 se consideraron como cumplimiento adecuado de las funciones. Se calcularon promedios para cada dominio y dos puntajes globales: con y sin dominios secundarios. Resultados. Se incluyeron 83 participantes (20 TB-S, 21 TB-NV, 19 NoTB-S y 23 NoTB-NoS). Las funciones evaluadas se percibieron como no adecuadas. El grupo TB-S tuvo los puntajes globales más bajos y en ningún dominio alcanzó 3 puntos. No hubo diferencias significativas en los dominios ni los puntajes globales entre grupos. Los participantes con TB dieron menores puntajes en todos los dominios, excepto en enfoque familiar que fue significativamente mayor que los de los participantes NoTB; el puntaje global sin dominios secundarios fue menor en los participantes con TB que en los NoTB. Conclusiones. Según la percepción de los participantes con TB y sin TB, las funciones de la atención primaria de salud no son satisfactorias, tanto dentro de las villas de emergencia como fuera de ellas.

[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Avaliar as funções da atenção primária à saúde da perspectiva de pacientes com tuberculose (TB) provenientes de comunidades desfavorecidas na cidade de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Métodos. Estudo observacional transversal com pacientes adultos com ou sem TB (TB, NãoTB), residentes ou não de comunidades desfavorecidas (C, NãoC). Avaliamos as percepções dos participantes utilizando questionário Primary Care Assessment Tool-usuários (versão reduzida), que mede quatro dimensões principais (primeiro contato, longitudinalidade da atenção, coordenação entre serviços e integralidade), bem como algumas dimensões secundárias. Utilizamos uma escala de Likert de 4 pontos, variando de “definitivamente não” (1 ponto) a “definitivamente sim” (4 pontos). Considerou-se que pontuações ≥3 indicavam o cumprimento adequado das funções. Calculamos as médias para cada domínio e duas pontuações globais: com e sem domínios secundários. Resultados. Ao todo, 83 participantes foram incluídos no estudo (20 TB-C, 21 TB-NãoC, 19 NãoTB-C e 23 NãoTB-NãoC). As funções avaliadas foram percebidas como inadequadas. O grupo TB-C apresentou a pontuação global mais baixa, não alcançando 3 pontos em nenhum domínio. Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos nos domínios nem na pontuação global. Os participantes com TB deram pontuações mais baixas em todos os domínios, exceto no enfoque familiar, no qual a pontuação foi significativamente mais alta que a dos participantes sem TB; a pontuação global sem domínios secundários foi mais baixa nos participantes com TB que nos sem TB. Conclusões. De acordo com as percepções dos participantes com e sem TB, as funções da atenção primária à saúde são insatisfatórias, tanto dentro como fora das comunidades desfavorecidas.