Absorbable Sutures Repair Without Meniscopexy, Results in Superior Outcomes for Discoid Lateral Meniscus With Meniscocapsular Anterior Detachment in Children.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that meniscocapsular anterior detachment is the most common location of instability in children with a Discoid Lateral Meniscus (DLM), there is a lack of consensus about the type of repair that should be utilized for stabilization. The aim of this study was to determine the best fixation method for anterior detachment of DLM in children. Our hypothesis was that excessive rigidity with fixation would restrict meniscal mobility and increase the rate of failure or prevent full knee flexion. METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-center study consisting of 51 consecutive knees (45 children) with menico-capsular anterior detachment that underwent stabilization and minimal saucerization of the meniscus between 2007 and 2018. We aimed to compare the need for revision surgery and knee flexion between the different types of fixations utilized; namely we compared meniscopexy using anchors on the tibia (n=30) with outside-in arthroscopic soft tissue fixation (n=21), and absorbable (n=18) and nonabsorbable sutures (n=33) were compared. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 10.4 years (3 to 17) with a mean follow-up of 52 months (18 to 148). The group of knees treated with absorbable sutures had a significantly better rate of full knee flexion (15/18) compared with the nonabsorbable group (17/33) ( P =0.03). Despite the absence of significance ( P =007), there was a lower rate of revision surgery due to suture failure in the soft tissue fixation group (0 revision operations) compared with the meniscopexy group (5 revision operations). CONCLUSIONS: For anterior meniscocapsular detachment of DLM, it is recommended to perform soft tissue fixation with absorbable sutures, as this technique resulted in better knee flexion and a lower rate of revision surgery when compared with meniscopexy and nonabsorbable suture fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective case studies.

Asymmetric Deficit of Knee Flexion: An Occasional Symptom of Discoid Lateral Meniscus in Children.

PURPOSE: A knee flexion deficit can be the unique symptom and sign of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) in children. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of this clinical sign. The hypothesis was that deficit of knee flexion was associated with anterior rim disinsertion and posteriorly fixed DLM. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted in a larger series of 114 operated knees for symptomatic DLM from 2007 to 2018. A focus was done on 9 knees with a deficit of knee flexion without snapping. History and clinical examination with grading of instability, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings were studied. RESULTS: Among 35 knees with DLM grade 3 of instability, 26 had an isolated extension deficit. Nine knees in 5 boys and 4 girls with a mean age of 9 years (range 6 to 12) had a flexion deficit. It was the only symptom of DLM in 6, and it was associated to extension deficit in 3. In the history, 8 knees were grade 2 (snapping knee) before evolving toward a flexion deficit. All had a complete DLM with posterocentral (n=7) or central (n=2) shift at magnetic resonance imaging analysis. All had DLM with posterior shift fixed during arthroscopic evaluation. Moreover, looking at the entire series, 1 knee was a false negative and had a full flexion despite a posterior and fixed DLM during arthroscopic evaluation. The sensitivity of asymmetrical knee flexion to predict posterior fixed DLM was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: An asymmetric deficit in knee flexion is highly suggestive of DLM with anterior detachment and fixed posterior meniscal shift (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%). Given this could be the only clinical sign of DLM, specific attention therefore must be paid in the assessment of knee flexion by measuring the distance between heel and bottom on both sides, especially in a knee without snapping currently but with a history of snapping (grade 3). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Short-term functional outcomes of Whiteside transfer for massive rupture of gluteus medius tendon in native hips.

PURPOSE: To assess the functional and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either open or endoscopic Whiteside transfer of gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata muscles in cases of massive rupture of gluteus medius tendon associated with muscle atrophy on a native hip METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive, single-centre study was conducted by a single operator with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. All Whiteside palliative transfers performed on patients with Type 5 gluteus medius tendon rupture, according to Lall's classification, resulting in painful and treatment-resistant Trendeleburg gait between 2017 and 2022 were included. Functional evaluation was based on modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), iHOT-12, Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and the pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Muscle strength was clinically assessed using the MRC classification. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and January 2022, a total of 15 Whiteside palliative transfers were identified, including nine (60%) open procedures and 6 (40%) endoscopic procedures, performed on 13 patients. One patient was excluded, and none were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up period was 41 (12; 59) months. The median age at the time of surgery was 74 (66; 76) years. The male-to-female sex ratio was 0.27. Functional results demonstrated a significant improvement in all scores: NAHS (45 vs. 72, p = 0.002), mHHS (22 vs. 55, p = 0.002), iHOT-12 (101 vs. 56, p = 0.002), and VAS (8 vs. 3, p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes also showed improvements in muscle strength (p = 0.003), single-leg stance (p = 0.01), and gait (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found in the various scores between the endoscopic and open techniques. CONCLUSION: Whiteside transfer surgery, whether performed through open surgery or endoscopically, is a palliative surgical approach that should be considered for patients with irreparable gluteus medius tendon tears, where the main symptom is trochanteric pain. This procedure yields satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes, although the gains in abduction strength recovery and gait improvement are modest.

Discoid lateral meniscus instability in children: part II.: Repair first to minimise the saucerisation.

PURPOSE: Despite an improved understanding of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM), the treatment of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus remains controversial. METHODS: The aim of this retrospective, single-centred, consecutive-case study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 60 DLM treated arthroscopically by the "meniscoplasty or saucerisation-suture" technique in children and adolescents [median (range) age 11 (4-17) years], and to investigate surgical failures. The instability was assessed before any saucerisation. The hypotheses were that: (i) the management of instability with suture first was effective and that (ii) a combined classification with clinical and MRI data had a prognostic value. RESULTS: In 57 knees (95%), the DLM was unstable, and a suture fixation was performed. After a median follow-up of 41.5 months, the median (range) IKDC score was improved from 55 (10-70) preoperatively to 90 (37.5-100) postoperatively. The median (range) Lysholm score at last follow-up was 93.5 (45-100). The procedure was effective in 49 knees (81.6%) after a single procedure. Eleven patients had a failure with a new meniscal tear after a median (range) delay of 42 months (24-60) after the initial procedure. The patterns of discoid lateral meniscus instability were not found to have a prognostic value for surgical failure since they mainly occurred after sport-related injuries. All the patients with initial repair failures but one achieved a good clinical outcome after revision repair without any further meniscectomy. CONCLUSION: In contrast to adult knees, symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus is rarely stable in children (5%). Meniscal repair is effective to preserve the meniscus tissue, but revision repair became necessary in 18% of the cases and was finally successful. Level of evidence Level III.

Survival and complications at a minimum 5years' follow-up of the modular Mark-2 Extreme™ cementless femoral stem: Does the reduced modularity resolve the mechanical issues of the Mark-I stem?

INTRODUCTION: The Extreme™ modular stem was developed for implant revision with metaphyseal-diaphyseal defect. Due to the high breakage rate, a new "reduced modularity" design has been introduced, but without reported results. We therefore conducted a retrospective assessment of (1) overall stem survival, (2) functional results, (3) osseointegration, and (4) the rate of complications, and notably of mechanical failure. HYPOTHESIS: Reduced modularity reduces the risk of revision surgery for mechanical failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five prostheses were implanted between January 2007 and December 2010 in 42 patients with severe bone defect (Paprosky≥III) or periprosthetic shaft fracture. Mean age was 69.6years (range: 44-91years). Minimum follow-up was 5years, for a mean 115.4months (range: 60-156months). The main study endpoint was femoral stem survival, counting all-cause explantation as event. Functional assessment comprised subjective rating of satisfaction, Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Harris Hip scores, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Whether the revision assembly was carried out in situ, in the patient's hip, or outside, on the operating table, was not known in 2 cases; in the other 43, assembly was in situ in 15 cases (35%) and on the operating table in 28 (65%). RESULTS: Five-year stem survival was 75.7% (95% CI: 61.9-89.5%), taking all causes of change together. Seventeen patients (45.9%) had complications, 13 (35.1%) requiring revision surgery, including 10 (27.0%) for stem replacement. Five patients (13.5%) had steam breakage at the junction between the metaphysis and the diaphyseal stem, 4 of which occurred within 2 years of implantation or of fixation of a periprosthetic fracture. Mean preoperative Harris score was 48.4 [IQR (25-75% interquartile range): 37-58] and PMA score 11.1 (IQR: 10-12), compared to respectively 74 (IQR: 67-89) and 13.6 (IQR: 12.5-16) at follow-up. Mean FJS at follow-up was 71.5 (IQR: 61-94.5). In the 15 in situ assemblies, there were 3 breakages (20%), compared to 2 (7.1%) in the 28 table assemblies (p=0.21). DISCUSSION: The stem breakage rate was high despite the reduced modularity, which concentrated all stress on a single junction but without reducing the risk of mechanical failure. Surgical technique was faulty in some cases, with in situ assembly of the metaphysis after implanting the diaphyseal stem, which does not respect the manufacturer's recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Evaluation of a smartphone application for self-rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during a COVID-19 lockdown.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation after surgery is a crucial process that governs the final functional outcome. The self-rehabilitation smartphone application Doct'up (Healing SAS, Lyon, France) is designed for patients who have had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. In France in the spring of 2020, the lockdown mandated due to the COVID-19 pandemic prevented patients from seeing their physiotherapists for 2 months. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in two groups of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery: in one group, surgery performed before the lockdown was followed by standard in-person physiotherapy while, in the other, surgery was done just before the lockdown and rehabilitation was performed by the patients themselves using the phone application. HYPOTHESIS: Using a self-rehabilitation smartphone app limits the negative effects of not receiving physiotherapist rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study involving the retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from two groups of patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction surgery. Patients in the App group had surgery just before the 2-month COVID-19-related lockdown that started in France on March 17, 2020,and used only the smartphone app for rehabilitation. The standard-care group was composed of matched controls who had surgery 1 year before the cases and received rehabilitation therapy during in-person physiotherapist visits. The ACL reconstruction technique was the same in the two groups. The primary outcome measure was extension lag 6 weeks after surgery. The secondary outcome measures were extension lag 3 weeks and 6 months after surgery, quadriceps muscle activation, knee extension locking 3 and 6 weeks after surgery, and the 6-month rate of surgical revision for cyclops syndrome. RESULTS: We included 32 cases managed using only self-rehabilitation guided by the phone app, and we identified 101 matched controls managed using standard care. We found no significant between-group difference in extension lag after 6 weeks: 9.4% (28/32) vs. 4.6% (87/101), p=0.39. After 3 weeks, the App group had a higher proportions of patients with quadriceps activation (94% [30/32] vs. 73% [74/101], p=0.015) and extension control using canes (78.1% [25/32] vs. 40.6% [41/101], p=0.0002). None of the other measured outcomes differed significantly between the two groups (extension lag after 3 weeks: 12.5% [4/32] vs. 13.8% 14/101]; extension lag after 6 months: 3.2% [1/32] vs. 1% [1/101]; quadriceps activation after 6 weeks: 97% [31/32] vs. 99% [100/101]; extension locking with canes after 6 weeks: 96.9% [31/32] vs. 93.1% [94/101]; extension locking without canes after 3 weeks: 53.2% [17/32] vs. 47.5% [48/101]; extension locking without canes after 6 weeks: 93.7% [30/32] vs. 82.2% [83/101]; and surgery for cyclops syndrome (3.1% [1/32] vs. 1% [1/101]). DISCUSSION: The use of a self-rehabilitation phone app after ACL reconstruction during a COVID-19 lockdown limited the adverse effects of not receiving in-person physiotherapy. The 6-month outcomes were similar to those seen with standard rehabilitation. The study results demonstrate the usefulness of self-rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction surgery. Self-rehabilitation guided by a phone app could be used as a complement to the protocols generally applied by physiotherapists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, single-centre retrospective case-control study.

Survival and Risk Factor Analysis of Arthroscopic Ramp Lesion Repair During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of research on the management of ramp lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Furthermore, there has been no report of the risk factors for failure of ramp lesion sutures, linked to either the technique used (all-inside suture implant vs suture hook through a posteromedial portal) or the type of lesion (location in the red zone or meniscocapsular junction, longitudinal extension, partial- or full-thickness tear). PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of arthroscopic repair of ramp lesions and determine the risk factors associated with ramp lesion repair failure, with special focus on their subtype and the suture technique. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All patients who underwent arthroscopic ramp lesion repair in association with ACL reconstruction between November 2015 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The following parameters were studied: demographics; clinical history; clinical findings including International Knee Documentation Committee score, complications, time from injury to surgery, side-to-side laxity, and pivot shift; and surgical findings including subtype, surgical management, and type and number of sutures. Failure of the ramp lesion repair was defined at secondary arthroscopy. RESULTS: Among the 248 lesions analyzed, 18 (7.3%) failures were documented. The failures occurred in 21.1% of repairs managed with the all-inside device versus 4.3% of sutures managed with the suture hook (P = .003). Among the 6 factors included in the Cox model, the only one identified as a risk factor for failure was the type of repair (P = .003), with a risk for the all-inside device that was >5-fold higher than that for the suture hook repair (corresponding hazard ratio, 5.1 [95% CI, 1.8-14.5]). No other complications involving the surgical technique or device were registered. CONCLUSION: An arthroscopic all-inside technique of meniscal repair of ramp lesions appeared to be safe and effective. It provided excellent healing of the repaired meniscus, with an overall failure rate of 7.3%. The type of suture was associated with failure of the ramp lesion repair, with a significantly higher risk with the all-inside device than with suture hook repair sutures.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Single-Strand Gracilis Graft.

There has been renewed interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair procedures in the past decade. Even though ACL reconstruction is still considered the gold standard, ACL repair is an alternative in selected patients. However, the risk of failure owing to isolated ACL repair remains a concern. Intra-articular augmentation has been proposed to protect the repair during the healing period. In the same way, the protective effect of anterolateral ligament reconstruction on the ACL graft is increasingly recognized. We describe a combined ACL repair and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with a single-strand gracilis for the intra-articular portion and as an anterolateral graft to protect the ACL repair during the healing phase.

Endoscopic transfer of gluteus maximus and tensor fasciae latae for massive gluteus medius tear: Preliminary results.

We report preliminary results for a novel technique of endoscopic Whiteside transfer for massive gluteus medius tear: i.e., tendon reinsertion not or only partly feasible and/or severe fatty atrophy of the muscle. Endoscopic transfer of gluteus maximus and/or tensor fasciae latae is associated to gluteus medius tendon reinsertion if at least partial tendon repair is feasible. In a continuous series of 6 patients at a minimum 2 years' follow-up, there was 1 early failure; 2 patients showed no improvement in pain and limping; 3 had satisfactory results, including 2 with complete resolution of limping and pain. Endoscopic Whiteside transfer associated to gluteus medius tendon repair provided only moderate results in terms of recovery of abduction power and resolution of Trendelenburg gait.

Ramp Lesion Subtypes: Prevalence, Imaging, and Arthroscopic Findings in 2156 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: Ramp lesions are defined as a particular type of injury within the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and its meniscocapsular attachments. Five subtypes have been described: type 1, meniscocapsular lesion; type 2, partial superior lesion; type 3, partial inferior lesion or hidden type; type 4, complete tear in the red zone; and type 5, complete double tear. PURPOSE: (1) To determine the prevalence of different subtypes of ramp lesions in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). (2) To describe the characteristics of ramp lesions based on imaging and diagnostic arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLRs between November 2015 and November 2018 by 2 senior surgeons at 1 institution were evaluated retrospectively (1) to describe the subtypes of ramp lesions diagnosed intraoperatively using transnotch arthroscopic exploration of the posteromedial compartment and (2) to look for any factors significantly associated with these subtypes. The following parameters were studied: demographics; history and clinical findings including time between injury and surgery, side-to-side laxity, and pivot shift; lesions missed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and medial proximal tibial bone contusion visible on MRI scans; and arthroscopic confirmation of ramp lesion (ie, prevalence), associated lateral meniscal tear, or medial chondral tear. RESULTS: Out of 2156 primary or revision arthroscopic reconstructions, 334 ramp lesions were confirmed, giving a prevalence of 15.5%. The subtype distribution was as follows: type 1, 47.9%; type 2, 4.8%; type 3, 11.4%; type 4, 28.7%; type 5, 7.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that gross pivot shift was significantly associated with complete ramp tears (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.7-17.2). Hidden lesions (type 3, inferior partial tear in the red zone) were the most likely to be missed on preoperative MRI (45.9%). CONCLUSION: In a population undergoing ACLR, the prevalence of ramp lesions was 15.5%. Among the subtypes of ramp lesion, the most common was a meniscocapsular junction tear (type 1). Partial inferior tears (type 3) were the most likely to be missed on preoperative MRI scans. Gross pivot shift was significantly associated with complete ramp tears (types 1, 4, and 5).

Risk factors for complications after primary intramedullary nailing to treat tibial shaft fractures: A cohort study of 184 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nailing is the standard of care for tibial shaft fractures. The risk factors for infectious and/or mechanical complications, notably non-union, remain incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for complications, notably non-union. HYPOTHESIS: Active smoking and an initial open wound are independent risk factors for complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients managed for open or closed tibial shaft fractures by primary intramedullary nailing between 2013 and 2018. We collected data on preoperative factors related to the patient and to the mechanism of injury (age, sex, smoking history, energy of the trauma, open wound), on intraoperative factors (residual interfragmentary gap), and on postoperative factors (early or delayed weight-bearing). We evaluated the associations between these factors and the occurrence of complications, notably non-union, by performing a univariate analysis followed by a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We included 184 patients [mean age, 38.5±17.6 (range, 15-91), 72.2% of males]. One or more complications developed in 28 (15.2%) patients and non-union occurred in 15 (8.1%) patients. There were three significant risk factors for complications: active smoking (OR, 7.93; 95%CI, 2.76-22.7), a residual interfragmentary gap >5mm (OR, 4.92; 95%CI, 1.72-14.02), and an initial open wound (OR,5.16; 95%CI, 1.62-16.43) (p<0.05). The same three factors were significant risk factors for non-union. Energy of the trauma, age, sex, and early or delayed weight bearing were not significantly associated with an excess risk of complications. DISCUSSION: Active smoking, a residual interfragmentary gap >5mm, and an initial open wound are risk factors for postoperative complications after intramedullary nailing to treat a tibial shaft fracture. Preventive strategies and specific information could be implemented for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Endoscopic Transfer of Gluteus Maximus and Tensor Fascia Lata for Primary Hip Abductor Deficiency.

Complete avulsion of hip abductor muscles may cause severe gait dysfunction and pain. An open surgical procedure to transfer tendons of the gluteus maximus and the tensor fasciae latae to the greater trochanter to make up for the deficient hip abductor has been proposed. The purpose of this study was to describe an endoscopic procedure to transfer gluteus maximus and the tensor fasciae latae to the greater trochanter for hip abductor deficiency.