Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 7 de 7
1.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 7(4): e2041, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577848

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in prostate cancer which manifests as cerebral, leptomeningeal, or dural involvement is uncommon and occurs late in the course of disease. CASE: A 60-year-old patient with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) presented with headache and fatigue. Evaluation revealed bone marrow and leptomeningeal involvement. The patient treated by whole brain radiotherapy, leuprolide, weekly docetaxel and daily 1000 mg abiraterone. Complete blood count (CBC) and CNS symptoms improved and the patient is alive after 11 months with excellent performance status. CONCLUSION: Leptomeningeal involvement in prostate cancer is rare and is associated with a poor prognosis but the possibility of such event should be considered in patients with new onset progressive CNS symptoms. New treatment strategies such as combination of docetaxel and abiraterone added to androgen deprivation therapy (triplet therapy) might improve outcome in these patients.


Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Docetaxel , Bone Marrow/pathology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Health Sci Rep ; 6(12): e1741, 2023 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38078303

Introduction: Cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia (VT), stand as a significant threat to health, often leading to mortality and sudden cardiac death. While conventional treatments for VT exhibit efficacy, cases of refractory VT pose challenges. Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) offers a novel approach, delivering precise high-dose radiation to well-defined targets with minimal collateral damage. This study explores the potential of STAR as an alternative therapy, especially for high-risk patients or those with refractory VT. Methods: This research reviews ongoing studies and preliminary investigations into the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of STAR. The method involves targeted radiation delivery, assessing reductions in VT recurrence and the early safety profile in refractory VT patients. However, given STAR's early stage and limited clinical evidence, cautious interpretation is advised. Results: Preliminary findings indicate a reduction in VT recurrence with STAR, suggesting promise as a therapeutic option. Early safety profiles are encouraging, but definitive statements on efficacy and safety require further investigation. Positive initial outcomes underscore the need for additional data and long-term studies. Conclusion: Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation is recently emerging as a promising treatment for refractory VT. While early results are encouraging, careful interpretation is needed, due to STAR's early stages. Ongoing investigations are critical for a comprehensive understanding of its long-term efficacy and tolerability. This review provides fundamental insights into STAR's background, principles, pre-treatment procedures, clinical implications, and toxicity, setting the stage for future research in this evolving therapeutic field.

3.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(3): e7037, 2023 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36873064

In this report, we shared our experience in the treatment of a patient with unresectable sinonasal melanoma, in whom a complete radiographic response was seen after a course of conventional external beam radiotherapy. Given that local control has an important role in maintaining the quality of life of patients.

5.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 54(2): 467-474, 2023 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426033

PURPOSE: Peripheral neuropathy is a dose-limiting adverse effect of oxaliplatin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). METHOD: Cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin based chemotherapy were randomized into two arms. Duloxetine 60 mg capsule was given in the first 14 days of each chemotherapy cycle to one arm and placebo was similarly given to another. We compared the two arms based on the incidence of neuropathy and the results of the nerve conduction study (NCS). Grade of complained neuropathy was recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients mostly rectal cancer (90.6%) were randomized to duloxetine and placebo arms. Highest grade of neuropathy in each cycle was not significantly different between the two groups. Six weeks after treatment incidence of neuropathy of any grade was 52.9 in duloxetine arm compared to 76.9% in placebo arm (P: 0.26). Patients in the duloxetine arm had a lower percentage of chemotherapy cycles (mean) in which they reported distal paresthesia (51% vs. 84%, P = 0.01) and throat discomfort (37% vs. 69%, P = 0.01). Results of NCS were mostly comparable between the two arms except for the velocity in two of the examined nerve which was significantly higher in duloxetine group. Duloxetine was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Although a definite conclusion might be difficult to draw but administering duloxetine for 14 days in each chemotherapy cycle could not decrease the incidence of acute OIPN based on CTCAE grading system.


Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Oxaliplatin , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 113(5): 946-959, 2022 08 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35537577

PURPOSE: Studies dating back to a century ago have reported using low-dose radiation therapy for the treatment of viral and bacterial pneumonia. In the modern era, since the COVID-19 pandemic began, several groups worldwide have researched the applicability of whole lung irradiation (WLI) for the treatment of COVID-19. We aimed to bring together the results of these experimental studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis searching PubMed and Scopus databases for clinical trials incorporating WLI for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Required data were extracted from each study. Using the random-effects model, the overall pooled day 28 survival rate, survival hazard ratio, and intubation-free days within 15 days after WLI were calculated, and forest plots were produced. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified, and eventually, 5 were included for meta-analysis. The overall survival hazard ratio was calculated to be 0.85 (0.46-1.57). The pooled mean difference of intubation-free days within 15 days after WLI was 1.87, favoring the WLI group (95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 3.76). The overall day 28 survival rate of patients receiving WLI for the 9 studies with adequate follow-up data was 74% (95% confidence interval, 61-87). Except for 2 studies, the other 8 studies were assessed to have moderate to high risk of bias, and there were many differences among the designs of the studies, included patients, primary endpoints, outcome measurement methods, and reporting of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a mild improvement in intubation-free days, WLI had no significant effect on patients' overall survival. Currently, we cannot recommend routine use of WLI for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19.


COVID-19 , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Lung/radiation effects , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pandemics
7.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 68(4): 396-406, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416084

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality thus far. Considering the historical uses of high-voltage X-ray beams for unresolvable pneumonia, we aimed to assess whether low-dose whole-lung irradiation (WLI) could provide any benefits for patients with refractory COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Eleven patients with refractory COVID-19 pneumonia were treated with WLI to a total dose of 1 Gy and compared to 11 patients in a matched control group from June to November 2020. The study's primary endpoint was improvement of chest X-ray severity score (CXRS), followed by changes in mean oxygen (O2) saturation and 28-day mortality as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The final CXRS was significantly lower in the WLI group (8.7 ± 2.5) compared to the control group (12.3 ± 3.3) (P: 0.016). Change of CXRS from the first to the last chest X-ray was -2.2 ± 3.1 for the WLI group and 0.7 ± 3.9 for the control group, which showed a trend for lower CXRS in the WLI group (U = 30, p: 0.085). Mean O2 saturation showed insignificant improvement in the first 24 hours after radiotherapy (mean difference: 2.5 ± 4.1, Z=-1.6, P value: 0.11). Overall survival after 28 days was 32% in the WLI group and 11% in the control group (P: 0.48). The reason for death in many patients was not merely respiratory failure, but also other adverse situations like pneumothorax, cardiogenic shock and pulmonary thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose WLI could improve the CXR severity score and O2 saturation in severely ill COVID-19 patients, but larger studies are required to determine its impact on mortality.


COVID-19 , Humans , Lung , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
...