Mechanosensitive receptors in migraine: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder with pain profile, suggesting exaggerated mechanosensation. Mechanosensitive receptors of different families, which specifically respond to various mechanical stimuli, have gathered increasing attention due to their potential role in migraine related nociception. Understanding these mechanisms is of principal importance for improved therapeutic strategies. This systematic review comprehensively examines the involvement of mechanosensitive mechanisms in migraine pain pathways. METHODS: A systematic search across the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline was conducted on 8th August 2023 for the period from 2000 to 2023, according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was constructed following a meticulous evaluation by two authors who independently applied rigorous inclusion criteria and quality assessments to the selected studies, upon which all authors collectively wrote the review. RESULTS: We identified 36 relevant studies with our analysis. Additionally, 3 more studies were selected by literature search. The 39 papers included in this systematic review cover the role of the putative mechanosensitive Piezo and K2P, as well as ASICs, NMDA, and TRP family of channels in the migraine pain cascade. The outcome of the available knowledge, including mainly preclinical animal models of migraine and few clinical studies, underscores the intricate relationship between mechanosensitive receptors and migraine pain symptoms. The review presents the mechanisms of activation of mechanosensitive receptors that may be involved in the generation of nociceptive signals and migraine associated clinical symptoms. The gender differences of targeting these receptors as potential therapeutic interventions are also acknowledged as well as the challenges related to respective drug development. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this analysis identified key molecular players and uncovered significant gaps in our understanding of mechanotransduction in migraine. This review offers a foundation for filling these gaps and suggests novel therapeutic options for migraine treatments based on achievements in the emerging field of mechano-neurobiology.

An invisible cause of disability: stigma in migraine and epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to identify the ratio and severity of stigmatization in patients with migraine and epilepsy. We also collected demographic and clinical data to search for possible facilitators. METHODS: In total, 196 patients with migraine and 60 patients with epilepsy were enrolled. Neuro-QoL Stigma Scale was applied in an office setting by a neurologist in 3 different centers. Stigma scores were calculated as standardized T scores (total, enacted, and internalized). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment status of the patients were also compared in terms of stigma scores. Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U tests were applied for comparisons. Spearman's correlation analysis was used for the evaluation of inter-parameter correlations. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of the patients with epilepsy and 72% of the patients with migraine reported being stigmatized. Total T scores were significantly higher in the epilepsy group (50.78 ± 9.1) than the patients with migraine (44.9 ± 7.62), also than the chronic (45.86 ± 8.76) and episodic (44.7 ± 7.27) migraine subgroups (p < 0.05). T scores increased as the duration of disease increased; however, this correlation was significant for the epilepsy group only (p < 0.05). Migraine group with prophylactic treatment had significantly higher scores than the migraineurs without preventive therapy (p < 0.05). Enacted T scores were higher than internalized T scores in all analyzed groups and subgroups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with migraine and epilepsy are subjected to stigma. The ratio and intensity can change in different countries. We need to increase the awareness and search for better solutions. The standardized tests are important to compare results between studies.