Rate of case reporting, physician compliance, and practice volume in a practice-based research network study.

OBJECTIVE: Practice-based research is one method for answering questions about common problems that are seen infrequently in referral centers. We explored the potential limitations of this method. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study of participants in a practice-based research network who submitted data on 231 patients with dyspepsia from a total of 45,337 patient encounters over a 53-week period. Reporting of individual cases involved use of a relatively high-burden data instrument. Outcome measures were compared using rank correlation. POPULATION: We included 18 physicians in a Wisconsin research network study on initial management of dyspepsia in primary care settings. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The outcomes we measured were the rate of dyspepsia visits, average weekly patient volume, and self-reported compliance to the study protocol for each physician. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation existed between physician patient volume and the reported rate of dyspepsia visits. Self?reported compliance with the protocol was negatively correlated to patient volume and positively correlated to the reported rate of dyspepsia visits. CONCLUSIONS: Practice volume may influence the results in practice-based research. Investigators using practice-base research networks need to consider the complexity of their protocols and should be cognizant of compliance-sensitive measures.

Primary care physicians' experience with mental health consultation.

A total of 684 primary care physicians in Wisconsin participated in a survey designed to explore their experiences of consulting with and referring patients to mental health care professionals. The respondents indicated that they had only moderate access to mental health care professionals, and even less access when a patient was covered by Medicare or Medicaid or had no insurance. Physicians in group practices that included at least one mental health professional reported having better access to care than those in practices that did not include mental health services. Perceived access to mental health care services was not related to community size or to a managed care setting.

The cost of primary care research.

A significant portion of research project costs is incurred before the receipt of grant funds. This poses a problem for the initiation of primary care research, especially in community practice settings. Potential investigators need financial support for staff time, training, pilot work, and grant proposal writing if primary care researchers are to compete successfully for grant funds. To find this support, we need to understand and eventually quantify the actual costs of research with attention to those that are incurred before the receipt of grant funds. We outline 10 phases of the research process and provide a model for understanding where costs are incurred and by whom. Costs include those associated with maintaining practice interest in research, supporting practice participation, and disseminating research findings. They may be incurred by either an academic center or a research network, by the practices and physicians themselves, or by an extramural funding source. The needed investment for initiating primary care research can be itemized and, with further research, quantified. This will enhance the arguments for capital investments in the primary care research enterprise.

Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries.

Access to data about the clinical problems, patients, and processes that characterise family practice is essential for the development of this specialty. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) play an increasing role in obtaining these data. We compared 3 PBRNs: one in Wisconsin in the United States, one in Wessex in the United Kingdom, and one in Nijmegen in the Netherlands. We organized our data into 4 key areas for review: the mission of the network, its contribution to the evidence base of family medicine, the management of the network, and the financing of the network infrastructure. Extending the evidence base of family practice is the overriding objective of these networks, and their main focus is on common morbidities. They provide access to unselected patient populations, but there are differences in their size. There are aspects of PBRNs that are common in countries with different health care systems, despite the fact that local circumstances--the research mission or the characteristics of the health care system under which they operate--determine their form and structure. Networks develop over time and their focus and activities may evolve. Financial support for these networks continues to be a problem.

Responses to questions about the specialty of family practice as a career.

This article provides answers to many of the questions medical students ask about the specialty of family practice. It is the fourth update of a previous article and was developed in response to feedback from medical students at the 1997 National Congress of Student Members held by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Students at the 1998 Congress also identified areas of interest and concern. This article discusses the hours and income of the family physician, the scope of medical practice in the specialty, required continuing medical education and board certification, family practice residency training and combined-specialty training.

The Wisconsin Primary Care Organizations Consortium: a forum for the primary care medical specialties.

The Wisconsin Primary Care Organizations Consortium (WI-PCOC) is composed of the leadership of Wisconsin's primary care medical specialties whose four professional societies have a combined membership of about 3,900 physicians. Since 1992, WI-PCOC has explored the priorities and issues of importance of each organization, and has reviewed organizational resources to synchronize agendas and to avoid conflict. WIPCOC articulates policy supported by its member societies with a common voice; it does not set policy. WI-PCOC has worked with legislators, medical school deans, other specialty societies and other groups interested in primary care service and education. WI-PCOC member organizations aspire to work together to improve the level of health of Wisconsin citizens and their communities.

Physician attitudes toward research study participation: a focus group.

The Wisconsin Research Network (WReN) and the UW Health Education And Research Trial (HEART) sponsored a focus group to explore the attitudes of primary care physicians toward research in their practices. Physicians, representing a variety of practice groups, emphasized that research is a low priority in their organizations. All had participated in some form of research, are philosophically committed to research as important to primary care, but are hesitant to commit themselves to participation in further research. They emphasized that academic researchers need to understand the constraints of primary care practice, propose research ideas that are practical and interesting to care providers, provide relevant feedback to participating practices, and do the majority of the research work themselves so impositions on the practice are minimal. The traditional barriers to practice-based research, such as the cost of physician and staff time and diversion from other tasks, continue to be of concern when physicians consider participation in research projects.