RESUMEN
At the beginning of 2023, there have been significant changes to the regulations for outpatient surgery in Germany, which were set out in a trilateral self-administration agreement between the umbrella association of statutory health insurance companies, the German Hospital Association and the Federal Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Among other things, a catalog stated circumstances under which an operation should not be carried out on an outpatient basis or should only be carried out with doubt. This catalog explains the patient's age: up to the first year of life, inpatient performance of a service can be justified. This formulation in itself means that children from one year of age on should regularly undergo outpatient surgery.In the german scientific societies for otolaryngology, head and neck surgery as well as for anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, doubts arose as to whether this age limit could also be scientifically justified for operations in the throat such as adenotomy or tonsillotomy.A search was carried out in international guidelines and in the international literature and the statements were evaluated. The results of this literature search were discussed with representatives of the Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Working Group (AG PädHNO) of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC) and the scientific working group for pediatric anesthesia (WAKKA) of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) in conferences.The consensus revealed that a strict age limit of the first year of life is not appropriate for the outpatient performance of adenotomies and tonsillotomies. First of all, specifying a strict age limit is questionable because, regardless of age, a number of other medical and social factors influence the responsible performance of outpatient operations. Furthermore, the age limit of one year is not considered appropriate in view of literature, guidelines and practical experience in the international area. The assessment of the literature and the consideration of the implementation in the international area make an age limit in the range of 2-3 years seem more appropriate.This review provides the responsible doctors with a variety of insights, aspects and arguments so that they can make their decision to carry out these operations on an outpatient or inpatient basis appropriately and responsibly.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Ambulatorios , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , AlemaniaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Airway management with supraglottic airway devices (SGA) in life-threatening emergencies in children is increasingly being used. Different specifications of laryngeal masks (LM) and the laryngeal tube (LT) are commonly used devices for this purpose. We present a literature review and interdisciplinary consensus statement of different societies on the use of SGA in pediatric emergency medicine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature review in the PubMed database and classification of studies according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Levels and consensus finding within the group of authors. RESULTS: The evidence for successful applications of the various types of LM is significantly higher than for LT application. Reported smaller series of successful applications of LT are currently limited to selected research groups and centers. Especially for children below 10â¯kg body weight there currently exists insufficient evidence for the successful application of the LT and therefore its routine use cannot be recommended. SGAs used for emergencies should have a gastric drainage possibility. DISCUSSION: Considering the scientific data and the large clinical experience with the LM in medical routine and emergency situations in children currently only the LM can be recommended for alternative (i.e., non-intubation) emergency airway management in children. If alternative airway management is part of a local emergency strategy, the LM should be provided in all pediatric sizes (1, 1½, 2, 2½, 3) for out of hospital use and in hospital emergency use and all users should regularly be trained in its application.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Medicina de Emergencia , Máscaras Laríngeas , Neonatología , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica , Ejecutivos Médicos , Niño , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Urgencias Médicas , Universidades , Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Cuidados Críticos , AlemaniaRESUMEN
Post-operative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV/POV) are among the biggest problems occurring in the paediatric recovery room and in the course of the following post-operative period. Apart from pain and emergence delirium, PONV is one of the main causes of post-operative discomfort in children. The DGAI Scientific Working Group on Paediatric Anaesthesia already worked out recommendations for the prevention and treatment of PONV in children years ago. These recommendations have now been revised by a team of experts, the current literature has been reviewed, and evidence-based core recommendations have been consented. Key elements of the new recommendations consist of effective individual measures for prevention and therapy, next to the implementation of a fixed dual prophylaxis in the clinical routine applicable to all children ≥â¯3 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia por Inhalación , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios , Humanos , Niño , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Otolaryngologic surgery is one of the most frequent operative interventions performed in children. Tonsil surgery with or without adenoidectomy due to hyperplasia of the tonsils and adenoids with obstruction of the upper airways with or without tympanic ventilation disorder is the most common of these procedures. Children with a history of sleep apnoea (OSA) suffer from a significantly increased risk of perioperative respiratory complications. Cases of death and severe permanent neurologic damage have been reported due to apnoea and increased opioid sensitivity. The current guideline represents a pragmatic risk-adjusted approach. Patients with confirmed or suspected OSA should be treated perioperatively according to their individual risks and requirements, in order to avoid severe permanent damage.
